Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (1) (learn more)

Overview

Distribution

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Unknown/Undetermined

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

United States

Origin: Unknown/Undetermined

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Unknown/Undetermined

Confidence: Confident

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Range Description

This species is distributed throughout North America and Canada and has been introduced into South America, Japan and Australia.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Sixweeks grass is widely distributed in North America, occurring from British Columbia east to Quebec and south to Baja California Norte, Mexico, the Texas panhandle, and central Florida [111,134,232,240]. Of the varieties, slender sixweeks grass is most common in the northern United States and southern Canada, although its distribution extends to the southern United States. Hairy sixweeks grass occurs in the western United States, Baja California, and Florida. The typical variety (V. o. var. o.) is most common in the Southeast, but occurs across southwestern Canada and all of the United States except the extreme Northeast [111,134]. Grass Manual on the Web provides a map of sixweeks grass's distribution in Canada and the United States. Plants database provides distributional maps of sixweeks grass and its varieties in the United States.

Although sixweeks grass is widespread, it is uncommon in some vegetation types and is not documented in every ecosystem or plant community where it grows. It may occur in some vegetation types that are not listed below.

  • 134. Lonard, Robert Irvin. 1970. A biosystematic study of the genus Vulpia (Gramineae). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. 154 p. Dissertation. [3827]
  • 232. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 240. Wiggins, Ira L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1025 p. [21993]
  • 111. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. In: North Carolina Botanical Garden (Producer). In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [36715]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

States or Provinces

(key to state/province abbreviations)
UNITED STATES
AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA
ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA
MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM
NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD
TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY DC

CANADA
AB BC ON PE PQ SK

MEXICO
B.C.N.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [19]:

1 Northern Pacific Border

2 Cascade Mountains

3 Southern Pacific Border

4 Sierra Mountains

5 Columbia Plateau

6 Upper Basin and Range

7 Lower Basin and Range

8 Northern Rocky Mountains

9 Middle Rocky Mountains

10 Wyoming Basin

11 Southern Rocky Mountains

12 Colorado Plateau

13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont

14 Great Plains

15 Black Hills Uplift

16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands
  • 19. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Description

More info for the term: caryopsis

This description provides characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology, and is not meant for identification. Keys for species identification are available (e.g. [86,97,134,176,245]). Lonard [134] provides a detailed key for distinguishing the varieties.

Sixweeks grass is a native winter or spring annual with a decumbent to erect growth form. Culms are solitary or in small tufts [77,176,206,208,232] that are 3.1 to 23 inches (8-59 cm) tall. Leaves are cauline. The blades are 1 to 2 mm wide and 0.8 to 4 inches (2-10 cm) long. The inflorescence is a narrow, compact panicle 1 to 6 inches (3-16 cm) long. Spikelets are 4.5 to 10 mm long [57,86,97,176,208,232]. The lemmas are awned [67]; awns are 3 to 25 mm long [97,176,208]. The seed is a caryopsis measuring 1.7 to 4 mm in length [77,176]. Mean seed mass for greenhouse-grown plants from the northern Mojave Desert was 0.30 mg/seed [55], while mean seed mass of field samples collected in northern Arizona was 0.49 mg/seed. The Arizona seeds averaged 3.29 × 0.58 mm in length and width [180]. Sixweeks grass roots are fibrous and shallow [165]: maximum rooting depth for Colorado plants was about 5.9 inches (15 cm) [78]. Maximum root depth for sixweeks grass harvested in late June in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming averaged 6.7 inches (17 cm); range was 6.3 to 7.1 inches (16-18 cm) [5]. Sixweeks grass's root:shoot ratio averaged 0.08 g/g for greenhouse-grown plants [55]. Sixweeks grass may form mycorrhizal associations [4].

  • 4. Allen, Edith Bach; Allen, Michael F. 1980. Natural re-establishment of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae following stripmine reclamation in Wyoming. Journal of Applied Ecology. 17(1): 139-147. [44048]
  • 5. Allen, Edith Bach; Knight, Dennis H. 1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush-grassland, Wyoming. The Southwestern Naturalist. 29(4): 407-421. [44452]
  • 55. DeFalco, Lesley A.; Bryla, David R.; Smith-Longozo, Vickie; Nowak, Robert S. 2003. Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquistion and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species. American Journal of Botany. 90(7): 1045-1053. [45275]
  • 57. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 67. Fassett, Norman C. 1951. Grasses of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. 173 p. [21728]
  • 77. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 78. Goslee, S. C.; Peters, D. P. C.; Beck, K. G. 2001. Modelling invasive weeds in grasslands: the role of allelopathy in Acroptilon repens invasion. Ecological Modelling. 139: 31-45. [39236]
  • 86. Hallsten, Gregory P.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Beetle, Alan A. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3rd ed. Research Journal 202. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. 432 p. [2906]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 134. Lonard, Robert Irvin. 1970. A biosystematic study of the genus Vulpia (Gramineae). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. 154 p. Dissertation. [3827]
  • 165. Ohlenbusch, Paul D.; Hodges, Elizabeth P.; Pope, Susan. 1983. Range grasses of Kansas. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Cooperative Extension Service. 23 p. [5316]
  • 176. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 180. Reichman, O. J. 1976. Relationships between dimensions, weights, volumes, and calories of some Sonoran Desert seeds. The Southwestern Naturalist. 20(4): 573-574. [12326]
  • 206. Stubbendieck, J.; Nichols, James T.; Roberts, Kelly K. 1985. Nebraska range and pasture grasses (including grass-like plants). E.C. 85-170. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. 75 p. [2269]
  • 208. Stubbendieck, James; Hatch, Stephan L.; Butterfield, Charles H. 1992. North American range plants. 4th ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 493 p. [25162]
  • 232. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 245. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. 806 p. [28655]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Annuals, Terrestrial, not aquatic, Stems nodes swollen or brittle, Stems erect or ascending, Stems geniculate, decumbent, or lax, sometimes rooting at nodes, Stems caespitose, tufted, or clustered, Stems terete, round in cross section, or polygonal, Stem internodes hollow, Stems with inflorescence less than 1 m tall, Stems, culms, or scapes exceeding basal leaves, Leaves mostly cauline, Leaves conspicuously 2-ranked, distichous, Leaves sheathing at base, Leaf sheath mostly open, or loose, Leaf sheath smooth, glabrous, Leaf sheath and blade differentiated, Leaf blades linear, Leaf blades 2-10 mm wide, Leaf blade margins f olded, involute, or conduplicate, Leaf blades mostly glabrous, Leaf blades more or less hairy, Ligule present, Ligule an unfringed eciliate membrane, Inflorescence terminal, Inflorescence an open panicle, openly paniculate, branches spreading, Inflorescence a contracted panicle, narrowly paniculate, branches appressed or ascending, Inflorescence solitary, with 1 spike, fascicle, glomerule, head, or cluster per stem or culm, Inflorescence single raceme, fascicle or spike, Flowers bisexual, Spikelets laterally compressed, Spikelet less than 3 mm wide, Spikelets with 3-7 florets, Spikelets solitary at rachis nodes, Spikelets all alike and fertille, Spikelets bisexual, Spikelets disarticulating above the glumes, glumes persistent, Spikelets disarticulating beneath or between the florets, Spikelets secund, in rows on one side of rachis, Rachilla or pedicel glabrous, Glumes present, empty bracts, Glumes 2 clearly present, Glumes equal or subequal, Glumes shorter than adjacent le mma, Glumes awn-like, elongated or subulate, Glumes 1 nerved, Glumes 3 nerved, Lemma coriaceous, firmer or thicker in texture than the glumes, Lemma 3 nerved, Lemma 5-7 nerved, Lemma glabrous, Lemma body or surface hairy, Lemma apex acute or acuminate, Lemma distinctly awned, more than 2-3 mm, Lemma with 1 awn, Lemma awn less than 1 cm long, Lemma awned from tip, Lemma awns straight or curved to base, Lemma margins thin, lying flat, Lemma straight, Palea present, well developed, Palea membranous, hyaline, Palea about equal to lemma, Palea 2 nerved or 2 keeled, Stamens 1, Styles 2-fid, deeply 2-branched, Stigmas 2, Fruit - caryopsis, Caryopsis ellipsoid, longitudinally grooved, hilum long-linear.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

Dr. David Bogler

Source: USDA NRCS PLANTS Database

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Type Information

Type collection for Festuca octoflora var. aristulata Torr. ex L.H. Dewey
Catalog Number: US 949116
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): G. C. Nealley
Year Collected: 1890
Locality: Texas, United States, North America
  • Type collection: Dewey, L. H. 1894. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 2: 547.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany

Source: National Museum of Natural History Collections

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
This species is found in forest ecoregions including temperate, subtropical dry, pine oak, highlands, hardwood, lowlands, boreal, coastal and montane forest types. It also occurs in desert, xeric scrub, shrub steppe, shrubland and grassland ecoregions. Habitats consist of dry upland prairies (including hill prairies, gravel prairies, and sand prairies), rocky glades, thinly wooded rocky slopes, sandy or gravelly areas along railroads, abandoned fields, and barren waste areas. This grass is most frequent in desert grassland, desert shrub, sagebrush, short- and mixed-grass prairie and annual grassland communities. Even in those communities, it is usually a minor grass. DeFalco et al. (2003) suggest this grass has adapted to low-nitrogen soils by slowing growth; thus, it has less demand for nitrogen compared to most annuals.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat characteristics

More info for the term: xeric

Sixweeks grass is most common on disturbed sites and open areas. It is reported on roadsides, fields, and "waste places" in the Southeast [176,245]. It also occurs on dry stream channels [201], and is common on animal-disturbed sites such as seed harvester ant mounds and prairie dog towns [25,57]. Common locales for sixweeks grass in Michigan include dunelands, lakeshores, roadsides, and oak woodlands [224]. Sixweeks grass favors plant communities with open structure [77,86], occurring on coastal and desert sites in Baja California [240]. Since is drought tolerant and grows on xeric sites that few other grasses can tolerate, it is sometimes a xeric-site indicator [94,139]. An Arizona field experiment showed that sixweeks grass had the lowest relative water requirement (as a ratio of water used:dry-matter production) of 5 southern Arizona annuals [142]. At the end of the Great Drought (1941), Weaver and Mueller [229] found sixweeks grass in "abundance" on depleted tallgrass prairies of eastern Kansas and Nebraska.

Aspect where sixweeks grass grows varies depending upon climate and surrounding vegetation. On morainal mountain grasslands of the Blackfoot Valley of western Montana, sixweeks grass occurred on low, dry, south- and southeastern aspects of the moraines [24]. However, in knob and kettle topography on south-central Washington, sixweeks grass grew on north-facing slopes but not south-facing slopes [179]. In a sand bluestem-prairie sandreed (Andropogon gerardii var. paucipilus-Calamovilfa longifolia) prairie in the Nebraska sandhills, sixweeks grass is most common in depressions [28]. It is reported on lowlands, alluvial flats, and bajadas of the Southwest [138].

Elevation: Sixweeks grass is most common at low elevations. Elevational range by state is:

Area Elevation
Arizona <6,500 feet (2,000 m) [113,239]
     Sawtooth Range 1,600-1,750 feet (490-530 m) [138]
California <7,000 feet (2,000 m) [97,156]
Colorado 3,500-8,500 feet (1,100-2,600 m) feet [88]
Nevada 1,800-6,600 feet (550-2,000 m) [112]
New Mexico 5,000-6,500 feet (1,500-2,000 m) [137]
Utah 2,490-5,510 feet (760-2,290 m) [232]
Baja California low elevations [240]

Soils: Sixweeks grass is adapted to a wide range of soils, but is most common on coarse-textured soils [208,224]. The soils are often disturbed [77,80,86,224]. Rydberg [187] described sixweeks grass as "characteristic of sandhill regions of Nebraska and Kansas," occurring on sandy riverbanks, draws, and canyon bottoms. Sixweeks grass also grows in loamy and rocky soils [97,104,113,129,137]. Slender sixweeks grass grows on dry, "ruderal" sands on Fire Island National Seashore, New York [59] and on coastal beaches and dunelands of Connecticut [99]. In the Central Great Plains of Kansas, sixweeks grass occurs on "mature, well-developed" soil profiles [2]. It grows on disturbed rocky, sandy, and sandy clay soils in Texas, where parent materials include limestone [57]. Sixweeks grass occurs on shale-derived soils in southern Illinois [139] and on gypsum-derived and alluvial soils in the eastern Mojave Desert [147].

  • 24. Blinn, Dean W.; Habeck, James R. 1967. An analysis of morainal vegetation in the upper Blackfoot Valley, Montana. Northwest Science. 41(3): 126-140. [4008]
  • 113. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 2. Albertson, F. W. 1937. Ecology of mixed prairie in west central Kansas. Ecological Monographs. 7: 483-547. [5057]
  • 25. Bonham, Charles D.; Lerwick, Alton. 1976. Vegetation changes induced by prairie dogs on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(3): 221-225. [3994]
  • 28. Bragg, Thomas B. 1978. Effects of burning, cattle grazing, and topography on vegetation of the choppy sands range site in the Nebraska sandhills prairie. In: Hyder, Donald N., ed. Proceedings, 1st international rangeland congress; 1978 August 14-18; Denver, CO. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 248-253. [4468]
  • 57. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 59. Dowhan, Joseph J.; Rozsa, Ron. 1989. Flora of Fire Island, Suffolk County, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 116(3): 265-282. [22041]
  • 77. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 86. Hallsten, Gregory P.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Beetle, Alan A. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3rd ed. Research Journal 202. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. 432 p. [2906]
  • 88. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2nd ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press, Inc. 666 p. [6851]
  • 94. Heikens, Alice L.; Robertson, Philip A. 1995. Classification of barrens and other natural xeric forest openings in southern Illinois. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 122(3): 203-214. [39656]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 99. Hill, Steven R. 1996. The flora of Latimer Point and vicinity, New London County, Connecticut. Rhodora. 98(894): 180-216. [44935]
  • 104. Hyder, D. N.; Bement, R. E. 1964. Sixweeks fescue as a deterrent to blue grama utilization. Journal of Range Management. 17: 261-264. [3415]
  • 129. Liang, Y. M.; Hazlett, D. L.; Lauenroth, W. K. 1989. Biomass dynamics and water use efficiencies of five plant communities in the shortgrass steppe. Oecologia. 80(2): 148-153. [43066]
  • 137. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 138. Mauz, Kathryn. 1999. Flora of the Sawtooth Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona. Desert Plants. 15(2): 3-27. [38731]
  • 139. McCall, Robin K.; Gibson, David J. 1999. The regeneration potential of a threatened southern Illinois shale barren. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 126(3): 226-233. [48333]
  • 142. McGinnies, W. G.; Arnold, Joseph F. 1939. Relative water requirement of Arizona range plants. Technical Bulletin No. 80. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station: 167-246. [4441]
  • 147. Meyer, Susan E. 1986. The ecology of gypsophile endemism in the eastern Mojave Desert. Ecology. 67(5): 1303-1313. [49011]
  • 156. Munz, Philip A.; Keck, David D. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 176. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 179. Reichman, O. J. 1975. Relation of desert rodent diets to available resources. Journal of Mammalogy. 56(4): 731-751. [4572]
  • 187. Rydberg, P. A. 1915. Phytogeographical notes on the Rocky Mountain region V. Grasslands of the subalpine and montane zones. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 42(11): 629-642. [60596]
  • 201. Smith, Michael A.; Dodd, Jerrold L.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Rodgers, J. Daniel. 1993. Dynamics of vegetation along and adjacent to an ephemeral channel. Journal of Range Management. 46(1): 56-64. [20350]
  • 208. Stubbendieck, James; Hatch, Stephan L.; Butterfield, Charles H. 1992. North American range plants. 4th ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 493 p. [25162]
  • 224. Voss, Edward G. 1972. Michigan flora. Part I: Gymnosperms and monocots. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium. 488 p. [11471]
  • 229. Weaver, J. E.; Mueller, I. M. 1942. Role of seedlings in recovery of midwestern ranges from drought. Ecology. 23: 275-294. [5599]
  • 232. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 239. Wiens, John F. 2000. Vegetation and flora of Ragged Top, Pima County, Arizona. Desert Plants. 16(2): 3-31. [39488]
  • 240. Wiggins, Ira L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1025 p. [21993]
  • 245. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. 806 p. [28655]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Key Plant Community Associations

More info for the terms: cover, lichen, presence, shrub, tree, xeric

Sixweeks grass is most frequent in desert grassland, desert shrub [138],
sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) [5], short- and mixed-grass prairie
[118,229,229], and annual grassland communities [92]. Even in those communities,
it is usually a minor grass (<5% cover) [3,61,214,217,234].
Coverage may be more extensive on disturbed
or open sites. A botanical survey in Zion National Park, Utah, showed 40% sixweeks grass
occurrence in open singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla) communities
[87]. Hairy sixweeks grass is common in burned singleleaf pinyon-juniper (Juniperus spp.) woodlands of
California [97]. Sixweeks grass was common on heavily grazed bison rangelands in
2 presettlement (1810) surveys of shortgrass prairies [89].

