Overview

Distribution

This oak is found in the California Desert Mountains (New York Mountains)/ The distribution outside California is east to Colorado and Texas, and south to Baja California, Mexico.

  • * Jepson Manual. 1993. "Quercus turbinella". University of California, Berkeley. Ca.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

Supplier: C. Michael Hogan

Trusted

Article rating from 1 person

Average rating: 4.0 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: It occurs in the mountains of southwestern Colorado through southern Utah and Nevada to southern California and northern Mexico (Little, 1979; Tucker, 1961; Tirmenstein, 1999). It extends eastward to the northwestern portion of the Trans-Pecos region of western Texas (Little, 1979). Shrub live oak is most abundant in the chaparral of central Arizona (Cottam et al., 1959; Pase, 1969; Pond, 1961). Shrub live oak-Gambel oak hybrids have been reported hundreds of miles north of the present-day range of shrub live oak in parts of northern Utah and central Colorado (Cottam et al., 1959; Tucker et al., 1961). Macrofossil evidence suggests that shrub live oak migrated northward in the warmer altithermal (or hypsithermal) period during which the Arizona monsoon shifted (Cottam et al., 1959; Neilson and Wullstein, 1983). Later climatic shifts to cooler temperatures presumably eliminated shrub live oak from this northern area, but the more cold-hardy hybrids survived in some protected areas (Cottam et al., 1959).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

More info for the terms: frequency, shrub

Sonoran scrub oak grows in the mountains of southwestern Colorado through southern Utah and Nevada to southern California and northern Mexico [49,91]. It extends eastward to the northwestern portion of the Trans-Pecos region of western Texas [49]. Shrub live oak is most abundant in the chaparral of central Arizona [8,14,63,68]. Quercus turbinella var. turbinella grows throughout most of the range of the species as a whole [49]. California Sonoran scrub oak grows from central San Benito County in California southeast in the inner South Coast Ranges to the mountain slopes near the southern and western borders of the Mojave Desert [90].

The northern distribution of Sonoran scrub oak is limited by spring freezes and summer moisture stress [57,78]. It is strongly influenced by the "Arizona monsoon gradient," which generates summer precipitation in the Southwest. Neilson and Wullstein [57] report that the frequency, intensity, and extent of late spring freezes, and intensity and extent of the "Arizona monsoon" appear to be the major factors controlling successful sexual reproduction in Sonoran scrub oak.

Sonoran scrub oak-Gambel oak hybrids have been reported hundreds of miles north of the present-day range of shrub live oak in parts of northern Utah and central Colorado [14,93]. Macrofossil evidence suggests that shrub live oak migrated northward in the warmer altithermal (or hypsithermal) period during which the Arizona monsoon shifted [14,57]. Later climatic shifts to cooler temperatures presumably eliminated Sonoran scrub oak from this northern area, but the more cold-hardy hybrids survived in some protected areas [14,30].

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 14. Cottam, Walter P.; Tucker, John M.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1959. Some clues to Great Basin postpluvial climates provided by oak distributions. Ecology. 49(3): 361-377. [698]
  • 30. Harper, Kimball T.; Wagstaff, Fred J.; Kunzler, Lynn M. 1985. Biology management of the Gambel oak vegetative type: a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-179. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [3286]
  • 49. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]
  • 57. Neilson, R. P.; Wullstein, L. H. 1983. Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics. Journal of Biogeography. 10: 275-297. [1734]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 68. Pond, Floyd W. 1961. Basal cover and production of weeping lovegrass under varying amounts of shrub live oak crown cover. Journal of Range Management. 14: 335-337. [259]
  • 78. Rowlands, Peter G. 1993. Climatic factors and the distribution of woodland vegetation in the Southwest. The Southwestern Naturalist. 38(3): 185-197. [22148]
  • 90. Tucker, John M. 1952. Taxonomic interrelationships in the Quercus dumosa complex. Madrono. 11: 234-251. [6367]
  • 91. Tucker, John M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. American Journal of Botany. 48(3): 202-208. [2361]
  • 93. Tucker, John M.; Cottam, Walter P.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. II. The contribution of Quercus turbinella. American Journal of Botany. 48(4): 329-339. [2364]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):


7 Lower Basin and Range

12 Colorado Plateau

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Occurrence in North America


AZ CA CO NV NM TX UT

 

MEXICO

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ariz., Calif., Colo., N.Mex., Nev., Tex., Utah; Mexico (Baja California, Sonora, and probably n Chihuahua).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Description

More info for the terms: shrub, tree

Sonoran scrub oak is a clump-forming or clonal evergreen shrub or less commonly a small tree [81,84,94,101]. It typically grows from 3 to 8 feet (0.9-2 m) in height with stem diameters to 8 inches (20 cm) [8,99,101]; however, it can reach 15 feet (5 m) or more [8]. The somewhat leathery leaves are 0.5 to 1.6 inches (1.3-4 cm) in length, 0.3 to 0.9 inch (0.7-2.4 cm) in width [94,101]. Leaves persist through the winter [93]. Fruits of Sonoran scrub oak are slender, annual acorns 0.5 to 1 inch (1.3-2.5 cm) in length, with turbinate cups [94].

Belowground structure: Root depths of over 25 feet (8 m) have been reported in parts of Arizona [81]. Roots and rhizomes may spread 16 feet (4.9 m) or more horizontally [16]. Sonoran scrub oak forms colonies by sprouting from rhizomes [8,100]. Thousands of individual stems may form from a single or only a few individuals [8]. Davis and Pase [16] report "what appears to be a relatively open stand of Sonoran scrub oak aboveground, may actually be a relatively closed system" of overlapping roots and rhizomes. The top foot of soil typically contains a dense network of small surface laterals that aid in the absorption of surface soil moisture. In central Arizona, the greatest accumulation of belowground biomass occurred in the top 2 feet (0.6 m) of soil, with biomass decreasing with depth as follows [16]:

Soil depth (m) Weight (g) 0 - 0.3 7053 0.3 - 0.6 7883 0.6 - 0.9 5068 0.9 - 1.2 3403 1.2 - 1.5 2602 1.5 - 1.8 1575 In an Arizona study, only 1 of 7 Sonoran scrub oak stems died within a 47-year period [69].

 

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 69. Pond, Floyd W. 1971. Chaparral: 47 years later. Res. Pap. RM-69. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 11 p. [1905]
  • 81. Saunier, Richard E.; Wagle, Robert F. 1965. Root grafting in Quercus turbinella Greene. Ecology. 46(5): 749-750. [3946]
  • 84. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 10 p. [20090]
  • 93. Tucker, John M.; Cottam, Walter P.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. II. The contribution of Quercus turbinella. American Journal of Botany. 48(4): 329-339. [2364]
  • 94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
  • 99. Welsh, Stanley L. 1986. Quercus (Fragaceae) in the Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist. 46(1): 107-111. [2498]
  • 101. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 100. Welsh, Stanley L. 2000. [E-mail to Janet L. Howard]. Feburary 8. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [33058]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Description

Shrubs or small trees , evergreen or subevergreen, to 4 m. Bark light gray or brown, scaly. Twigs brown to gray, 1-3 mm diam., usually tomentulose, sometimes glabrous, becoming glabrate. Buds brown, round to ovoid, 1-2 mm, minutely pubescent. Leaves: petiole 1-4 mm. Leaf blade elliptic or ovate, (1.5-)20-30 × (5-)10-15(-20) mm, thick, leathery, base cordate or rounded, margins planar or slightly crisped-undulate, coarsely 3-5-toothed or very shallowly lobed on each side, teeth spinose with spines 1-1.5 mm, secondary veins 4-8 on each side, apex acute or obtuse; surfaces abaxially yellow or reddish, usually glaucous, minutely stellate-puberulent, adaxially grayish, glaucous, or yellowish glandular, glabrous or sparsely and minutely stellate-pubescent. Acorns solitary or several, on axillary peduncle 10-40 mm; cup hemispheric or shallowly cup-shaped, 4-6 mm deep × 8-12 mm wide, covering 1/4-1/2 nut, scales tightly appressed, ovate, moderately tuberculate, grayish or yellowish puberulent; nut light brown, ovoid, to 20 × 11 mm, minutely puberulent or glabrate. Cotyledons distinct.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Diagnostic Description

