Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (1) (learn more)
Overview
Comprehensive Description
Comments
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Description
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Distribution
Occurrence in North America
IN IA KS KY ME MD MA MI MN MS
MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY ND OH
OK OR PA RI SD TN TX UT VT WA
WV WI WY AB BC LB MB NB NF NT
NS ON PQ SK YT MEXICO
Trusted
become naturalized in the East and now occurs throughout the United
States with the exception of the South Atlantic and Gulf Coast states
[2,17]. It occurs throughout most of Canada and some areas of Mexico
[35,45].
- 17. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
- 2. Badger, Kemuel S.; Ungar, Irwin A. 1991. Life history and population dynamics of Hordeum jubatum along a soil salinity gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany. 69: 384-393. [14539]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
- 45. Hardy BBT Limited. 1989. Manual of plant species suitability for reclamation in Alberta. 2d ed. Report No. RRTAC 89-4. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council. 436 p. [15460]
Trusted
Range and Habitat in Illinois
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Regional Distribution in the Western United States
This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):
1 Northern Pacific Border
2 Cascade Mountains
3 Southern Pacific Border
4 Sierra Mountains
5 Columbia Plateau
6 Upper Basin and Range
7 Lower Basin and Range
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
10 Wyoming Basin
11 Southern Rocky Mountains
12 Colorado Plateau
13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont
14 Great Plains
15 Black Hills Uplift
16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
United States (North America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Kucera, C. L. 1998. The Grasses of Missouri 305 pp., University of Missouri Press, Colombia.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018088
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
SPECIMEN BASED RECORD. Published protolog data.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9990002
-
Espejo Serna, A., A. R. López-Ferrari & J. Valdés-Reyna. 2000. Poaceae. Monocot. Mexic. Sinopsis Floríst. 10: 7–236 [and index].
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1015183
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
United States (North America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Munz, P. A. & D. D. Keck. 1959. Cal. Fl. 1–1681. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1717
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Canada (North America)
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
United States (North America)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Soreng, R. J., G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, E. J. Judziewicz, T. S. Filgueiras & O. Morrone. 2003 and onwards. On-line taxonomic novelties and updates, distributional additions and corrections, and editorial changes since the four published volumes of the Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae) published in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. vols. 39, 41, 46, and 48. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/CNWG:. In R. J. Soreng, G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, T. S. Filgueiras, E. J. Judziewicz & O. Morrone Internet Cat. New World Grasses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1024044
-
Soreng, R. J. 2003. Hordeum. In Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): IV. Subfamily Pooideae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 48: 389–402.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1003690
-
Baden, C. & R. v. Bothmer. 1994. A taxonomic revision of Hordeum sect. Critesion. Nordic J. Bot. 14(2): 117–136.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/46668
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Canada (North America)
Chile (South America)
Denmark (Europe)
Germany (Europe)
France (Europe)
Greenland (North America)
Ireland (Europe)
Mexico (Mesoamerica)
Netherlands (Europe)
Norway (Europe)
Sweden (Europe)
Russian Federation (Asia)
United Kingdom (Europe)
United States (North America)
China (Asia)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Anonymous. 1986. List-Based Rec., Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S.D.A. Database of the U.S.D.A., Beltsville.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1103
-
Soreng, R. J., G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, E. J. Judziewicz, T. S. Filgueiras & O. Morrone. 2003 and onwards. On-line taxonomic novelties and updates, distributional additions and corrections, and editorial changes since the four published volumes of the Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae) published in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. vols. 39, 41, 46, and 48. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/CNWG:. In R. J. Soreng, G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, T. S. Filgueiras, E. J. Judziewicz & O. Morrone Internet Cat. New World Grasses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1024044
-
Herrera Arrieta, Y. & A. Cortés Ortiz. 2010. Listado florístico y aspectos ecológicos de la familia Poaceae para Chihuahua, Durango y Zacatecas, México. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 4(2): 711–738.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100002652
-
Espejo Serna, A., A. R. López-Ferrari & J. Valdés-Reyna. 2000. Poaceae. Monocot. Mexic. Sinopsis Floríst. 10: 7–236 [and index].
