Articles on this page are available in 2 other languages: Spanish (1), Dutch (1) (learn more)
Overview
Brief Summary
Trusted
European beachgrass, also known as Marram and Marram grass (Ammophila arenaria) is a coarse perennial coastal grass in the Poaceae family.
Native to coastal areas in Northern Africa; the Arabian Peninsula, Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon and Turkey; and Northern, Middle, East, Southeastern and Southwestern Europe, it plays an important role in dune formation and erosion prevention.
As an invasive, introduced species in North America, it is threatening coastal sand dunes in the eastern and western United States, where it is displacing native dune species (such as the American beachgrass Ammophila breviligulata) and significantly altering the structure of the dune systems it invades. Control of this invasive species can only be achieved at this time through ongoing manual removal. It can also extend inland for several miles. It has also been naturalized in Australia and Hawaii.
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ammophila arenaria, http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=AMAR4, accessed 28 March 2012
- USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network, Ammophila arenaria, http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?2911, accessed 28 March 2012
- Mary Russo, Andrea Pickart, Larry Morse, and Rick Young. The Nature Conservancy Element Stewardship Abstract for Ammophila arenaria. http://www.invasive.org/gist/esadocs/documnts/ammoare.pdf, accessed 28 March 2012
Trusted
Distribution
Global Distribution
All around the coasts of Europe and the Mediterranean region to latitude 62°, but widely introduced as a very efficient sand-binder.
Trusted
Localities documented in Tropicos sources
Argentina (South America)
Australia (Oceania)
Canada (North America)
Chile (South America)
China (Asia)
United States (North America)
South Africa (Africa & Madagascar)
New Zealand (Oceania)
Note: This information is based on publications available through Tropicos and may not represent the entire distribution. Tropicos does not categorize distributions as native or non-native.
-
Anonymous. 1986. List-Based Rec., Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S.D.A. Database of the U.S.D.A., Beltsville.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1103
-
Marticorena, C. & M. Quezada. 1985. Catálogo de la Flora Vascular de Chile. Gayana, Bot. 42: 1–157.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1592
-
Soreng, R. J., G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, E. J. Judziewicz, T. S. Filgueiras & O. Morrone. 2003 and onwards. On-line taxonomic novelties and updates, distributional additions and corrections, and editorial changes since the four published volumes of the Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae) published in Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. vols. 39, 41, 46, and 48. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/CNWG:. In R. J. Soreng, G. Davidse, P. M. Peterson, F. O. Zuloaga, T. S. Filgueiras, E. J. Judziewicz & O. Morrone Internet Cat. New World Grasses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1024044
-
Simon, B. K. 1990. Key Austral. Grasses 1–150.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/25890
-
Moore, D. M. 1983. Fl. Tierra del Fuego 396 pp. A. Nelson; Missouri Botanical Garden, Oswestry; St. Louis.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/458
-
Nicora, E. G., M. E. D. Paula, A. M. Faggi, M. d. Mariano, A. M. M. A., L. R. Parodi, C. A. Petetin, F. A. Roig & Z. R. Agrasar. 1978. Gramineae. 8(3): 1–583. In M. N. Correa Fl. Patagónica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/11289
-
Edgar, E., M. A. O'Brien & H. E. Connor. 1991. Checklist of pooid grasses naturalised in New Zealand. 1. Tribes Nardeae, Stipeae, Hainardieae, Meliceae, and Aveneae. New Zealand J. Bot. 29: 101–116.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/44386
-
Gibbs Russell, G. E., W. G. Welman, E. Reitief, K. L. Immelman, G. Germishuizen, B. J. Pienaar, M. v. Wyk & A. Nicholas. 1987. List of species of southern African plants. Mem. Bot. Surv. S. Africa 2(1–2): 1–152(pt. 1), 1–270(pt. 2).