Synonym

Quercus dumosa Nuttall var. turbinella (Greene) Jepson; Q. subturbinella Trelease
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Type Information

Type fragment for Quercus turbinella Greene
Catalog Number: US 61854
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Verification Degree: Card file verified by examination of original publication
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): G. Dunn
Year Collected: 1888
Locality: Baja California, Mexico, North America
  • Type fragment: Greene, E. L. 1889. Ill. W. Amer. Oaks. 37.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany

Source: National Museum of Natural History Collections

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Comments: Dry desert slopes, often in juniper and pinyon woodlands; 800-2000 m (Flora of North America, 1993). It grows in semiarid, lower elevation chaparral, pinyon-juniper (Pinus-Juniperus spp.), shrub deserts, oak woodlands, ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa) and riparian communities of the Southwest (Johnson, 1988; Tiedemann and Schmutz, 1967; Tucker, 1961; Welsh et al., 1987). It is a dominant shrub in Arizona chaparral and frequently comprises up to 50% of the shrub cover on these sites (Knipe et al., 1979; Pase, 1969). Soil: Shrub live oak grows well on dry hillsides and mesas and tolerates a wide range of soil types. Growth is best on sandy to clay loams. Soils are often slightly acidic (Davis and Pase, 1977). This oak is not restricted to deep soils and can grow on shallow, broken and fractured substrates (Davis and Pase, 1977; Saunier and Wagle, 1967). Soils are typically coarse-textured and poorly developed in shrub live oak chaparral (Ffolliott and Thorus, 1974).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat characteristics

More info for the term: shrub

Sonoran scrub oak is particularly common on many low winter ranges in southern Utah and Nevada and in chaparral-desert grassland ecotones in Arizona [8,94]. Sonoran scrub oak often grows in scattered patches in swales and canyons [94].

Soil: Sonoran scrub oak grows well on dry hillsides and mesas and tolerates a wide range of soil types [94]. Growth is best on sandy to clay loams [20]. Soils are often slightly acidic [16]. This oak is not restricted to deep soils and can grow on shallow, broken and fractured substrates [16,79]. Soils are typically coarse-textured and poorly developed in Sonoran scrub oak chaparral [24].

In eastern Yavapai County in central Arizona, soils developed from quartz diorite provide more favorable moisture regimes than do heavy clay soils developed from volcanics. In north-central Arizona, shrub live oak growing on less favorable, drier, sedimentary and volcanic substrates may be more susceptible to drought damage. Where root penetration is restricted, plants are more susceptible to damage from drought or fire [79].

Climate: Sonoran scrub oak is drought tolerant and typically occupies drier and warmer sites than Gambel oak [57,58]. In the northern part of its range, Sonoran scrub oak often grows on warm, dry, southern exposures [21]. Arizona chaparral is characterized by a biseasonal precipitation pattern with summer and winter precipitation and spring and fall droughts [16]. Annual precipitation averages 16 to 25 inches (410-640 mm) [24].

Elevation: Ranges of Sonoran scrub oak are as follows [20,32,56,80,101]:

4,000 to 8,000 ft (1,220-1,525 m) in AZ
3,934 to 10,492 ft (1,200-2,000 m) in CA
2,689 to 5,607 ft (820-1,710 m) in UT

 

  • 32. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 21. Drobnick, Rudy. 1958. The ecology of a relic hybrid oak in the Great Basin area of Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah. 96 p. Thesis. [827]
  • 24. Ffolliott, Peter F.; Thorud, David B. 1974. Vegetation for increased water yield in Arizona. Tech. Bull. 215. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 38 p. [4448]
  • 56. Neilson, R. P. 1981. Biogeography of Quercus gambelii and Quercus turbinella in relation to seedling drought response and atmospheric flow structure. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah. 135 p. Dissertation. [1735]
  • 57. Neilson, R. P.; Wullstein, L. H. 1983. Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics. Journal of Biogeography. 10: 275-297. [1734]
  • 58. Neilson, Ronald P.; Wullstein, L. H. 1985. Comparative drought physiology and biogeography of Quercus gambelii and Quercus turbinella. The American Midland Naturalist. 114(2): 259-271. [35]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 80. Saunier, Richard E. 1964. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 95 p. M.S. thesis. [3947]
  • 94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
  • 101. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Key Plant Community Associations

More info for the terms: cover, formation, natural, series, shrub


Sonoran scrub oak grows in semiarid, lower elevation chaparral,
pinyon-juniper (Pinus-Juniperus spp.), shrub deserts, oak woodlands, ponderosa pine (P.
ponderosa) and riparian communities of the Southwest
[37,87,91,101]. It is a dominant shrub in Arizona chaparral and
frequently comprises up to 50% of the shrub cover on these
sites [42,63]. Published classifications listing Sonoran scrub oak as a dominant
or indicator species in community types or plant
associations are presented below.



Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of
Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico [2]

Vegetation and soils of the Pine and Mathews Canyon watersheds
[5]

Arizona chaparral: plant associations and ecology [9]

Woodland classification: the pinyon-juniper formation [38]

Vegetation of the San Bernardino Mountains [51]

A series vegetation classification for Region 3 [53]

The natural vegetation of Arizona [59]

A vegetation classification system applied to southern California [66]

Plant associations (habitat types) of the forests and
woodlands of Arizona and New Mexico [85]

Vegetation and flora of Fort Bowie National Historic Site, Arizona
[98]

In Arizona chaparral, Sonoran scrub oak commonly occurs with pointleaf
manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens), Pringle manzanita
(A. pringlei), grama (Bouteloua spp.), mountain-mahogany
(Cercocarpus spp.), hollyleaf
buckthorn (Rhamnus crocea), sugar sumac (Rhus ovata),
desert ceanothus (Ceanothus greggii),
Emory oak (Quercus emoryi), yellowleaf silktassel (Garrya flavescens), wait-a-minute
bush (Mimosa biuncifera), yerba-santa (Eriodictyon angustifolium), broom snakeweed
(Gutierrezia sarothrae), and bottlebrush squirreltail
(Elymus elymoides) [16,24,25,42,74,70,79,87].



Common associates of Sonoran scrub oak in pinyon-juniper woodlands
include oneseed juniper (J. monosperma), Utah juniper
(J. osteosperma), singleleaf pinyon
(P. monophylla), Colorado pinyon (P. edulis), grama,
and skunkbush sumac (R. trilobata) [19,33].