Sixweeks grass is documented in several vegetation types besides those
listed above. It grows in shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia), Joshua tree (Yucca
brevifolia), and riparian California broomsage (Lepidospartum squamatum)
scrub in southeastern California and Nevada [21,22,27]. In Pinnacles National Monument,
California, sixweeks grass was present on mostly barren sites with cheatgrass (Bromus
tectorum) and woven-spore lichen
(Texosporium sancti-jacobi), a rare lichen that occurs on xeric,
undisturbed sites [141]. Sixweeks grass occurs in a saguaro-yellow paloverde
(Carnegiea gigantea-Cercidium microphyllum)
community on the Tonto National Forest, Arizona [42].
Sixweeks grass and red brome (B. rubens) were the 2 most productive annuals
in a vegetation survey in Saguaro National Park, Arizona (Esque and Schwalbe, unpublished data cited
in [63]). Sixweeks grass also occurs in silver sagebrush-western wheatgrass
(Artemisia cana-Pascopyrum smithii) in north-central Colorado [129],
and in sand dropseed (Sporobolus cryptandrus)
communities of Nebraska [228].
Sixweeks grass was probably an important component of pristine California
prairie, growing in the interspaces between dominant bunchgrasses such as purple
needlegrass (Nassella pulchra). It may have been more prevalent on dry
sites than on wet sites. California prairie is almost entirely replaced by
annual grassland, which is dominated by nonnative annual grasses such as ripgut
brome (B. diandrus) [92].
Sixweeks grass is not usually named as a dominant species in vegetation
classifications. Burzlaff [39] describes 3 sixweeks grass
unions and 1 sixweeks grass-forb union on the Nebraska sandhills prairie.
Daubenmire [51] defines a plant union as "the smallest
structural unit in the organization of vegetation, consisting of 1 or more
species that make similar demands on their environment." A winterfat/Sandberg bluegrass
(Krascheninnikovia lanata/Poa secunda)-sixweeks grass community was
identified on the Snake River Birds of
Prey Area of southern Idaho [247]. Sixweeks grass is important in rock outcrop communities of
the Cross Timbers region, where a survey showed 11% sixweeks grass presence and
5.4% mean cover on a yellow stonecrop (Sedum
nuttallianum)-foliose lichen rock outcrop community in south-central
Oklahoma [46]. Sixweeks grass and poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata) dominate pristine
shale barrens of southern Illinois [139].
  • 3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 393-479. [2462]
  • 5. Allen, Edith Bach; Knight, Dennis H. 1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush-grassland, Wyoming. The Southwestern Naturalist. 29(4): 407-421. [44452]
  • 21. Billings, W. D. 1951. Vegetational zonation in the Great Basin of western North America. Union of International Science: Biological Series B. 9: 101-122. [443]
  • 22. Billings, W. E. 1949. The shadscale vegetation zone of Nevada and eastern California in relation to climate and soils. The American Midland Naturalist. 42(1): 87-109. [36960]
  • 27. Boyd, Steve. 1999. Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California. Aliso. 18(2): 93-139. [40639]
  • 39. Burzlaff, Donald F. 1962. A soil and vegetation inventory and analysis of three Nebraska Sandhills range sites. Research Bulletin 206. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. 33 p. [21600]
  • 42. Cave, George Harold, III. 1982. Ecological effects of fire in the upper Sonoran Desert. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. 124 p. Thesis. [12295]
  • 46. Collins, Scott L.; Mitchell, Gail S.; Klahr, Sabine C. 1989. Vegetation-environment relationships in a rock outcrop community in southern Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist. 122: 339-348. [11136]
  • 51. Daubenmire, R. 1952. Forest vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetation classification. Ecological Monographs. 22(4): 301-330. [25238]
  • 61. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs. 18(3): 326-376. [3683]
  • 63. Esque, Todd C.; Schwalbe, Cecil R. 2002. Alien annual grasses and their relationships to fire and biotic change in Sonoran desertscrub. In: Tellman, Barbara, ed. Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Studies in Natural History. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press; The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum: 165-194. [48660]
  • 87. Harper, Kimball T.; Sanderson, Stewart C.; McArthur, E. Durant. 2003. Pinyon-juniper woodlands in Zion National Park. Western North American Naturalist. 63(2): 189-202. [44853]
  • 89. Hart, Richard H.; Hart, James A. 1997. Rangelands of the Great Plains before European settlement. Rangelands. 19(1): 4-11. [27301]
  • 92. Heady, H. F.; Bartolome, J. W.; Pitt, M. D.; Savelle, G. D.; Stroud, M. C. 1992. California prairie. In: Coupland, R. T., ed. Natural grasslands: Introduction and western hemisphere. Ecosystems of the World 8A. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.: 313-335. [23831]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 118. Kelso, Leon. 1931. Some notes on young desert horned larks. The Condor. 33(2): 60-65. [60499]
  • 129. Liang, Y. M.; Hazlett, D. L.; Lauenroth, W. K. 1989. Biomass dynamics and water use efficiencies of five plant communities in the shortgrass steppe. Oecologia. 80(2): 148-153. [43066]
  • 138. Mauz, Kathryn. 1999. Flora of the Sawtooth Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona. Desert Plants. 15(2): 3-27. [38731]
  • 139. McCall, Robin K.; Gibson, David J. 1999. The regeneration potential of a threatened southern Illinois shale barren. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 126(3): 226-233. [48333]
  • 141. McCune, Bruce; Rosentreter, Roger. 1992. Texosporium sancti-jacobi, a rare western North American lichen. Bryologist. 95(3): 329-333. [18432]
  • 214. Towne, E. Gene; Hartnett, David C.; Cochran, Robert C. 2005. Vegetation trends in tallgrass prairie from bison and cattle grazing. Ecological Applications. 15(5): 1550-1559. [60222]
  • 217. Uresk, Daniel W.; Severson, Kieth E. 1998. Response of understory species to changes in ponderosa pine stocking levels in the Black Hills. The Great Basin Naturalist. 58(4): 312-327. [29413]
  • 228. Weaver, J. E.; Bruner, W. E. 1945. A seven-year quantitative study of succession in grassland. Ecological Monographs. 15(3): 297-319. [60667]
  • 229. Weaver, J. E.; Mueller, I. M. 1942. Role of seedlings in recovery of midwestern ranges from drought. Ecology. 23: 275-294. [5599]
  • 234. West, N.E. 1983. Southeastern Utah galleta-threeawn shrub steppe. In: West, Neil E., ed. Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: 413-421. (Goodall, David W., ed. in chief; Ecosystems of the world; vol. 5). [2509]
  • 247. Yensen, Eric; Quinney, Dana L.; Johnson, Kathrine; Timmerman, Kristina; Steenhof, Karen. 1992. Fire, vegetation changes, and population fluctuations of Townsend's ground squirrels. The American Midland Naturalist. 128(2): 299-312. [19682]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):

More info for the terms: cover, shrub

SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES [199]:

101 Bluebunch wheatgrass

102 Idaho fescue

103 Green fescue

104 Antelope bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

105 Antelope bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

106 Bluegrass scabland

107 Western juniper/big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass

109 Ponderosa pine shrubland

110 Ponderosa pine-grassland

201 Blue oak woodland

202 Coast live oak woodland

203 Riparian woodland

204 North coastal shrub

205 Coastal sage shrub

206 Chamise chaparral

207 Scrub oak mixed chaparral

208 Ceanothus mixed chaparral

209 Montane shrubland

210 Bitterbrush

211 Creosote bush scrub

212 Blackbush

214 Coastal prairie

215 Valley grassland

301 Bluebunch wheatgrass-blue grama

302 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass

303 Bluebunch wheatgrass-western wheatgrass

304 Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass

305 Idaho fescue-Richardson needlegrass

306 Idaho fescue-slender wheatgrass

309 Idaho fescue-western wheatgrass

310 Needle-and-thread-blue grama

311 Rough fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass

312 Rough fescue-Idaho fescue

314 Big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

315 Big sagebrush-Idaho fescue

316 Big sagebrush-rough fescue

317 Bitterbrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

318 Bitterbrush-Idaho fescue

319 Bitterbrush-rough fescue

320 Black sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass

321 Black sagebrush-Idaho fescue

322 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany-bluebunch wheatgrass

323 Shrubby cinquefoil-rough fescue

324 Threetip sagebrush-Idaho fescue

401 Basin big sagebrush

402 Mountain big sagebrush

403 Wyoming big sagebrush

404 Threetip sagebrush

405 Black sagebrush

406 Low sagebrush

407 Stiff sagebrush

408 Other sagebrush types

411 Aspen woodland

412 Juniper-pinyon woodland

413 Gambel oak

414 Salt desert shrub

415 Curlleaf mountain-mahogany

416 True mountain-mahogany

417 Littleleaf mountain-mahogany

418 Bigtooth maple

419 Bittercherry

421 Chokecherry-serviceberry-rose

501 Saltbush-greasewood

502 Grama-galleta

503 Arizona chaparral

504 Juniper-pinyon pine woodland

505 Grama-tobosa shrub

506 Creosotebush-bursage

507 Palo verde-cactus

508 Creosotebush-tarbush

509 Transition between oak-juniper woodland and mahogany-oak association

601 Bluestem prairie

602 Bluestem-prairie sandreed

603 Prairie sandreed-needlegrass

604 Bluestem-grama prairie

605 Sandsage prairie

606 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

607 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

608 Wheatgrass-grama-needlegrass

609 Wheatgrass-grama

610 Wheatgrass

611 Blue grama-buffalo grass

612 Sagebrush-grass

613 Fescue grassland

614 Crested wheatgrass

703 Black grama-sideoats grama

704 Blue grama-western wheatgrass

705 Blue grama-galleta

706 Blue grama-sideoats grama

707 Blue grama-sideoats grama-black grama

708 Bluestem-dropseed

709 Bluestem-grama

710 Bluestem prairie

713 Grama-muhly-threeawn

714 Grama-bluestem

715 Grama-buffalo grass

716 Grama-feathergrass

717 Little bluestem-Indiangrass-Texas wintergrass

718 Mesquite-grama

719 Mesquite-liveoak-seacoast bluestem

720 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (dunes)

721 Sand bluestem-little bluestem (plains)

722 Sand sagebrush-mixed prairie

724 Sideoats grama-New Mexico feathergrass-winterfat

727 Mesquite-buffalo grass

728 Mesquite-granjeno-acacia

729 Mesquite

730 Sand shinnery oak

731 Cross timbers-Oklahoma

732 Cross timbers-Texas (little bluestem-post oak)

733 Juniper-oak

734 Mesquite-oak

735 Sideoats grama-sumac-juniper

801 Savanna

802 Missouri prairie

804 Tall fescue

805 Riparian

810 Longleaf pine-turkey oak hills

812 North Florida flatwoods
  • 199. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Cover Types

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

More info for the term: cover

SAF COVER TYPES [64]:

12 Black spruce

16 Aspen

40 Post oak-blackjack oak

42 Bur oak

43 Bear oak

44 Chestnut oak

45 Pitch pine

46 Eastern redcedar

50 Black locust

57 Yellow-poplar

63 Cottonwood

66 Ashe juniper-redberry (Pinchot) juniper

67 Mohrs (shin) oak

68 Mesquite

70 Longleaf pine

71 Longleaf pine-scrub oak

72 Southern scrub oak

73 Southern redcedar

75 Shortleaf pine

80 Loblolly pine-shortleaf pine

81 Loblolly pine

82 Loblolly pine-hardwood

83 Longleaf pine-slash pine

84 Slash pine

85 Slash pine-hardwood

204 Black spruce

210 Interior Douglas-fir

217 Aspen

220 Rocky Mountain juniper

222 Black cottonwood-willow

229 Pacific Douglas-fir

230 Douglas-fir-western hemlock

233 Oregon white oak

234 Douglas-fir-tanoak-Pacific madrone

235 Cottonwood-willow

236 Bur oak

237 Interior ponderosa pine

238 Western juniper

239 Pinyon-juniper

242 Mesquite

243 Sierra Nevada mixed conifer

244 Pacific ponderosa pine-Douglas-fir

245 Pacific ponderosa pine

246 California black oak

248 Knobcone pine

249 Canyon live oak

250 Blue oak-foothills pine

255 California coast live oak
  • 64. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Plant Associations

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the term: shrub

KUCHLER [124] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:

K002 Cedar-hemlock-Douglas-fir forest

K005 Mixed conifer forest

K009 Pine-cypress forest

K010 Ponderosa shrub forest

K011 Western ponderosa forest

K012 Douglas-fir forest

K016 Eastern ponderosa forest

K017 Black Hills pine forest

K018 Pine-Douglas-fir forest

K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland

K024 Juniper steppe woodland

K026 Oregon oakwoods

K027 Mesquite bosques

K028 Mosaic of K002 and K026

K029 California mixed evergreen forest

K030 California oakwoods

K031 Oak-juniper woodland

K032 Transition between K031 and K037

K033 Chaparral

K034 Montane chaparral

K035 Coastal sagebrush

K036 Mosaic of K030 and K035

K037 Mountain-mahogany-oak scrub

K038 Great Basin sagebrush

K039 Blackbrush

K040 Saltbush-greasewood

K041 Creosote bush

K042 Creosote bush-bur sage

K043 Paloverde-cactus shrub

K044 Creosote bush-tarbush

K045 Ceniza shrub

K046 Desert: vegetation largely lacking

K047 Fescue-oatgrass

K048 California steppe

K050 Fescue-wheatgrass

K051 Wheatgrass-bluegrass

K053 Grama-galleta steppe

K054 Grama-tobosa prairie

K055 Sagebrush steppe

K056 Wheatgrass-needlegrass shrubsteppe

K057 Galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe

K058 Grama-tobosa shrubsteppe

K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna

K060 Mesquite savanna

K061 Mesquite-acacia savanna

K063 Foothills prairie

K064 Grama-needlegrass-wheatgrass

K065 Grama-buffalo grass

K066 Wheatgrass-needlegrass

K067 Wheatgrass-bluestem-needlegrass

K068 Wheatgrass-grama-buffalo grass

K069 Bluestem-grama prairie

K070 Sandsage-bluestem prairie

K071 Shinnery

K074 Bluestem prairie

K075 Nebraska Sandhills prairie

K076 Blackland prairie

K081 Oak savanna

K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100

K083 Cedar glades

K084 Cross Timbers

K085 Mesquite-buffalo grass

K086 Juniper-oak savanna

K087 Mesquite-oak savanna

K089 Black Belt

K096 Northeastern spruce-fir forest

K097 Southeastern spruce-fir forest

K098 Northern floodplain forest

K100 Oak-hickory forest

K101 Elm-ash forest

K102 Beech-maple forest

K103 Mixed mesophytic forest

K104 Appalachian oak forest

K106 Northern hardwoods

K107 Northern hardwoods-fir forest

K108 Northern hardwoods-spruce forest

K109 Transition between K104 and K106

K110 Northeastern oak-pine forest

K111 Oak-hickory-pine

K112 Southern mixed forest
  • 124. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat: Ecosystem

More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

ECOSYSTEMS [76]:

FRES10 White-red-jack pine

FRES11 Spruce-fir

FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine

FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine

FRES14 Oak-pine

FRES15 Oak-hickory

FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress

FRES17 Elm-ash-cottonwood

FRES18 Maple-beech-birch

FRES19 Aspen-birch

FRES20 Douglas-fir

FRES21 Ponderosa pine

FRES23 Fir-spruce

FRES28 Western hardwoods

FRES29 Sagebrush

FRES30 Desert shrub

FRES31 Shinnery

FRES32 Texas savanna

FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe

FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub

FRES35 Pinyon-juniper

FRES36 Mountain grasslands

FRES38 Plains grasslands

FRES39 Prairie

FRES40 Desert grasslands

FRES42 Annual grasslands
  • 76. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; Lewis, Mont E.; Smith, Dixie R. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Known predators

Vulpia octoflora (six-weeks fescue (grass)) is prey of:
Lepus californicus
Lepus townsendii
Pogonomyrmex

Based on studies in:
USA: California, Cabrillo Point (Grassland)

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
  • L. D. Harris and L. Paur, A quantitative food web analysis of a shortgrass community, Technical Report No. 154, Grassland Biome. U.S. International Biological Program (1972), from p. 17.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Fire Management Considerations

More info for the term: frequency

Prescribed and wildfires are most likely to benefit or have no effect on sixweeks grass coverage and frequency. Typically a minor grass favored by disturbance, sixweeks grass is well adapted to establish in most early postfire environments. Regarding fire season, spring prescribed burning may reduce sixweeks grass coverage the most, at least in the short term. Widespread fire that burns into the soil, killing seed, can reduce sixweeks grass's ability to recover from fire. Nonnative annual grasses, which outcompete sixweeks grass (see Invasives), can also greatly impact postfire coverage and frequency of sixweeks grass. A postfire reduction in sixweeks grass is likely if annual bromes, schismus, and/or lovegrasses are present before fire or represented in the seed bank.

