Overview

Distribution

Range Description

Euphagus carolinus has a large range, breeding across the boreal zone of North America from New England, through Canada to Alaska and winters widely across the south-eastern United States. The population was estimated at 2 million individuals based on data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey collected during the 1980's and 1990's. This figure is now likely to be a considerable overestimate as the species continues to decline. Estimates of the global decline since 1966 vary between 85% and 99%. This ongoing decline follows a longer term decline that began prior to 1950. The reasons for this dramatic decline remain poorly understood.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Breeding

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: Breeding range extends from western and north-central Alaska to southern Keewatin and Labrador, south to central British Columbia, central Saskatchewan, northern shores of Lake Superior and Lake Huron, southeastern Ontario, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, northeastern New York, Massachusetts, and Nova Scotia (Avery 1995). During the nonbreeding season, this species ranges from southcoastal Alaska, southern Canada, and northern United States south to Texas, Gulf Coast, and northern Florida (but primarily in the southeastern United States) (Avery 1995).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 23 cm

Weight: 64 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
It breeds in boreal wetlands, primarily around ponds and streams within the boreal forest. It winters primarily in wooded wetlands and is not strongly associated with open agricultural habitats.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Breeding habitat includes moist woodland (primarily coniferous), bushy bogs and fens, and wooded edges of water courses and beaver ponds. Nests are in trees or shrubs, usually in or near water, frequently in a conifer to about 6 meters above ground. During migration and winter, habitat is primarily wooded wetlands and riparian areas but also includes various open woodlands, scrub, pastures, and cultivated lands (AOU 1983).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Arrives in northern U.S. February-April (Terres 1980).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Comments: Eats insects and various other invertebrates, some small amphibians and fishes, seeds, grains, small fruits; forages on ground and in shallow water (Terres 1980).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Number of Occurrences

Note: For many non-migratory species, occurrences are roughly equivalent to populations.

Estimated Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300

Comments: This species is represented by a large number of nesting occurrences (subpopulations).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Abundance

>1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Post-breeding global abundance estimated at 4,900,000 individuals by Blancher (2003) based on analysis of North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) and Canadian Breeding Bird Census (BBC) data. For the same time period, Rich et al. (2004) estimated a global population of about 2,000,000 birds based on BBS survey data. The disparity between population estimates demonstrates the current lack of abundance data and the potential inadequacies of using the BBS to survey for this species due, in part, to the relative inaccessibility of most of the species breeding range (Hannah 2004).

Results from the North American BBS indicate a survey-wide average of 0.27 birds/survey route for 1966-2004 (Sauer et al. 2005). Breeding densities are generally very low, even at the center of the breeding range (Flood 1987, Hannah 2004). Densities are generally higher in northwestern Canada than in Atlantic Canada. In northern Saskatchewan, densities ranged from 2 to 31 individuals/km2 (Hobson et al 2000); in the Hudson Bay lowlands of northern Manitoba densities were 20 individuals/km2 (Gillespie and Kendeigh 1982); in the Old Crow region, Yukon Territory, densities range from 18 to 90 individuals/km2; and in British Columbia, densities of 5 individuals/km2 were reported (Erskine 1977). In Alaska, densities are relatively high, ranging from 10 to 30 territories/km2 (Hannah 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 8.8 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Clutch size is 4-5. Incubation, by female, lasts 14 days. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest at about 13 days.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Euphagus carolinus

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There are 4 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.  Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
 
TZBNA277-03|1B-3617|Euphagus carolinus| ------------------------------------------CTATACTTAATTTTCGGTGCATGAGCCGGAATAGTAGGTACCGCCCTA---AGCCTCCTCATCCGAGCAGAACTAGGCCAACCTGGAGCCCTTCTAGGAGAC---GACCAGGTCTACAACGTAGTTGTCACGGCCCATGCTTTCGTAATAATCTTCTTCATAGTCATACCAATCATAATCGGAGGGTTCGGGAACTGACTAGTTCCCCTAATA---ATCGGAGCCCCAGACATAGCATTCCCACGAATAAACAACATAAGCTTCTGGCTACTTCCCCCATCCTTTCTCCTCCTCCTAGCATCTTCCACAGTTGAAGCAGGTGTGGGTACAGGCTGAACAGTATATCCCCCACTAGCAGGCAACCTAGCCCACGCCGGAGCCTCAGTCGACCTA---GCAATCTTCTCCCTACATCTGGCCGGTATCTCTTCAATTCTAGGAGCAATCAACTTCATTACAACAGCAATCAACATGAAACCACCTGCCCTGTCACAATACCAAACCCCCCTATTCGTTTGATCAGTACTAATCACTGCAGTACTACTACTCCTGTCTCTTCCAGTTCTAGCCGCA---GGAATCACAATGCTTCTCACAGACCGCAACCTTAACACCACATTCTTTGACCCTGCCGGAGGAGGGGATCCTGTACTGTACCAACACCTATTCTGATTCTTTGGCCACCCAGAAGTCTACATCCTAATCCTC------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Euphagus carolinus

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 4
Species: 4
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
VU
Vulnerable

Red List Criteria
A2cde+3cde+4cde

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Bird, J. & Butchart, S.