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1371
-
Hickman, J. C. 1993. Jepson Man.: Higher Pl. Calif. i–xvii, 1–1400. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/40453
-
Munz, P. A. & D. D. Keck. 1959. Cal. Fl. 1–1681. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1717
-
Munz, P. A. 1974. Fl. S. Calif. 1–1086. University of California Press, Berkeley.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1719
-
Moore, D. M. 1968. The vascular flora of the Falkland Islands. Brit. Antarc. Surv. Sci. Rep. 60: 1–202, 1–6 pls.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/20903
-
Zuloaga, F. O., E. G. Nicora, Z. E. R. Agrasar, O. Morrone, J. Pensiero & A. M. Cialdella. 1994. Catálogo de la familia Poaceae en la República Argentina. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: i–xi, 1–178.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/43109
-
Sharp, D. & B. K. Simon. 2002. AusGrass: Grasses of Australia. CD-ROM, Version 1.0. CD–ROM.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1026312
-
Soreng, R. J. 2003. Ammophila. In Catalogue of New World Grasses (Poaceae): IV. Subfamily Pooideae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 48: 107.
http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1003623
Trusted
-
Poma, L. (1936). Botanisch verslag van de excursies naar het Zwin op 15 mei en 13 september 1936. Biol. Jb. Dodonaea 3: 65-69
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=138557
-
Provoost, S.; Bonte, D. (Ed.) (2004). Animated dunes: a view of biodiversity at the Flemish coast [Levende duinen: een overzicht van de biodiversiteit aan de Vlaamse kust]. Mededelingen van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, 22. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud: Brussel, Belgium. ISBN 90-403-0205-7. 416, ill., appendices pp.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=133005
-
Goetghebeur, P. (1976). The vegetation of mud flats and salt marshes along the IJzer estuary at Nieuwpoort (West Flanders, Belgium) from 1900 to present [De vegetatie van de slikken en de schorren langs de IJzermonding te Nieuwpoort (Prov. West-Vlaanderen, België) van 1900 tot heden]. Biol. Jb. Dodonaea 44: 163-177, 1 folded table
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=133465
Trusted
National Distribution
Canada
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
United States
Origin: Exotic
Regularity: Regularly occurring
Currently: Unknown/Undetermined
Confidence: Confident
Trusted
Global Range: Native to the shores of Europe between 30 and 63 degrees north latitude. Introduced to other continents to stabilize drifting sands. In the United States it is found along the west coast.
Trusted
Physical Description
Morphology
Physical Description
Trusted
Diagnostic Description
Ammophila arenaria and A. breviligulata (American beachgrass) can be distinguished by their ligules, those of A. arenaria being thinner and longer ligules (10-30 mm) versus A. breviligulata's firmer and shorter ligules (1-3 mm).
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Comments: Ammophila arenaria occurs on coastal sand dunes throughout the world. Along the west coast of the United States, it thrives in areas of active sand movement and most often occupies the windward slopes of exposed dunes. However, it may extend inland for several miles. It grows on well-drained soils with various mineral compositions, including the sands of the Pacific Coast. It tolerates a range of soil pH from 4.5-9.0 and soil temperatures from 10-40 C (Ranwell 1959).
Trusted
Associations
Foodplant / saprobe
scattered, subepidermal, black pycnidium of Tiarospora coelomycetous anamorph of Amarenomyces ammophilae is saprobic on dead leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 1-3(-7)
Foodplant / spot causer
becoming erumpent pycnidium of Ascochyta coelomycetous anamorph of Ascochyta psammae causes spots on live leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 2-9
Foodplant / saprobe
Asteromyces anamorph of Asteromyces cruciatus is saprobic on dead Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / parasite
Blumeria graminis parasitises live Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / miner
larva of Cerodontha superciliosa mines leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / sap sucker
Chorosoma schillingi sucks sap of Ammophila arenaria
Other: major host/prey
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Conocybe dunensis is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Coprinopsis ammophilae is saprobic on Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Cyathus stercoreus is associated with plant of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / feeds on
larva of Demetrias monostigma feeds on Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / feeds on
larva of Dicronychus equisetoides feeds on Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Entoloma phaeocyathus is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Geastrum minimum is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Gymnopilus flavus is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Other: minor host/prey
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Hohenbuehelia culmicola is saprobic on dying stem (usu. near base) of Ammophila arenaria
Other: major host/prey