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: cool-season, cover, fire use, frequency, prescribed fire, restoration, succession, wildfire

Fire season:
Few studies have documented seasonal effects of fire to sixweeks grass. However,
a study in mixed chamise-mission manzanita-bushrue (Xyloccus bicolor-Cneoridium
dumosum) in San Diego County, California, found no significant differences
in mean herbaceous cover on spring-burned (10 May 1993) and fall-burn (28-29
October 1993) sites, but overall herbaceous diversity was greater on fall burns. The
spring following burning, sixweeks grass was infrequent on spring burns, but at
0.5% frequency and 0.08% cover, it was still 1 of the 10 most common herbs on
fall burns [20]. Owensby and Smith [167] reported that in tallgrass prairie, spring burning is
most damaging to sixweeks grass because it is actively growing at that time.
Prescribed spring fire on a Kansas prairie reduced annual grasses, including
sixweeks grass, little barley (Hordeum pusillum), and bromes (Bromus
spp.), from 1.5% to 0.3% cover [167].
Fire and grazing:
Cool-season annual prescribed burning and grazing reduced sixweeks grass on the
Flint Hills of Kansas. After repeat (1950-1966) annual spring burns and continuous cattle grazing
(5 acres/animal unit)
on big bluestem-little bluestem-grama (Bouteloua
spp.) mixed-grass prairie, annual grasses (sixweeks grass, bromes (Bromus
spp.), and little barley) showed less basal cover on burned sites compared to
unburned sites, with mid-spring burning most harmful to the annual grasses. Data
were collected in the fall of 1966 and pooled for annual grasses. Annual
grasses had 7.6% basal cover on unburned sites; 2.1% cover on early
spring-burned (20 March) sites; 1.6% cover on mid-spring burned (10 April)
sites; and 2.6% cover on late-spring burned (1 May) sites. Bluestems also
decreased under this burning-and-grazing prescription, while gramas and Kentucky
bluegrass (Poa pratensis) increased [6].
Keeley and others [116] compared postfire establishment and succession on 14
chaparral burn sites in southern California. They noted sixweeks grass had high
coverage on only 1 burn: a heavily grazed chamise chaparral site in its 9th year
of postfire succession [116].
Postfire rehabilitation: After a
1996 wildfire in a Utah juniper/basin big sagebrush
community in Utah, the burn was chained and seeded with a mix of native and nonnative rangeland
grasses before the next growing season. The mix did not include sixweeks grass. Sixweeks grass showed 1% frequency at
postfire years 1 and 2 [166]. The treatment did not include a comparative control.
Research Project Summaries:
The following Research Project Summaries provide information on prescribed fire use and postfire response of plant
community species including sixweeks grass:
  • 6. Anderson, Kling L.; Smith, Ed F.; Owensby, Clenton E. 1970. Burning bluestem range. Journal of Range Management. 23: 81-92. [323]
  • 20. Beyers, Jan L.; Wakeman, Carla D. 2000. Season of burn effects in southern California chaparral. In: Keeley, Jon E.; Baer-Keeley, Melanie; Fotheringham, C. J., eds. 2nd interface between ecology and land development in California. U.S. Geological Survey: Open-File Report 0062. Sacramento, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center: 45-55. [60561]
  • 116. Keeley, Sterling C.; Keeley, Jon E.; Hutchinson, Steve M.; Johnson, Albert W. 1981. Postfire succession of the herbaceous flora in southern California chaparral. Ecology. 62(6): 1608-1621. [5778]
  • 166. Ott, Jeffrey E. 2001. Vegetation of chained and non-chained rangelands following wildfire and rehabilitation in west-central Utah. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 79 p. Thesis. [46563]
  • 167. Owensby, Clenton E.; Smith, Ed F. 1973. Burning true prairie. In: Hulbert, Lloyd C., ed. 3rd Midwest prairie conference proceedings; 1972 September 22-23; Manhattan, KS. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Division of Biology: 1-4. [18770]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Plant Response to Fire

More info for the terms: cover, density, frequency, prescribed burn, prescribed fire, relative frequency, succession, wildfire

Sixweeks grass establishes from soil-stored seed in early postfire plant communities [1,48,54,190,238]. It often reaches greatest coverage and frequency in the 1st few years after fire, then declines [54,210]. To date (2006), there are too few fire studies to access sixweeks grass's "typical" response to fire. Some studies show an increase after fire [3,41,52,54,102,172,210]; some show little overall change in sixweeks grass abundance before and after fire [1,42,130,209]; and a minority show a decrease [28,153]. Because it is an annual with its establishment rate closely tied to growing-season precipitation, short-term fire studies that do not provide comparative pre- and postfire precipitation data may provide little insight into sixweeks grass response to fire. Postfire drought will probably impact sixweeks grass's ability to compete for water against deep-rooted perennials. Studies characterizing sixweeks grass response to fire in the short term may show trends, however. As an annual, sixweeks grass's response is most likely linked to fire effect on the seed bank, with severe surface and ground fires most restricting its ability to recover from fire.

Postfire increases in sixweeks grass coverage and frequency are usually not large. Minor postfire increases in sixweeks grass may be statistically insignificant but biologically important. Doubling sixweeks grass production may provide important cover on disturbed sites [3] and enhance wildlife food webs. Sixweeks grass is, for example, highly important in the diet of the Townsend's ground squirrel, a keystone species [161] in sagebrush ecosystems (see Seed use). A doubling of sixweeks grass seed production may greatly benefit the rodent and its predators.

Positive fire effect: Sixweeks grass was the most common annual in maritime coast live oak and chamise communities 1 to 5 years after fire in Santa Barbara County, California [54]. In a survey of postfire vegetation in chamise and mixed-chaparral communities of California, Sweeney [210] found sixweeks grass was most common at postfire year 1, with abundance "decreasing somewhat" on older burns. Daubenmire [52] reported that a July 1961 wildfire ""benefited" sixweeks grass near Clarkston, Washington. The fire occurred in an old field succeeding to a bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass community. Percent cover of sixweeks grass was low under all conditions, but relative frequency was high in early postfire years [52]:

  Postfire year 2 Postfire year 4 Postfire year 12
Burned sites Cover (%) 2 1 trace
Frequency (%) 85 62 2
Unburned sites Cover (%) 0 1 1
Frequency (%) 0 28 30

Biomass of sixweeks grass greatly increased (547%) on open sites after prescribed fire on the Tonto National Forest, Arizona. Plant response to 3 fires in a saguaro-desert ironwood (Olneya tesota)/white bursage/cholla (Opuntia spp.) community was compared. Study sites included an unburned control and 2 adjacent burn sites. One of the adjacent sites burned in a wildfire on 26 May 1980; the other adjacent site was burned under prescription on 12 June 1981. For each treatment, density and biomass were measured on 2 microhabitats: open/shrub (shrub interspaces or areas with low shrubs) and shade (beneath saguaro or desert ironwood trees). Changes in sixweeks grass density were not significant (p<0.05) across treatments on open/shrub sites. Changes in biomass were significant, with sixweeks grass on the wildfire site showing biomass reduction and other sites showing increases. Changes in density and biomass were not significant on shaded sites. Mean sixweeks grass density and biomass were [41]:

Microhabitat Variable No Fire 1980 Wildfire 1981 Prescribed Burn
1981 1982 1981 1982 1981 1982
open/shrub density (plants/m²) 121 123 20 34 88 153
  biomass (g/m²) 0.5 1.5* 1.2 0.7* 0.6 9.7*
shade density 84 8 40 35 99 23
  biomass 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.3 1.5
*significant change across treatments (p<0.05)

Mean precipitation for the growing season (December-March) is 5.0 inches (127 mm, measured from the nearest weather station). Growing-season precipitation during the fire study years was 10.8 inches (275 mm, 216% of normal) in 1979-1980; 3.5 inches (90 mm, 71% of normal) in 1980-1981; and 6.06 inches (154 mm, 121% of normal) in 1981-1982 [41].

Burn surveys showed that late-season prescribed fires and wildland fires for resource benefit favored sixweeks grass in Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado. Sixweeks grass and/or cheatgrass formed a "major component" of the postfire vegetation on 5 of 6 burn sites. The management objective was to reduce the Wyoming big sagebrush component of the vegetation and increase native grasses including sixweeks grass [172].

No fire effect: With or without fire, sixweeks grass typically shows less than 5% cover on most sites. On open or already disturbed sites, fire may have little effect on sixweeks grass's relative coverage. It was noted as a minor grass (<5% cover), for example, on both burned and unburned big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass sites in southeastern Washington [130,131]. Near Pocatello, Idaho, it was noted on both burned and unburned sites 1 year after prescribed fire in a threetip sagebrush-mountain big sagebrush community. Although the dominant species in the seed bank, sixweeks grass was uncommon on both burned or unburned plots. Relative sixweeks grass seedling density and cover at postfire year 1 were [1]:

  Burned site Unburned site
Relative seedling density (%) 0.651 0.239
Cover (%) 0.5 0.16

After the 1979 Ship Island Fire on the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness in Idaho, differences in sixweeks grass coverage on burned vs. unburned plots at postfire years 1 and 2 were insignificant (p=0.05), ranging from 0.8% to 4.7% [209]. Similarly, April 1981 vegetation sampling conducted after an October 1980 prescribed fire in an Arizona saguaro-yellow paloverde community showed no significant (p<0.05) differences in sixweeks grass cover on burned and unburned plots [42].

Negative fire effect: Fire may not always benefit sixweeks grass in the short term. On the Arapho Prairie preserve in Nebraska, vegetation analysis was conducted in 1982 after an October 1981 wildfire. Biomass (g/m²) of sixweeks grass on burned and adjacent unburned plots was [153]:

  June July August October
burned 1.2 2.7 1.9 1.0
unburned 4.7 3.3 2.3 7.4

A Nebraska sandhills prairie rangeland showed a decrease in sixweeks grass after May 1976 prescribed burning [28]. Data were not provided.

Longer-term fire effects: Many fire studies follow sixweeks grass's response for only postfire years 1 and 2; however, sixweeks grass may occur in later stages of postfire succession providing there are open microsites available. Sixweeks grass showed 4% frequency 4 years after prescribed fire in a redberry juniper community on the Rolling Plains of Texas [127]. Sixweeks grass was present on both burned and unburned blackbrush sites 6 years after wildfire in southwestern Utah and 14 years after wildfire on the Spring Mountain National Recreation Area in southern Nevada. Cover and frequency data were not given [213].

Seed bank: Fire may reduce but does not deplete the soil seed bank. Over several to many years, postfire seed production replenishes sixweeks grass's seed bank. In a study of seed bank composition and fire effects to seed on different-aged burns, Zammit and Zedler [251] collected soil-litter samples from chamise-desert ceanothus (Ceanothus greggii) stands on the Sky Oaks Biological Field Station and the adjacent Cleveland National Forest near San Diego, California. Soil-litter samples were placed in flats; dry straw burned over half the samples (temperatures of 300-570 °F (150-300 °C) for 1.2-2 min.); then all samples were tested for germination in a greenhouse for 6 months. The researchers found density of germinable sixweeks grass seed was significantly (p<0.05) higher in soil from a 62-year-old stand compared to soil from chamise-desert ceanothus stands of other ages. Sixweeks grass seed density (seeds/dm²±s) was [251]:

Stand age
(years since fire)
10 17 36 62 86
Burned flats 0.5±0.7 0.0 0.3±0.5 2.2±1.5 0.5±0.7
Unburned flats 0.2±0.4 1.2±1.9 0.2±0.4 4.0±4.5 0.4±0.6
  • 1. Akinsoji, Aderopo. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio. 78: 151-155. [6944]
  • 3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 393-479. [2462]
  • 28. Bragg, Thomas B. 1978. Effects of burning, cattle grazing, and topography on vegetation of the choppy sands range site in the Nebraska sandhills prairie. In: Hyder, Donald N., ed. Proceedings, 1st international rangeland congress; 1978 August 14-18; Denver, CO. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 248-253. [4468]
  • 41. Cave, George H.; Patten, Duncan T. 1984. Short-term vegetation responses to fire in the upper Sonoran Desert. Journal of Range Management. 37(6): 491-496. [610]
  • 42. Cave, George Harold, III. 1982. Ecological effects of fire in the upper Sonoran Desert. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. 124 p. Thesis. [12295]
  • 48. Crawford, Hewlette S.; Kucera, Clair L.; Ehrenreich, John H. 1969. Ozark range and wildlife plants. Agric. Handb. 356. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 236 p. [18602]
  • 52. Daubenmire, Rexford. 1975. Plant succession on abandoned fields, and fire influences, in a steppe area in southeastern Washington. Northwest Science. 49(1): 36-48. [745]
  • 54. Davis, Frank W.; Hickson, Diana E.; Odion, Dennis C. 1988. Composition of maritime chaparral related to fire history and soil, Burton Mesa, Santa Barbara County, California. Madrono. 35(3): 169-195. [6162]
  • 102. Humes, Hubert Ray. 1960. The ecological effects of fire on natural grasslands in western Montana. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 85 p. Thesis. [1213]
  • 127. Leif, Anthony P. 1987. Bobwhite and scaled quail responses to burning of redberry juniper-dominated rangelands. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University. 84 p. Thesis. [23080]
  • 130. Link, Steven O.; Gee, Glendon W.; Downs, Janelle L. 1990. The effect of water stress on phenological and ecophysiological characteristics of cheatgrass and Sandberg's bluegrass. Journal of Range Management. 43(6): 506-513. [14114]
  • 131. Link, Steven O.; Gee, Glendon W.; Thiede, Michael E.; Beedlow, Peter A. 1990. Response of a shrub-steppe ecosystem to fire: soil water and vegetational change. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 4(3): 163-172. [15466]
  • 153. Morrison, Linda C.; DuBois, John D.; Kapustka, Lawrence A. 1986. The vegetational response of a Nebraska Sandhills grassland to a naturally occurring fall burn. Prairie Naturalist. 18(3): 179-184. [1696]
  • 161. Nydegger, Nicholas C.; Smith, Graham W. 1986. Prey populations in relation to Artemisia vegetation types in southwestern Idaho. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Welch, Bruce L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Artemisia and Chrysothamnus; 1984 July 9-13; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-200. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 152-156. [1787]
  • 172. Perryman, Barry L.; Olson, Richard A.; Petersburg, Stephen; Naumann, Tamara. 2002. Vegetation response to prescribed fire in Dinosaur National Monument. Western North American Naturalist. 62(4): 414-422. [43906]
  • 190. Sampson, Arthur W.; Burcham, L. T. 1954. Costs and returns of controlled brush burning for range improvement in northern California. Range Improvement Studies No. 1. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. 41 p. [41820]
  • 209. Stucker, Donald E.; Peek, James M. 1984. Response of bighorn sheep to the Ship Island Burn. Report submitted to the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory: Supplement No. INT-80-108CA. 33 p. On file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [17070]
  • 213. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
  • 238. White, Thomas C.; Stephenson, John; Sproul, Fred. 1995. Postburn monitoring of the Eagle Fire: first year recovery on sites seeded with buckwheat and coastal sage. In: Keeley, Jon F.; Scott, Tom, eds. Brushfires in California: ecology and resource management: Proceedings; 1994 May 6-7; Irvine, CA. Fairfield, WA: International Association of Wildland Fire: 185-187. [43340]
  • 251. Zammit, C.; Zedler, P. H. 1994. Organization of the soil seed bank in mixed chaparral. Vegetatio. 111: 1-16. [23457]
  • 210. Sweeney, James R. 1956. Responses of vegetation to fire: A study of the herbaceous vegetation following chaparral fires. University of California Publications in Botany. [Berkeley, CA: University of California Press]. 28(4): 143-250. [3776]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Broad-scale Impacts of Fire

More info for the terms: charate, density, fire intensity, litter, prescribed burn, wildfire, xeric

It is unclear whether heat breaks seed dormancy and enhances sixweeks grass germination. In an outdoor pot study, Odion [163] found a significant positive effect of heat on seedling emergence. At Vanderburg Air Force Base, California, pre- and postfire soil samples were collected from a maritime chamise community that had not burned for at least 75 years (at Site 1) or 50 years (at Site 2). Prefire soil cores were collected in fall, and both study sites were burned under prescription soon after. Postfire soil samples were also collected [163]. Fire intensity was relatively high (see [164] for fire data). Laboratory treatments for prefire soil samples were a control, heat (100 °C for 7 min.), and heat with chamise charate. Seedling emergence was counted for pre- and postfire soils samples and in the field on prescribed burn plots. Mean number of germinants/m² emerging from soil samples and on burn plots was [163]:

Prefire soil samples
   Control 4.4
   Heat 74.8*
   Heat and charate Site 1 Site 2
74.8 492.8
Postfire soil samples 8.8 101.2
Field emergence on burn 0.1 0.5
*significant at p>0.05

However, heat or charate treatments had no effect on sixweeks grass germination in another laboratory experiment [20].

Intense heat generated in some shrubland fires can kill shallowly buried seed and seeds in litter. In field and greenhouse studies of the seed bank of a basin big sagebrush community near Reno, Nevada, Young and Evans [248] found 4 times as many viable sixweeks grass seeds in litter than buried in soil, where seeds were less vulnerable to fire. In a greenhouse study, soil cores from unburned chamise plots produced 122 sixweeks grass germinants/300 cm³ of soil, while samples taken from an adjacent site that had recently burned produced no germinants [233]. A vegetation survey also illustrates this trend. An eastern Mojave buckwheat-California sagebrush costal sage community in the Santa Monica Mountains of California experienced wildfire on 18 June 1978, and a portion of the site reburned in June 1979. The 1978 fire had relatively long burnout times (2-minute exposure to 9 kcal/sec/m²); reaction intensity of the fire was modeled at 120 kcal/sec/m². The site was a southeast-facing, xeric slope where fortunately, vegetation sampling had been conducted in 1977. Prefire (1977) vegetation sampling showed 30.9% prefire coverage of sixweeks grass. Postfire coverage in spring 1980 was 0.5% [235].

Fire does not always reduce sixweeks grass's soil seed bank. In a seed bank study at La Purisima State Historic Park northwest of Los Angeles, Davis and others [53] found approximately equal numbers of sixweeks germinants from pre- and postfire soils. Soil samples were collected before and after prescribed burning in a maritime chamise community and moved to a greenhouse for seed germination. Mean sixweeks grass germinant density was 1 plant/250 cm³ in unburned soil and 0.85 plant/250 cm³ in burned soil [53].