Contributor/s
Butcher, G., Greenberg, R. & Wells, J.

Justification
This species has experienced a long term population decline which has been rapid during the past decade. For this reason it is currently classified as Vulnerable. More accurate survey data may warrant a re-evaluation of its status.


History
  • 2007
    Vulnerable
  • 2004
    Least Concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N4B - Apparently Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N4B,N4N : N4B: Apparently Secure - Breeding, N4N: Apparently Secure - Nonbreeding

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G4 - Apparently Secure

Reasons: Still common, but overall abundance appears to have declined precipitously over the past few decades.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
R. Greenberg in litt. (2006).

Population Trend
Decreasing
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Long Term Trend: Decline of 30-50%

Comments: A significant, range-wide decline of approximately 90% over the past 4-5 decades is indicated by data from the Breeding Bird Survey, Christmas Bird Counts, and Quebec Checklist Program (Greenberg and Droege 1999, Niven et al. 2004, Savignac 2004, Sauer et al. 2005). Analyses of abundance classifications in bird distribution books and annotated checklists reveal a long-term decline dating back to at least the early part of the 1900s (Greenberg and Droege 1999).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
The reasons behind current trends are poorly understood but hypotheses for the cause of decline include: destruction and conversion of boreal wetlands (particularly in the southern boreal forest), boreal wetland drying and chemical change resulting from global climate change, depletion of available calcium resulting from acid precipitation, increase in methyl mercury, loss of wooded wetlands in the south-east U.S. winter range, and mortality associated with past and ongoing blackbird control efforts. All of these remain possible threats.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: On wintering grounds, potential threats and/or causes for observed population decline include destruction of wooded wetlands and blackbird control programs; on breeding grounds, acid precipitation and conversion of boreal forest wetlands have been implied (Greenberg and Droege 1999).

Habitat degradation: Land-use practices that degrade or reduce wooded wetlands are detrimental to this species' habitat needs (Avery 1995). Greatest loss of wooded wetlands is on the wintering grounds. Between the mid-1950s and mid-1980s, about 25% of remaining wooded wetlands in the southeastern U.S, an area that encompasses most of the species' winter range, were drained and converted (Hefner and Brown 1984, Greenberg and Droege 1999). However, modern rates of wooded wetland conversion may not be sufficient to explain the severity of recent declines; changes on the breeding grounds may also be limiting this species (Greenberg and Droege 1999). Several other species that utilize high-latitude wetland habitats for breeding, such as the Horned Grebe (Podiceps auritius) and Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes), are also experiencing survey-wide (BBS) declines (Sauer et al. 2005).

Clearcut logging on breeding grounds removes habitat and may also encourage establishment of competitors Common Grackles and Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) (Ellison 1990), or encourage invasion by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater), a common and potentially problematic nest parasite (Avery 1995). Conversely, recently logged habitat, when saturated with water, may provide breeding habitat for this species; Ellison (1990) found several Rusty Blackbird nests and fledglings in recent clearcuts in Vermont. Although recent clearcuts may satisfy habitat requirements for this species, no data exists on the relative quality of these sites (Hannah 2000, 2004).

Blackbird control programs: Rusty Blackbirds may form mixed-species flocks in winter with other blackbirds and starlings, regularly exceeding 1 million birds. As a result, species has been subjected to lethal control to reduce nuisance, health, and crop damage problems (Avery 1995). Winter roost control programs in the eastern U.S. coincided with declines in Common Grackle populations (Avery 1995, Greenberg and Droege 1999). The overall effect on Rusty Blackbird populations is unknown but suspected localized and nominal, as this species typically constitutes <1% of winter roosts (Avery 1995).