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1015183
-
Beetle, A. A. 1977. Noteworthy grasses from Mexico V. Phytologia 37(4): 317–407.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/2538
-
Gould, F. W. & R. Moran. 1981. The grasses of Baja California, Mexico. Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 12: 1–140.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/11232
-
Kucera, C. L. 1998. The Grasses of Missouri 305 pp., University of Missouri Press, Colombia.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018088
-
Tolmatchev, A. I. 1964. Gramineae. Arktic. Fl. SSSR 2: 1–274.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/10152
-
McVaugh, R. 1983. Gramineae. 14: 1–436. In R. McVaugh Fl. Novo-Galiciana. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/9853
-
Parodi, L. R. & E. G. Nicora. 1978. Hordeum. In: E. G. Nicora, Gramineae. 8(3): 406–440. In M. N. Correa Fl. Patagónica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/19452
-
Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles & C. R. Bell. 1968. Man. Vasc. Fl. Carolinas i–lxi, 1–1183. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/636
-
Correll, D. S. & M. C. Johnston. 1970. Man. Vasc. Pl. Texas i–xv, 1–1881. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1493
-
Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Fl. Great Plains i–vii, 1–1392. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/637
-
Fernald, M. 1950. Manual (ed. 8) i–lxiv, 1–1632. American Book Co., New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1327
-
Munz, P. A. 1974. Fl. S. Calif. 1–1086. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1719
-
Voss, E. G. 1972. Gymnosperms and Monocots. i–xv, 1–488. In Michigan Fl. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1494
-
Moore, D. M. 1968. The vascular flora of the Falkland Islands. Brit. Antarc. Surv. Sci. Rep. 60: 1–202, 1–6 pls.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20903
-
Flora of China Editorial Committee. 2006. Fl. China 22: 1–733. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1029690
-
Zuloaga, F. O., E. G. Nicora, Z. E. R. Agrasar, O. Morrone, J. Pensiero & A. M. Cialdella. 1994. Catálogo de la familia Poaceae en la República Argentina. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: i–xi, 1–178.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/43109
-
Soreng, R. J. 2003. Hordeum. In Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): IV. Subfamily Pooideae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 48: 389–402.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1003690
-
Baden, C. & R. v. Bothmer. 1994. A taxonomic revision of Hordeum sect. Critesion. Nordic J. Bot. 14(2): 117–136.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/46668
-
Gleason, H. A. & A. J. Cronquist. 1968. The Pteridophytoa, Gymnospermae and Monocotyledoneae. 1: 1–482. In H. A. Gleason Ill. Fl. N. U.S. (ed. 3). New York Botanical Garden, New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1495
-
Cronquist, A. J., A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren & Reveal. 1977. Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. 6: 1–584. In A. J. Cronquist, A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal & P. K. Holmgren (eds.) Intermount. Fl. Hafner Pub. Co., New York.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1725
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
United States
Origin: Unknown/Undetermined
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
United States
Origin: Native
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Present
Confidence: Confident
Type of Residency: Year-round
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Description
Foxtail barley is a short-lived, native, perennial, cool-season grass
[1,14,26,32]. It has erect, slender stems, 1 to 2 feet (0.3-0.6 m)
tall, growing in thick bunches or tufts [23,26,38]. The roots are
fibrous [35].
- 23. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798]
- 1. Badger, Kemuel S.; Ungar, Irwin A. 1989. The effects of salinity and temperature on the germination of the inland halophyte Hordeum jubatum. Canadian Journal of Botany. 67(5): 1420-1425. [14650]
- 14. Hallsten, Gregory P.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Beetle, Alan A. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3rd ed. Research Journal 202. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. 432 p. [2906]
- 26. Morris, H. E.; Booth, W. E.; Payne, G. F.; Stitt, R. E. 1950. Important grasses on Montana ranges. Bull. No. 470. Bozeman, MT: Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. 52 p. [5520]
- 32. Stubbendieck, J.; Nichols, James T.; Roberts, Kelly K. 1985. Nebraska range and pasture grasses (including grass-like plants). E.C. 85-170. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. 75 p. [2269]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
- 38. Vallentine, John F. 1961. Important Utah range grasses. Extension Circular 281. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 48 p. [2937]
Trusted
Physical Description
Trusted
Description
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Synonym
Trusted
Type Information
Catalog Number: US 1939943
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Verification Degree: Original publication and alleged type specimen examined
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): L. Pammel
Year Collected: 1897
Locality: Edgemont., South Dakota, United States, North America
- Syntype: Scribner, F. L. 1899. Proc. Davenport Acad. Nat. Sci. 7: 245.