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Inocybe arenicola is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Inocybe dulcamara is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Other: major host/prey
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Inocybe dunensis is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / sap sucker
nymph of Ischnodemus sabuleti agg. sucks sap of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Marasmius anomalus is saprobic on dead culm of Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Melanoleuca cinereifolia is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Other: major host/prey
Foodplant / feeds on
larva of Melanotus villosus feeds on Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Mycena chlorantha is saprobic on dead, decayed debris of Ammophila arenaria
Other: minor host/prey
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Mycocalia duriaeana is saprobic on dead culm of Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
Otiorhynchus atroapterus is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / parasite
Psammina coelomycetous anamorph of Psammina bommeriae parasitises live Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Psathyrella ammophila is saprobic on dead, decayed litter of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Psathyrella flexispora is saprobic on debris of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / parasite
amphigenous telium of Puccinia pygmaea var. ammophilina parasitises live leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Ramaricium albo-ochraceum is saprobic on dead stem of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
epiphyllous, immersed then erumpent acervulus of Rhodesia coelomycetous anamorph of Rhodesia subtecta is saprobic on inrolled leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 7-8
Foodplant / saprobe
hypophyllous, arranged in rows, covered, piercing pycnidium of Septoria coelomycetous anamorph of Septoria ammophilae is saprobic on dead leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 8
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Simocybe centunculus var. maritima is saprobic on dead, decaying debris of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
grouped, at first subepidermal, dark brown pycnidium of Stagonospora coelomycetous anamorph of Stagonospora arenaria var. arenaria is saprobic on culm of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 5-10
Foodplant / saprobe
grouped, at first subepidermal, dark brown pycnidium of Stagonospora coelomycetous anamorph of Stagonospora arenaria var. minor is saprobic on culm of Ammophila arenaria
Remarks: season: 5-10
Plant / associate
fruitbody of Stropharia halophila is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
sporodochium of Thyrostromella dematiaceous anamorph of Thyrostromella myriana is saprobic on dead leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
epiphyllous apothecium of Tubeufia trichella is saprobic on decaying, dead leaf of Ammophila arenaria
Plant / associate
basidiome of Tulostoma melanocyclum is associated with Ammophila arenaria
Foodplant / saprobe
fruitbody of Vararia gallica is saprobic on dead, decayed Ammophila arenaria
Trusted
Known predators
Tetramesa eximia
Based on studies in:
Great Britain (Grassland)
This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
- Martinez, N.D., Hawkins, B.A., Dawah, H.A. & Feifarek, B.P. (1999). Effects of sampling effort on characterization of foodweb structure. Ecology, 80, 10441055.
Trusted
General Ecology
Synecology:
Native habitat. Ammophila arenaria is native to the British Isles and the coasts of the Baltic and North seas from 30 to 63 degrees north latitude. It grows most vigorously on mobile and semi-fixed dunes of varying chemical and physical make-up. However, all of the substrates share instability, free drainage, low organic material content, and a homogeneous soil profile (Huiskes 1979a).
European beachgrass plays an important role in the process of dune formation. Young plants become established along the upper beach, often in the lee of driftwood or other beach plant species. As the grass grows taller, wind is deflected upward over the plant. An equilibrium is established between the growth of A. arenaria and sand deposition. The plant causes the wind to slow and sand particles to be deposited. Sand deposition stimulates growth of A. arenaria, which in turn encourages more sand deposition. Too much sand deposition slows growth; too little causes senescence. Thus, sand dune formation is largely determined by the interaction of A. arenaria and wind. Added protection from the wind and sand deposition results in the pattern of new growth to the lee of the existing tussocks (Willis et al. 1959a, 1959b).
In native habitats, A. arenaria alone makes up the foredune plant community. It also occupies dunes further inland where sand is actively moving. This community is known as "Pure Ammophiletum." As dunes become stabilized by this species, however, other species are able to take hold. This process creates a "Mixed Ammophiletum" community. This mosaic community is typically found on the lee slopes of dunes, mostly on inland, less active slip faces. Occasionally it is found in sheltered areas near the sea. It is an open community with only a moderate amount of bare sand. Since the sand supply is reduced by the fully colonized foredune, the vigor of A. arenaria generally declines in the "Mixed Ammophiletum" community (Willis et al. 1959a, 1959b).
