Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (11) (learn more)
Overview
Comprehensive Description
Distribution
Distribution in Egypt
Nile region, Oases, Mediterranean region and cultivated cereal (sorgho).
Trusted
Global Distribution
Cultivated in tropical regions, particularly in the Old World.
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
China (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Flora of China Editorial Committee. 2006. Fl. China 22: 1–733. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1029690
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Caribbean (Caribbean)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Catasus Guerra, L. 1997. Las gramíneas (Poaceae) de Cuba, I. Fontqueria 46: [i–ii], 1–259.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1012771
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Burma (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Flora of China Editorial Committee. 2006. Fl. China 22: 1–733. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1029690
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Peru (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Egypt (Africa & Madagascar)
Sudan (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Nigeria (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Nigeria (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Nigeria (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
South Africa (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Egypt (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Guam (Oceania)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Fosberg, F. R. & M. H. Sachet. 1982. Micronesian Poaceae: critical and distributional notes. Micronesica 18(2): 45–102.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/27047
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Micronesia Federated States (Oceania)
Marshall Isl (Oceania)
Northern Marianas (Oceania)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Fosberg, F. R. & M. H. Sachet. 1982. Micronesian Poaceae: critical and distributional notes. Micronesica 18(2): 45–102.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/27047
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Marshall Isl (Oceania)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Fosberg, F. R. & M. H. Sachet. 1982. Micronesian Poaceae: critical and distributional notes. Micronesica 18(2): 45–102.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/27047
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Northern Marianas (Oceania)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Fosberg, F. R. & M. H. Sachet. 1982. Micronesian Poaceae: critical and distributional notes. Micronesica 18(2): 45–102.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/27047
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Chad (Africa & Madagascar)
Malawi (Africa & Madagascar)
Nigeria (Africa & Madagascar)
Sudan (Africa & Madagascar)
Swaziland (Africa & Madagascar)
Tanzania (Africa & Madagascar)
Uganda (Africa & Madagascar)
United States (North America)
South Africa (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Kucera, C. L. 1998. The Grasses of Missouri 305 pp., University of Missouri Press, Colombia.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018088
-
de Wet, J. M. J. 1978. Systematics and evolution of Sorghum sect. Sorghum (Gramineae). Amer. J. Bot. 65(4): 477–484.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/26042
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Flora of China Editorial Committee. 2006. Fl. China 22: 1–733. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1029690
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Egypt (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Caribbean (Caribbean)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Lindeman, J. C. & A. L. Stoffers. 1963. Gramineae. 1: 121–203. In Fl. Netherl. Antilles. Natuurwetenschappelijke studiekring voor Suriname en de Nederlandse Antillen, Utrecht.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20404
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Bolivia (South America)
Uruguay (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Rosengurtt, B., B. R. A. Maffei & P. I. Artucio. 1970. Gram. Urug. [i–vii], 1–489. Universidad de la República, Montevideo.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19689
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
-
Adolfo Maria, H. 1966. Nóm. Pl. Recol. Valle Cochabamba 2: 17–86. Colegio La Salle, Cochabamba.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018799
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Uruguay (South America)
Caribbean (Caribbean)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Liogier, H. & L. Martorell. 1982. Fl. Puerto Rico Adj. Islands 1–342. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Río Piedras.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19728
-