Trusted
Catalog Number: US 2808440
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany
Verification Degree: Original publication and alleged type specimen examined
Preparation: Pressed specimen
Collector(s): A. J. A. Bonpland
Locality: Between Mt. Chapultepec and Carpio., Mexico, Central America
- Type fragment: Kunth, C. S. 1816. Nova Genera Sp. Pl. 1: 145.
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat characteristics
Foxtail barley grows chiefly on grassland types on the plains and lower
foothills but also extends upward to subalpine elevations in the spruce
belt. It is very common throughout the West, especially along roadsides
and other waste places, and in grain and hay fields [17,23,31,35]. It
reaches its greatest abundance on the edges of sloughs and salt marshes,
grassy slopes, and flatlands in the western prairies [4]. It is also
abundant in overgrazed sagebrush margins and irrigated meadows [14]. In
sagebrush, pinyon-juniper, salt-desert shrub, and plains grasslands
communities, it generally occurs in areas where extra water has
accumulated, such as sloughs and around stock-water developments [38].
Soils and salt-tolerance: Foxtail barley grows well on a variety of
soil textures ranging from sandy loam to clay, with clay content varying
from 17 percent to 56 percent [34,45]. It requires fairly moist
conditions and cannot sustain itself during long dry periods [8,34].
Foxtail barley commonly occurs on soils with moderate salinity but can
also grow and reproduce under nonsaline conditions [34,45]. Foxtail
barley has a broad tolerance to variations in pH. It occurs in areas
with a pH from 6.4 to 9.5, with a median value of 8.1 in the surface
soils [34].
Elevational range: The elevational range of foxtail barley in several
western states is as follows [8]:
Utah: 2,500 to 8,800 feet (762-2,682 m)
Colorado: 3,400 to 10,400 feet (1,036-3,170 m)
Wyoming: 3,500 to 9,400 feet (1,067-2,865 m)
Montana: 2,100 to 3,900 feet (640-1,189 m)
Plant associates: Foxtail barley may occur in relatively pure stands in
moderately saline communities or as a codominant with inland saltgrass
(Distichlis stricta var. stricta) and spearleaf saltweed (Atriplex
patula var. hastata) [34]. Foxtail barley is also commonly associated
with coastal saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), nutka alkaligrass
(Puccinellia nutkaensis), Pursh seepweed (Suaeda depressa), heath aster
(Aster ericoides), field sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis), curly dock
(Rumex crispus), bluegrass (Poa spp.), and wheatgrass (Agropyron spp.)
[6,13,15,34].
- 8. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
- 17. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
- 23. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798]
- 4. Baum, Bernard R.; Bailey, L. Grant. 1990. Key and synopsis of North American Hordeum species. Canadian Journal of Botany. 68: 2433-2442. [16150]
- 6. Clambey, Gary K.; Landers, Roger Q. 1978. A survey of wetland vegetation in north-central Iowa. In: Glenn-Lewin, David C.; Landers, Roger Q., Jr., eds. Proceedings, 5th Midwest prairie conference; 1976 August 22-24; Ames, IA. Ames, IA: Iowa State University: 32-35. [3304]
- 13. Hadley, E. B.; Buccos, R. P. 1967. Plant community composition and net primary production within a native eastern North Dakota prairie. American Midland Naturalist. 77: 116-127. [11422]
- 14. Hallsten, Gregory P.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Beetle, Alan A. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3rd ed. Research Journal 202. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. 432 p. [2906]
- 15. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
- 31. Sampson, Arthur W.; Chase, Agnes; Hedrick, Donald W. 1951. California grasslands and range forage grasses. Bull. 724. Berkeley, CA: University of California College of Agriculture, California Agricultural Experiment Station. 125 p. [2052]
- 34. Ungar, Irwin A. 1974. Inland halophytes of the United States. In: Reinold, Robert J.; Queen, William H., eds. Ecology of halophytes. New York: Academic Press, Inc: 235-305. [11429]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
- 38. Vallentine, John F. 1961. Important Utah range grasses. Extension Circular 281. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 48 p. [2937]
- 45. Hardy BBT Limited. 1989. Manual of plant species suitability for reclamation in Alberta. 2d ed. Report No. RRTAC 89-4. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council. 436 p. [15460]