Non-native habitat. A. arenaria has been introduced to stabilize sand on the west coast of the United States since the early 1900's (Knudson 1917, Barbour and Johnson 1977, Crook 1979a, 1979b). When planted on disturbed dunes or bare sand, it has initiated dune formation in the manner described above. Rhizome fragments washed along the shore may become buried on the beach, initiating the formation of foredunes (Wiedemann et al. 1974). However, the topography and composition of the foredunes differ from those formed by plant species native to the West Coast (Barbour and Johnson 1977).
A. arenaria has escaped and become naturalized north of San Francisco (Barbour and Johnson 1977) and forms extensive stands as far south as Vandenberg Air Force Base, San Luis Obispo county. Before the introduction of European beachgrass, foredunes in northern California were dominated by Elymus. The foredunes were low and rose above the beach with a gentle slope. Inland from the foredune was a series of dune ridges and swales aligned roughly perpendicular to the coast in the direction of the prevailing onshore winds.
Currently, where dominated by A. arenaria, the foredune topography has changed to a steep slope, and the orientation of the dunes is parallel to the coast. In addition to topographical alterations, A. arenaria replaces the native foredune vegetation, greatly reducing species diversity (Barbour and Johnson 1977).
In Oregon, Crook (1979a, 1979b) reports that prior to the introduction of European beachgrass there were no foredunes along the coast. Since its introduction in 1910 near Coos Bay and in 1935 on the Clatsop Plains, A. arenaria has created a foredune and colonized portions of the deflation plains. In addition, it occupies the hummock dunes, the fields of vegetated sand dune mounds occurring inland from the foredune, and the deflation plain. The foredune, as a recent geomorphological feature, has greatly reduced sand supplies to the interior moving dunes and led to their decline (Crook 1979a, 1979b, Bruce 1983). It has recently been determined that A. breviligulata, native to the dunes of the East Coast and Great Lakes and introduced to Washington and Oregon, is actually more prevalent than A. arenaria in Washington (Wiedemann 1988).
Competitive relations:
A study of Pacific Coast beach vegetation (Barbour et al. 1976) revealed that A. arenaria exerts more control over community competition than any other beach dominant. The upper beach and foredune along much of northern California's coast were formerly dominated by Elymus mollis (Barbour and Johnson 1977). Research on Elymus and Ammophila ssp. has shown several morphological and physiological differences that may explain A. arenaria's competitive advantage.
A. arenaria's adaptation to sand accretion is well known. Ranwell (1959) reports that it can survive 100 cm of sand deposition per year, whereas Elymus mollis can only tolerate 30 cm per year. Increased human disturbance and therefore sand dune destabilization, along the coastline favors A. arenaria (Barbour and Johnson 1977).
At Point Reyes, California, Barbour (1977) found that A. arenaria had twice the root density of Elymus at every depth measured from 1-5 m. Differences in root systems may provide A. arenaria greater resistance to drought and more efficient means of tapping soil moisture. In addition, the leaves of A. arenaria inroll during dry periods reducing water loss through transpiration (Huiskes 1979a).
Radioactive carbon studies suggest that Ammophila ssp. may have a higher photosynthetic rate than E. mollis during the September to May wet season (Barbour 1977).
In contrast, Elymus mollis is able to withstand tidal inundation and is tolerant of a wider range of soil salt concentrations. A. arenaria cannot tolerate salt concentrations greater than 1.5-2.0 percent, whereas E. mollis can withstand concentrations of 12 percent or more (Huiskes 1979a).
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Life Expectancy
Reproduction
Ammophila arenaria is a stout perennial grass with horizontal and vertical rhizomes. Horizontal rhizomes anchor the young plants and produce new shoots around the parent plant. Vertical rhizomes develop, branching from a horizontal rhizome, as sand accumulates around plants. Several aerial shoots or tillers per node arise from the vertical rhizome to form dense tufts.
Shoots grow most vigorously in spring when leaf production exceeds leaf senescence. In autumn the latter predominates. Growth slows during winter but never ceases entirely (Huiskes 1979a). On dune systems in Sweden, the average yearly above ground biomass production is 400 grams per square meter (Wallen 1980).