Rosengurtt, B., B. R. A. Maffei & P. I. Artucio. 1970. Gram. Urug. [i–vii], 1–489. Universidad de la República, Montevideo.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19689
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
-
Fabris, H. A. 1970. Phyllostachys. In: A. L. Cabrera (ed.), Gramíneas. 4(2): 35. In A. L. Cabrera Fl. Prov. Buenos Aires. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20502
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Uruguay (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Rosengurtt, B., B. R. A. Maffei & P. I. Artucio. 1970. Gram. Urug. [i–vii], 1–489. Universidad de la República, Montevideo.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19689
-
Burkart, A. & M. Toursarkissian. 1969. Andropogoneae. In A. Burkart, Gramineas. 2: 447–508. In A. Burkart Fl. Il. Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19884
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Guatemala (Mesoamerica)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Swallen, J. R. 1955. Gramineae. In: P. C. Standley & J. A. Steyermark (eds.), Flora of Guatemala---Part II. Fieldiana, Bot. 24(2): i–ix, 1–390.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/6706
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Egypt (Africa & Madagascar)
Sudan (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Belize (Mesoamerica)
Bolivia (South America)
Chile (South America)
Costa Rica (Mesoamerica)
Brazil (South America)
Canada (North America)
Colombia (South America)
Ecuador (South America)
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
El Salvador (Mesoamerica)
Nicaragua (Mesoamerica)
Guatemala (Mesoamerica)
Honduras (Mesoamerica)
Iran (Asia)
India (Asia)
French Guiana (South America)
Guyana (South America)
Ethiopia (Africa & Madagascar)
Panama (Mesoamerica)
United States (North America)
Peru (South America)
Suriname (South America)
Caribbean (Caribbean)
Uruguay (South America)
Paraguay (South America)
Venezuela (South America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Forzza, R. C. & et al. 2010. 2010 Lista de espécies Flora do Brasil. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/2010/.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100002289
-
Jørgensen, P. M. & C. Ulloa Ulloa. 1994. Seed plants of the high Andes of Ecuador---A checklist. AAU Rep. 34: 1–443.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/47124
-
Berendsohn, W. G. & A. E. A. González. 1991. Listado básico de la Flora Salvadorensis. Monocotelydoneae: Iridaceae, Commelinaceae, Gramineae, Cyperaceae. Cuscatlania 1(6): 1–29.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/34024
-
Funk, V. A., P. E. Berry, S. Alexander, T. H. Hollowell & C. L. Kelloff. 2007. Checklist of the Plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 55: 1–584.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1033072
-
Moraes, M. 1990. Lista preliminar de especies Botánicas coleccionadas durante la Expedición Río Madre de Dios (Norte de Bolivia). Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. (Bolivia) Com. 10: 32–52.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1014738
-
Marticorena, C. & M. Quezada. 1985. Catálogo de la Flora Vascular de Chile. Gayana, Bot. 42: 1–157.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1592
-
Soreng, R. J., G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, E. J. Judziewicz, T. S. Filgueiras & O. Morrone. 2003 and onwards. On-line taxonomic novelties and updates, distributional additions and corrections, and editorial changes since the four published volumes of the Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae) published in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. vols. 39, 41, 46, and 48. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/CNWG:. In R. J. Soreng, G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, T. S. Filgueiras, E. J. Judziewicz & O. Morrone Internet Cat. New World Grasses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1024044
-
Herrera Arrieta, Y. & A. Cortés Ortiz. 2010. Listado florístico y aspectos ecológicos de la familia Poaceae para Chihuahua, Durango y Zacatecas, México. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 4(2): 711–738.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100002652
-
Killeen, T. J. 1990. The grasses of Chiquitania, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 77(1): 125–201.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/10868
-
Judziewicz, E. J. 1990. Family 187. Poaceae (Gramineae). 8: 1–727. In A. R. A. Görts-van Rijn Fl. Guianas, ser. A, Phanerog. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/18404
-
Filgueiras, T. S. 1991. A floristic analysis of the Gramineae of Brazil's Distrito Federal and a list of the species occurring in the area. Edinburgh J. Bot. 48: 73–80.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/24594
-
Espejo Serna, A., A. R. López-Ferrari & J. Valdés-Reyna. 2000. Poaceae. Monocot. Mexic. Sinopsis Floríst. 10: 7–236 [and index].