  • 5. Blackburn, Wilbert H.; Tueller, Paul T.; Eckert, Richard E., Jr. 1969. Vegetation and soils of the Pine and Mathews Canyon watersheds. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Agricultural Experiment Station. 109 p. In cooperation with: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. [7437]
  • 9. Carmichael, R. S.; Knipe, O. D.; Pase, C. P.; Brady, W. W. 1978. Arizona chaparral: plant associations and ecology. Res. Pap. RM-202. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p. [3038]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 24. Ffolliott, Peter F.; Thorud, David B. 1974. Vegetation for increased water yield in Arizona. Tech. Bull. 215. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 38 p. [4448]
  • 25. Frost, William E.; Smith, E. Lamar. 1991. Biomass productivity and range condition on range sites in southern Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 44(1): 64-67. [14974]
  • 33. Holland, Carol J. 1990. Pinyon-juniper management in Region 3. In: Silvicultural challenges and opportunities in the 1990's: Proceedings of the national silviculture workshop; 1989 July 10-13; Petersburg, AK. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Timber Management: 206-216. [16575]
  • 37. Johnsen, Thomas N., Jr. 1988. Conditions influencing Turbinella oak (Quercus turbinella) mortality from picloram or picloram 2,4-D. Weed Science. 36: 810-817. [6596]
  • 38. Johnston, Barry C. 1989. Woodland classification: the pinyon-juniper formation. In: Ferguson, Dennis E.; Morgan, Penelope; Johnson, Frederic D., compilers. Proceedings--land classifications based on vegetation: applications for resource management; 1987 November 17-19; Moscow, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-257. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 160-166. [6958]
  • 42. Knipe, O. D.; Pase, C. P.; Carmichael, R. S. 1979. Plants of the Arizona chaparral. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-64. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 54 p. [1365]
  • 51. Minnich, Richard A. 1976. Vegetation of the San Bernardino Mountains. In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium proceedings: plant communities of southern California; 1974 May 4; Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No. 2. Berkeley, CA: California Native Plant Society: 99-124. [4232]
  • 53. Moir, W. H. 1983. A series vegetation classification for Region 3. In: Moir, W. H.; Hendzel, Leonard, tech. coords. Proceedings of the workshop on Southwestern habitat types; 1983 April 6-8; Albuquerque, NM. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region: 91-95. [1672]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 74. Reynolds, Hudson G. 1959. Brush control in the Southwest. Grasslands. Publication 53: 374-389. [17036]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 85. Stuever, Mary C.; Hayden, John S. 1996. Plant associations (habitat types) of the forests and woodlands of Arizona and New Mexico. Final report submitted to: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Contract R3-95-27. Placitas, NM: Seldom Seen Expeditions, Inc. 520 p. [28868]
  • 87. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Schmutz, Ervin M. 1966. Shrub control and reseeding effects on the oak chaparral of Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 19: 191-195. [2336]
  • 91. Tucker, John M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. American Journal of Botany. 48(3): 202-208. [2361]
  • 98. Warren, Peter L.; Hoy, Marina S.; Hoy, Wilton E. 1992. Vegetation and flora of Fort Bowie National Historic Site, Arizona. Tech. Rep. NPS/WRUA/NRTR-92/43. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit. 78 p. [19871]
  • 101. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 2. Bassett, R.; Larson, M.; Moir, W. 1987. Forest and woodland habitat types (plant associations) of Arizona south of the Mogollon Rim and southwestern New Mexico. 2nd Edition. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region. [Pages unknown]. [20308]
  • 19. Ditsworth, T. M.; Butt, S. M.; Beley, J. R.; [and others]. 1982. Arthropods, plants, and tranmission lines in Arizona: community dynamics during secondary succession in a pinyon-juniper woodland. The Southwestern Naturalist. 27(2): 167-181. [805]
  • 59. Nichol, A. A. [revisions by Phillips, W. S.]. 1952. The natural vegetation of Arizona. Tech. Bull. 68 [revision]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station: 189-230. [3928]
  • 66. Paysen, Timothy E.; Derby, Jeanine A.; Black, Hugh, Jr.; [and others]. 1980. A vegetation classification system applied to southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-45. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. [1849]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):



201 Blue oak woodland

202 Coast live oak woodland

203 Riparian woodland

206 Chamise chaparral

207 Scrub oak mixed chaparral

412 Juniper-pinyon woodland

413 Gambel oak

416 True mountain-mahogany

503 Arizona chaparral

504 Juniper-pinyon pine woodland

509 Transition between oak-juniper woodland and mahogany-oak association

730 Sand shinnery oak

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Plant Associations

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):


K019 Arizona pine forest

K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland

K030 California oakwoods

K031 Oak-juniper woodlands

K032 Transition between K031 and K037

K033 Chaparral

K037 Mountain-mahogany-oak scrub

K057 Galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe

K071 Shinnery

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Ecosystem

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):


FRES21 Ponderosa pine

FRES28 Western hardwoods

FRES29 Sagebrush

FRES30 Desert shrub

FRES31 Shinnery

FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub

FRES35 Pinyon-juniper

FRES40 Desert grasslands

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):



67 Mohrs (shin) oak

237 Interior ponderosa pine

239 Pinyon-juniper

240 Arizona cypress

250 Blue oak-foothills pine

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Dry desert slopes, often in juniper and pinyon woodlands; 800-2000m.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Fire Management Considerations

More info for the terms: cover, fuel, litter, prescribed fire, reburn, shrub

Davis and Dieterich [17] report "people experienced with fire characteristics in Arizona oak chaparral have always maintained that chaparral either burns fiercely or does not burn at all." A critical rate of spread threshold has been estimated at 20 feet per minute. For fire to spread, conditions must be suitable for generating spread at or above that rate. Minimum sustained spread of 1/4 mile per hour (22 ft/min) has been reported in prescribed burns [17]. Details are available on rate of spread in Sonoran scrub oak-dominated chaparral [17].

Flammability of Sonoran scrub oak is increased by preheating which may cause chemical changes. Detailed information is available [88].

Prescribed fire: Prescribed fires have resulted in temporary reduction of Sonoran scrub oak [65]. At some sites fuels are sparse, and broadcast burning may nearly impossible [70]. Several years may be needed for Sonoran scrub oak chaparral to produce enough fuel to carry a fire. Ten to 20 years may be required for Sonoran scrub to reburn at some sites [6,8]. Herbicides may be applied prior to prescribed burning to increase flammability and kill the tops of Sonoran scrub oak without removing litter [65]. In an Arizona study, late summer application of 'Dinoxol' (a mixture of 2 lbs/gallon (acid equivalent) of the butoxyethanol esters of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T herbicides) killed 80% of the leaves and twigs. Moisture content of herbicide-killed leaves was 8 to 15% (oven-dry) compared with 85 to 97% for untreated leaves [65]. Sonoran scrub oak leaves contain approximately 6.2% volatiles [27]. Regressions have been developed for foliar moisture of Sonoran scrub oak [48].

Grass production: The production of introduced perennial grasses may increase following fire in Sonoran scrub oak communities. Productivity may be increased for 5 to 7 years following fire. In an Arizona study, comparative production values by treatment were as follows [87]:

Perennial grass production Unburned- Burned- Burned- native reseeded reseeded- herbicide 1956 site 3 lb/acre ---- 280 lb/acre 1958 site 31 lb/acre 179 lb/acre 803 lb/acre The grasses increased in the preceding study were seeded exotics. Native grasses were scarce prior to burning and thus, treatment did not produce increases in native grasses. Grazing may have little impact on postburn cover of Sonoran scrub oak. Pond and Cable [71] reported the following results after a 1951 fire in Arizona chaparral: Sonoran scrub oak cover (%) grazed ungrazed 1952 20.40 18.46 1956 33.93 30.27 1958 36.37 31.04 Browse: Sonoran scrub oak is fairly palatable to browsers while in the early sprout stage. The value of Sonoran scrub oak to wildlife is thus enhanced by burning [65].

Soils: Fire acts as a mineralizing agent quickly volatilizing the litter and standing fuels of Sonoran scrub oak. These compounds then condense within the soil and on the soil surface. Immediately after a prescribed fire amounts of exchangeable ammonium and extractable phosphorus in the soil increased under shrub live oak [62].