  • 20. Beyers, Jan L.; Wakeman, Carla D. 2000. Season of burn effects in southern California chaparral. In: Keeley, Jon E.; Baer-Keeley, Melanie; Fotheringham, C. J., eds. 2nd interface between ecology and land development in California. U.S. Geological Survey: Open-File Report 0062. Sacramento, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center: 45-55. [60561]
  • 53. Davis, Frank W.; Borchert, Mark I.; Odion, Dennis C. 1989. Establishment of microscale vegetation pattern in maritime chaparral after fire. Vegetatio. 84: 53-67. [10159]
  • 163. Odion, Dennis C. 2000. Seed banks of long-unburned stands of maritime chaparral: composition, germination behavior, and survival with fire. Madrono. 47(3): 195-203. [38720]
  • 164. Odion, Dennis C.; Davis, Frank W. 2000. Fire, soil heating, and formation of vegetation patterns in chaparral. Ecological Monographs. 70(1): 149-169. [35515]
  • 233. Went, F. W.; Juhren, G.; Juhren, M. C. 1952. Fire and biotic factors affecting germination. Ecology. 33(3): 351-364. [4919]
  • 235. Westman, W. E.; O'Leary, J. F.; Malanson, G. P. 1981. The effects of fire intensity, aspect and substrate on post-fire growth of Californian coastal sage scrub. In: Margaris, N. S.; Mooney, H. A., eds. Components of productivity of Mediterranean climate regions--basic and applied aspects. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers: 151-179. [13593]
  • 248. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1975. Germinability of seed reserves in a big sagebrush community. Weed Science. 23(5): 358-364. [2654]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Immediate Effect of Fire

More info for the terms: litter, root crown

Fire occurring when plants are mature kills sixweeks grass [53]. If fire occurs early in the growing season, annuals such as sixweeks grass may sprout from the root crown [104]. Fire in any season may reduce the seed bank [53]. Seed in litter or lying on the soil surface is most vulnerable to fire kill [248].
  • 53. Davis, Frank W.; Borchert, Mark I.; Odion, Dennis C. 1989. Establishment of microscale vegetation pattern in maritime chaparral after fire. Vegetatio. 84: 53-67. [10159]
  • 104. Hyder, D. N.; Bement, R. E. 1964. Sixweeks fescue as a deterrent to blue grama utilization. Journal of Range Management. 17: 261-264. [3415]
  • 248. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1975. Germinability of seed reserves in a big sagebrush community. Weed Science. 23(5): 358-364. [2654]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Post-fire Regeneration

More info for the terms: ground residual colonizer, initial off-site colonizer, secondary colonizer

POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY [204]:
Ground residual colonizer (on-site, initial community)
Initial off-site colonizer (off-site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on-site or off-site seed sources)
  • 204. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. FEIS postfire regeneration workshop--April 12: Seral origin of species comprising secondary plant succession in Northern Rocky Mountain forests. 10 p. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [20090]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Fire Ecology

More info for the terms: density, fire exclusion, fire frequency, fire interval, fire regime, fire severity, frequency, fuel, fuel continuity, litter, presence, relict, severity, shrub, shrubs, stand-replacing fire, succession, tree, understory fire

Fire adaptations: Sixweeks grass establishes from soil-stored seed after fire, typically as a component of early postfire vegetation [1,54,66,98,109,132,173,226]. No other means of postfire regeneration are documented, although establishment from off-site wind-, animal-, or water-dispersal seed is possible.

FIRE REGIMES: Sixweeks grass occurs in many different ecosystems and plant communities, so it experiences a wide range of FIRE REGIMES. In closed-canopy ecosystems such as maple-beech (Acer-Fagus spp.), where hundreds of years may pass without fire, sixweeks grass presence is most likely after canopy-gap disturbances. As long as it is at least sparsely represented in the prefire community, sixweeks grass may become more important when fire does occur in plant communities with long fire return intervals. Sixweeks grass is most important in open-canopy forests, woodlands, grasslands, and shrublands (see Distribution and Occurrence). Fire is important in retaining open structure in most of the communities where sixweeks grass is common. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and oak (Quercus spp.) woodlands, for example, are maintained by frequent understory fire [8,225]. Fire intervals in pinyon-juniper (Pinus-Juniperus spp.) woodlands vary greatly, but fire is important in eventually opening the canopies. Pinyon-juniper communities experience understory burns when fire is frequent, but typically have moderate- to long-interval, stand-replacing fires [152,211]. Frequent fire in annual grasslands and palouse, plains, and mixed-grass prairies maintains the grasslands by preventing invasion of woody plants and reducing litter [169,169,185,205,242]. Fire plays a more variable ecological role in shrublands where sixweeks grass is important. Some of the shrublands (e.g., chamise and other chaparral types) depend on moderate-interval (30-100 years), stand-replacing fire [169]; others are adapted to mixed-severity fires (e.g., big sagebrush) [8,38,148,192]; while many desert shrubland types (such as creosotebush) are poorly adapted to fire [33]. Descriptions of fire regimes of communities where sixweeks grass is important follow.

Desert shrub: Fire is infrequent in pristine creosotebush-white bursage, Joshua tree, and saguaro communities. Discontinuity of fine fuels in most years hinders the spread of fire, which was historically uncommon to rare [31,33,35,103,162]. In most years, pristine stand structure of these Southwestern desert shrub communities is widely spaced woody plants, some perennial bunchgrasses, and bare interspaces [29,33,34,186]. During wet winters and springs, annuals such as sixweeks grass increase fuels loads. Biomass accumulations from native annuals following an exceptionally wet growing season may provide enough fine fuels to carry a fire in desert ecosystems that otherwise rarely burn [26,212].

Dry sixweeks grass provides little fine fuel biomass in most years because it crumbles so quickly after senescence. During prescribed burning on the Mojave Desert, native annual vegetation including sixweeks grass was unable to sustain fire despite abundant growth after above-average winter rains [33]. Nonnative, invasive annual grasses including red brome, have schismus have increased fuel loads from historic levels. While native annual grasses mostly grow in the protective shade of shrubs, nonnative grasses also grow in shrub interspaces, increasing fuel continuity and fire frequency and severity on invaded sites. Ecological consequences are serious, as most southwestern desert plants are poorly adapted to frequent and/or stand-replacing fire [33,34]. Nonnative annual grasses outcompete sixweeks grass on most desert shrub sites (see Invasives). Sixweeks grass became uncommon after the 1940s, when common Mediterranean grass (S. barbatus) invaded the Mojave Desert and coastal grasslands of California (Clarke, O, personal observation cited in [32]). For detailed information on fine fuel production of sixweeks grass, red brome, schismus, and other Mojave Desert annuals, see the Research Project Summary Nonnative annual grass fuels and fire in the Mojave Desert.

Sagebrush/bunchgrass: Prior to the 1890s, probably only a few grass species occupied a prominent position in early postfire sagebrush communities of the Great Basin. Sixweeks grass and small sixweeks grass (Vulpia microstachys) were among the most important of these early postfire annuals. Generally, native Vulpias would increase for a few years, then be suppressed by recovering bunchgrasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass, bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides), and Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), and by shrubs such as basin big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata) and rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) [173]. Historic fire return intervals in sagebrush ecosystems were variable, ranging from around 20 to 100 years. Most fires were mixed-severity and of small extent, although more widespread fires occurred on some sites [100,242,243]. Cheatgrass and medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae), nonnative annual grasses, have altered FIRE REGIMES and successional patterns in some sagebrush communities. Fine fuel loads from dry cheatgrass and/or medusahead can support fire-return intervals as short as 3 to 6 years [173,236].

Short- and mixed-grass prairies: Fires were frequent in presettlement prairie ecosystems. Widespread plains grassland fires were often noted in historical records from the early 1880s [89], and presettlement fires probably occurred every 35 years or less. Agriculture, urbanization, and fire exclusion have greatly lengthened fire return intervals on the Great Plains [169,185,242]. A few shortgrass prairies mostly retain their historical composition and structure, although few are absolutely pristine. A wet-year survey of a relict threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia)-bluebunch wheatgrass-blue grama community in south-central Montana found sixweeks grass and cheatgrass occupied interspaces between bunchgrasses only "occasionally" [244].

Pinyon-juniper woodlands: Fire return intervals in pinyon-juniper woodlands vary greatly, depending upon fine fuel loads and stand density. Historical fire return interval for western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) woodlands is estimated at 10 to 30 years. Livestock grazing in pinyon-juniper tends to increase fire return intervals by reducing fine fuels and increasing woody fuel density (review by [243]). Cheatgrass invasion in some pinyon-juniper communities has greatly decreased fire return intervals and increased fire severity [121].

Annual grasslands: Because they are dominated by nonnative annuals, annual grasslands have no "natural" fire regime. There are no data and few historic records of presettlement fire return intervals in pristine California prairie. Probable mean fire intervals (estimates of fire intervals that are derived from historical or very limited physical evidence) for California prairie are frequent: approximately every 1 to 2 years. Probable mean fire intervals for annual grasslands are every 20 to 30 years [205].

Chaparral: Historic fire return intervals in chamise and mixed-chaparral range from 10 to 90 years [169,210]. Intervals between fires were longer in communities dominated by nonsprouting shrubs, such as bigberry manzanita (Arctostaphylos glauca), than in communities dominated by sprouting shrubs such as chamise [115].

Coastal sage scrub chaparral: Documentation of historic fire intervals in coast sage scrub is lacking. Current fire return intervals vary widely. Total area burned strongly correlates with precipitation during the previous winter, with heaviest burning occurring after wet years. Fire is rare following drought [149]. Vogl [223] estimated an average fire interval of 20 years for lightning-ignited fire in chaparral adjacent to coastal sage scrub. Fire severity is generally higher in coastal sage scrub than in seral chaparral due to higher litter loading and the higher percentage of terpenes in coastal sage scrub vegetation [81,136]. For a California sagebrush-eastern Mojave buckwheat (Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum) community on the Cleveland National Forest, California, fire records show that stand-replacing fire occurs at approximate 28-year intervals. Sixweeks grass is noted in early postfire succession in the community [238].

Fuels: Because it usually constitutes less than 5% of the total vegetation and crumbles rapidly upon drying, sixweeks grass typically contributes little fine fuel biomass during the fire season [220].

A few studies provide measures of sixweeks grass fuel loads or fuel loads in plant communities where sixweeks grass is a component of the vegetation. On undisturbed palouse prairie in eastern Washington, annual grasses ― with sixweeks grass the most common annual grass ― composed less than 2% of total biomass from late May to early June. Live shoot biomass ranged from 50 to 69 g/m², and mostly consisted of perennial bunchgrasses [182].  In a "drier than normal" year, McColley and Hodgkinson [141] found sixweeks grass air-dry production averaged 8.3 lbs/acre on Idaho fescue-threadleaf sedge palouse prairie of east-central Washington. Potvin and Harrison [174] measured September biomass of sixweeks litter at 2.1 gm/m² on the Arapaho Prairie of Nebraska. Whisenant [236] provides the following mean fuel loads for a rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus)/cheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass-sixweeks grass site on the Snake River Plains of Idaho:

Fire frequency (#/year) Fine fuel frequency (%) Fine fuel quantity (lb/acre) Elevation (feet) Burn age when sampled
0.6 50 705 3,570 6

Fine fuels in pinyon-juniper can vary greatly. In a review, Wright and others [243] gave an average production of western juniper communities in eastern Oregon, which often contain sixweeks grass, at 600 lb/ac, with yields on sites with good soils and high precipitation as high as 1,400 lb/ac.

Leaf area index is a variable in some fuel models (e.g., FARSITE). Hazlet [91] provides leaf area indices for northern Colorado blue grama-buffalo grass communities containing sixweeks grass.

The following table provides fire return intervals for plant communities and ecosystems where sixweeks grass is important. For further information, see the FEIS review of the dominant species listed below.