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1015183
-
Beetle, A. A. 1977. Noteworthy grasses from Mexico V. Phytologia 37(4): 317–407.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/2538
-
Gould, F. W. & R. Moran. 1981. The grasses of Baja California, Mexico. Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 12: 1–140.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/11232
-
Kucera, C. L. 1998. The Grasses of Missouri 305 pp., University of Missouri Press, Colombia.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018088
-
McVaugh, R. 1983. Gramineae. 14: 1–436. In R. McVaugh Fl. Novo-Galiciana. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9853
-
Correa A., M. D., C. Galdames & M. N. S. Stapf. 2004. Cat. Pl. Vasc. Panamá 1–599. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1031911
-
Jørgensen, P. M. & S. León-Yánez. (eds.) 1999. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: i–viii, 1–1181.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/42250
-
Breedlove, D. E. 1986. Flora de Chiapas. Listados Floríst. México 4: i–v, 1–246.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/513
-
Correll, D. S. & M. C. Johnston. 1970. Man. Vasc. Pl. Texas i–xv, 1–1881. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1493
-
Sousa Sánchez, M. & E. F. Cabrera Cano. 1983. Flora de Quintana Roo. Listados Floríst. México 2: 1–100.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/512
-
Dodson, C. H. & A. H. Gentry. 1978. Flora of the Río Palenque Science Center: Los Ríos Province, Ecuador. Selbyana 4(1–6): i–xxx, 1–628.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/105
-
Martínez Salas, E. M., M. Sousa Sánchez & C. H. Ramos Álvarez. 2001. Región de Calakmul, Campeche. Listados Floríst. México 22: 1–55.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018508
-
Munz, P. A. & D. D. Keck. 1959. Cal. Fl. 1–1681. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1717
-
Munz, P. A. 1974. Fl. S. Calif. 1–1086. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1719
-
Voss, E. G. 1972. Gymnosperms and Monocots. i–xv, 1–488. In Michigan Fl. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1494
-
Davidse, G., M. Sousa Sánchez & A. O. Chater. (eds.) 1994. Alismataceae a Cyperaceae. Fl. Mesoamer. 6: i–xvi, 1–543.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/8200
-
Liogier, H. & L. Martorell. 1982. Fl. Puerto Rico Adj. Islands 1–342. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Río Piedras.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19728
-
Pohl, R. W. 1980. Family 15. Gramineae. In: W. C. Burger, (ed.), Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana, Bot., n.s. 4: 1–608.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/5421
-
Barkworth, M. E., K. M. Capels, S. Long & M. B. Piep. 2003. Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Poaceae, part 2. 25: i–xxv, 1–783. In Fl. N. Amer. Oxford University Press, New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1021466
-
Phillips, S. 1995. Poaceae (Gramineae). Fl. Ethiopia 7: i–xx, 1–420.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1010988
-
Longhi-Wagner, H. M., V. Bittich, M. d. L. Wanderley & G. J. Shepherd. 2001. Poaceae. Fl. Fanerogam. Estado Sao Paulo 1: i–xxv, 1–292.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018627
-
Smith, L. B., D. C. Wasshausen & R. M. Klein. 1982. Gramíneas. Gêneros: 85. Paspalum até 115. Zea. 1(GRAM): 909–1407. In R. Reitz Fl. Il. Catarin. Herbário "Barbarosa Rodrigues", Itajaí, Brasil.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20677
-
Catasus Guerra, L. 1997. Las gramíneas (Poaceae) de Cuba, I. Fontqueria 46: [i–ii], 1–259.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1012771
-
Gould, F. W. 1979. Poaceae. In R. A. Howard (ed.). Fl. Lesser Antilles 3: 25–220.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19786
-
Filgueiras, T. S. 2003. Sorghum. In Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): III. Subfamilies Panicoideae, Aristidoideae, Arundinoideae, and Danthonioideae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 46: 598–606.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1004266
-
Pohl, R. W. 1994. 151. Sorghum Moench. Fl. Mesoamer. 6: 381–382.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1003333
-
Balick, M. J., M. Nee & D. E. Atha. 2000. Checklist of the vascular plants of Belize. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 85: i–ix, 1–246.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1014725
-
Brako, L. & J. L. Zarucchi. (eds.) 1993. Catalogue of the Flowering Plants and Gymnosperms of Peru. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 45: i–xl, 1–1286.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/7728
-
Hokche, O., P. E. Berry & O. Huber. 2008. 1–860. In O. Hokche, P. E. Berry & O. Huber Nuevo Cat. Fl. Vasc. Venezuela. Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela, Caracas.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1033110
-
Idárraga-Piedrahita, A., R. D. C. Ortiz, R. Callejas Posada & M. Merello. 2011. Flora de Antioquia. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares, vol. 2. Listado de las Plantas Vasculares del Departamento de Antioquia. Pp. 1-939.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100008595
-
D'Arcy, W. G. 1987. Flora of Panama. Checklist and Index. Part 1: The introduction and checklist. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 17: v–xxx, 1–328.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1289
-
García-Mendoza, A. J. & J. Meave del Castillo. 2011. Divers. Florist. Oaxaca 1–351. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100009052
-