A. arenaria is highly adapted to sand accretion. It can withstand burial by as much as one meter per year. Sand burial promotes both leaf elongation and development of vertical rhizomes from axillary buds on the horizontal stems (Ranwell 1959). Internode length of vertical rhizomes varies according to the amount of sand burial and indicates seasonal sand accretion (Huiskes 1979a).
Inflorescences are initiated in autumn of the second year after germination and mature in May or June. Flowering occurs from May to August. In Europe, anthesis occurs in July and August (Huiskes 1979a) but has been reported as early as May (Munz and Keck 1973). Mature fruits are dispersed in September. Seeds germinate the following spring. Viability of seeds is low. Seedling survival is low as a result of desiccation, burial, and/or erosion.
Reproduction is primarily vegetative by rhizomes. Rhizome fragments are dispersed along the shore by wind and water (Wallen 1980).
A. arenaria usually invades from the upper beach. There, rhizome fragments of the grass are washed ashore, buried, and sprout. Rapid vertical growth of the grass initiates dune formation, and the grass spreads rapidly in all directions by horizontal rhizomes.
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Ammophila arenaria
Public Records: 2
Specimens with Barcodes: 12
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
National NatureServe Conservation Status
Canada
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
United States
Rounded National Status Rank: NNA - Not Applicable
Trusted
NatureServe Conservation Status
Rounded Global Status Rank: GNR - Not Yet Ranked
Reasons: Native to northwestern Europe and the British Isles; introduced to other continents to stabilize drifting sand. Established and locally abundant on dunes of the western U.S. coast.
Trusted
Trends
Threats
Comments: Coastal sand dune systems around the world are threatened by the introduction and establishment of Ammophila arenaria. First, it is able to outcompete native dune plants. Second, it interferes with the natural dynamics of dune systems. In northern California, A. arenaria changes the geomorphology of the foredune community from a gentle slope to a vertical wall which prevents adequate sand movement from beach to interior dunes (Barbour and Johnson 1977). In Oregon, it has severely reduced the sand supply from beach to large inland dunes. Along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States it is known to greatly alter beach profiles and subsequently change the impact and effect of storms on the coastline (Dolan et al. 1973).
The Northern Foredune Grassland Community described by Holland (1986) has been most severely threatened by the invasion of A. arenaria. This community is restricted to foredunes and is dominated by Elymus mollis. Only two undisturbed examples of this community remain in California, one of which occurs on the North Spit of Humboldt Bay (Holland 1986). The most pristine remaining occurrence is at the Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve. In 1963, A. arenaria existed as one small clump 1 km north of the preserve boundary and as several clumps 4 km to the south. By 1984, it occupied 2.2 acres.
Trusted
Management
Management Requirements: Control of this introduced species is necessary to protect the limited occurrences of viable natural sand dune systems along our coastlines. Continued control of existing Ammophila arenaria stands and monitoring for new introductions are needed.
Manual removal (digging) controls the spread of A. arenaria but is labor intensive. In one case, complete removal was achieved, but the site was subsequently invaded by other exotic species. In the first year, monthly treatment intervals are suggested; in subsequent years, frequency can be decreased. Monitoring should be conducted to determine if exotic species, such as Carpobrotus, are replacing A. arenaria. Ultimately, re-vegetation with native species should be a standard part of management, once control techniques are refined.
Management Programs: Management of Ammophila arenaria is being carried out by TNC at the Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve, by Humboldt State University through the Menzies' Wallflower Research Project, by the California Department of Parks at McKenicher State Park, at Vandenberg Air Force Base, and by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Contact: Andrea Pickart Habitat Restoration Coordinator Menzies' Wallflower Research Project Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve 6800 Lanphere Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-6378.
James Barry Resource Protection Division California Dept. of Parks PO Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 322-8562
Charles Bruce Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Route 5, Box 325 Corvallis, OR 97330 (503) 757-4186.
Monitoring Programs: The current monitoring program involves annual photodocumentation of stands before and after control treatments, and measurement of untreated stands.
Contact: Andrea Pickart, Preserve Manager Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve 6800 Lanphere Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-6378.