Trusted
Habitat: Cover Types
This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):
1 Jack pine
5 Balsam fir
12 Black spruce
13 Black spruce - tamarack
22 White pine - hemlock
23 Eastern hemlock
38 Tamarack
32 Red spruce
33 Red spruce - balsam fir
34 Red spruce - Fraser fir
31 Red spruce - sugar maple - beech
35 Paper birch - red spruce - balsam fir
206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir
210 Interior Douglas-fir
224 Western hemlock
225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce
229 Pacific Douglas-fir
230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock
237 Interior ponderosa pine
239 Pinyon - juniper
244 Pacific ponderosa pine - Douglas-fir
245 Pacific ponderosa pine
Trusted
Habitat: Plant Associations
This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):
More info for the term: shrub
K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest
K010 Ponderosa shrub forest
K011 Western ponderosa forest
K012 Douglas-fir forest
K015 Western spruce - fir forest
K016 Eastern ponderosa forest
K017 Black Hills pine forest
K018 Pine - Douglas-fir forest
K019 Arizona pine forest
K021 Southwestern spruce - fir forest
K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland
K024 Juniper steppe woodland
K027 Mesquite bosque
K033 Chaparral
K034 Montane chaparral
K037 Mountain-mahogany - oak scrub
K038 Great Basin sagebrush
K039 Blackbrush
K040 Saltbush - greasewood
K041 Creosotebush
K048 California steppe
K049 Tule marshes
K050 Fescue - wheatgrass
K051 Wheatgrass - bluegrass
K053 Grama - galleta steppe
K055 Sagebrush steppe
K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe
K057 Galleta - three-awn shrubsteppe
K060 Mesquite savanna
K063 Foothills prairie
K064 Grama - needlegrass - wheatgrass
K065 Grama - buffalograss
K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass
K067 Wheatgrass - bluestem - needlegrass
K068 Wheatgrass - grama - buffalograss
K069 Bluestem - grama prairie
K070 Sandsage - bluestem prairie
K074 Bluestem prairie
K081 Oak savanna
K093 Great Lakes spruce - fir forest
K094 Conifer bog
K095 Great Lakes pine forest
K098 Northern floodplain forest
K101 Elm - ash forest
Trusted
Habitat: Ecosystem
This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):
FRES10 White - red - jack pine
FRES11 Spruce - fir
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES21 Ponderosa pine
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES24 Hemlock - Sitka spruce
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES34 Chaparral - mountain shrub
FRES35 Pinyon - juniper
FRES36 Mountain grasslands
FRES37 Mountain meadows
FRES38 Plains grasslands
FRES39 Prairie
FRES40 Desert grasslands
FRES41 Wet grasslands
FRES42 Annual grasslands
FRES44 Alpine
Trusted
Range and Habitat in Illinois
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Key Plant Community Associations
mid-elevations throughout Montana. It occurs in disturbed areas,
meadows, basins, and drawdown areas, where soils are saline or alkaline
[15].
- 15. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
Trusted
Habitat & Distribution
Trusted
Associations
Faunal Associations
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Trusted
General Ecology
Fire Management Considerations
As a general rule, undesirable cool-season grasses such as foxtail
barley can be reduced with late spring burns [41].
- 41. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
Trusted
Broad-scale Impacts of Plant Response to Fire
The Research Project Summary Vegetation response to restoration treatments
in ponderosa pine-Douglas-fir forests of western Montana provides information
on prescribed fire and postfire response of plant community species, including
foxtail barley, that was not available when this species review was written.
Trusted
Plant Response to Fire
Foxtail barley generally recovers after fire through off-site seeds
[27]. Foxtail barley is most sensitive to spring fire that coincides
with its active growing period [41,42]. After a North Dakota prairie
fire in the spring of 1966, foxtail barley culm production was greatly
reduced [12]. However, the opposite was found to be true following a
1972 spring fire on a northwestern Minnesota prairie. Here flowering
activity was stimulated [27]. Following a burn along the Missouri River
Breaks of central Montana, foxtail barley was one of the first grass
species to become established [44].