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 71. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1962. Recovery of vegetation following wildfire on a chaparral area in Arizona. Research Note RM-72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 . [12059]
  • 87. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Schmutz, Ervin M. 1966. Shrub control and reseeding effects on the oak chaparral of Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 19: 191-195. [2336]
  • 6. Brown, Thomas C.; Boster, Ron S. 1974. Effects of chaparral-to-grass conversion on wildfire suppression costs. Res. Pap. RM-119. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 11 p. [549]
  • 17. Davis, James R.; Dieterich, John H. 1976. Predicting rate of fire spread (ROS) in Arizona oak chaparral: field workbook. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-24. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 8 p. [20803]
  • 27. Green, Lisle R. 1980. Prescribed burning in California oak management. In: Plumb, Timothy R., technical coordinator. Proceedings of the symposium on the ecology, management, and utilization of California oaks; 1979 June 24-26; Claremont, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-44. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest and Range Experiment Station: 136-142. [3719]
  • 48. Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr.; Davis, James R. 1970. Foliar moisture content of chaparral in Arizona: accounting for its variation and relating it to prescribed fires. Res. Note RM-158. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 8 p. [13589]
  • 62. Overby, S. T.; Perry, H. M. 1996. Direct effects of prescribed fire on available nitrogen and phosphorus in an Arizona chaparral watershed. Arid Soil and Research Rehabilitation. 10(4): 347-357. [27741]
  • 88. Trujillo, D. P. 1976. Chemical properties of chaparral fuels change during preheating before flaming. Res. Note RM-320. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 2 p. [5702]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: cover, density, prescribed burn, shrub


Recovery times after fire for Sonoran scrub oak range from 4 to 8
years or more
[87]. Cable [7] observed that Sonoran scrub oak had regained
preburn density within 5 years after fire in Arizona. After
an early fall prescribed burn in a Sonoran scrub oak-true mountain-mahogany
(Cercocarpus montanus) community in central Arizona, shrub
live oak exceeded pretreatment cover
within 5 years. Crown canopy over (%) of Sonoran scrub oak was as
follows [65]: Postfire year

Prefire 0 1 2 3 4 5
22.7 1.3 9.0 14.1 14.7 17.8 25.6

At a 2nd site in Arizona oak chaparral, Sonoran scrub oak began
revegetating the area within 4 to 6 years after burning, herbicide
treatment, and reseeding with Lehmann (Eragrostis lehmanniana) or
weeping lovegrass. However, more
than 8 years were required for complete recovery of shrub
live oak at this site [87].



Cover values (%) of Sonoran scrub oak 1 to 8 years after fire in 2 Arizona
studies were as follows:



1st study - based on line intercepts following June 1956 burn [8] -1956 1957 1958 1960 1961
81.0 80.4 69.4 70.5 68.0

2nd study - crown cover by sites and treatments (all measured in 1963) [87] -
Unburned- Burned- Burned-
native reseeded* reseeded*-
herbicide
Treatment year
1955 site 21.8 16.8 ---
1956 site 29.6 25.5 3.8
1958 site 27.2 19.8 2.1
1959 site 18.4 13.8 ---
average 24.2 19.0 3.0

*seeded to Lehmann lovegrass and weeping lovegrass or a combination


In central Arizona chaparral
communities, Sonoran scrub oak response depended in part on frequency
of burning [70]. After the first 4 of 5 annual burns, stem
counts were still higher than pretreatment numbers and only
after the 5th burn did stem numbers drop below preburn levels. Burning at 2-year intervals failed to
reduce sprouting in Sonoran scrub oak. After
3 treatments at 2-year intervals, live stems still numbered
4.37 times the original number [71]. Results of this study follow [70]: Stem counts before burning in indicated year -

Yrs. between 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959
burns (pretmt)
1 121 710 330 371 161 38 17
2 152 --- 1231 1161 1142 --- 662
3 276 --- --- --- --- --- 1469
4 170 --- --- --- 790 --- 773
5 94 --- --- --- --- 436 1107

  • 7. Cable, Dwight R. 1957. Recovery of chaparral following burning and seeding in central Arizona. Res. Note. No. 28. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 6 p. [6342]
  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 71. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1962. Recovery of vegetation following wildfire on a chaparral area in Arizona. Research Note RM-72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 . [12059]
  • 87. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Schmutz, Ervin M. 1966. Shrub control and reseeding effects on the oak chaparral of Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 19: 191-195. [2336]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: root crown, shrub

Sonoran scrub oak typically sprouts from the root crown and rhizomes following fire [8,16,79,80,100,104,105]. In Arizona chaparral communities, Sonoran scrub oak may be favored by repeated burning [75].

Although sprouting is apparently the most common form of regeneration after fire, seedling establishment may also be important. A "moderate population" of shrub live oak seedlings was observed on Arizona chaparral burned 1 and 2 years earlier. Survival after 3 years was 26% with most mortality attributable to drought [63]. Postfire seedling emergence and survival after fall burning in Arizona chaparral site were as follows [65]:

Seedling emergence - # years after burn 1 2 3 4 5 seedlings/acre 62 12 16 0 9 = 99 (total) Seedlings surviving at the end of the growing season - # years after fire 1 2 3 4 5 seedlings/acre 57 50 36 36 9

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 75. Reynolds, Hudson G. 1962. Some characteristics and uses of Arizona's major plant communities. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. 2: 62-71. [1959]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 80. Saunier, Richard E. 1964. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 95 p. M.S. thesis. [3947]
  • 104. Wright, Henry A. 1972. Shrub response to fire. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: Proceedings of a symposium; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 204-217. [2611]
  • 105. Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F.; Britton, Carlton M. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state-of-the-art review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-58. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [2625]
  • 100. Welsh, Stanley L. 2000. [E-mail to Janet L. Howard]. Feburary 8. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [33058]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Fire

More info for the terms: severity, wildfire

Sonoran scrub oak is more susceptible to fire-induced damage on drier, unfavorable sedimentary or volcanic substrates than on more favorable sites and can occasionally be eliminated from these marginal sites by fire. Evidence suggests that Sonoran scrub oak is especially difficult to kill on soils with relatively favorable moisture relationships [79,80].

Fires of high severity generally result in increased mortality. Seedling survival tends to be higher following "light" fires [8,79,80]. Survival of 1-year old Sonoran scrub oak seedlings was as follows after fires in central Arizona chaparral [64]:

intense burn* light burn** 48% 91% *leaves and twigs mostly consumed **shrubs dead, but leaves and twigs mostly intact; "largely a cool or ground fire" A June wildfire in Arizona top-killed all Sonoran scrub oak present on the site [18]. In many areas annual burning may be necessary to eliminate or significantly reduce Sonoran scrub oak. On some Arizona chaparral sites at least 5 consecutive annual burns were necessary to reduce stem numbers to below pretreatment levels [70].

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 18. DeBano, Leonard F.; Schmidt, Larry J. 1989. Improving southwestern riparian areas through watershed management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-182. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. [11016]
  • 64. Pase, Charles P. 1965. Shrub seedling regeneration after controlled burning and herbicidal treatment of dense pringle manzanita chaparral. Res. Note RM-56. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 2 p. [16668]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 80. Saunier, Richard E. 1964. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 95 p. M.S. thesis. [3947]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Immediate Effect of Fire

More info for the terms: fire intensity, fuel, severity, shrub

Sonoran scrub oak is top-killed by fire [15,18]. The degree of damage and subsequent mortality rate of shrub live oak following fire depends largely on fire intensity and severity, site characteristics that influence fuel levels, and climatic factors [87]. On most sites, Sonoran scrub oak is difficult to kill by burning [70].

  • 15. Davis, Edwin A. 1970. Propagation of shrub live oak from cuttings. Botanical Gazette. 131(1): 55-61. [3454]
  • 18. DeBano, Leonard F.; Schmidt, Larry J. 1989. Improving southwestern riparian areas through watershed management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-182. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. [11016]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 87. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Schmutz, Ervin M. 1966. Shrub control and reseeding effects on the oak chaparral of Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 19: 191-195. [2336]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Post-fire Regeneration

More info for the terms: adventitious, initial off-site colonizer, root sucker, tree

Tree with adventitious bud/root crown/soboliferous species root sucker
Initial off-site colonizer (off-site, initial community)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Ecology

More info for the terms: natural, reburn, root crown

Sonoran scrub oak is well adapted to survive fire. This oak typically sprouts vigorously from the root crown and rhizomes in response to fire or other types of disturbance [16,63,79,100,104,105]. Postfire establishment by seed also occurs. In central Arizona, seedlings generally emerge in summer after the onset of summer rain [65].

