Overview

Distribution

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Breeding

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: (>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)) BREEDING: just inland from the coasts across northern and western Alaska (east to Sagavanirktok River), northern Scandinavia, across northern Russia and northern Siberia to Chukotski Peninsula and northern Anadyrland. NON-BREEDING: Eurasia, Africa, Indian Ocean islands, southeastern Asia, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand (AOU 1983, Johnson and Herter 1989). MIGRATION: through Hawaiian, Aleutian, and Pribilof Islands, along Bering Sea coast of Alaska Peninsula, through Europe and Pacific (AOU 1983). Lagoons along north shore of Alaska Peninsula are important fall staging areas (see Johnson and Herter 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Size

Length: 41 cm

Weight: 376 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
Behaviour This species is a full long-distance migrant1. It breeds from late-May to August2 in solitary pairs1, although it may also form small colonies4. After breeding adults disperse to coastal moulting sites, the onward migration to wintering grounds then continuing into October and November2. The species often flies in large flocks2 and forages in groups outside of the breeding season1, occasionally aggregating into huge flocks of several hundreds of thousands of individuals at favoured sites (e.g. in Mauritania)2. Habitat Breeding The species breeds in marshy, swampy areas in lowland moss and shrub tundra1, 3, 4 near wet river valleys3, lakes and sedge bogs4, as well as on swampy heathlands in the willow and birch zone near the Arctic treeline3, in open larch Larix spp. woodland close to water1, and occasionally on open bogs in the extreme north of the coniferous forest zone3. Non-breeding On passage the species may frequent inland wetlands2, sandy beaches with pine Pinus spp. stands, swampy lowlands near lakes4 and short-grass meadows, but during the winter it is more common in intertidal areas along muddy coastlines, estuaries, inlets, mangrove-fringed lagoons and sheltered bays1 with tidal mudflats or sandbars3. Diet Breeding When breeding the species feeds on insects, annelid worms, molluscsand occasionally seeds and berries1. Non-breeding In intertidal areas the species's diet consists of annelids (e.g. Nereis spp. and Arenicola spp.), bivalves and crustaceans, although it will also take cranefly larvae and earthworms on grasslands and occasionally larval amphibians (tadpoles) and small fish1. Breeding site The nest is a depression positioned on a dry elevated site1 such as a tundra ridge3 or hummock4, often between clumps of grass1 or under a thicket4. Management information In the UK there is evidence that the removal of Spartina anglica from tidal mudflats using a herbicide is beneficial for the species5.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
  • Marine
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Depth range based on 10 specimens in 3 taxa.
Water temperature and chemistry ranges based on 7 samples.

Environmental ranges
  Depth range (m): 0 - 0
  Temperature range (°C): 9.226 - 10.963
  Nitrate (umol/L): 1.402 - 6.915
  Salinity (PPS): 31.635 - 35.082
  Oxygen (ml/l): 6.327 - 6.746
  Phosphate (umol/l): 0.273 - 0.481
  Silicate (umol/l): 0.987 - 3.586

Graphical representation

Temperature range (°C): 9.226 - 10.963

Nitrate (umol/L): 1.402 - 6.915

Salinity (PPS): 31.635 - 35.082

Oxygen (ml/l): 6.327 - 6.746

Phosphate (umol/l): 0.273 - 0.481

Silicate (umol/l): 0.987 - 3.586
 
Note: this information has not been validated. Check this *note*. Your feedback is most welcome.
Public Domain

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Coastal tundra and sedge-dwarf shrub tundra of foothills; in migration and winter also marshes, flooded fields, estuarine areas and beaches (AOU 1983). Nest is a simple depression in dry upland tundra. In Europe, apparently seeks nest protection by breeding near nesting Whimbrels (Numenius phaeopus), which are more actively defensive against predators (Larsen and Moldsvor 1992).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Nesting birds from Alaska probably winter in southeastern Asia and on South Pacific islands (Johnson and Herter 1989). Adults begin fall migration before juveniles, which usually depart nesting areas shortly after mid-August.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Known prey organisms

Limosa lapponica (Limosa lapponica bar-tailed godwit) preys on:
Nereis diversicolor

Based on studies in:
Scotland (Estuarine)