- 12. Hadley, Elmer B. 1970. Net productivity and burning response of native eastern North Dakota prairie communities. American Midland Naturalist. 84(1): 121-135. [5434]
- 27. Pemble, R. H.; Van Amburg, G. L.; Mattson, Lyle. 1981. Intraspecific variation in flowering activity following a spring burn on a northwestern Minnesota prairie. In: Stuckey, Ronald L.; Reese, Karen J., eds. The prairie peninsula--in the "shadow" of Transeau: Proceedings, 6th North American prairie conference; 1978 August 12-17; Columbus, OH. Ohio Biological Survey: Biological Notes No. 15. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, College of Biological Sciences: 235-240. [3435]
- 41. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
- 42. Young, Richard P. 1986. Fire ecology and management in plant communities of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Portland, OR: Oregon State University. 169 p. Thesis. [3745]
- 44. Eichhorn, Larry C.; Watts, C. Robert. 1984. Plant succession on burns in the river breaks of central Montana. Proceedings, Montana Academy of Science. 43: 21-34. [15478]
Trusted
Immediate Effect of Fire
Moderate fires with probably top-kill foxtail barley, and hot fires may
kill the underground root system.
Trusted
Successional Status
More info for the term: climax
Facultative Seral Species
Foxtail barley is a pioneer or invader in disturbed areas and in areas
with high salinity [10,15,20,43]. It is among the first grasses to
establish after disturbance and may become dominant in early seral
grassland communities. It also occurs but is not dominant in some late
seral to climax grassland communities [29]. It rapidly invades areas
exposed by a receding water table. If the water table becomes stabilized
at a high level, foxtail barley will ultimately be replaced by saltgrass
(Distichlis spp.) or common spikesedge (Eleocharis palustris) in saline
areas [10,20,43].
- 10. Frolik, A. L.; Shepherd, W. O. 1940. Vegetative composition and grazing capacity of a typical area of Nebraska sandhills rangeland. University of Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin. Number 117. 39 p. [5417]
- 15. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
- 20. Keith, Lloyd B. 1961. A study of waterfowl ecology on small impoundments in southeastern Alberta. Wildlife Monographs. 6: 1-88. [4501]
- 29. Ross, Robert L.; Hunter, Harold E. 1976. Climax vegetation of Montana based on soils and climate. Bozeman, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 64 p. [2028]
- 43. Millar, J. B. 1973. Vegetation changes in shallow marsh wetlands under improving moisture regimes. Canadian Journal of Botany. 51: 1443-1457. [14589]
Trusted
Regeneration Processes
Sexual reproduction: Foxtail barley is a prolific seeder. Ripe
seedheads break up and are dispersed by wind or transported in the hair
of grazing animals [35].
Seed germination: Foxtail barley produces two germination cohorts: one
in the spring and one in the fall. These two cohorts are important in
maintaining populations of foxtail barley [2]. On a saline marsh at
Rittman, Ohio, foxtail barley seed production per inflorescence was
greater with an increase in soil salinity [1]. Seed germination is
inhibited by warm summer temperatures, but seeds readily germinate when
exposed to cooler fall temperatures. After cold stratification the
temperature range favorable for germination broadens. Freezing
temperatures result in high seed mortality [1]. Seeds are capable of
germinating in 1.0 percent total salts or less. Germination decrease
when salinity increases past 1.0 percent [34]. Germination is
independent of light conditions [1].
Seedlings: Foxtail barley seedlings can survive for several months at
salinities unfavorable for growth and reproduction. In a marsh at
Rittman, Ohio, highest survival of fall and spring seedlings occurred in
the most saline lower marsh [2].
Vegetative reproduction: Foxtail barley reproduces vegetatively by
tillering [33].