FIRE REGIMES: In Arizona chaparral dominated by Sonoran scrub oak, fire return intervals have been estimated at 74 to 100 years. At least 20 years may be required before these sites can reburn [8]. Childers and Piirto [10] note that fire is a natural part of the ecosystem in southern California communities in which Sonoran scrub oak occurs.

Minnich and Chou [52] report the following average fire rotations in communities in which Sonoran scrub oak occurs:

southern California mixed chaparral - 59 years
northern Mexico mixed chaparral - 59 years
desert chaparral/pinyon-juniper woodland - 219 years

 

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 10. Childers, Christian A.; Piirto, Douglas D. 1991. Cost-effective wilderness fire management: a case study in southern California. In: Nodvin, Stephen C.; Waldrop, Thomas A., eds. Fire and the environment: ecological and cultural perspectives: Proceedings of an international symposium; 1990 March 20-24; Knoxville, TN. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-69. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 179-186. [16649]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 52. Minnich, Richard A.; Chou, Yue Hong. 1997. Wildland fire dynamics in the chaparral of southern California and northern Baja California. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 7(3): 221-248. [27871]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 104. Wright, Henry A. 1972. Shrub response to fire. In: McKell, Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., eds. Wildland shrubs--their biology and utilization: Proceedings of a symposium; 1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 204-217. [2611]
  • 105. Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F.; Britton, Carlton M. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state-of-the-art review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-58. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [2625]
  • 100. Welsh, Stanley L. 2000. [E-mail to Janet L. Howard]. Feburary 8. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [33058]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Successional Status

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: climax, density, forbs, shrubs

Sonoran scrub oak may have climax or seral status. This long-lived oak is considered to be an indicator of climax in parts of Arizona and New Mexico [8,53]. During the 2nd and 3rd years after fire in Sonoran scrub oak-dominated chaparral in Arizona, forbs and grasses dominate. Shrubs, including Sonoran scrub oak, assume prominence the 5th through 7th year after disturbance, although it may take more than 11 years for shrubs to reach preburn levels [8]. A typical successional pathway in pinyon-juniper is as follows [33]:

bare soil
annuals
perennial grasses and forbs
shrubs (including Sonoran scrub oak)
shrubs and open trees
climax pinyon-juniper

Pond [68] reports that weeping lovegrass dies out as the density of Sonoran scrub oak increases.

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 33. Holland, Carol J. 1990. Pinyon-juniper management in Region 3. In: Silvicultural challenges and opportunities in the 1990's: Proceedings of the national silviculture workshop; 1989 July 10-13; Petersburg, AK. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Timber Management: 206-216. [16575]
  • 53. Moir, W. H. 1983. A series vegetation classification for Region 3. In: Moir, W. H.; Hendzel, Leonard, tech. coords. Proceedings of the workshop on Southwestern habitat types; 1983 April 6-8; Albuquerque, NM. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region: 91-95. [1672]
  • 68. Pond, Floyd W. 1961. Basal cover and production of weeping lovegrass under varying amounts of shrub live oak crown cover. Journal of Range Management. 14: 335-337. [259]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regeneration Processes

More info for the terms: rhizome, shrub

Sonoran scrub oak reproduces through both sexual and vegetative means.

Sexual reproduction: Sonoran scrub oak produces small acorns which usually germinate and establish from late July through mid-September [8,93]. Germination often occurs shortly after acorn maturation and coincides with the summer rainy season [63]. Under laboratory conditions germination capacity may reach 95% [61].

Acorn production is largely dependent on the amount of precipitation received during the previous winter [63]. Dry summers may inhibit or retard acorn production [79,80]. In "good" years Sonoran scrub oak produces an abundance of acorns [79]. Total acorn failure, although rare, can occur [63,79]. Total crop failures may occur when October-March precipitation is less than 15 inches (38 cm) [63]. Generally, good crops are produced at 3- to 5-year intervals [61].

The vast majority of Sonoran scrub oak seedling mortality is apparently attributable to drought. In an Arizona study, seedling mortality during the first spring drought period following germination was 53%. Mortality rates appeared to decline by 3 years after germination [63].

Sonoran scrub oak acorns do not require a ripening period and frequently germinate while in storage. Shrub live oak acorns are characterized by a short period of viability, and seedbanking is unlikely. Pase [63] reports "there is probably a negligible carryover of seeds from 1 year to the next." Very few viable seeds remain 1 year after burial, due in large part to predation by insects, birds, and mammals [63].

Acorns are dispersed by numerous birds and mammals which eat and/or cache the acorns. Sonoran scrub oak seeds tend to be somewhat heavy, weighing an average of 0.046 to 0.053 ounce (1.3-1.5 g) per seed [30], and are consequently not transported long distances by most seed-dispersing animals. Scrub jays are particularly important dispersal agents. These birds generally "plant" single acorns at depths of 1.5 to 2 inches (4-5 cm), a few feet to a hundred feet from the parent plant. Rodents more often cache multiple seeds, which can germinate and produce groups of 10 to 20 or more seedlings at a single location. Seedling distribution indicates that, at least in many of the central Arizona sites studied, scrub jays play a much more significant role as dispersers than do rodents [63].

Seedlings are rarely encountered in the field [8,79,63]. Successful establishment is thought to require 15 inches (38 cm) or more of precipitation from October through March, followed by 10 inches (25 cm) or more from July to September [8,63]. These conditions are met in only 1 year out of 10 at many Arizona sites [63]. In laboratory experiments seedling roots grew to a depth of 1 foot (30 cm) prior to leaf development [16]. Plants only 12.9 inches (7.4 cm) in height had roots that extended to 21 inches (53 cm) in depth [8].

Vegetative reproduction: Sonoran scrub oak tends to increase more through rhizome sprouting than by seedling establishment [63,79]. Sonoran scrub oak sprouts vigorously after fire, application of herbicides, or mechanical treatment [8,16,65,79,100,105].

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 16. Davis, Edwin A.; Pase, Charles P. 1977. Root system of shrub live oak: implication for water yield in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 32: 174-180. [3456]
  • 30. Harper, Kimball T.; Wagstaff, Fred J.; Kunzler, Lynn M. 1985. Biology management of the Gambel oak vegetative type: a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-179. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [3286]
  • 61. Olson, David F., Jr. 1974. Quercus L. oak. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 692-703. [7737]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 80. Saunier, Richard E. 1964. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 95 p. M.S. thesis. [3947]
  • 93. Tucker, John M.; Cottam, Walter P.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. II. The contribution of Quercus turbinella. American Journal of Botany. 48(4): 329-339. [2364]
  • 105. Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F.; Britton, Carlton M. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state-of-the-art review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-58. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [2625]
  • 100. Welsh, Stanley L. 2000. [E-mail to Janet L. Howard]. Feburary 8. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. [33058]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: phanerophyte

Phanerophyte

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Form

More info for the terms: shrub, tree

Tree, shrub

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Phenology

More info on this topic.

Sonoran scrub oak flowers from April through June. In Ventura County, California, Sonoran scrub oak usually flowers in April [89]. In Utah, flowering begins by April and ends by May [20].

Sonoran scrub oak acorns mature by the summer or early fall. Acorns were present on Sonoran scrub oak from late August to early September at 1 Arizona site [79]. Acorns often germinate during the summer rainy period, with germination and emergence occurring from late July to mid-September [63].