This list may not be complete but is based on published studies.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© SPIRE project

Source: SPIRE

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

Global Abundance

>1,000,000 individuals

Comments: Estimated to be 1,345,000 (range 1,200,000 - 2,200,000) by Rose and Scott (1997).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Life Expectancy

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Maximum longevity: 31.3 years (wild)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Clutch size usually 4. Incubation 20-21 days, by both sexes (female at night). Young tended by both parents or by male only (Johnson and Herter 1989).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Evolution and Systematics

Functional Adaptations

Functional adaptation

Organ changes enable long migration: bar-tailed godwit
 

The metabolism of the eastern bar-tailed godwit allows it to survive long-distance migration by absorbing and then rebuilding tissue from its organs.

   
  "A grotesque phenomenon known as autophagy or autocannibalism, in which an animal eats portions of its own body, can be used as an aid to migration. Intriguingly, the eastern bar-tailed godwit (Limosa lapponica baueri), a wading bird, exhibits a similar but more subtle behavior that appears to assist its long-distance migration. As revealed in 1998 by Groningen University researcher Dr. Theunis Piersma and Dr. Robert Gill from the U.S. Geological Survey, before setting out on its 6,800 mile (11,000 km) migration from Alaska to New Zealand, this bird builds up huge amounts of fat to sustain it on its flight. In order to provide itself with enough room to house all of this extra fuel, yet also keep its weight down for flying, the godwit absorbs up to 25 percent of the tissue comprising its liver, kidneys, and alimentary canal. Only when the bird completes its migration are these organs reformed in their entirety. This is the first time that partial organ absorption and subsequent reconstitution has been documented in a species of migratory bird." (Shuker 2001:71)
  Learn more about this functional adaptation.
  • Shuker, KPN. 2001. The Hidden Powers of Animals: Uncovering the Secrets of Nature. London: Marshall Editions Ltd. 240 p.
  • Piersma, T.; Gill, R.E., Jr. 1998. Guts don't fly: small digestive organs in obese Bar-tailed Godwits. Auk. 115(1): 196-203.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© The Biomimicry Institute

Source: AskNature

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Limosa lapponica

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There are 10 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.  Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
 
BON437-07|NHMO-BC437|Limosa lapponica| ------------TTTTCTCCAACCCACAAAGACATTGGCACCCTATACTTAATTTTCGGCGCATGAGCCGGTATAGTCGGAACTGCCCTT---AGTCTACTCATTCGTGCAGAACTAGGCCAACCAGGAACCCTTCTAGGAGAC---GACCAAATTTACAATGTAATCGTCACCGCCCATGCTTTCGTAATAATTTTCTTCATAGTAATGCCAATCATGATCGGCGGATTTGGAAACTGACTAGTCCCACTCATA---ATCGGCGCCCCCGATATGGCATTCCCACGCATAAACAACATGAGCTTTTGACTGCTTCCCCCATCATTCCTACTATTATTGGCCTCATCTACAGTAGAAGCTGGAGCAGGGACAGGATGAACAGTTTATCCTCCTCTCGCTGGTAACCTTGCCCACGCTGGAGCCTCAGTAGACCTG---GCCATCTTCTCTCTTCACCTAGCAGGTGTCTCCTCCATCCTAGGTGCTATTAACTTCATCACAACAGCCATTAACATAAAACCCCCAGCTCTTTCCCAATATCAAACCCCCCTGTTCGTATGATCAGTACTCATCACCGCTGTTCTACTACTGCTCTCCCTCCCAGTTCTCGCTGCT---GGCATTACCATACTACTAACAGATCGAAACCTAAACACTACATTCTTCGATCCCGCTGGGGGAGGAGATCCAGTTCTATATCAACACCTTTTCTGATTCTTTGGACACCCAGAAGTCTATATCCTAATCCTACCAGGATTTGGAATTATCTCCCAC-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Limosa lapponica

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 10
Species: 36
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2009

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Bird, J., Butchart, S.

Contributor/s

Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.

History
  • 2008
    Least Concern
  • 2004
    Least Concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Status in Egypt

Regular passage visitor and winter visitor?