- 1. Badger, Kemuel S.; Ungar, Irwin A. 1989. The effects of salinity and temperature on the germination of the inland halophyte Hordeum jubatum. Canadian Journal of Botany. 67(5): 1420-1425. [14650]
- 2. Badger, Kemuel S.; Ungar, Irwin A. 1991. Life history and population dynamics of Hordeum jubatum along a soil salinity gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany. 69: 384-393. [14539]
- 33. Stubbendieck, J.; Hatch, Stephan L.; Hirsch, Kathie J. 1986. North American range plants. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 465 p. [2270]
- 34. Ungar, Irwin A. 1974. Inland halophytes of the United States. In: Reinold, Robert J.; Queen, William H., eds. Ecology of halophytes. New York: Academic Press, Inc: 235-305. [11429]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
Trusted
Growth Form (according to Raunkiær Life-form classification)
More info for the terms: chamaephyte, hemicryptophyte
Chamaephyte
Hemicryptophyte
Trusted
Fire Ecology
- 15. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
Trusted
Post-fire Regeneration
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Cyclicity
Phenology
Foxtail barley starts growth in April or May. Flowering and seed set
generally occur from May until late July [2,33,34].
- 2. Badger, Kemuel S.; Ungar, Irwin A. 1991. Life history and population dynamics of Hordeum jubatum along a soil salinity gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany. 69: 384-393. [14539]
- 33. Stubbendieck, J.; Hatch, Stephan L.; Hirsch, Kathie J. 1986. North American range plants. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 465 p. [2270]
- 34. Ungar, Irwin A. 1974. Inland halophytes of the United States. In: Reinold, Robert J.; Queen, William H., eds. Ecology of halophytes. New York: Academic Press, Inc: 235-305. [11429]
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Hordeum jubatum ssp intermedium
Public Records: 0
Specimens with Barcodes: 2
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Hordeum jubatum
Public Records: 17
Specimens with Barcodes: 23
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: NNR - Unranked
Trusted
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure
Trusted
Management
Management considerations
animals, it is often considered a pasture weed [21,24,35]. Hay
containing foxtail barley is nearly valueless [24]. Additionally,
seedheads of this species can downgrade the value of wool or pelts,
causing further economic loss to ranchers [24]. Once established,
foxtail barley is hard to eradicate. It increases under excessive
grazing pressure. Dense stands are usually associated with some type of
disturbance, such as overgrazing, close mowing, or repeated burning
[14,29,45].
Seeding disturbed meadows and pastures with desirable, fast-growing
forage grasses is effective in reducing the amount of foxtail barley
that invades the site. Additionally, conservative grazing can
facilitate the establishment of native, palatable grasses and reduce
foxtail barley [15,35].
Control with herbicides: Forty-eight pounds of dalapon
(2,2-dichloropropionic acid) per acre (7.2 kg/ha) in water at 50 gallons
per acre (76 liters/ha) has been shown to give complete kill of foxtail
barley. Lower rates of 16 and 32 pounds of dalapon per acre (2.4
kg/ha-4.8 kg/ha) allows some survival. A combination of 30 pounds (4.5
kg/ha) of dalapon and 4 pounds (0.6 kg/ha) of amino triazole per acre
will also effectively control foxtail barley [36]. The herbicide
mefluidide is most effective in controlling foxtail barley when applied
near initiation of flowering [39]. In a meadow brome (Bromus spp.)
stand, the herbicide kerb at the rate of 0.5 pounds per acre ( 0.7
kg/ha) gave excellent control of foxtail barley without apparent
reduction of the meadow brome [18].
- 14. Hallsten, Gregory P.; Skinner, Quentin D.; Beetle, Alan A. 1987. Grasses of Wyoming. 3rd ed. Research Journal 202. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station. 432 p. [2906]
- 15. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
- 18. Humberg, N. E.; Alley, H. P.; Vore, R. E. 1981. Rangeland and meadowland: Section II. University of Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Research Journal. 63: 29-51. [4907]
- 21. Kingsbury, John M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 626 p. [122]
- 24. Lamson-Scribner, F. 1900. Economic grasses. Bulletin No. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Agrostology. 85 p. [4282]
- 29. Ross, Robert L.; Hunter, Harold E. 1976. Climax vegetation of Montana based on soils and climate. Bozeman, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 64 p. [2028]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
- 36. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of the Interior; Range Seeding Equipment Committee. 1959. Handbook: Chemical control of range weeds. Washington, DC: [Publisher unknown]
- 39. White, Larry M. 1989. Growth regulators' effect on crested wheatgrass forage yield and quality. Journal of Range Management. 42(1): 46-50. [4170]
- 45. Hardy BBT Limited. 1989. Manual of plant species suitability for reclamation in Alberta. 2d ed. Report No. RRTAC 89-4. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council. 436 p. [15460]
Trusted
-
Aeschimann, D. & C. Heitz. 2005. Synonymie-Index der Schweizer Flora und der angrenzenden Gebiete (SISF). 2te Auflage. Documenta Floristicae Helvetiae N° 2. Genève.