  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 79. Saunier, R. E.; Wagle, R. F. 1967. Factors affecting the distribution of shrub live oak (Quercus turbinella Greene). Ecology. 48: 35-41. [271]
  • 89. Tucker, J. M. 1972. Hermaphroditic flowers in Californian oaks. Madrono. 21(7): 482-486. [30416]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Flowering/Fruiting

Flowering spring.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Shrub live oak reproduces through both sexual and vegetative means.
Sexual reproduction: Shrub live oak produces small acorns which usually germinate and establish from late July through mid-September (Pase, 1969; Tucker et al., 1961). Acorn production is largely dependent on the amount of precipitation received during the previous winter (Pase, 1969). The vast majority of shrub live oak seedling mortality is apparently attributable to drought. Shrub live oak acorns are characterized by a short period of viability, and seedbanking is unlikely. Pase (1969) reports "there is probably a negligible carryover of seeds from 1 year to the next." Very few viable seeds remain 1 year after burial, due in large part to predation by insects, birds, and mammals.
Vegetative reproduction: Shrub live oak tends to increase more through rhizome sprouting than by seedling establishment (Pase, 1969; Saunier and Wagle, 1967). Shrub live oak sprouts vigorously after fire, application of herbicides, or mechanical treatment (Davis and Pase, 1977; Pase and Lindenmuth, 1971; Wright et al., 1979).
Shrub live oak flowers from April through June. In Ventura County, California, shrub live oak usually flowers in April (Tucker, 1972). In Utah, flowering begins by April and ends by May. Shrub live oak acorns mature by the summer or early fall. Acorns were present on shrub live oak from late August to early September at 1 Arizona site (Saunier and Wagle, 1967). Acorns often germinate during the summer rainy period, with germination and emergence occurring from late July to mid-September (Pase, 1969).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Reasons: It occurs in the mountains of southwestern Colorado through southern Utah and Nevada to southern California and northern Mexico. It is considered relatively secure throughout its range although fossil evidence indicated in previously occurred much further north but climate change eliminated most northern populations so the species may be susceptible to climate changes today, as well. Also, frequency, intensity, and extent of late spring freezes, and intensity and extent of the "Arizona monsoon" appear to be the major factors controlling successful sexual reproduction.

Environmental Specificity: Narrow to moderate.

Comments: The northern distribution of shrub live oak is limited by spring freezes and summer moisture stress (Neilson and Wullstein, 1983; Rowlands, 1993). It is strongly influenced by the "Arizona monsoon gradient," which generates summer precipitation in the Southwest. Neilson and Wullstein (1983) report that the frequency, intensity, and extent of late spring freezes, and intensity and extent of the "Arizona monsoon" appear to be the major factors controlling successful sexual reproduction in shrub live oak.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Comments: Shrub live oak is drought tolerant and typically occupies drier and warmer sites than Gambel oak (Neilson and Wullstein, 1983; 1985). In the northern part of its range, shrub live oak often grows on warm, dry, southern exposures (Ffolliot and Thorud, 1974). Arizona chaparral is characterized by a biseasonal precipitation pattern with summer and winter precipitation and spring and fall droughts (Davis, 1870). Annual precipitation averages 16 to 25 inches (410-640 mm) (Ffolliot and Thorud, 1974). Shrub live oak is well adapted to survive fire (Tirmenstein, 1999). This oak typically sprouts vigorously from the root crown and rhizomes in response to fire or other types of disturbance (Davis and Pase, 1977; Pase, 1969; Saunier and Wagle, 1967; Wright et al., 1979). Postfire establishment by seed also occurs.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Management considerations

More info for the term: cover


Exotic grass production increases in response to removal of Sonoran scrub
oak. On Arizona sites where Sonoran scrub oak was killed by
herbicides and weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula)
seeded, the basal cover of weeping lovegrass was found to be inversely
proportional to oak cover. Where less than
50% of the Sonoran scrub oak cover was removed, the basal cover of
weeping lovegrass remained constant for
3 years, but where more than 50% of the basal cover was removed,
weeping lovegrass continued to increase during the 2nd and
3rd years [68].



Sonoran scrub oak may be difficult to control with herbicides [69].
Repeated applications are often necessary [87]. Best results
have been reported if herbicides are applied when subsoil at
24 inches (60 cm) depth is moist or wet and when leaves are not
senescent or falling [37]. Specific details on the effects
of herbicides on Sonoran scrub oak are available
[8,11,31,36,37,87].

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 11. Clary, Warren P. 1974. Response of herbaceous vegetation to felling of alligator juniper. Journal of Range Management. 27(5): 387-389. [636]
  • 31. Hibbert, Alden R.; Davis, Edwin A.; Scholl, David G. 1974. Chaparral conversion potential in Arizona: Part I: water yield response and effects on other resources. Res. Pap. RM-126. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 36 p. [1144]
  • 36. Johnsen, T. N., Jr.; Dalen, R. S. 1984. Controlling individual junipers and oaks with pelleted picloram. Journal of Range Management. 37(4): 380-384. [4940]
  • 37. Johnsen, Thomas N., Jr. 1988. Conditions influencing Turbinella oak (Quercus turbinella) mortality from picloram or picloram 2,4-D. Weed Science. 36: 810-817. [6596]
  • 68. Pond, Floyd W. 1961. Basal cover and production of weeping lovegrass under varying amounts of shrub live oak crown cover. Journal of Range Management. 14: 335-337. [259]
  • 69. Pond, Floyd W. 1971. Chaparral: 47 years later. Res. Pap. RM-69. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 11 p. [1905]
  • 87. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Schmutz, Ervin M. 1966. Shrub control and reseeding effects on the oak chaparral of Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 19: 191-195. [2336]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites

More info for the terms: peat, softwood

Sonoran scrub oak is rated as having "high potential" for erosion control and for long-term revegetation projects, but it is of little value in short-term revegetation [20].

Under laboratory conditions Sonoran scrub oak can be propagated from softwood cuttings of stems with fully expanded leaves [30]. Average successful rootings of up to 75% have been attained under optimal conditions [15]. Best results were obtained when cuttings were trimmed to 2 to 3 inches (5-8 cm) and put in a rooting medium of 1:1 perlite to peat moss. Details on propagation by cuttings are available [15,30].

  • 15. Davis, Edwin A. 1970. Propagation of shrub live oak from cuttings. Botanical Gazette. 131(1): 55-61. [3454]
  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 30. Harper, Kimball T.; Wagstaff, Fred J.; Kunzler, Lynn M. 1985. Biology management of the Gambel oak vegetative type: a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-179. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [3286]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Cover Value

More info for the terms: cover, tree

Sonoran scrub oak provides effective cover for a wide range of birds and mammals. Chaparral dominated by Sonoran scrub oak provides habitat for the peccary, California brown bat, ringtail, whitetail deer, Cooper's hawk, screech owl, many songbirds, canyon tree frog, leopard frog, and Mexican garter snake [77]. In central Arizona, mountain lion kills are sometimes hidden in Sonoran scrub oak thickets [60]. Sonoran scrub oak provides cover during 1 or more seasons for wildlife in Utah as follows [20]: Pronghorn Fair Elk Poor Mule deer Good Small mammals Good Small nongame birds Good Upland game birds Good Waterfowl Poor

  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 60. Ockenfels, Richard A. 1994. Mountain lion predation on pronghorn in central Arizona. The Southwestern Naturalist. 39(3): 305-306. [24572]
  • 77. Reynolds, Hudson G.; Johnson, R. Roy. 1964. Habitat relations of vertebrates of the Sierra Ancha Experimental Forest. Res. Pap. RM-4. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p. [13485]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

More info for the terms: mast, shrub

Sonoran scrub oak generally provides relatively little browse for most species of wildlife and livestock. In many areas it is used heavily only when other more palatable species are lacking [70]; however, Sonoran scrub oak is sometimes an important food source for deer and livestock [8]. In southern and central Arizona, it is considered to be a valuable browse plant because of its abundance and evergreen leaves [94]. Sonoran scrub oak can be a valuable emergency winter food when snow is deep or when preferred foods are scarce [8]. Sonoran scrub oak also provides an excellent source of emergency browse during droughts when other plants become desiccated and unpalatable [94]. Sonoran scrub oak can survive heavy browsing and may remain as "almost the only forage" on deteriorated ranges in Arizona [35].