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years)
maple-beech-birch Acer-Fagus-Betula spp. >1,000 [225]
California chaparral Adenostoma and/or Arctostaphylos spp. 169]
bluestem prairie Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 123,169]
Nebraska sandhills prairie A. gerardii var. paucipilus-Schizachyrium scoparium 169]
silver sagebrush steppe Artemisia cana 5-45 [96,175,242]
sagebrush steppe A. tridentata/Pseudoroegneria spicata 20-70 [169]
basin big sagebrush A. tridentata var. tridentata 12-43 [192]
mountain big sagebrush A. tridentata var. vaseyana 15-40 [8,38,148]
Wyoming big sagebrush A. tridentata var. wyomingensis 10-70 (x=40) [222,249]
coastal sagebrush A. californica <35 to <100
saltbush-greasewood Atriplex confertifolia-Sarcobatus vermiculatus <35 to <100
desert grasslands Bouteloua eriopoda and/or Pleuraphis mutica 5-100 [169]
plains grasslands Bouteloua spp. 169,242]
blue grama-needle-and-thread grass-western wheatgrass B. gracilis-Hesperostipa comata-Pascopyrum smithii 169,185,242]
blue grama-buffalo grass B. gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides 169,242]
grama-galleta steppe B. gracilis-Pleuraphis jamesii <35 to <100
blue grama-tobosa prairie B. gracilis-Pleuraphis mutica 169]
cheatgrass Bromus tectorum 173,236]
California montane chaparral Ceanothus and/or Arctostaphylos spp. 50-100
paloverde-cactus shrub Parkinsonia microphylla/Opuntia spp. 169]
curlleaf mountain-mahogany* Cercocarpus ledifolius 13-1,000 [11,195]
mountain-mahogany-Gambel oak scrub C. ledifolius-Quercus gambelii <35 to <100
blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima 169]
California steppe Festuca-Danthonia spp. 169,205]
black ash Fraxinus nigra 225]
juniper-oak savanna Juniperus ashei-Quercus virginiana <35
Ashe juniper J. ashei <35
western juniper J. occidentalis 20-70
Rocky Mountain juniper J. scopulorum <35 [169]
cedar glades J. virginiana 3-22 [85,169]
creosotebush Larrea tridentata <35 to <100
Ceniza shrub L. tridentata-Leucophyllum frutescens-Prosopis glandulosa <35 [169]
yellow-poplar Liriodendron tulipifera <35 [225]
wheatgrass plains grasslands Pascopyrum smithii <5-47+ [169,175,242]
northeastern spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35-200 [60]
southeastern spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35 to >200 [225]
black spruce P. mariana 35-200 [60]
pine-cypress forest Pinus-Cupressus spp. <35 to 200 [8]
pinyon-juniper Pinus-Juniperus spp. <35 [169]
Mexican pinyon P. cembroides 20-70 [152,211]
shortleaf pine P. echinata 2-15
shortleaf pine-oak P. echinata-Quercus spp. <10 [225]
Colorado pinyon P. edulis 10-400+ [72,79,114,169]
slash pine P. elliottii 3-8
slash pine-hardwood P. elliottii-variable <35 [225]
longleaf-slash pine P. palustris-P. elliottii 1-4 [158,225]
longleaf pine-scrub oak P. palustris-Quercus spp. 6-10 [225]
Pacific ponderosa pine* P. ponderosa var. ponderosa 1-47 [8]
interior ponderosa pine* P. ponderosa var. scopulorum 2-30 [8,13,126]
pitch pine P. rigida 6-25 [37,95]
loblolly pine P. taeda 3-8
loblolly-shortleaf pine P. taeda-P. echinata 10 to <35 [225]
galleta-threeawn shrubsteppe Pleuraphis jamesii-Aristida purpurea <35 to <100
eastern cottonwood Populus deltoides <35 to 200 [169]
aspen-birch P. tremuloides-Betula papyrifera 35-200 [60,225]
quaking aspen (west of the Great Plains) P. tremuloides 7-120 [8,83,146]
mesquite Prosopis glandulosa <35 to <100 [144,169]
mesquite-buffalo grass P. glandulosa-Buchloe dactyloides <35
Texas savanna P. glandulosa var. glandulosa <10 [169]
mountain grasslands Pseudoroegneria spicata 3-40 (x=10) [7,8]
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir* Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca 25-100 [8,8,10]
coastal Douglas-fir* P. menziesii var. menziesii 40-240 [8,154,184]
California mixed evergreen P. menziesii var. menziesii-Lithocarpus densiflorus-Arbutus menziesii <35
California oakwoods Quercus spp. <35 [8]
oak-hickory Quercus-Carya spp. <35 [225]
oak-juniper woodland (Southwest) Quercus-Juniperus spp. <35 to <200 [169]
northeastern oak-pine Quercus-Pinus spp. 10 to <35 [225]
oak-gum-cypress Quercus-Nyssa-spp.-Taxodium distichum 35 to >200 [158]
southeastern oak-pine Quercus-Pinus spp. <10 [225]
coast live oak Q. agrifolia 2-75 [82]
canyon live oak Q. chrysolepis <35 to 200
blue oak-foothills pine Q. douglasii-P. sabiniana <35
Oregon white oak Q. garryana <35 [8]
bear oak Q. ilicifolia <35 [225]
California black oak Q. kelloggii 5-30 [169]
bur oak Q. macrocarpa <10 [225]
oak savanna Q. macrocarpa/Andropogon gerardii-Schizachyrium scoparium 2-14 [169,225]
shinnery Q. mohriana <35 [169]
chestnut oak Q. prinus 3-8
post oak-blackjack oak Q. stellata-Q. marilandica <10
black oak Q. velutina <35 [225]
interior live oak Q. wislizenii <35 [8]
blackland prairie Schizachyrium scoparium-Nassella leucotricha <10 [225]
little bluestem-grama prairie S. scoparium-Bouteloua spp. <35 [169]
elm-ash-cottonwood Ulmus-Fraxinus-Populus spp. <35 to 200 [60,225]
*fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species review
  • 8. Arno, Stephen F. 2000. Fire in western forest ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 97-120. [36984]
  • 11. Arno, Stephen F.; Wilson, Andrew E. 1986. Dating past fires in curlleaf mountain-mahogany communities. Journal of Range Management. 39(3): 241-243. [350]
  • 195. Schultz, Brad W. 1987. Ecology of curlleaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius) in western and central Nevada: population structure and dynamics. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 111 p. Thesis. [7064]
  • 13. Baisan, Christopher H.; Swetnam, Thomas W. 1990. Fire history on a desert mountain range: Rincon Mountain Wilderness, Arizona, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 20: 1559-1569. [14986]
  • 10. Arno, Stephen F.; Scott, Joe H.; Hartwell, Michael G. 1995. Age-class structure of old growth ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir stands and its relationship to fire history. Res. Pap. INT-RP-481. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 25 p. [25928]
  • 1. Akinsoji, Aderopo. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio. 78: 151-155. [6944]
  • 7. Arno, Stephen F. 1980. Forest fire history in the Northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry. 78(8): 460-465. [11990]
  • 83. Gruell, G. E.; Loope, L. L. 1974. Relationships among aspen, fire, and ungulate browsing in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. In cooperation with: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Region. [3862]
  • 154. Morrison, Peter H.; Swanson, Frederick J. 1990. Fire history and pattern in a Cascade Range landscape. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-254. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 77 p. [13074]
  • 26. Bowns, James E.; West, Neil E. 1976. Blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.) on southwestern Utah rangelands. Research Report 27. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station. 27 p. [3831]
  • 31. Brooks, Matthew L.; Matchett, John R. 2003. Plant community patterns in unburned and burned blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.) shrublands in the Mojave Desert. Western North American Naturalist. 63(3): 282-298. [47672]
  • 38. Burkhardt, Wayne J.; Tisdale, E. W. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology. 57: 472-484. [565]
  • 100. Houston, Douglas B. 1973. Wildfires in northern Yellowstone National Park. Ecology. 54(5): 1111-1117. [5781]
  • 29. Brooks, M. L.; Matchett, J. R. 2006. Spatial and temporal patterns of wildfires in the Mojave Desert, 1980-2004. Journal of Arid Environments. 67(Supplement): 148-164. [65283]
  • 32. Brooks, Matthew L.; Pyke, David A. 2001. Invasive plants and fire in the deserts of North America. In: Galley, Krista E. M.; Wilson, Tyrone P., eds. Proceedings of the invasive species workshop: The role of fire in the control and spread of invasive species; Fire conference 2000: the 1st national congress on fire ecology, prevention, and management; 2000 November 27 - December 1; San Diego, CA. Misc. Publ. No. 11. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 1-14. [40491]
  • 33. Brooks, Matthew L.; United States Geological Survey. 2000. Competition between alien annual grasses and native annual plants in the Mojave Desert. The American Midland Naturalist. 144(1): 92-108. [61188]
  • 34. Brooks, Matthew Lamar. 1998. Ecology of a biological invasion: alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. Riverside, CA: University of California. 186 p. Dissertation. [37220]
  • 35. Brown, David E.; Minnich, Richard A. 1986. Fire and changes in creosote bush scrub of the western Sonoran Desert, California. The American Midland Naturalist. 116(2): 411-422. [537]
  • 37. Buchholz, Kenneth; Good, Ralph E. 1982. Density, age structure, biomass and net annual aboveground productivity of dwarfed Pinus rigida Moll. from the New Jersey Pine Barren Plains. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 109(1): 24-34. [8639]
  • 54. Davis, Frank W.; Hickson, Diana E.; Odion, Dennis C. 1988. Composition of maritime chaparral related to fire history and soil, Burton Mesa, Santa Barbara County, California. Madrono. 35(3): 169-195. [6162]
  • 60. Duchesne, Luc C.; Hawkes, Brad C. 2000. Fire in northern ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 35-51. [36982]
  • 66. Fahnestock, Jace T.; Larson, Diane L.; Plumb, Glenn E.; Detling, James K. 2003. Effects of ungulates and prairie dogs on seed banks and vegetation in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Plant Ecology. 167(2): 255-268. [60482]
  • 72. Floyd, M. Lisa; Romme, William H.; Hanna, David D. 2000. Fire history and vegetation pattern in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado, USA. Ecological Applications. 10(6): 1666-1680. [37590]
  • 79. Gottfried, Gerald J.; Swetnam, Thomas W.; Allen, Craig D.; Betancourt, Julio L.; Chung-MacCoubrey, Alice L. 1995. Pinyon-juniper woodlands. In: Finch, Deborah M.; Tainter, Joseph A., eds. Ecology, diversity, and sustainability of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-268. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 95-132. [26188]
  • 81. Green, Lisle R. 1981. Burning by prescription in chaparral. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-51. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 36 p. [19800]
  • 85. Guyette, Richard; McGinnes, E. A., Jr. 1982. Fire history of an Ozark glade in Missouri. Transactions, Missouri Academy of Science. 16: 85-93. [5170]
  • 89. Hart, Richard H.; Hart, James A. 1997. Rangelands of the Great Plains before European settlement. Rangelands. 19(1): 4-11. [27301]
  • 91. Hazlett, Donald L. 1992. Leaf area development of four plant communities in the Colorado steppe. The American Midland Naturalist. 127(2): 276-289. [18195]
  • 98. Hild, A. L.; Karl, M. G.; Haferkamp, M. R.; Heitschmidt, R. K. 2001. Drought and grazing. III: root dynamics and germinable seed bank. Journal of Range Management. 54(3): 292-298. [39478]
  • 103. Humphrey, Robert R. 1974. Fire in the deserts and desert grassland of North America. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 365-400. [14064]
  • 109. Juhren, Marcella; Went, F. W.; Phillips, Edwin. 1956. Ecology of desert plants. IV. Combined field and laboratory work on germination of annuals in the Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Ecology. 37(2): 318-330. [12975]
  • 115. Keeley, Jon E.; Zedler, Paul H. 1978. Reproduction of chaparral shrubs after fire: a comparison of sprouting and seeding strategies. The American Midland Naturalist. 99(1): 142-161. [4610]
  • 121. Knapp, Paul A. 1995. Intermountain West lightning-caused fires: climatic predictors of area burned. Journal of Range Management. 48(1): 85-91. [24426]
  • 126. Laven, R. D.; Omi, P. N.; Wyant, J. G.; Pinkerton, A. S. 1980. Interpretation of fire scar data from a ponderosa pine ecosystem in the central Rocky Mountains, Colorado. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., tech. coords. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 46-49. [7183]
  • 132. Lippert, Robert D.; Hopkins, Harold H. 1950. Study of viable seeds in various habitats in mixed prairie. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 53(3): 355-364. [1461]
  • 136. Malanson, George P.; O'Leary, John F. 1985. Effects of fire and habitat on post-fire regeneration in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: Ceanothus spinosus chaparral and Californian coastal sage scrub. Acta Oecologica. 6(20): 169-181. [6180]
  • 141. McCune, Bruce; Rosentreter, Roger. 1992. Texosporium sancti-jacobi, a rare western North American lichen. Bryologist. 95(3): 329-333. [18432]
  • 144. McPherson, Guy R. 1995. The role of fire in the desert grasslands. In: McClaran, Mitchel P.; Van Devender, Thomas R., eds. The desert grassland. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press: 130-151. [26576]
  • 146. Meinecke, E. P. 1929. Quaking aspen: A study in applied forest pathology. Tech. Bull. No. 155. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 34 p. [26669]
  • 148. Miller, Richard F.; Rose, Jeffery A. 1995. Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon. The Great Basin Naturalist. 55(1): 37-45. [25666]
  • 149. Minnich, Richard A. 1983. Fire mosaics in southern California and northern Baja California. Science. 219: 1287-1294. [4631]
  • 152. Moir, William H. 1982. A fire history of the High Chisos, Big Bend National Park, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 27(1): 87-98. [5916]
  • 158. Myers, Ronald L. 2000. Fire in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 161-173. [36985]
  • 162. O'Leary, John F.; Minnich, Richard A. 1981. Postfire recovery of creosote bush scrub vegetation in the western Colorado Desert. Madrono. 28(2): 61-66. [3973]
  • 169. Paysen, Timothy E.; Ansley, R. James; Brown, James K.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Haase, Sally M.; Harrington, Michael G.; Narog, Marcia G.; Sackett, Stephen S.; Wilson, Ruth C. 2000. Fire in western shrubland, woodland, and grassland ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-volume 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 121-159. [36978]
  • 173. Peters, Erin F.; Bunting, Stephen C. 1994. Fire conditions pre- and postoccurrence of annual grasses on the Snake River Plain. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., comps. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 31-36. [24249]
  • 174. Potvin, M. A.; Harrison, A. T. 1984. Vegetation and litter changes of a Nebraska Sandhills prairie protected from grazing. Journal of Range Management. 37(1): 55-58. [25456]
  • 175. Quinnild, Clayton L.; Cosby, Hugh E. 1958. Relicts of climax vegetation on two mesas in western North Dakota. Ecology. 39(1): 29-32. [1925]
  • 182. Rickard, W. H. 1985. Biomass and shoot production in an undisturbed sagebrush-bunchgrass community. Northwest Science. 59(2): 126-133. [1981]
  • 184. Ripple, William J. 1994. Historic spatial patterns of old forests in western Oregon. Journal of Forestry. 92(11): 45-49. [33881]
  • 185. Rowe, J. S. 1969. Lightning fires in Saskatchewan grassland. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 83: 317-324. [6266]
  • 186. Rundel, Philip W.; Gibson, Arthur C. 1996. Ecological communities and processes in a Mojave Desert ecosystem: Rock Valley, Nevada. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 369 p. [61799]
  • 192. Sapsis, David B. 1990. Ecological effects of spring and fall prescribed burning on basin big sagebrush/Idaho fescue--bluebunch wheatgrass communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 105 p. Thesis. [16579]
  • 205. Stromberg, Mark R.; Kephart, Paul; Yadon, Vern. 2001. Composition, invasibility, and diversity in coastal California grasslands. Madrono. 48(4): 236-252. [41371]
  • 211. Swetnam, Thomas W.; Baisan, Christopher H.; Caprio, Anthony C.; Brown, Peter M. 1992. Fire history in a Mexican oak-pine woodland and adjacent montane conifer gallery forest in southeastern Arizona. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane A.; Hernandez C., Victor Manuel; Ortega-Rubio, Alfred; Hamre, R. H., tech. coords. Ecology and management of oak and associated woodlands: perspectives in the southwestern United States and northern Mexico: Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-218. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 165-173. [19759]
  • 212. Thatcher, Albert P. 1975. The amount of blackbrush in the natural plant community is largely controlled by edaphic conditions. In: Stutz, Howard C., ed. Wildland shrubs: Proceedings--symposium and workshop; 1975 November 5-7; Provo, Utah. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University: 155-156. [2315]
  • 220. Van Devender, Thomas R.; Felger, Richard S.; Burquez M., Alberto. 1997. Exotic plants in the Sonoran Desert region, Arizona and Sonora. In: Kelly, M.; Wagner, E.; Warner, P., eds. Proceedings, California Exotic Pest Plant Council symposium; 1997 October 2-4; Concord, CA. Volume 3. Berkeley, CA: California Exotic Pest Plant Council: 10-15. [44103]
  • 222. Vincent, Dwain W. 1992. The sagebrush/grasslands of the upper Rio Puerco area, New Mexico. Rangelands. 14(5): 268-271. [19698]
  • 223. Vogl, Richard J. 1976. An introduction to the plant communities of the Santa Ana and San Jacinto Mountains. In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium proceedings: plant communities of southern California; 1974 May 4; Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No. 2. Berkeley, CA: California Native Plant Society: 77-98. [4230]
  • 225. Wade, Dale D.; Brock, Brent L.; Brose, Patrick H.; Grace, James B.; Hoch, Greg A.; Patterson, William A., III. 2000. Fire in eastern ecosystems. In: Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 53-96. [36983]
  • 226. Walters, Gretchen M. 2003. Winter ephemeral vegetation and seed banks of four north-facing slopes in the Sonoran Desert. Madrono. 50(1): 45-52. [44810]
  • 236. Whisenant, Steven G. 1990. Changing fire frequencies on Idaho's Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., comps. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 4-10. [12729]
  • 238. White, Thomas C.; Stephenson, John; Sproul, Fred. 1995. Postburn monitoring of the Eagle Fire: first year recovery on sites seeded with buckwheat and coastal sage. In: Keeley, Jon F.; Scott, Tom, eds. Brushfires in California: ecology and resource management: Proceedings; 1994 May 6-7; Irvine, CA. Fairfield, WA: International Association of Wildland Fire: 185-187. [43340]
  • 242. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
  • 243. Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F.; Britton, Carlton M. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state-of-the-art review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-58. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [2625]
  • 244. Wright, John C.; Wright, Elnora A. 1948. Grassland types of south central Montana. Ecology. 29(4): 449-460. [2627]
  • 249. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. Journal of Range Management. 34(6): 501-505. [2659]
  • 82. Greenlee, Jason M.; Langenheim, Jean H. 1990. Historic FIRE REGIMES and their relation to vegetation patterns in the Monterey Bay area of California. The American Midland Naturalist. 124(2): 239-253. [15144]
  • 114. Keeley, Jon E. 1981. Reproductive cycles and FIRE REGIMES. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; Lotan, J. E.; Reiners, W. A., tech. coords. FIRE REGIMES and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 231-277. [4395]
  • 95. Hendrickson, William H. 1972. Perspective on fire and ecosystems in the United States. In: Fire in the environment: Symposium proceedings; 1972 May 1-5; Denver, CO. FS-276. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 29-33. In cooperation with: Fire Services of Canada, Mexico, and the United States; Members of the Fire Management Study Group; North American Forestry Commission; FAO. [17276]
  • 96. Heyerdahl, Emily K.; Berry, Dawn; Agee, James K. 1994. Fire history database of the western United States. Final report. Interagency agreement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency DW12934530; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service PNW-93-0300; University of Washington 61-2239. Seattle, WA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station; University of Washington, College of Forest Resources. 28 p. [+ appendices]. Unpublished report on file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [27979]
  • 210. Sweeney, James R. 1956. Responses of vegetation to fire: A study of the herbaceous vegetation following chaparral fires. University of California Publications in Botany. [Berkeley, CA: University of California Press]. 28(4): 143-250. [3776]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Successional Status

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: cover, density, eruption, frequency, presence, relict, succession

Sixweeks grass is a ruderal species favoring open sites and bare ground [93,112,113,145,165]. It is shade intolerant [139], and its presence is documented on disturbed sites across its distribution [197,198,221]. It was present in black spruce (Picea mariana) plantation plots in New Brunswick, but did not occur in undisturbed, naturally regenerated forest plots [221]. Slender sixweeks grass is noted in early duneland succession on Fire Island, New York [59] and on innundated streambanks of Colorado [74]. Beetle [16] lists it as an "invader" on shortgrass prairie near Laramie, Wyoming. A vegetation survey 3 weeks after the May 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens in Washington showed no effect of ashfall on sixweeks grass, which was setting seed even in areas where compacted ash was >1 inch (3 cm) thick [135].

Sixweeks grass occurs on sites disturbed by fossorial rodents [66]. In eastern Colorado it was more common in black-tailed prairie dog towns than on undisturbed blue grama-buffalo grass prairie [25]. Carlson and Crist [40] found sixweeks grass was most common on northern pocket gopher mounds and heavily grazed (≥60% utilization) cattle pastures on the Central Plains Experimental Range of north-central Colorado, and least common on lightly grazed pastures.

Because it is an annual, sixweeks grass cover may change from year to year without a major change in its successional status, particularly on open sites where light and space are not limiting. For example, in a Colorado pinyon (Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper community in northeastern Utah, Austin [12] noted little change in overall plant community composition and species frequency after 10-year remeasurements. Sixweeks grass showed 4% frequency in 1974 and 7% frequency in 1984 [12].

Fire: Sixweeks grass probably held an early seral position in fire-prone ecosystems prior to European settlement [173]. It is still common on burns in early postfire succession [54], but may occur in nearly equal numbers on similar unburned sites that are open. It was, for example, noted on both burned and adjacent unburned sites in a threetip sagebrush-mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita-A. tridentata var. vaseyana) community near Pocatello, Idaho [1]. Sixweeks grass was seeded in after a 1958 broadcast burn on a clearcut in southwestern North Carolina. By 1995, the site had succeeded to black locust-yellow-poplar (Robinia pseudoacacia-Liriodendron tulipifera) forest. Sixweeks grass frequency and biomass declined as the canopy closed [62]. See Fire Ecology for information on FIRE REGIMES of plant communities supporting sixweeks grass and Fire Effects for more information about sixweeks grass response to fire

Old fields: Sixweeks grass is a common component of old-field succession in palouse and shortgrass prairies [47,52]. In old-field succession on a bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata)-Sandberg bluegrass community near Clarkston, Washington, sixweeks grass showed trace coverage and frequency on young (1-12 years since tilling) and old fields (39-52 years since tilling), and 2% coverage and 82% frequency on untilled sites [52]. It was a component of old fields that had been plowed 53 years before a vegetation survey on the Pawnee National Grasslands and the Central Plains Experimental Range of Colorado. The fields were succeeding to blue grama-buffalo grass communities [44]. In an old-field study in the Cross Timbers region of Texas, sixweeks grass formed 17% cover 1 year after cultivation [61]. Sixweeks grass may be invasive on tallgrass prairies where overgrazing and/or drought has reduced cover of tallgrass species [229].

Abiotic influences: Sixweeks grass was important in drought-induced succession from 1934 to 1940. During the Great Drought, Weaver and Albertson [3] wrote that "the density and extent of (sixweeks grass) stands was astonishing. Bunches consisting of 20 to 30 stems growing out of the dead crowns of little bluestems were found regularly. Two hundred such aggregations of stems in a single square meter were common." After the drought ended, sixweeks grass became less important except on disturbed sites and small openings. The authors placed sixweeks grass in the "2nd weed stage" of tallgrass prairie succession: it established after ruderal weeds such as Russian-thistle (Salsola kali) and narrowleaf goosefoot (Chenopodium leptophyllum) but before native perennial grasses [3].

On the Central Plains Experimental Range, sixweeks grass density and cover were significantly (p<0.05) greater on fine-textured soils compared to coarse-textured soils. Study sites were denuded by hand-pulling aboveground and sieving plant organs from soil to a depth of 4 inches (10 cm), then allowed to recolonize without further treatment [43].