http://www.crsf.ch/
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Benefits
Cover Value
during one or more seasons for wildlife species is rated as follows [8]:
CO MT ND UT WY
Pronghorn ---- ---- Poor Poor Poor
Elk ---- Poor ---- Poor Poor
Mule deer ---- Poor Poor Poor Poor
White-tailed deer Poor Fair ---- Poor ----
Small mammals ---- Poor ---- Fair Good
Small nongame birds ---- Poor ---- Fair Good
Upland game birds Poor Poor ---- Fair Fair
Waterfowl ---- Good Good Fair Fair
- 8. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
Trusted
Palatability
several western states is rated as follows [8]:
CO MT ND UT WY
Cattle Fair Poor Fair Fair Poor
Sheep Fair Fair Fair Poor Fair
Horses Fair ---- ---- Fair Fair
Pronghorn ---- Poor Poor Fair Poor
Elk ---- Poor ---- Good Poor
Mule deer ---- Poor Poor Fair Poor
White-tailed deer ---- Poor Poor ---- Poor
Small mammals ---- ---- ---- Fair Fair
Small nongame birds ---- Fair ---- Fair ----
Upland game birds ---- Poor ---- Fair Fair
Waterfowl Good Fair ---- Fair Fair
- 8. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
Trusted
Other uses and values
an ornamental in dry bouquets [24].
- 24. Lamson-Scribner, F. 1900. Economic grasses. Bulletin No. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Agrostology. 85 p. [4282]
Trusted
Value for rehabilitation of disturbed sites
where forage value is of secondary importance. Its extensive root
system and aggressive habit make it a good species for erosion control.
Foxtail barley seeds are not commercially available [45].
- 45. Hardy BBT Limited. 1989. Manual of plant species suitability for reclamation in Alberta. 2d ed. Report No. RRTAC 89-4. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council. 436 p. [15460]
Trusted
Importance to Livestock and Wildlife
foxtail barley [20]. Before flowering, foxtail barley is palatable to
livestock and big game. Up to the time when seedheads develop, it is
fair to good forage for cattle and horses and fair for sheep [35].
Foxtail barley seedheads, when dry, are very harmful to all kinds of
grazing animals, particularly deer, elk, and pronghorn [35]. The
sharp-pointed joints of the spike, each with several long and slender
awns, stick in the nose and mouth of grazing animals, often penetrating
the flesh [24,35]. Infection caused by awns stuck in tissue can cause
necrotic sores and necrotic stomatitis, which in turn finally attacks
the bones and causes an abnormal enlargement as well as lumpy jaw and
pus-forming abscesses. These infections may result in death of the
animal [35].
- 20. Keith, Lloyd B. 1961. A study of waterfowl ecology on small impoundments in southeastern Alberta. Wildlife Monographs. 6: 1-88. [4501]
- 24. Lamson-Scribner, F. 1900. Economic grasses. Bulletin No. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Agrostology. 85 p. [4282]
- 35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
Trusted
Cultivation
-
Hilty, J. Editor. 2013. Illinois Wildflowers. World Wide Web electronic publication. flowervisitors.info, version 04/2013.
See: Botanical Terminology and Line Drawings, Ecological Terminology, Website Description, Links to Other Websites, Reference Materials
Trusted
Wikipedia
Hordeum jubatum
Hordeum jubatum (Foxtail barley) is a perennial plant species in the grass family Poaceae. It occurs wild mainly in northern North America and adjacent northeastern Siberia. However, as it escaped often from gardens it can be found worldwide in areas with temperate to warm climates, and is considered a weed in many countries. The species is a polyploid and originated via hybridization of an East Asian Hordeum species with a close but extinct relative of Californian H. brachyantherum. It is grown as an ornamental plant for its attractive inflorescences and when done flowering for its infructescence.