The foliage of Sonoran scrub oak is utilized to at least some degree by a number of big game species. New, succulent growth is the most palatable and is readily consumed [8,65]. New growth is described as "fair" forage for deer in Arizona. In some areas, deer may consume considerable amounts of foliage [65,94]. Use of Sonoran scrub oak by mule deer in the southern Rocky Mountains is described as "moderate" in winter and "light" in summer [46]. Use of Sonoran scrub oak by desert mule deer is described as "low to high" in winter, "low" in spring, "moderate to high" during summer, and "low" in the fall [44]. Desert bighorn sheep feed on Sonoran scrub oak in Arizona [82].

Cattle, domestic sheep [94], and domestic goats use Sonoran scrub oak at least moderately [7]. In some Arizona locations, shrub live oak may become too dense for livestock and big game use [70].

Acorns of Sonoran scrub oak and related species constitute an important source of mast for many small birds and mammals in the Southwest. Acorns are utilized by the collared peccary, wild turkey, numerous rodents such as Abert's squirrel, geese, grouse, quail, scrub jays, and many other birds [8,63,97]. Scrub jays and many rodents collect and cache acorns of Sonoran scrub oak, thereby aiding in seed dispersal [63]. Mule deer, white-tailed deer, and cattle also consume acorns during the fall [8,50,63,96].

In the Southwest, scrub live oak cambium is eaten by sapsuckers, porcupines eat the bark, and beavers consume the twigs [97].

  • 46. Kufeld, Roland C.; Wallmo, O. C.; Feddema, Charles. 1973. Foods of the Rocky Mountain mule deer. Res. Pap. RM-111. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [1387]
  • 7. Cable, Dwight R. 1957. Recovery of chaparral following burning and seeding in central Arizona. Res. Note. No. 28. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 6 p. [6342]
  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 35. Humphrey, R. R. 1950. Arizona range resources. II. Yavapai County. Bull. 229. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 55 p. [5088]
  • 50. McCulloch, Clay Y. 1973. Part I: Seasonal diets of mule and white-tailed deer. In: Deer nutrition in Arizona chaparral and desert habitats. Special Report No. 3. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Game and Fish Department: 1-37. [9894]
  • 63. Pase, C. P. 1969. Survival of Quercus turbinella and Q. emoryi seedlings in an Arizona chaparral community. The Southwestern Naturalist. 14(2): 149-156. [1824]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 70. Pond, Floyd W.; Cable, Dwight R. 1960. Effect of heat treatment on sprout production of some shrubs of the chaparral in central Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 13: 313-317. [260]
  • 82. Seegmiller, Rick F.; Krausman, Paul R.; Brown, William H.; Whiting, Frank M. 1990. Nutritional composition of desert bighorn sheep forage in the Harquahala Mountains, Arizona. Desert Plants. 10(2): 87-90. [11943]
  • 94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
  • 96. Urness, P. J.; McCulloch, C. Y. 1973. Part III: Nutritional value of seasonal deer diets. In: Special Report 3. Deer nutrition in Arizona chaparral and desert habitats. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Game and Fish Department: 53-68. [12223]
  • 97. Van Dersal, William R. 1940. Utilization of oaks by birds and mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management. 4(4): 404-428. [11983]
  • 44. Krausman, Paul R.; Kuenzi, Amy J.; Etchberger, Richard C.; [and others]. 1997. Diets of mule deer. Journal of Range Management. 50(5): 513-522. [27845]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Nutritional Value


Sonoran scrub oak is rated fair in energy and protein value [20].
Nutrient content (%) of Sonoran scrub oak is as follows [82]:
Date Dry Protein Lignin Cellulose Ether Ash
matter
Jan-Feb 47.35 15.45 6.38 9.00 20.16 8.22
Mar-April 45.51 13.57 6.59 10.03 15.28 6.59
May-June 58.10 12.19 8.38 13.37 15.38 7.70
July-Aug 60.04 12.16 6.90 12.07 15.33 8.12
Sept-Oct 57.99 11.08 6.10 12.02 17.78 8.06
Nov-Dec 50.76 12.62 7.31 11.51 19.46 7.38

Crude fiber is lowest in May and highest during the winter months [76]. Crude
protein levels of Sonoran scrub oaks in California varied seasonally as follows
[4]:
Oven-dry weight (%)
January 7.7
February 7.3
March 7.5
April 6.9

Nutritional value (%) for Quercus spp. forage is as follows [55]:
Acorns Acorn meats Oak leaves

Dry matter 100.0 100.0 100.0
Organic matter 97.5 98.0 ----
Ash 2.5 5.6 2.0
Crude fiber 13.9 2.0 27.4
Ether extract 5.4 8.9 2.5
N-free extract 73.5 80.7 54.3
Protein (N × 6.25) 4.8 6.4 10.2
Cattle* 0.5 1.9 5.8
Horses* 1.7 3.1 6.2
Domestic goats* 1.7 3.1 6.1
Domestic sheep* 1.7 3.1 5.7

*digestible protein

  • 4. Bissell, Harold D.; Strong, Helen. 1955. The crude protein variations in the browse diet of California deer. California Fish and Game. 41(2): 145-155. [10524]
  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 55. National Academy of Sciences. 1971. Atlas of nutritional data on United States and Canadian feeds. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. 772 p. [1731]
  • 76. Reynolds, Hudson G. 1967. Chemical constituents and deer use of some crown sprouts in Arizona chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 65(12): 905-908. [12057]
  • 82. Seegmiller, Rick F.; Krausman, Paul R.; Brown, William H.; Whiting, Frank M. 1990. Nutritional composition of desert bighorn sheep forage in the Harquahala Mountains, Arizona. Desert Plants. 10(2): 87-90. [11943]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Palatability


Palatability of Sonoran scrub oak to most species of wildlife and livestock
is relatively low in most seasons [8,86]. It is generally used
only lightly by deer in Arizona [65] and most other big
game species throughout its range. New
sprouts are most palatable and are browsed readily [8,65,86]. Domestic
goats, however, frequently use it year-round
[8,43]. In an Arizona chaparral study,
Sonoran scrub oak was the most preferred species of domestic goats
during the first weeks after goats were released onto the
range [43]. Sonoran scrub oak is fairly palatable to cattle and
domestic sheep in some areas [94].



The palatability of Sonoran scrub oak for livestock and wildlife
species for Sonoran scrub oak in Utah is as follows [20]:
Cattle Poor
Domestic sheep Poor
Horses Poor
Pronghorn Fair
Elk Poor
Mule deer Fair
Small mammals Good
Small nongame birds Poor
Upland game birds Good
Waterfowl Poor

  • 8. Cable, Dwight R. 1975. Range management in the chaparral type and its ecological basis: the status of our knowledge. Res. Pap. RM-155. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 30 p. [579]
  • 20. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 43. Knipe, Oren D. 1983. Effects of Angora goat browsing on burned over Arizona chaparral. Rangelands. 5(6): 252-255. [1363]
  • 65. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
  • 86. Swank, Wendell G. 1958. The mule deer in Arizona chaparral. Wildlife Bulletin No. 3. Phoenix, AZ: State of Arizona, Game and Fish Department. 109 p. [12327]
  • 94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Other uses and values

Native Americans of the Southwest used Sonoran scrub oak acorns for food [94]; for example, the Pima used them as a "snack food" [73].