Late succession: Sixweeks grass occurs in late-successional communities with open ground, such as pinyon-juniper; small openings within closed-canopy communities; and in small disturbances in mostly undisturbed grassland [145]. In a study on northern Wyoming's shortgrass prairie, sixweeks grass occurred in small disturbed areas within lands that had been ungrazed for 40 or more years [191]. Sixweeks grass was found on both undisturbed shortgrass prairie and reclaimed stripmine sites in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming [4,5]. In another Wyoming shortgrass prairie study, sixweeks grass occurred on ungrazed sites and sites experiencing heavy domestic sheep use. The authors suggested that plentiful fall precipitation when sixweeks grass was establishing was more important than level of grazing disturbance in determining sixweeks grass density [125]. Lippert and Hopkins [132] found sixweeks grass on "climax" buffalo grass-blue grama communities of Kansas. In southern Utah and northern Arizona, sixweeks grass occurred on an ungrazed, relict mesa of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and on heavily grazed sites on the nearby Navajo Reservation [107]. It was also present on a remote ungrazed, relict site in the Grand Canyon that had not burned since 1889 [194]. On desert grassland of Canyonlands National Park, Utah, sixweeks grass showed 1% or less cover on a site that had been lightly grazed for many years prior to the area being made a Park (which was 10 years prior to the study), and 1% cover on an ungrazed relict area [120]. In chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) chaparral of California, sixweeks grass occurred on undisturbed sites beneath chamise and in experimental clearings [71].

  • 1. Akinsoji, Aderopo. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio. 78: 151-155. [6944]
  • 12. Austin, Dennis D. 1987. Plant community changes within a mature pinyon-juniper woodland. The Great Basin Naturalist. 47(1): 96-99. [362]
  • 113. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 393-479. [2462]
  • 4. Allen, Edith Bach; Allen, Michael F. 1980. Natural re-establishment of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae following stripmine reclamation in Wyoming. Journal of Applied Ecology. 17(1): 139-147. [44048]
  • 5. Allen, Edith Bach; Knight, Dennis H. 1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush-grassland, Wyoming. The Southwestern Naturalist. 29(4): 407-421. [44452]
  • 16. Beetle, Alan A. 1952. A relic area on the Wyoming shortgrass plains. Journal of Range Management. 5: 141-143. [48300]
  • 25. Bonham, Charles D.; Lerwick, Alton. 1976. Vegetation changes induced by prairie dogs on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(3): 221-225. [3994]
  • 40. Carlson, Joanne M.; Crist, Thomas O. 1999. Plant responses to pocket-gopher disturbances across pastures and topography. Journal of Range Management. 52(6): 637-645. [35010]
  • 43. Coffin, D. P.; Lauenroth, W. K. 1989. Small scale disturbances and successional dynamics in a shortgrass plant community: interactions of disturbance characteristics. Phytologia. 67(3): 258-286. [34887]
  • 44. Coffin, Debra P.; Lauenroth, William K.; Burke, Ingrid C. 1996. Recovery of vegetation in a semiarid grassland 53 years after disturbance. Ecological Applications. 6(2): 538-555. [28426]
  • 47. Costello, David F. 1944. Natural revegetation of abandoned plowed land in the mixed prairie association of northeastern Colorado. Ecology. 25(3): 312-326. [25703]
  • 52. Daubenmire, Rexford. 1975. Plant succession on abandoned fields, and fire influences, in a steppe area in southeastern Washington. Northwest Science. 49(1): 36-48. [745]
  • 54. Davis, Frank W.; Hickson, Diana E.; Odion, Dennis C. 1988. Composition of maritime chaparral related to fire history and soil, Burton Mesa, Santa Barbara County, California. Madrono. 35(3): 169-195. [6162]
  • 59. Dowhan, Joseph J.; Rozsa, Ron. 1989. Flora of Fire Island, Suffolk County, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 116(3): 265-282. [22041]
  • 61. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs. 18(3): 326-376. [3683]
  • 62. Elliott, Katherine J.; Boring, Lindsay R.; Swank, Wayne T. 1998. Changes in vegetation structure and diversity after grass-to-forest succession in a southern Appalachian watershed. The American Midland Naturalist. 140(2): 219-232. [30080]
  • 66. Fahnestock, Jace T.; Larson, Diane L.; Plumb, Glenn E.; Detling, James K. 2003. Effects of ungulates and prairie dogs on seed banks and vegetation in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Plant Ecology. 167(2): 255-268. [60482]
  • 71. Flores, Joel; Jurado, Enrique. 2003. Are nurse-protege interactions more common among plants from arid environments? Journal of Vegetation Science. 14: 911-916. [56160]
  • 74. Friedman, Jonathan M.; Osterkamp, W. R.; Lewis, William M., Jr. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology. 77(7): 2167-2181. [55984]
  • 93. Heckman, Charles W. 1999. The encroachment of exotic herbaceous plants into the Olympic National Forest. Northwest Science. 73(4): 264-276. [36188]
  • 107. Jeffries, Douglas L.; Klopatek, Jeffrey M. 1987. Effects of grazing on the vegetation of the blackbrush association. Journal of Range Management. 40(5): 390-392. [248]
  • 120. Kleiner, Edgar F. 1983. Successional trends in an ungrazed, arid grassland over a decade. Journal of Range Management. 36(1): 114-118. [21578]
  • 125. Lang, Robert L.; Barnes, Oscar K.; Rauzi, Frank. 1956. Shortgrass range: grazing effects on vegetation and on sheep gains. Bull. 343. Laramie, WY: Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station. 32 p. [12188]
  • 132. Lippert, Robert D.; Hopkins, Harold H. 1950. Study of viable seeds in various habitats in mixed prairie. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 53(3): 355-364. [1461]
  • 135. Mack, Richard N. 1981. Initial effects of ashfall from Mount St. Helens on vegetation in eastern Washington and adjacent Idaho. Science. 213: 537-539. [7898]
  • 139. McCall, Robin K.; Gibson, David J. 1999. The regeneration potential of a threatened southern Illinois shale barren. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 126(3): 226-233. [48333]
  • 145. McPherson, James K.; Muller, Cornelius H. 1969. Allelopathic effects of Adenostoma fasciculatum, "chamise", in the California chaparral. Ecological Monographs. 39(2): 177-198. [13559]
  • 165. Ohlenbusch, Paul D.; Hodges, Elizabeth P.; Pope, Susan. 1983. Range grasses of Kansas. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Cooperative Extension Service. 23 p. [5316]
  • 173. Peters, Erin F.; Bunting, Stephen C. 1994. Fire conditions pre- and postoccurrence of annual grasses on the Snake River Plain. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., comps. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 31-36. [24249]
  • 191. Samuel, Marilyn J.; Hart, Richard H. 1994. Sixty-one years of secondary succession on rangelands of the Wyoming high plains. Journal of Range Management. 47: 184-191. [23026]
  • 194. Schmutz, Ervin M.; Michaels, Charles C.; Judd, B. Ira. 1967. Boysag Point: a relict area on the North Rim of Grand Canyon in Arizona. Journal of Range Management. 20: 363-369. [2083]
  • 197. Shantz, H. L. 1917. Plant succession on abandoned roads in eastern Colorado. The Journal of Ecology. 5(1): 19-42. [60503]
  • 198. Shaw, R. B.; Diersing, V. E. 1990. Tracked vehicle impacts on vegetation at the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado. Journal of Environmental Quality. 19: 234-243. [24484]
  • 221. Veinotte, Cam; Freedman, Bill; Maass, Wolfgang; Kirstein, Friederike. 2003. Comparison of the ground vegetation in spruce plantations and natural forest in the Greater Fundy ecosystem. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 117(4): 531-540. [50507]
  • 229. Weaver, J. E.; Mueller, I. M. 1942. Role of seedlings in recovery of midwestern ranges from drought. Ecology. 23: 275-294. [5599]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Regeneration Processes

More info for the terms: density, frequency, litter, relict, root crown

Because it is an annual, sixweeks grass regenerates only from seed [1,54,66,98,109,132,226].

Breeding system/pollination: The Vulpia genus is cleistogamous [133].

Seed production: Under favorable conditions, sixweeks grass produces "numerous" small seeds. In the greenhouse, sixweeks grass showed higher rates of seed production than either red brome or pinnate tansymustard (Descurainia pinnata), even though its resource uptake (water and nitrogen) was less. Seed yield can vary greatly across years. A North Dakota study found 283 sixweeks grass seedlings/kg emerged from hay harvested in 1978, while no sixweeks grass seedlings emerging from hay harvested in 1980 and 1981 [183]. Declines ― or total failures ― in the seed crop may occur in drought years; however, sixweeks grass seed production rebounds quickly when climate is favorable [55]. Drought does not necessarily mean seed crop failure. The Great Drought of 1939 to 1941 was the most severe Great Plains drought of the 20th century. During the end of the Great Drought, when associated perennial grasses were mostly dead, sixweeks grass produced "abundant" seed crops in eastern Kansas and Nebraska [3].

Seed dispersal: Seed is dispersed primarily by wind [3] and sometimes on waterways [74]. The seed awns provide a mechanism for possible animal dispersal, although animal dispersal is not documented. Sixweeks grass may also be dispersed as a contaminant in hay. In North Dakota an equal number of sixweeks grass seedlings (142 seedlings/kg hay) emerged from year-old, unstored hay and year-old hay that was stored in an unheated shed [183].

Seed banking: As an annual with dormant seeds, sixweeks grass depends entirely on its seed bank for regeneration [1,54,66,98,109,132,226]. Most seeds remain dormant until soil moisture levels are adequate for germination [109]. Even in years of high germination, some viable sixweeks grass seeds remain ungerminated in the seed bank. This reproductive strategy is a hedge against high seedling mortality and poor seed set in any given year [55,168]. For example, sod slabs (20 ft²), removed from mixed-grass prairie and kept in watered flats in a greenhouse, supported 344 sixweeks grass seedlings over a 4-year study period (1929-1932). On 35-cm² quadrats on open prairie during the same period, mean sixweeks grass seedling emergence was "nearly a hundred" in 1929 and 7 in 1931, with no sixweeks grass seedlings present in either 1930 or 1932 [23]. In a blue grama-buffalo grass (Bouteloua gracilis-Buchloe dactyloides) community on the Central Plains Experimental Range of Colorado, sixweeks grass seed had a "relatively homogeneous spatial distribution." Seeds were more numerous on coarse soils, and seed density varied across sample months and years. Seed bank density was [43]:

Date Site Density
(sixweeks grass seedlings/m²)
July 1984 coarse-textured 181
fine-textured 283
Sept. 1984 coarse-textured 2,143
fine-textured 1,147
Nov. 1984 coarse-textured 8
fine-textured 0
March 1985 coarse-textured 38
fine-textured 8
May 1985 coarse-textured 1,140
fine-textured 400
July 1985 coarse-textured 1,653
fine-textured 596
Sept. 1985 coarse-textured 91
fine-textured 45
Nov. 1985 coarse-textured 242
fine-textured 98

Walters [226] found sixweeks grass was "notably dominant" in the seed bank of a creosotebush-yellow paloverde-white bursage (Cercidium microphyllum-Ambrosia dumosa) community near Phoenix, Arizona, but not in aboveground vegetation. Near Reno, Nevada, more viable seeds were found in the litter layer of a basin big sagebrush/cheatgrass (Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata/Bromus tectorum) community than in soil. Density (viable sixweeks grass seeds/m²) was [248]:

  Sept. Nov.
litter 4,350 900
soil (0-2.5 cm depth) 1,200 300

Grazing may affect seed concentration either negatively or positively. In a seed bank inventory of Colorado pinyon-juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus spp.) and blackbrush/Indian ricegrass (Coleogyne ramosissima/Achnatherum hymenoides) communities of southern Utah and northern Arizona, sixweeks grass seed was much more prevalent on ungrazed relict plots (225 seeds/m²) than on heavily, moderately, and lightly grazed plots (125, 110, and 90 seeds/m², respectively) [14]. However, on mixed- and tallgrass prairies where sixweeks grass occurred with highly palatable perennial grasses, sixweeks grass density was greater on sites with heavy and moderate cattle grazing compared to lightly grazed sites [105].

Germination requires warm temperatures or mechanical scarification of the seed coat to break dormancy [14,55]. Seed dormancy ensures sixweeks grass population survival across unfavorable growing seasons [45]. As an annual, sixweeks grass is sensitive to climate fluctuations and only germinates in years when sufficient moisture is available in upper soil layers [36,101,105]. For example, a Kansas vegetation survey was conducted during (1939 and 1940) and after (1941) the Great Drought. Percentages of available soil moisture in the top 6 inches (20 cm) of soil during sixweeks grass's growing seasons were [36]:

1939 1940 1941
April May June April May June April May June
6.2 0.5 2.9 7.3 4.0 5.3 19.2 24.0 16.9

In this study, sixweeks grass was present in blue grama-buffalo grass-sand dropseed communities. Sixweeks grass density (plants/m²) and mean seed yield (lbs/acre) during that time were [36]:

1930 1940 1941
Density Yield Density Yield Density Yield
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 9.0

Even though sixweeks grass requires soil moisture during the germination and establishment period, it is highly drought tolerant. Germination and establishment may occur in dry years if sparse rains are favorably timed [3,151,227]. Weaver and Albertson [3] found that sixweeks grass was "abundant" during the Great Drought, when perennial grasses were dying out. Hylton and Bement [105] compared 20-year rates of sixweeks grass establishment on the Central Plains Experimental Range with 20-year weather data (1941-1960) and greenhouse studies. They found best germination (93%-96%) in the greenhouse occurred with constant 68 °F (20 °C) temperature. Alternating day/night temperatures of 59/77 °F (15/25 °C), which closely approximated fall field conditions, produced good germination rates (66%-79%). Sixweeks grass field densities were highest in 1941 and 2nd-highest in 1958. Weather data from the same time period show that temperature and moisture conditions in late August and early September of 1940 and 1957 closely paralleled those producing most favorable germination in the greenhouse [105].

In a greenhouse experiment, DeFalco and others [55] found thinning established seedlings promoted new sixweeks grass germinants.

Seedling establishment: Sixweeks grass population numbers can vary greatly from year to year [75,125,160]. Germination and seedling establishment are strongly tied to climate fluctuation, with best establishment occurring in relatively wet years that have plentiful precipitation during germination and growth. In a garden study, Lippert and Hopkins [132] reported 35 sixweeks grass seedlings/m² in soil samples collected from a buffalo grass-blue grama community in Kansas. Study time was 73 days, and the garden site was watered [132]. In a creosotebush-white bursage study in Nye County, Nevada, where sixweeks grass is a winter annual, mean seedling emergence of sixweeks grass varied with precipitation [24]:

 

Mean precipitation (mm)

 
Year Sept.-Oct. Nov.-Dec. Jan.-Feb. Total (Sept.-Feb.) Density*
1971 0 37 8 45 2.960
1972 0 41 0 41 0.530
1973 40 29 70 141 5.005
1973 3 24 35 63 3.890
1975 25 35 5 63 10.108
1976 5 4 98 108 7.652
*plants/m²

A 1992 Montana study showed ample seeds and good seedling establishment, but poor crop maturation. The researchers estimated the seed:plant ratio of sixweeks grass on the Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory by counting seeds in soil samples and measuring seedling density and mature plant biomass. Seed, seedling, and mature (standing crop) measures of the sixweeks grass population ranged as follows [110]:

Date Seed density Seedling density (plants/m²) Standing crop mean,
1992 (g/m²)
March 1992 0-1,865 ---- 0-4
June 1992 ---- 0-1,090 ----

Nurse plants may facilitate sixweeks grass establishment in arid climates. Creosotebush is a common nurse plant for sixweeks grass and other annuals in the Mojave Desert (review by [71]).

Growth rate is rapid in dry years, but may be slow compared to most annuals if favorable weather extends the growing season. DeFalco and others [55] suggest sixweeks grass has adapted to low-nitrogen soils by slowing growth; thus, it has less demand for nitrogen compared to most annuals. Plant community structure and type may also affect seedling establishment and growth rates. In adjacent plant communities of the Mojave Desert of California, sixweeks grass establishment and growth varied as follows [26]:

  Joshua tree/blackbrush blackbrush Utah juniper (J. osteosperma)/
blackbrush
1969 1970 1971 1969 1970 1971 1969 1970 1971
density (plants/0.1 m²) 0.22 0.46 0.06 0.14 1.42 0.35 0 0 0.04
frequency (%) 10 14 4 9 23 10 0 0 4
height (x, cm) 7.3 3.0 4.5 2.2 3.1 5.7 0 0 3.0

Asexual regeneration: Because it is an annual, sixweeks grass does not sprout from the root crown after it produces seed. It dies. However, annual grasses may die back and sprout from the root crown when wet weather follows a short-term dry period during the growing season [104].