Cronquist, A. J., A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren & Reveal. 1977. Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. 6: 1–584. In A. J. Cronquist, A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal & P. K. Holmgren (eds.) Intermount. Fl. Hafner Pub. Co., New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1725
-
Morales, J. F. 2003. Poaceae. En: Manual de Plantas de Costa Rica. Vol. 3. B.E. Hammel, M.H. Grayum, C. Herrera & N. Zamora (eds.). Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 93: 598–821.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100008963
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Bolivia (South America)
India (Asia)
United States (North America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
-
Foster, R. C. 1958. A catalogue of the ferns and flowering plants of Bolivia. Contr. Gray Herb. 184: 1–223.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1313
-
Small, J. K. 1933. Man. S.E. Fl. i–xxii, 1–1554. Published by the Author, New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1515
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Brazil (South America)
Guatemala (Mesoamerica)
India (Asia)
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
Peru (South America)
United States (North America)
Venezuela (South America)
Caribbean (Caribbean)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Cowan, C. P. 1983. Flora de Tabasco. Listados Floríst. México 1: 1–123.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/511
-
Macbride, J. F. 1936. Gramineae, Flora of Peru. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 13(1/1): 96–261.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/719
-
Pittier, H., T. Lasser, L. Schnee, Z. L. Febres & V. Badillo. 1945. Gramineae, IN: Catalogo de la Flora Venezolana. Conf. Interamer. Agricultura, Caracas 1: 75–119.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1014100
-
Hitchcock, A. S. 1936. Man. Grasses W. Ind. 1–439. United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20405
-
Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles & C. R. Bell. 1968. Man. Vasc. Fl. Carolinas i–lxi, 1–1183. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/636
-
Swallen, J. R. 1955. Gramineae. In: P. C. Standley & J. A. Steyermark (eds.), Flora of Guatemala---Part II. Fieldiana, Bot. 24(2): i–ix, 1–390.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/6706
-
Hackel, E. 1883. Gramineae IV. Andropogoneae, Tristegineae. 2(3C): 245–326, t. 59–74. In C. F. P. von Martius Fl. Bras. F. Fleischer, Monachii et Lipsiae.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/25889
-
Pérez, A., M. Sousa Sánchez, A. M. Hanan-Alipi, F. Chiang Cabrera & P. Tenorio L. 2005. Vegetación terrestre. 65–110. In Biodivers. Tabasco. CONABIO-UNAM, México.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1030034
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Egypt (Africa & Madagascar)
Sudan (Africa & Madagascar)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
India (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
United States
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
United States
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Trusted
Description
Trusted
Description
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Synonym
Trusted
Synonym
Trusted
Type Information
Catalog Number: US 865436A
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Verification Degree: Card file verified by examination of alleged type specimen
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): G. H. W. Schimper
Locality: Abyssinia., Ethiopia, Africa
- Type fragment: Steudel, E. G. von. 1853. Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 393.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat & Distribution
Trusted
Associations
Foodplant / pathogen
sorus of Sporisorium sorghi infects and damages floret of Sorghum vulgare
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Sorghum bicolor
No available public DNA sequences.
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Sorghum bicolor
Public Records: 3
Specimens with Barcodes: 16
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
Trusted
Management
-
Aeschimann, D. & C. Heitz. 2005. Synonymie-Index der Schweizer Flora und der angrenzenden Gebiete (SISF). 2te Auflage. Documenta Floristicae Helvetiae N° 2. Genève.
http://www.crsf.ch/
Trusted
Wikipedia
Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor, commonly called sorghum and also known as durra, jowari, or milo, is a grass species cultivated for its grain, which is used for food, both for animals and humans, and for ethanol production. Sorghum originated in northern Africa, and is now cultivated widely in tropical and subtropical regions. S. bicolor is typically an annual, but some cultivars are perennial. It grows in clumps that may reach over 4 m high. The grain is small, ranging from 3 to 4 mm in diameter. Sweet sorghums are sorghum cultivars that are primarily grown for foliage, syrup production, and ethanol; they are taller than those grown for grain.[2][3]
S. bicolor is the cultivated species of sorghum; its wild relatives make up the botanical genus Sorghum.
Contents |
Cultivation
The leading producers of sorghum bicolor in 2011 were Nigeria (12.6%), India (11.2%), Mexico (11.2%) and the United States (10.0%).[4] Sorghum grows in a wide range of temperature, high altitudes, toxic soils and can recover growth after some drought.[2] It has four features that make it one of the most drought-resistant crops:
- It has a very large root-to-leaf surface area.
- In times of drought, it will roll its leaves to lessen water loss by transpiration.
- If drought continues, it will go into dormancy rather than dying.
- Its leaves are protected by a waxy cuticle.