  • 73. Rea, Amadeo M. 1991. Gila River Pima dietary reconstruction. Arid Lands Newsletter. 31: 3-10. [18255]
  • 94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Quercus turbinella

Quercus turbinella is a species of oak known by the common names Sonoran scrub oak, shrub live oak, and grey oak.[1] It is native to northwestern Mexico and the southwestern United States from far eastern California to southwest Colorado, Rio Grande New Mexico,[2] to west Texas.

Distribution[edit]

Quercus turbinella grows in woodland, chaparral, forest, and other habitat. It is most common in chaparral habitat in central Arizona,[3] through the transition zone of the Mogollon RimWhite Mountains, but also southeast Arizona in the Madrean Sky Island mountain ranges of sky islands.[4]

Description[edit]

Quercus turbinella is a shrub growing two to five meters in height but sometimes becoming treelike and exceeding six meters. The branches are gray or brown, the twigs often coated in short woolly fibers when young and becoming scaly with age. The thick, leathery evergreen leaves are up to three centimeters long by two wide and are edged with large, spine-tipped teeth. They are gray-green to yellowish in color and waxy in texture on the upper surfaces, and yellowish and hairy or woolly and glandular on the lower surfaces. The males catkins are yellowish-green and the female flowers are in short spikes in the leaf axils, appearing at the same time as the new growth of leaves. The fruit is a yellowish brown acorn up to two centimeters long with a shallow warty cup about a centimeter wide.[5] This oak reproduces sexually via its acorns if there is enough moisture present, but more often it reproduces vegetatively by sprouting from its rhizome and root crown.[3]

This oak easily hybridizes with other oak species, including Quercus gambelii and Q. grisea.[3] Many species of animals use it for food, with wild and domesticated ungulates browsing the foliage and many birds and mammals eating the acorns.[3] Animals also use the shrub as cover, and mountain lions hide their kills in the thickets.[3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Calphotos". 
  2. ^ Little. Atlas of United States Trees, Volume 3, Minor Western Hardwoods, Map 147, Quercus turbinella.
  3. ^ a b c d e US Forest Service Fire Ecology
  4. ^ Little. Map 147, Quercus turbinella.
  5. ^ Virginia Tech: Shrub live oak

Further reading[edit]

  • Little. Atlas of United States Trees, Volume 3, Minor Western Hardwoods, Little, Elbert L, 1976, US Government Printing Office. Library of Congress No. 79-653298. Map 147, Quercus turbinella.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Notes

Comments

Formerly, California populations of what here is referred to as Quercus john-tuckeri have been included in the concept of Q . turbinella . Quercus john-tuckeri has subsessile fruit and noncordate leaf bases as opposed to the consistently pedunculate fruit and strongly cordate leaf bases of Q . turbinella . The two species seem to be no more closely related to each other than each might be to other southwestern oaks, and Q . john-tuckeri shares at least as many characteristics with Q . berberidifolia as with Q . turbinella . Thus, treatment of these two taxa as varieties of the same species is inappropriate. 

 Quercus turbinella forms putative hybrid swarms with Q . gambelii (see treatment), as well as with Q . grisea .

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63110 USA

Source: Missouri Botanical Garden

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Formerly, California populations of what here is referred to as Quercus john-tuckeri have been included in the concept of Quercus turbinella. Q. john-tuckeri has subsessile fruit and noncordate leaf bases as opposed to the consistently pedunculate fruit and strongly cordate leaf bases of Q. turbinella. The two species seem to be no more closely related to each other than each might be to other southwestern oaks, and Q. john-tuckeri shares at least as many characteristics with Quercus berberidifolia as with Q. turbinella. Thus, treatment of these two taxa as varieties of the same species is inappropriate (Tucker, 1961; Flora of North America, 1993). Varieties of Quercus turbinella are now recognized at the species level (Kartesz' 1999 data). Quercus turbinella var. ajoensis is treated as Q. ajoensis, and Q. turbinella var. californica as Q. john-tuckeri.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Common Names

Sonoran scrub oak

shrub live oak

turbinella oak

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5


The fully documented scientific name of Sonoran scrub oak is
Quercus turbinella Greene (Fagaceae) [32,39,40,91,101]. It is a member of the white oak subgenus Lepidobalanus or Quercus [41,64,77,]. Varieties are as follows [40,91,101]:



Quercus turbinella var. californica (Tucker) L. Benson   California Sonoran scrub oak

Quercus turbinella var. turbinella   Sonoran scrub oak

Sonoran scrub oak hybridizes with Gambel
oak (Q. gambelii): The hybrid is described as Q. × pauciloba Rydb. [49]. Sonoran scrub oak-Gambel oak hybrids are particularly evident in northern and southwestern Utah and in central Colorado [13,14,21,91,92,93]. Alvord oak (Q. × alvordiana Eastw.) results from hybridization of Sonoran scrub oak and blue oak (Q. douglasii) [49]. Sonoran scrub oak also hybridizes with sand shinnery oak (Q. havardii), Nuttall's scrub oak (Q. dumosa), gray oak (Q. grisea), and valley oak (Q. lobata) [14,30,49,67,92,93,99,102].

Welsh [99] divided Utah oaks into 3 complexes, one of which he identified as the
Sonoran scrub oak (Quercus turbinella) complex. According
to Welsh [99], there are "no apparent barriers to hybridization and intermediates are known
between nearly all (species)" within the complex.

  • 32. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 14. Cottam, Walter P.; Tucker, John M.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1959. Some clues to Great Basin postpluvial climates provided by oak distributions. Ecology. 49(3): 361-377. [698]
  • 21. Drobnick, Rudy. 1958. The ecology of a relic hybrid oak in the Great Basin area of Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah. 96 p. Thesis. [827]
  • 30. Harper, Kimball T.; Wagstaff, Fred J.; Kunzler, Lynn M. 1985. Biology management of the Gambel oak vegetative type: a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-179. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [3286]
  • 49. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]
  • 91. Tucker, John M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. American Journal of Botany. 48(3): 202-208. [2361]
  • 93. Tucker, John M.; Cottam, Walter P.; Drobnick, Rudy. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. II. The contribution of Quercus turbinella. American Journal of Botany. 48(4): 329-339. [2364]
  • 99. Welsh, Stanley L. 1986. Quercus (Fragaceae) in the Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist. 46(1): 107-111. [2498]
  • 101. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 39. Jones, Stanley D.; Wipff, Joseph K.; Montgomery, Paul M. 1997. Vascular plants of Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 404 p. [28762]
  • 40. Kartesz, John T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume I--checklist. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 622 p. [23877]
  • 13. Cottam, Walter P.; Tucker, John M. 1956. The impact of postpluvial climates on oak distribution within the Great Basin area of Utah. Utah Academy Proceedings. 33: 178-179. [697]
  • 67. Plumb, Timothy R.; Gomez, Anthony P. 1983. Five southern California oaks: identification and postfire management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-71. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 56 p. [5898]
  • 92. Tucker, John M. 1970. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. IV. the contribution of Quercus havardii. American Journal of Botany. 57(1): 71-84. [2363]
  • 102. White, Keith L. 1966. Structure and composition of foothill woodland in central coastal California. Ecology. 47(2): 229-237. [17347]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Synonyms

Quercus turbinella var. ajoensis (C. H. Muller) Little [40]

Quercus turbinella ssp. ajoensis (C. H. Muller) Felger and Lowe [23]
  • 40. Kartesz, John T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume I--checklist. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 622 p. [23877]
  • 23. Felger, Richard S.; Lowe, Charles H. 1970. New combinations for plant taxa in northwestern Mexico and southwestern United States. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. 6(1): 82-84. [33109]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!