  • 24. Blinn, Dean W.; Habeck, James R. 1967. An analysis of morainal vegetation in the upper Blackfoot Valley, Montana. Northwest Science. 41(3): 126-140. [4008]
  • 14. Baskin, Carol C.; Baskin, Jerry M. 2001. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 666 p. [60775]
  • 1. Akinsoji, Aderopo. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio. 78: 151-155. [6944]
  • 26. Bowns, James E.; West, Neil E. 1976. Blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima Torr.) on southwestern Utah rangelands. Research Report 27. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station. 27 p. [3831]
  • 3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 393-479. [2462]
  • 23. Blake, Abigail Kincaid. 1935. Viability and germination of seeds and early life history of prairie plants. Ecological Monographs. 5(4): 405-460. [22086]
  • 36. Brown, H. Ray. 1943. Growth and seed yields of native prairie plants in various habitats of the mixed-prairie. Transactions, Kansas Academy of Science. 46: 87-99. [26146]
  • 43. Coffin, D. P.; Lauenroth, W. K. 1989. Small scale disturbances and successional dynamics in a shortgrass plant community: interactions of disturbance characteristics. Phytologia. 67(3): 258-286. [34887]
  • 45. Cohen, Dan. 1966. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 12: 119-129. [61187]
  • 54. Davis, Frank W.; Hickson, Diana E.; Odion, Dennis C. 1988. Composition of maritime chaparral related to fire history and soil, Burton Mesa, Santa Barbara County, California. Madrono. 35(3): 169-195. [6162]
  • 55. DeFalco, Lesley A.; Bryla, David R.; Smith-Longozo, Vickie; Nowak, Robert S. 2003. Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquistion and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species. American Journal of Botany. 90(7): 1045-1053. [45275]
  • 66. Fahnestock, Jace T.; Larson, Diane L.; Plumb, Glenn E.; Detling, James K. 2003. Effects of ungulates and prairie dogs on seed banks and vegetation in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Plant Ecology. 167(2): 255-268. [60482]
  • 71. Flores, Joel; Jurado, Enrique. 2003. Are nurse-protege interactions more common among plants from arid environments? Journal of Vegetation Science. 14: 911-916. [56160]
  • 74. Friedman, Jonathan M.; Osterkamp, W. R.; Lewis, William M., Jr. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology. 77(7): 2167-2181. [55984]
  • 75. Frolik, A. L.; Shepherd, W. O. 1940. Vegetative composition and grazing capacity of a typical area of Nebraska sandhill range land. Research Bulletin No. 117. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station. 39 p. [5417]
  • 98. Hild, A. L.; Karl, M. G.; Haferkamp, M. R.; Heitschmidt, R. K. 2001. Drought and grazing. III: root dynamics and germinable seed bank. Journal of Range Management. 54(3): 292-298. [39478]
  • 101. Houston, W. R.; Hyder, D. N. 1976. Controlling sixweeks fescue on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(2): 151-153. [3740]
  • 104. Hyder, D. N.; Bement, R. E. 1964. Sixweeks fescue as a deterrent to blue grama utilization. Journal of Range Management. 17: 261-264. [3415]
  • 105. Hylton, L. O., Jr.; Bement, R. E. 1961. Effects of environment on germination and occurrence of sixweeks fescue. Journal of Range Management. 14: 157-161. [5323]
  • 109. Juhren, Marcella; Went, F. W.; Phillips, Edwin. 1956. Ecology of desert plants. IV. Combined field and laboratory work on germination of annuals in the Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Ecology. 37(2): 318-330. [12975]
  • 110. Karl, Michael G.; Heitschmidt, R. K.; Haferkamp, Marshall R. 1999. Vegetation biomass dynamics and patterns of sexual reproduction in a northern mixed-grass prairie. The American Midland Naturalist. 141(2): 227-237. [48340]
  • 125. Lang, Robert L.; Barnes, Oscar K.; Rauzi, Frank. 1956. Shortgrass range: grazing effects on vegetation and on sheep gains. Bull. 343. Laramie, WY: Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station. 32 p. [12188]
  • 132. Lippert, Robert D.; Hopkins, Harold H. 1950. Study of viable seeds in various habitats in mixed prairie. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 53(3): 355-364. [1461]
  • 133. Lonard, Robert I.; Gould, Frank W. 1974. The North American species of Vulpia (Gramineae). Madrono. 22(5): 217-280. [3826]
  • 151. Moir, W. H.; Trlica, M. J. 1976. Plant communities and vegetation pattern as affected by various treatments in shortgrass prairies of northeastern Colorado. The Southwestern Naturalist. 21(3): 359-371. [2803]
  • 160. Nelson, James F.; Chew, Robert M. 1977. Factors affecting seed reserves in the soil of a Mojave Desert ecosystem, Rock Valley, Nye County, Nevada. American Midland Naturalist. 97(2): 300-320. [62415]
  • 168. Pake, Catherine E.; Venable, D. Lawrence. 1996. Seed banks in desert annuals: implications for persistence and coexistence in variable environments. Ecology. 77(5): 1427-1435. [27369]
  • 183. Ries, R. E.; Hofmann, L. 1983. Number of seedlings established from stored prairie hay. In: Brewer, Richard, ed. Proceedings, 8th North American prairie conference; 1982 August 1-4; Kalamazoo, MI. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Department of Biology: 3-4. [3112]
  • 226. Walters, Gretchen M. 2003. Winter ephemeral vegetation and seed banks of four north-facing slopes in the Sonoran Desert. Madrono. 50(1): 45-52. [44810]
  • 227. Weaver, J. E. 1968. Prairie plants and their environment: A fifty-year study in the Midwest. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 276 p. [17546]
  • 248. Young, James A.; Evans, Raymond A. 1975. Germinability of seed reserves in a big sagebrush community. Weed Science. 23(5): 358-364. [2654]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)

More info on this topic.

More info for the term: therophyte

RAUNKIAER [177] LIFE FORM:
Therophyte
  • 177. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Form

More info for the term: graminoid

Graminoid

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Phenology

More info on this topic.

More info for the terms: cool-season, cover, phenology

Sixweeks grass is a cool-season species that establishes in late fall or early spring, flowers in spring or early summer, then matures, sets seed, and dies by late spring or early summer, depending on geographic location [39,39,106,165,208,230]. It is a winter or spring annual in the deserts of the Southwest [33,55,109,138]. Growing season generally extends for several months in wet years, but may be 6 weeks or less in dry years [155,208]. Phenology of sixweeks grass across its distributional range is shown below.

Area Germination and seedling emergence Flowers Seeds disperse Plants die
Arizona ---- spring [113] ---- ----
 Sonoran Desert ---- April-June [155] ---- ----
California ---- April-June [156] ---- ----
     Mojave Desert fall-winter [15,109] April-June [155] ---- ----
Carolinas ---- April-June [176] ---- ----
Colorado Sept.-Nov. [104,157] mid-May-early June [56] early July-Aug.  [104,129,157] early fall [104,157]
Nebraska ---- June-July [203] ---- ----
Nevada ---- April-June [112] ---- ----
New Mexico ---- May-July [137] ---- ----
     Chihuahuan Desert Feb.-March March April [119] ----
North Dakota Sept.-Dec.; May-Aug. [106] ---- ---- ----
Texas ---- April-May [57] ---- ----
Cross Timbers January [61] ---- ---- ----
Great Plains March [193] April-June [80] ---- ----
Intermountain Region ---- May-June [49] ---- ----
Ozarks ---- ---- June [48] ----
Baja California ---- April-June [240] ---- ----

On blue grama-buffalo grass sites in Colorado, sixweeks grass cover declined as plants matured and died. It showed 1.4% and 5.6% cover in May (on black-tailed prairie dog town and undisturbed sites, respectively), 0.3% and 1.7% cover in June, and 0.1% cover (both sites) in August and September [25].
  • 113. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 15. Beatley, Janice C. 1969. Biomass of desert winter annual plant populations in southern Nevada. Oikos. 20: 261-273. [62340]
  • 25. Bonham, Charles D.; Lerwick, Alton. 1976. Vegetation changes induced by prairie dogs on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(3): 221-225. [3994]
  • 33. Brooks, Matthew L.; United States Geological Survey. 2000. Competition between alien annual grasses and native annual plants in the Mojave Desert. The American Midland Naturalist. 144(1): 92-108. [61188]
  • 39. Burzlaff, Donald F. 1962. A soil and vegetation inventory and analysis of three Nebraska Sandhills range sites. Research Bulletin 206. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. 33 p. [21600]
  • 48. Crawford, Hewlette S.; Kucera, Clair L.; Ehrenreich, John H. 1969. Ozark range and wildlife plants. Agric. Handb. 356. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 236 p. [18602]
  • 49. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1977. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 6: The Monocotyledons. New York: Columbia University Press. 584 p. [719]
  • 55. DeFalco, Lesley A.; Bryla, David R.; Smith-Longozo, Vickie; Nowak, Robert S. 2003. Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquistion and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species. American Journal of Botany. 90(7): 1045-1053. [45275]
  • 56. Dickinson, C. E.; Dodd, Jerrold L. 1976. Phenological pattern in the shortgrass prairie. The American Midland Naturalist. 96(2): 367-378. [799]
  • 57. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 61. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs. 18(3): 326-376. [3683]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 104. Hyder, D. N.; Bement, R. E. 1964. Sixweeks fescue as a deterrent to blue grama utilization. Journal of Range Management. 17: 261-264. [3415]
  • 106. Iverson, Louis R.; Wali, Mohan K. 1982. Buried, viable seeds and their relation to revegetation after surface mining. Journal of Range Management. 35(5): 648-652. [23855]
  • 109. Juhren, Marcella; Went, F. W.; Phillips, Edwin. 1956. Ecology of desert plants. IV. Combined field and laboratory work on germination of annuals in the Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Ecology. 37(2): 318-330. [12975]
  • 119. Kemp, Paul R. 1983. Phenological patterns of Chihuahuan Desert plants in relation to the timing of water availability. Journal of Ecology. 71: 427-436. [5054]
  • 129. Liang, Y. M.; Hazlett, D. L.; Lauenroth, W. K. 1989. Biomass dynamics and water use efficiencies of five plant communities in the shortgrass steppe. Oecologia. 80(2): 148-153. [43066]
  • 137. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 138. Mauz, Kathryn. 1999. Flora of the Sawtooth Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona. Desert Plants. 15(2): 3-27. [38731]
  • 155. Mulroy, Thomas W.; Rundel, Philip W. 1977. Annual plants: adaptations to desert environments. BioScience. 27(2): 109-114. [12919]
  • 156. Munz, Philip A.; Keck, David D. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 157. Myers, Gary T.; Vaughan, Terry A. 1964. Food habits of the plains pocket gopher in eastern Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy. 45(4): 588-598. [55048]
  • 165. Ohlenbusch, Paul D.; Hodges, Elizabeth P.; Pope, Susan. 1983. Range grasses of Kansas. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Cooperative Extension Service. 23 p. [5316]
  • 176. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 193. Savage, D. A.; Heller V. G. 1947. Nutritional qualities of range forage plants in relation to grazing with beef cattle on the Southern Plains Experimental Range. Tech. Bull. No. 943. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 61 p. [5680]
  • 203. Steiger, T. L. 1930. Structure of prairie vegetation. Ecology. 11(1): 170-217. [3777]
  • 208. Stubbendieck, James; Hatch, Stephan L.; Butterfield, Charles H. 1992. North American range plants. 4th ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 493 p. [25162]
  • 230. Weber, William A.; Wittmann, Ronald C. 1996. Colorado flora: eastern slope. 2nd ed. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado. 524 p. [27572]
  • 240. Wiggins, Ira L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1025 p. [21993]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Vulpia octoflora

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 1
Specimens with Barcodes: 4
Species With Barcodes: 1
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: NNR - Unranked

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: NNR - Unranked

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2013

Assessor/s
Thacker, H.

Reviewer/s
Scott, J.A.

Contributor/s

Justification
Vulpia octoflora has been assessed as Least Concern due to its wide range including several continents and ecoregions. It has also been listed as weedy in the Global Compendium of Weeds and is conserved in protected areas with no direct threats against this species known. This species has also been introduced into other countries and has thrived there. The aforementioned factors all contribute to the rating of Least Concern.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Sixweeks grass is endangered in Vermont. Slender sixweeks grass is endangered in New Hampshire [216].
  • 216. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2007. PLANTS Database, [Online]. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/ [2007, February 22]. [34262]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
The population size for this species is not known, however it can be inferred that this species is weedy due to its listing in the Global Compendium of Weeds.

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Major Threats
There are no known threats to this species.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
This species is conserved in several protected areas and seed has been collected and banked as part of the Millennium Seed Bank project.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Management considerations

More info for the terms: cover, shrub

Invasives:
Red brome, cheatgrass and other exotic annuals may outcompete and displace
sixweeks grass and other native annuals on some sites [15,130,159,189]. Previously common in the Mojave
Desert, sixweeks grass became uncommon after invasion of the nonnative annual
grasses red brome, Arabian schismus (Schismus arabicus), and common
Mediterranean grass [30]. In a big sagebrush steppe
community in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming, Allen and Knight [5] found that
sixweeks grass had shallow roots compared to associated annual
herbs, so it was unable to extract water from deep soil layers. Nonnative
tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimum), Russian-thistle, and red brome, and native common pepperweed
(Lepidium densiflorum) showed greatest maximum root depths; sixweeks
grass showed least maximum root depth of 5 nonnative and 2 native herbs [5]. DeFalco and
others [55] suggest that sixweeks grass is best able to compete with red brome
after extended drought, because red brome's lack of seed dormancy tends to deplete its soil seed bank (see Seed banking). Desert sites where sixweeks grass may
compete with or even outcompete red brome include hummocks and nitrogen-poor soils [33].
Rangeland:
Sixweeks grass is not invasive on well-managed rangelands. Stubbendieck and others [207]
stated that it is "usually not a serious weed."
Since it is relatively unpalatable, sixweeks grass is generally favored by
moderate to heavy grazing [105,107,178,215]. Valone and
Kelt [219] found significantly (p=0.05) more sixweeks grass on ungrazed plots than on
cattle-grazed plots in an acacia (Acacia spp.)-dominated desert shrub
community of southeastern Arizona. Sixweeks grass increased after long-term summer cattle grazing
(0.2 AUM)
on the Crescent Lake National Wildlife Refuge,
located in Nebraska sandhills prairie [28]. Even short-term intensive grazing
may increase sixweeks grass cover [231], and moderate to dense sixweeks grass
cover is sometimes used as an indicator of poor or declining rangeland
conditions [143,250]. However, total sixweeks grass coverage may be slight
even on overgrazed rangelands. Dyksterhuis [61] reported
2.5% to 3.0% sixweeks grass coverage on old fields in the Cross Timbers region
of Texas and Oklahoma. The old fields were
subjected to year-round, unrestricted cattle grazing. Sixweeks grass was not
present on rangelands in good to excellent condition, had 1% cover on
fair-condition sites, and 6% cover on poor-condition rangelands [61].
Fertilizer:
Nitrogen application on plains grasslands may increase coverage of sixweeks grass and other annual herbs
at the expense of blue grama and other palatable perennial grasses [90,101,128].
Control:
Applications of either atrazine or simazine controlled sixweeks grass
on the Central Plains Experimental Range. Houston and Hyder [101] recommend
either spring or fall application. Since sixweeks grass establishment is largely
dependent upon weather conditions, they also recommend spraying only when
needed, and caution against routine annual control [101].
  • 5. Allen, Edith Bach; Knight, Dennis H. 1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush-grassland, Wyoming. The Southwestern Naturalist. 29(4): 407-421. [44452]
  • 15. Beatley, Janice C. 1969. Biomass of desert winter annual plant populations in southern Nevada. Oikos. 20: 261-273. [62340]
  • 28. Bragg, Thomas B. 1978. Effects of burning, cattle grazing, and topography on vegetation of the choppy sands range site in the Nebraska sandhills prairie. In: Hyder, Donald N., ed. Proceedings, 1st international rangeland congress; 1978 August 14-18; Denver, CO. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 248-253. [4468]
  • 33. Brooks, Matthew L.; United States Geological Survey. 2000. Competition between alien annual grasses and native annual plants in the Mojave Desert. The American Midland Naturalist. 144(1): 92-108. [61188]
  • 55. DeFalco, Lesley A.; Bryla, David R.; Smith-Longozo, Vickie; Nowak, Robert S. 2003. Are Mojave Desert annual species equal? Resource acquistion and allocation for the invasive grass Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens (Poaceae) and two native species. American Journal of Botany. 90(7): 1045-1053. [45275]
  • 61. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs. 18(3): 326-376. [3683]
  • 101. Houston, W. R.; Hyder, D. N. 1976. Controlling sixweeks fescue on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(2): 151-153. [3740]
  • 105. Hylton, L. O., Jr.; Bement, R. E. 1961. Effects of environment on germination and occurrence of sixweeks fescue. Journal of Range Management. 14: 157-161. [5323]
  • 107. Jeffries, Douglas L.; Klopatek, Jeffrey M. 1987. Effects of grazing on the vegetation of the blackbrush association. Journal of Range Management. 40(5): 390-392. [248]
  • 130. Link, Steven O.; Gee, Glendon W.; Downs, Janelle L. 1990. The effect of water stress on phenological and ecophysiological characteristics of cheatgrass and Sandberg's bluegrass. Journal of Range Management. 43(6): 506-513. [14114]
  • 30. Brooks, Matt; Berry, Kristin. 1999. Ecology and management of alien annual plants in the California deserts. CalEPPC News (California Exotic Pest Plant Council Newsletter). 7(3/4): 4-6. [61753]
  • 90. Hart, Richard H.; Shoop, Marvin C.; Ashby, Mary M. 1995. Nitrogen and atrazine on shortgrass: vegetation, cattle and economic responses. Journal of Range Management. 48(2): 165-171. [35368]
  • 128. Lesica, Peter L.; DeLuca, Thomas H. 2000. Sweetclover: a potential problem for the northern Great Plains. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 55(3): 259-261. [40878]
  • 143. McLean, A.; Lord, T. M.; Green, A. J. 1970. Utilization of the major plant communities in the Similkameen Valley, British Columbia. Journal of Range Management. 24: 346-351. [7626]
  • 159. Nagel, Jennifer M.; Huxman, Travis E.; Griffin, Kevin L.; Smith, Stanley D. 2004. CO2 enrichment reduces the energetic cost of biomass construction in an invasive desert grass. Ecology. 85(1): 100-106. [47153]
  • 178. Reed, Merton J.; Peterson, Roald A. 1961. Vegetation, soil, and cattle responses to grazing on northern Great Plains range. Tech. Bull. 1252. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 79 p. [4286]
  • 189. Salo, L. F.; McPherson, G. R.; Williams, D. G. 2005. Sonoran Desert winter annuals affected by density of red brome and soil nitrogen. The American Midland Naturalist. 153(1): 95-109. [62540]
  • 207. Stubbendieck, James; Coffin, Mitchell J.; Landholt, L. M. 2003. Weeds of the Great Plains. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry. 605 p. In cooperation with: University of Nebraska - Lincoln. [50776]
  • 215. Turner, George T. 1971. Soil and grazing influences on a salt-desert shrub range in western Colorado. Journal of Range Management. 24(1): 31-37. [46158]
  • 219. Valone, Thomas J.; Kelt, Douglas A. 1999. Fire and grazing in a shrub-invaded arid grassland community: independent or interactive ecological effects? Journal of Arid Environments. 42(1): 15-28. [31026]
  • 231. Weigel, Jeffrey R.; McPherson, Guy R.; Britton, Carlton M. 1989. Effects of short-duration grazing on winter annuals in the Texas Rolling Plains. Journal of Range Management. 42(5): 372-375. [9325]
  • 250. Zacek, Joseph C.; Hunter, Harold E.; Bown, T. A.; Ross, Robert L. 1977. Montana grazing guides. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 12 p. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [2687]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites

More info for the terms: cover, fire exclusion, litter, natural

Sixweeks grass is an important component of several endangered communities including California prairies, desert grasslands, and shale barrens [141]. It may regenerate naturally on some sites. As of 2006, commercial seed was apparently unavailable [216]. On shale barrens of southern Illinois, now reduced to 5.9 acres (2.4 ha) as a result of fire exclusion and oak (Quercus spp.) encroachment, sixweeks grass was represented in the soil seed bank on restored (prescribed burn) sites, but was not found in soil samples from unrestored (unburned) sites [139]. It was also present on an unreclaimed lignite surface mine in east-central Texas [200]. In Colorado, natural sixweeks grass regeneration occurred on both ends of dirt road succession: on new roads created by military vehicles and on long-abandoned roads in old fields [197,198].