Richard Pankhurst reports (citing Augustus B. Wylde) that in 19th-century Ethiopia, durra was "often the first crop sown on newly cultivated land", explaining that this cereal did not require the thorough ploughing other crops did, and its roots not only decomposed into a good fertilizer, but they also helped to break up the soil while not exhausting the subsoil.[5]
Uses
Sorghum is cultivated in many parts of the world today. In the past 50 years, the area planted with sorghum worldwide had increased 66%.[4] In many parts of Asia and Africa, its grain are used to make flat breads that form the staple food of many cultures.[6][7] The grains can also be popped in a similar fashion to popcorn.
| Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz) | |
|---|---|
| Energy | 1,418 kJ (339 kcal) |
| Carbohydrates | 74.63 g |
| - Dietary fiber | 6.3 g |
| Fat | 3.30 g |
| Protein | 11.30 g |
| Percentages are relative to US recommendations for adults. | |
The species can be used as a source for making ethanol fuel, and in some environments may be better than maize or sugarcane, as it can grow under harsher conditions.[2] It typically has protein levels of around 9%, enabling dependent human populations to subsist on it in times of famine, in contrast to regions where maize has become the staple crop. It is also used for making a traditional corn broom.[8]
The reclaimed stalks of the sorghum plant are used to make a decorative millwork material marketed as Kirei board.
Sweet sorghum syrup is known as molasses in some parts of the U.S., although it is not true molasses.
In China, sorghum is fermented and distilled to produce maotai, which is regarded as one of the country's most famous liquors. Sorghum was ground and the flour was the main alternative to wheat in northern China for a long time.
In India, where it is commonly called jwaarie, jowar, jola, or jondhahlaa, sorghum is one of the staple sources of nutrition. An Indian bread, jowar rotti or jolada rotti, is prepared from this grain. In some countries, sweet sorghum stalks are used for producing biofuel by squeezing the juice and then fermenting it into ethanol.[9] Texas A&M University in the United States is currently running trials to find the best varieties for ethanol production from sorghum leaves and stalks in the USA.[10]
In Korea, it is cooked with rice, or its flour is used to make cake called susu bukkumi.
In Australia, South America, and the United States (the second largest producer of sorghum after Nigeria), sorghum grain is used primarily for livestock feed and in a growing number of ethanol plants.[11]
Sorghum is one of a number of grains used as wheat substitutes in gluten-free recipes and products.
Agricultural uses
Sorghum is used in feed for livestock. Its use is limited, however, because the starch and protein in sorghum is more difficult for animals to digest than the starches and protein in corn.[citation needed] Research is being done to find a process that will pre-digest the grain. One study on cattle showed that steam-flaked sorghum was preferable to dry-rolled sorghum because it improved daily weight gain.[4] In hogs, sorghum has been shown to be a more efficient feed choice than corn when both grains were processed in the same way.[clarification needed][4]
Research
Research is being conducted to develop a genetic cross[clarification needed] that will make the plant more tolerant to colder temperatures, since it is native to tropical climates.[12] In the United States, this is important because the cost of corn is steadily increasing due to its usage in ethanol production for addition to gasoline. Sorghum silage can be used as a replacement of corn silage in the diet for dairy cattle.[13] Other research has shown that a timely harvest of sorghum is essential for a safe feed product. The plants need to be harvested during the time when the plant's total moisture content is between 63 and 68 percent, to prevent lodging.[clarification needed] Approximately, this is when the grain reaches the "soft dough" stage.[clarification needed] More research has found that sorghum has higher nutritional value compared to corn when feeding dairy cattle. And the type of processing is also essential in harvesting the grain's maximum nutrition. Feeding steam-flaked sorghum showed an increase in milk production when compared to dry-rolling.[13] When a grain is steam-flaked, it is cooked slightly, this makes certain nutrients more available to be digested.
Genome
The genome of Sorghum bicolor was sequenced between 2005 and 2007.[14][15]
Parasite
Sorghum is a host of the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica.[16] This parasite is a devastating pest on the crop.
See also
Notes
- ^ "The Plant List".
- ^ a b c "Grassland Index: Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench".
- ^ "Sweet Sorghum". Sweet Sorghum Ethanol Producers. Retrieved 13 November 2012.
- ^ a b c d Jeri Stroade, Michael Boland, and Mykel Taylor. "AGMRC Sorghum profile".
- ^ Richard Pankhurst, Economic History of Ethiopia (Addis Ababa: Haile Selassie I University, 1968), p. 193.
- ^ O P Sharma (1993). Plant Taxonomy. Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 439. ISBN 0-07-460373-6.