Wetland acidification: Acidification of boreal wetlands due to industrial emissions is also of concern, particularly in eastern North America, but overall effects are unknown (Greenberg and Droege 1999). Since Rusty Blackbirds inhabit areas with naturally high soil acidity, it is difficult to determine the real impact of acidification (Darveau et al. 1989, Savignac 2004). Declines in snail abundance in acidified soils in the Netherlands have been linked to declines in passerine production (Graveland et al. 1994); given the high proportion of snails and mollusks in Rusty Blackbird diets, the impacts of acidification on food resources could be of concern (Greenberg and Droege 1999).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
Conservation Actions Underway
The species is not currently listed under the United States Endangered Species Act but there is an International Rusty Blackbird Technical Group set up to research trends, threats and actions for this species.

Conservation Actions Proposed
Continue to monitor population trends. Identify the reasons behind long-term declines. Devise suitable actions to reverse declines. Consider listing under US Endangered Species Act. Protect suitable habitat.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Biological Research Needs: Research using stable isotopes to link wintering and breeding populations, and to connect demographic changes with specific regions of North America, is underway in the United States and Canada (CWS 2005). Additional research is needed to understand the cause(s) of the population decline. Natural history and breeding biology, including productivity and courtship behavior, require further study. Also needed is information on foraging behavior and diet, flocking habits, and habitat and resource use during the nonbreeding season (Greenberg and Droege 1999).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Rusty Blackbird

The Rusty Blackbird, Euphagus carolinus, is a medium-sized blackbird, closely related to grackles (Rusty Grackle is an older name for the species).

Contents

Appearance

Adults have a pointed bill and a pale yellow eye. They have black plumage; the female is greyer. "Rusty" refers to the brownish winter plumage. They resemble the western member of the same genus, the Brewer's Blackbird; however, this bird has a longer bill and the male's head is iridescent green.

male, alternate plumage

Habitat

Their breeding habitat is wet temperate coniferous forests and muskeg across Canada and Alaska. The cup nest is located in a tree or dense shrub, usually over water. Birds often nest at the edge of ponds/wetland complexes and travel large distances to feed at the waters edge. Emerging dragonflies and their larvae are important food items during the summer.

These birds migrate to the eastern and southeastern United States, into parts of the Grain Belt, sometimes straying into Mexico.

Behavior

They forage on wet ground or in shallow water, mainly eating insects, small fish and some seeds. Their most common mode of foraging is to vigorously flip leaves and rip at submerged aquatic vegetation. The mast of small-acorn producing oaks, such as Willow Oak, is also important. In some areas, the nuts of planted pecans are heavily used. They very rarely will attack small passerine birds, and have been known to kill species as large as Common Snipe. They feed in flocks during migration and on the wintering grounds, sometimes joining other blackbirds, both often occurring in single species flocks. They more often roost with other blackbirds; some small roosts are in brushy vegetation in old fields and others are in massive mixed flocks—sometimes in the urban areas.

The species nests relatively early for a boreal forest bird. They linger in the boreal zone to complete their molt. Their autumn migration is slow, with birds often remaining in the northern states well into December; spring migration is much more rapid. The largest wintering concentrations are found in the lower Mississippi Valley, with smaller concentrations in the Piedmont and south Atlantic coastal plain.

Fairly quiet in fall migration and most of the winter, both males and females will sing (particularly on warm days) in the late winter and spring. The song consists of gurgling and high-pitched squeaks.

Population

Rusty Blackbirds have declined significantly in recent decades. The reasons are unclear, but habitat loss is likely a major contributor to the decline. Mercury contamination may be a problem for populations in northeastern North America. Rarer than previously believed, it is uplisted from a species of Least Concern to Vulnerable status in the 2007 IUCN Red List.[1]

Additionally, citizen science projects such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey and Christmas Bird Count have determined that Rusty Blackbirds have dropped 85%–98% in the past 40 years. This is very worrisome for many people, as scientists are desperately trying to figure out what exactly went wrong. Sighting submission services such as eBird are encouraging birders to keep track of Rusty Blackbirds. The Rusty Blackbird Technical Working group has been actively coordinating and conducting research on this species since 2005

Footnotes

  1. ^ See BirdLife International (2007a,b).

References

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Two subspecies are recognized in North America: Euphagus carolinus carolinus, which occupies most of the species' range, and the darker E. c. nigrans, which breeds in Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Magdalen Island, and possibly eastern New Brunswick (AOU 1957, Avery 1995).

Few comprehensive molecular or morphological studies have been conducted on relationships between rusty blackbirds and other members of the sizeable family Icteridae. Brewer's blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus) is likely the closest relative. Species in the genus Euphagus are probably more closely allied with the grackles (Quiscalus) than to Agelaius blackbirds (Avery 1995).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!