Weaver and Alberston [3] credited sixweeks grass as an important soil stabilizer during the Great Drought. In eastern Kansas and Nebraska, it "covered the dead bodies of dead dominants." They write that had this grass been removed, much of the landscape would have lost 95% of its litter and live plant cover [3].

  • 3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1944. Nature and degree of recovery of grassland from the great drought of 1933 to 1940. Ecological Monographs. 14(4): 393-479. [2462]
  • 139. McCall, Robin K.; Gibson, David J. 1999. The regeneration potential of a threatened southern Illinois shale barren. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 126(3): 226-233. [48333]
  • 141. McCune, Bruce; Rosentreter, Roger. 1992. Texosporium sancti-jacobi, a rare western North American lichen. Bryologist. 95(3): 329-333. [18432]
  • 197. Shantz, H. L. 1917. Plant succession on abandoned roads in eastern Colorado. The Journal of Ecology. 5(1): 19-42. [60503]
  • 198. Shaw, R. B.; Diersing, V. E. 1990. Tracked vehicle impacts on vegetation at the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado. Journal of Environmental Quality. 19: 234-243. [24484]
  • 200. Skousen, J. G.; Call, C. A.; Knight, R. W. 1990. Natural revegetation of an unreclaimed lignite surface mine in east-central Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 35(4): 434-440. [21195]
  • 216. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2007. PLANTS Database, [Online]. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/ [2007, February 22]. [34262]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Importance to Livestock and Wildlife

More info for the terms: cover, dough stage, frequency

Overall forage value of sixweeks grass is slight due to its sparse growth [112]; however, sixweeks grass provides seasonal forage when green [208]. Productivity of sixweeks grass varies greatly, depending upon precipitation during the establishment period (see Fuels for sample production rates). In the Cross Timbers region of Oklahoma and Texas, Dyksterhuis [61] found light cattle use of sixweeks grass in March, heavy use in April, and light use in May; after that, it was not utilized. Cullen and others [50] noted that cattle on the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory near Whitman, Nebraska, did not graze sixweeks grass in summer.

Wild ungulates and herbivorous small mammals utilize sixweeks grass. Bison, pronghorn, and desert mule deer graze it lightly in spring [122,170,171,196]. Black-tailed jackrabbits consume sixweeks grass (review by [218]). Near Twin Falls, Idaho, they grazed sixweeks grass heavily in April and lightly in June [65]. Black-tailed and white-tailed prairie dogs also graze sixweeks grass [117,118].

Seed use: Granivorous rodents consume sixweeks grass seeds in summer and fall and may graze new foliage early in the growing season (review by [84]),[69,157,202]. On the Eastern Colorado Range Station, plains pocket gopher consumption peaked during seed set (August) and seedling establishment (November) [157]. In a northern Arizona study, Reichman [179] found Merriam's kangaroo rats and Arizona, Bailey's and rock pocket mice consumed sixweeks grass seeds more than expected based upon availability. A study on the Snake River Birds of Prey Area showed that Townsend ground squirrels consumed sixweeks grass in early March (25% frequency in stomach contents) and heavily in May (100% frequency), when seed was curing [246]. Granivorous songbirds and upland game birds, such as chukar and sharp-tailed grouse, consume sixweeks grass seeds (review by [84],[207]). Relative importance of sixweeks grass forage is largely unstudied for most birds, and sixweeks grass may be very important for some species. It was the top-ranking food for lesser prairie-chickens on a sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia)-shortgrass prairie in Oklahoma [108].

Palatability/nutritional value: Sixweeks grass is not highly palatable to large herbivores. Palatability is rated as poor for elk, mule deer, and pronghorn [58]. Palatability ratings for livestock generally range from poor to fair [58,84,101,143]. Kelso [117] rated sixweeks grass's forage value as poor to good for cattle and horses and poor to fair for domestic goats and sheep. In a review, Gullion [84] rates sixweeks grass palatability as fair for cattle and domestic sheep. Loosely rooted, sixweeks grass tends to tear out by the roots when grazed, leaving bits of soil that livestock will not consume [207]. Cattle on the Central Plains Experimental Range, Colorado, avoided areas with concentrations of sixweeks grass, and tended to drop sixweeks grass plants inadvertently included in a bite [101,104].

Few studies have measured the nutrient content of sixweeks grass. Nutritional value of plants collected in Suton County, Texas, was [73]:

  Preflower Dough stage
Date collected 23 March 26 April
Protein (%) 18.9 (high)* 9.36 (fair)
Ether extract (%) 3.01 2.05
Crude fiber (%) 21.86 27.34
N-free extract (%) 41.32 47.33
Water (%) 7.04 7.21
Ash (%) 8.48 6.71
K2O (%) 2.63 1.22
CaO (%) 0.59 (good) 0.62 (good)
 MgO (%) 0.32 0.22
P2O5 (%) 0.79 (good) 0.43 (fair)
*(overall ratings for livestock)

In Arches National Park, Utah, Belnap and Harper [17,18] found sixweeks grass growing on cryptobiotic soil crusts was more nutritious than sixweeks grass on unstable blow-out sands:

  Cyanobaterial-
Collema spp. sands
Blow-out sands Significance (p)
N (mg/g) 22.5 19.5 <0.05
P (mg/g) 2.5 1.4 <0.0001
K (mg/g) 18.8 16.4 <0.05
Ca (mg/g) 6.5 5.2 <0.0001
Mg (µg/g) 1.5 1.3 <0.01
Cu (µg/g) 11.0 10.4 NS
Fe (µg/g) 300.3 149.4 <0.01
Ma (µg/g) 60.3 74.0 NS
Na (µg/g) 61.5 59.8 NS
Zn (µg/g) 43.0 33.0 NS

Sixweeks grass seed from northern Arizona averaged 4,132 calories/g and 2.02 calories/seed. [180].

Cover value: Sixweeks grass provides poor cover for small mammals and birds [58].

  • 61. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1948. The vegetation of the western Cross Timbers. Ecological Monographs. 18(3): 326-376. [3683]
  • 101. Houston, W. R.; Hyder, D. N. 1976. Controlling sixweeks fescue on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management. 29(2): 151-153. [3740]
  • 104. Hyder, D. N.; Bement, R. E. 1964. Sixweeks fescue as a deterrent to blue grama utilization. Journal of Range Management. 17: 261-264. [3415]
  • 118. Kelso, Leon. 1931. Some notes on young desert horned larks. The Condor. 33(2): 60-65. [60499]
  • 157. Myers, Gary T.; Vaughan, Terry A. 1964. Food habits of the plains pocket gopher in eastern Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy. 45(4): 588-598. [55048]
  • 179. Reichman, O. J. 1975. Relation of desert rodent diets to available resources. Journal of Mammalogy. 56(4): 731-751. [4572]
  • 180. Reichman, O. J. 1976. Relationships between dimensions, weights, volumes, and calories of some Sonoran Desert seeds. The Southwestern Naturalist. 20(4): 573-574. [12326]
  • 208. Stubbendieck, James; Hatch, Stephan L.; Butterfield, Charles H. 1992. North American range plants. 4th ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 493 p. [25162]
  • 17. Belnap, J.; Harper, K. T. 1995. Influence of cryptobiotic soil crusts on elemental content of tissue of two desert seed plants. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation. 9: 107-115. [26468]
  • 18. Belnap, Jayne. 1994. Potential role of cryptobiotic soil crusts in semiarid rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Kitchen, Stanley G., comps. Proceedings--ecology and management of annual rangelands; 1992 May 18-22; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-313. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 179-185. [24276]
  • 50. Cullan, Andrew P.; Reece, Patrick E.; Schacht, Walter H. 1999. Early summer grazing effects on defoliation and tiller demography of prairie sandreed. Journal of Range Management. 52(5): 447-453. [41384]
  • 58. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
  • 65. Fagerstone, Kathleen A.; Lavoie, G. Keith; Griffith, Richard E., Jr. 1980. Black-tailed jackrabbit diet and density on rangeland and near agricultural crops. Journal of Range Management. 33(3): 229-233. [21756]
  • 69. Flake, Lester D. 1973. Food habits of four species of rodents on a short-grass prairie in Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy. 54(3): 636-647. [60492]
  • 73. Fraps, G. S.; Cory, V. L. 1940. Composition and utilization of range vegetation of Sutton and Edwards Counties. Bulletin No. 58. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 39 p. [5746]
  • 84. Gullion, Gordon W. 1964. Contributions toward a flora of Nevada. No. 49: Wildlife uses of Nevada plants. CR-24-64. Beltsville, MD: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Arboretum Crops Research Division. 170 p. [6729]
  • 108. Jones, R. E. 1963. Identification and analysis of lesser and greater prairie chicken habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27: 757-778. [5522]
  • 117. Kelso, Leon H. 1939. Food habits of prairie dogs. Circ. No. 529. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1-15. [61322]
  • 122. Krausman, Paul R.; Kuenzi, Amy J.; Etchberger, Richard C.; Rautenstrauch, Kurt T.; Ordway, Leonard L.; Hervert, John J. 1997. Diets of mule deer. Journal of Range Management. 50(5): 513-522. [27845]
  • 143. McLean, A.; Lord, T. M.; Green, A. J. 1970. Utilization of the major plant communities in the Similkameen Valley, British Columbia. Journal of Range Management. 24: 346-351. [7626]
  • 170. Peden, D. G.; Van Dyne, G. M.; Rice, R. W.; Hansen, R. M. 1974. The trophic ecology of Bison bison L. on shortgrass plains. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11: 489-497. [1861]
  • 171. Peden, Donald G. 1976. Botanical composition of bison diets on shortgrass plains. The American Midland Naturalist. 96(1): 225-229. [24596]
  • 196. Schwartz, Charles C.; Nagy, Julius G. 1976. Pronghorn diets relative to forage availability in northeastern Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management. 40(3): 469-478. [4937]
  • 202. Stamp, Nancy E.; Ohmart, Robert D. 1978. Resource utilization by desert rodents in the lower Sonoran Desert. Ecology. 59(4): 700-707. [49025]
  • 207. Stubbendieck, James; Coffin, Mitchell J.; Landholt, L. M. 2003. Weeds of the Great Plains. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry. 605 p. In cooperation with: University of Nebraska - Lincoln. [50776]
  • 218. Vallentine, John F. 1971. Range development and improvements. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press. 516 p. [2414]
  • 246. Yensen, Eric; Quinney, Dana L. 1992. Can Townsend's ground squirrels survive on a diet of exotic annuals? The Great Basin Naturalist. 52(3): 269-277. [20990]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Other uses and values

Native Americans in the Southwest traditionally ate roasted sixweeks grass seeds [150].
  • 150. Moerman, Dan. 2003. Native American ethnobotany: A database of foods, drugs, dyes, and fibers of Native American peoples, derived from plants, [Online]. Dearborn, MI: University of Michigan (Producer). Available: http://herb.umd.umich.edu/herb/search.pl [2006, June 29]. [62492]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Festuca octoflora

Festuca octoflora (formerly Vulpia octoflora'[1]), also called Six-weeks fescue, Pullout grass,[citation needed] Sixweeks grass,[2] Eight-flower sixweeks grass,[citation needed] Eight-flowered fescue;[citation needed] is an annual plant in the grass family (Poaceae).[3] The common name "six week fescue" is because it supplies about 6 weeks of cattle forage after a rain.[3]

Subspecies include Festuca octoflora Walter var. tenella, Festuca gracilenta Buckley, and Festuca tenella Willd.[4])

Range and habitat[edit]

This bunchgrass is native to North America occurring across a large part of Canada, in all of the lower 48 contiguous United States, and Baja California of Mexico.[5][6] It grows in open, sunny places between shrubs and in burn areas.[3] It is commonly found in burn areas after a fire.[7]

  • Vulpia octoflora var. hirtella [8]
  • Vulpia octoflora var. octoflora [9]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Mojave Desert Wildflowers, Pam MacKay, 2nd E. 2013, p 314
  2. ^ USDA:Vulpia octoflora Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  3. ^ a b c Mojave Desert Wildflowers, Pam MacKay, 2nd E. 2013, p 285
  4. ^ USDA Forest Service FEIS Retrieved 2010-03-09
  5. ^ USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  6. ^ http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/get_JM_treatment.pl?8738,9330,9340 Jepson . accessed 10 May 2010
  7. ^ http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=VUOCG v. glauca; USDA . accessed 10 May 2010
  8. ^ http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=VUOCH v. hirtella; USDA . accessed 10 May 2010
  9. ^ http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=VUOCO v. octoflora; USDA . accessed 10 May 2010

See also[edit]


Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Synonyms

More info for the term: fern

Infrataxa―

Sixweeks grass:

Festuca octoflora Walt. [67,80,113,137,176,224,232]

    =Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. octoflora [57,77,97,112,137]

Slender sixweeks grass:

Festuca octoflora Walt. var. tenella (Willd.) Fernald [67,68,137]

    =Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. glauca (Nutt.) Fernald

Festuca gracilenta Buckl.

    =Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. glauca (Nutt.) Fernald

Festuca tenella Willd.

    =Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. glauca (Nutt.) Fernald [57,67,77]

Vulpia octoflora var. tenella (Willd.) Fern. [134]

    =Vulpia octoflora var. glauca [57,67,77]
  • 113. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
  • 57. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 67. Fassett, Norman C. 1951. Grasses of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. 173 p. [21728]
  • 77. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 134. Lonard, Robert Irvin. 1970. A biosystematic study of the genus Vulpia (Gramineae). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. 154 p. Dissertation. [3827]
  • 137. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 176. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 224. Voss, Edward G. 1972. Michigan flora. Part I: Gymnosperms and monocots. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium. 488 p. [11471]
  • 232. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 68. Fernald, M. L. 1932. Notes on Festuca octoflora. Rhodora. 34: 209-212. [3698]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

The scientific name of sixweeks grass is
Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. (Poaceae) [49,57,77,97,111,112,133,188,230,245]. Varieties
recognized by some authorities are:

Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. glauca (Nutt.) Fernald [49,57,67,77,133], slender sixweeks grass

Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. hirtella (Piper) Henrard [49,57,68,97,112,133,134,137], hairy sixweeks grass

Vulpia octoflora (Walt.) Rydb. var. octoflora [49,57,77,97,112,133,134,137], sixweeks grass

Other authorities do not recognize sixweeks grass infrataxa [80,137,176,232].
Varieties are based on relative hairiness of the lemmas [57,232], and hairy and
glaucous lemma types are not geographically segregated in sixweeks grass.
Examples of both types may occur within a single population, or even on the same plant [232].
The genus Vulpia is distinguished by annual life form and cleistogamous
breeding habit, while Festuca is perennial and chasmogamous [133].
Not all systematists support the separation of
these closely aligned genera [80,176,224,232].
  • 49. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; Reveal, James L.; Holmgren, Patricia K. 1977. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 6: The Monocotyledons. New York: Columbia University Press. 584 p. [719]
  • 57. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
  • 67. Fassett, Norman C. 1951. Grasses of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. 173 p. [21728]
  • 77. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
  • 80. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
  • 97. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p. [21992]
  • 133. Lonard, Robert I.; Gould, Frank W. 1974. The North American species of Vulpia (Gramineae). Madrono. 22(5): 217-280. [3826]
  • 134. Lonard, Robert Irvin. 1970. A biosystematic study of the genus Vulpia (Gramineae). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. 154 p. Dissertation. [3827]
  • 137. Martin, William C.; Hutchins, Charles R. 1981. A flora of New Mexico. Volume 2. Germany: J. Cramer. 2589 p. [37176]
  • 176. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
  • 224. Voss, Edward G. 1972. Michigan flora. Part I: Gymnosperms and monocots. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium. 488 p. [11471]
  • 230. Weber, William A.; Wittmann, Ronald C. 1996. Colorado flora: eastern slope. 2nd ed. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado. 524 p. [27572]
  • 232. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
  • 245. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. 806 p. [28655]
  • 68. Fernald, M. L. 1932. Notes on Festuca octoflora. Rhodora. 34: 209-212. [3698]
  • 188. Rydberg, Per Axel. 1909. Studies on the Rocky Mountain flora--19. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 36: 531-541. [29598]
  • 111. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. In: North Carolina Botanical Garden (Producer). In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [36715]
  • 112. Kartesz, John Thomas. 1988. A flora of Nevada. Reno, NV: University of Nevada. 1729 p. [In 2 volumes]. Dissertation. [42426]

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Common Names

sixweeks grass

six-weeks grass

common sixweeks grass

eight-flower sixweeks grass

sixweeks fescue

eight-flowered fescue

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Default rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!