- ^ National Research Council (1996-02-14). "Sorghum". Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains. Lost Crops of Africa 1. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-04990-0. Retrieved 2008-07-18.
- ^ "How to make a broom". Ogden Publications, Inc. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
- ^ Sweet Sorghum : A New "Smart Biofuel Crop" AgriBusinessWeek, 30 June 2008
- ^ Ceres and Texas A&M to Develop and Market High-Biomass Sorghum for Biofuels Texas A&M University System Agriculture Program, 1 October 2007
- ^ [1] United Sorghum Checkoff Program
- ^ "Sorghum Research Showing Promise". Oklahoma Farm Report. 23 February 2011.
- ^ a b Micheal J. Brouk and Brent Bean. Sorghum in Dairy Cattle Production Feeding Guide.
- ^ Paterson, Andrew H.; John E. Bowers, Remy Bruggmann, Inna Dubchak, Jane Grimwood, Heidrun Gundlach, Georg Haberer, Uffe Hellsten, Therese Mitros, Alexander Poliakov, Jeremy Schmutz, Manuel Spannagl, Haibao Tang, Xiyin Wang, Thomas Wicker, Arvind K. Bharti, Jarrod Chapman, F. Alex Feltus, Udo Gowik, Igor V. Grigoriev, Eric Lyons, Christopher A. Maher, Mihaela Martis, Apurva Narechania, Robert P. Otillar, Bryan W. Penning, Asaf A. Salamov, Yu Wang, Lifang Zhang, Nicholas C. Carpita, Michael Freeling, Alan R. Gingle, C. Thomas Hash, Beat Keller, Patricia Klein, Stephen Kresovich, Maureen C. McCann, Ray Ming, Daniel G. Peterson, Mehboob-ur-Rahman, Doreen Ware, Peter Westhoff, Klaus F. X. Mayer, Joachim Messing, Daniel S. Rokhsar (2009-01-29). "The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses". Nature 457 (7229): 551–556. Bibcode:2009Natur.457..551P. doi:10.1038/nature07723. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 19189423.
- ^ Sorghum bicolor genome on Phytozome
- ^ Yoshida, Satoko; Maruyama, Shinichiro; Nozaki, Hisayoshi; Shirasu, Ken (28 May 2010). "Horizontal Gene Transfer by the Parasitic Plant Stiga hermanthica". Science 328 (5982): 1128. Bibcode:2010Sci...328.1128Y. doi:10.1126/science.1187145. PMID 20508124.
Trusted
Notes
Comments
There is a multiplicity of forms of cultivated sorghum, derived by human selection and all fully interfertile. Some forms have sweet culms. Many species names have been proposed in the past in an attempt to categorize this variation, but they represent no more than intergrading cultivars within the common species pool.
The name Holcus saccharatus Linnaeus (Sorghum saccharatum (Linnaeus) Moench) has been identified as this species, but its application is uncertain (see Davidse & Turland in Taxon 50: 577–580. 2001) and the name has been formally rejected.
The principal races grown in China are as follows.
‘bicolor’
高粱 gao liang
Panicle loose with long branches, to 40 cm. Sessile spikelets broadly obovate; glumes leathery, glossy. Grain relatively small, enclosed within the glumes or only the top protruding.
Cultivated for grain; a primitive type.
‘cernuum’
弯头高粱 wan tou gao liang
Panicle elliptic or ovate-elliptic, dense, 8–20 cm, curved or erect. Sessile spikelets broadly ovate, whitish; glumes thin, papery, transversely wrinkled, densely white-villous to glabrescent. Grain pale, subrotund to orbicular, usually much flattened, protruding beyond the glumes.
Cultivated in Xinjiang for grain and forage.
‘dochna’
甜高粱 tian gao liang
Culms with sweet juice. Panicle elongate, to 50 cm; branches racemose or corymbose, the lower ones half as long as panicle or more. Sessile spikelets broadly elliptic to obovate; glumes crustaceous, striately veined above middle. Grain elliptic or elliptic-oblong, enclosed by the glumes or only slightly protruding.
Cultivated for grain and forage throughout most of China, including forms used for making brooms.
‘nervosum’
多脉高粱 duo mai gao liang
Panicle elongate, dense, elliptic in outline, to 40 cm. Sessile spikelets elliptic to broadly elliptic; glumes papery, prominently veined ± throughout. Grain broadly elliptic, protruding beyond the glumes.
Cultivated for grain, mainly in N China.
Trusted
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