Contents |
Properties
Foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) propagates by seed. It is known for its ability to tolerate saline soils but is capable of productive growth on soil types ranging from loamy to clayey soils with pH's of 6.4 to 9.5. The upper limit of soil NaCl for productive growth and development is 1.0%. Foxtail barley is also adapted to a wide range of moisture regimes from dry to wet. Although this species is generally found on moist sites, it can withstand drought-like conditions. It is commonly found in lowland areas with restricted soil drainage, disturbed sites, waste areas and fields. Foxtail barley is a pioneer species or invader in disturbed areas and in areas with high salinity. It is among the first grasses to establish after disturbance and rapidly invades areas exposed by a receding water table.
Seedling
Foxtail barley is a prolific seed producer, with each plant capable of producing upwards of 200 seeds. Seeds are elliptical, yellowish-brown and about a ¼ inch long with four to eight awns. The seeds have sharp, backwards pointing barbs. Seed is dispersed by wind, machinery and animals and germinates in the cooler temperatures of the spring or fall. Seed germinating in the fall can overwinter and resume growth in early spring, giving Foxtail barley a competitive advantage over many crops. Germination is inhibited by warm temperatures and seeds require a period of darkness for germination to occur. Foxtail barley is a shallow-rooted plant with germination occurring at soil depths not greater than three inches. The seedling of Foxtail barley first appears as thin, vertical leaves covered in short, dense hairs. The leaves have prominent venation and rough margins, while auricles are absent or elemental and the membranous ligule is very short with fine hairs.
Juvenile/Mature
Foxtail barley is a fibrous-rooted, densely tufted grass that grows from 30 cm to 100 cm tall and is erect or reclining at the base. The stems are erect and smooth and the leaf sheaths are split and hairy. The inflorescence of the mature plant is a dense, long-awned nodding spike with greenish or purplish colouring. The jointed rachis breaks into sharply pointed segments with three spikelets composing each segment. Only the central spikelet has one creamy coloured seed while each segment has seven awns with upward pointing barbs. These awns are up to three inches long and become easily attached to animals, clothing, machinery, etc. Leaf blades are slender and a greyish-green colour.
Ecological Impact
Foxtail barley is distinguished from cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Meadow barley (Hordeum brachyantherum) by lemma awn length. H. brachyantherum has awn lengths of ½ an inch; Foxtail barley has lengths of ½-3 inches; and cultivated barley of 10–15 cm in length. Once Foxtail barley is established, it becomes extremely difficult to eradicate. Its extensive root systems and aggressive habit, as well as its ability to tolerate saline soils make it a resilient competitor. It is considered a weed because of this competitive ability and the dangers it poses to wildlife and livestock. While Foxtail barley may be palatable for animals in early spring before it flowers, its seed heads, when dry, are very harmful to grazing animals. The awns with upward-pointing barbs become easily attached and embedded in the animal's mouth and face, causing severe irritation, abscesses, and even blindness. Foxtail barley is also host to a number of viruses, and because it harbours wheat rust and blackstem rust, can indirectly affect the development of field crops. Since Foxtail barley accumulates high amounts of salt in its leaves and roots, it has the potential of reducing soil salinity. Given Foxtail barley's ability to withstand saline soils, it has been identified as having potential for the revegetation of saline mine spoils to reduce erosion. It has also been recommended as a species suitable for wildlife habitat rehabilitation on disturbed lands, but given its other less desirable traits, other natural grass species would be more beneficial.
References
- Pink, A. (2004). Gardening for the Million. Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.
- R. von Bothmer, N. Jacobsen, C. Baden, R. B. Jørgensen & I. Linde-Laursen (1995). An ecogeographical study of the genus Hordeum, 2nd ed.. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. ISBN 92-9043-229-2.
- Blattner, F. R. (2004). "Phylogenetic analysis of Hordeum (Poaceae) as inferred by nuclear rDNA ITS sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33 (2): 289–299. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.05.012. PMID 15336664.
- Blattner, F. R. (2006). "Multiple intercontinental dispersals shaped the distribution area of Hordeum (Poaceae)". New Phytologist 169 (3): 603–614. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01610.x. PMID 16411962.
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