Management Research Programs: The Habitat Restoration Program of the Menzies' Wallflower Research Project (MWRP) at Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, is currently investigating three methods of A. arenaria control: salt application, use of herbicides, and manual removal. Previous research at LCDP indicates manual removal (digging up plants 10 cm below the surface at repeated intervals) is effective in reducing stand density. An ongoing eradication program has utilized this method with mixed results. Complete eradication has been accomplished on only one stand. The MWRP is implementing an experimental program which increases the frequency and depth of digging to remove the active rhizome bud bank.
Earlier small-scale experiments at the preserve found that a 2% solution of Roundup, applied during anthesis, resulted in 60 to 100% mortality. The MWRP is further refining methods and specifications. Timing of application may be critical.
Salt was believed to be a potential control since A. arenaria has a relatively low tolerance to soil salt (NaCl), although brief to moderate exposure to high salinity may stimulate bud emergence (Baye 1988). Unfortunately, the use of NaCl to control a weedy species is illegal as it is not registered as a pesticide in the state of California. The use of alternate salts has not been addressed.
Management Research Needs: Research is needed on the effects of potential control methods including the use of herbicides (Roundup), manual removal, and salt application.
Trusted
Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems
Risks
Stewardship Overview: Ammophila arenaria threatens coastal sand dunes in the eastern and western United States. It displaces native dune species and significantly alters the morphology of dune systems where it invades. Successful management of coastal sand dune elements requires the control of this aggressive species.
The spread of A. arenaria can be controlled through manual removal, but this type of control requires on-going treatment. Control should be emphasized until eradication techniques are refined. Further research is a high priority and is currently being carried out by Humboldt State University, California.
Trusted
Wikipedia
Ammophila arenaria
Ammophila arenaria is a species of grass known by the common names European marram grass and European beachgrass. It is one of two species of the genus Ammophila (marram grass). It is native to the coastlines of Europe and North Africa where it grows in the sands of beach dunes. It is a perennial grass forming stiff, hardy clumps of erect stems up to 1.2 metres (3.9 ft) in height. It grows from a network of thick rhizomes which give it a sturdy anchor in its sand substrate and allow it to spread outward. These rhizomes can grow laterally by 2 metres (7 feet) in six months. One clump can produce 100 new shoots annually.[1]
The rhizomes tolerate submersion in sea water and can break off and float in the currents to establish the grass at new sites.[2] The leaves are thick and coated in a white waxy cuticle. They are up to 1 metre (3.3 ft) long and sharply pointed. The cylindrical inflorescence is up to 30 centimetres (12 in) long. It is adapted to habitat made up of shifting, accreting sand layers, as well as that composed of stabilised dunes.[2]
Invasiveness: Pacific coast of North America
A. arenaria is also recognised as one of the most problematic noxious weeds of coastal California. This sand-adapted grass was introduced to the beaches of western North America during the mid-nineteenth century to provide stabilization to shifting sand dunes. It grew readily and it can now be found from California to British Columbia. The grass is invasive in the local ecosystems, forming dense monotypic stands that crowd out native vegetation, reduce species diversity of native arthropods, and cover vital open stretches of sand used for nesting by the threatened Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus).[2] The plant's spread has changed the topography of some California beach ecosystems, especially in sand dunes. The presence of this grass was a major cause of the destruction of native dune habitat in Oregon and Washington during the twentieth century.[3]
Several methods have been employed in attempts to eradicate the grass in California, including manual pulling, burning, mechanical removal followed by salt water irrigation, and glyphosate application.[3] Studies to find the best methods are ongoing.
References
- ^ Apteker, Rachel. "Invasive Plants of California's Wildland: Ammophila arenaria". California Invasive Plants Council. http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/management/ipcw/pages/detailreport.cfm@usernumber=5&surveynumber=182.php. Retrieved 2008-09-18.
- ^ a b c "UC Cooperative Extension Species Profile: Ammophila arenaria". University of California. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/datastore/detailreport.cfm?usernumber=5&surveynumber=182. Retrieved 2008-09-18.
- ^ a b Pickart, Andrea J. (1997). "Control of European Beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria) on the West Coast of the United States". 1997 Symposium of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.cal-ipc.org/symposia/archive/pdf/1997_symposium_proceedings1934.pdf. Retrieved 2008-09-20.
Unreviewed
Disclaimer
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!