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Source: Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

IUCN

Least Concern.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Source: Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5B - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Reasons: Fairly large range, numerous within range, no significant threats.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
The species is threatened by the degradation of foraging sites due to land reclamation, pollution, human disturbance1, 6, reduced river flows6 and in some areas the invasion of mudflats and coastal saltmarshes by mangroves (owing to sea-level rise and increased sedimentation and nutrient loads at the coast from uncontrolled development and soil erosion in upstream catchment areas)8. The species is also susceptible to avian influenza so may be threatened by future outbreaks of the virus7.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Bar-tailed Godwit

The Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica) is a large wader in the family Scolopacidae, which breeds on Arctic coasts and tundra mainly in the Old World, and winters on coasts in temperate and tropical regions of the Old World.[2] It makes the longest known non-stop flight of any bird and also the longest journey without pausing to feed by any animal, 11,680 kilometres (7,258 mi) along a route from Alaska to New Zealand.[3]

Contents

Description

non breeding plumage
Cairns, Australia
Redcliffe, SE Queensland, Australia

The Bar-tailed Godwit is a relatively short-legged species of godwit. The bill-to-tail length is 37–41 cm, with a wingspan of 70–80 cm. Males average smaller than females but with much overlap; males weigh 190–400 g, while females weigh 260–630 g; there is also some regional variation in size (see subspecies, below). The adult has blue-grey legs and a very long dark bill with a slight upward curve and pink at the tip. The neck, breast and belly are unbroken brick red in breeding plumage, off white in winter. The back is mottled grey.[2][4]

It is distinguished from the Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa) by its barred, rather than wholly black, tail and a lack of white wing bars. The most similar species is the Asiatic Dowitcher.


There are three subspecies, listed from west to east:[2][4]

Diet

It forages by probing in mudflats or marshes. It may find insects by sight in short vegetation. It eats mainly insects and crustaceans, but also parts of aquatic plants.

Breeding

A flock landing in Tasmania, Australia. Note the barring on the tail

The Bar-tailed Godwit is a non-breeding migrant in Australia. Breeding take place each year in Scandinavia, northern Asia, and Alaska. The nest is a shallow cup in moss sometimes lined with vegetation. Both sexes share incubation of the eggs and care for the young.

Migrations

The routes of satellite tagged Bar-tailed Godwits migrating north from New Zealand to Korea and China

The Bar-tailed Godwit migrates in flocks to coastal East Asia, Alaska, New Zealand, Australia, Africa and northwestern Europe, where the sub-species Limosa lapponica baueri is called Kūaka in Māori.[5][6][7]

It was shown in 2007 to undertake the longest non-stop flight of any bird. Birds in New Zealand were tagged and tracked by satellite to the Yellow Sea in China. According to Dr. Clive Minton (Australasian Wader Studies Group) "The distance between these two locations is 9,575 kilometres (5,950 mi), but the actual track flown by the bird was 11,026 kilometres (6,851 mi). This was the longest known non-stop flight of any bird. The flight took approximately nine days. At least three other Bar-tailed Godwits also appear to have reached the Yellow Sea after non-stop flights from New Zealand."[8]

One specific female of the flock, nicknamed "E7", flew onward from China to Alaska and stayed there for the breeding season. Then on 29 August 2007 she departed on a non-stop flight from the Avinof Peninsula in western Alaska to the Piako River near Thames New Zealand, setting a new known flight record of 11,680 kilometres (7,258 mi).[3] Stray birds from Europe and Asia occasionally appear on both North American coasts.[citation needed]

Protection

The Bar-tailed Godwit is one of the species to which the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) applies.

References

  1. ^ BirdLife International (2008). Limosa lapponica. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 30 April 2008.
  2. ^ a b c del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., & Sargatal, J., eds. (1996). Handbook of the Birds of the World Vol. 3. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona ISBN 84-87334-15-6.
  3. ^ a b Gill RE, Tibbitts TL, Douglas DC, Handel CM, Mulcahy DM, Gottschalck JC, Warnock N, McCaffery BJ, Battley PF, Piersma T. (2009) Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? Proc Biol Sci.276(1656):447-57. PDF
  4. ^ a b Snow, D. W. & Perrins, C. M. (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic Concise Edition. OUP ISBN 0-19-854099-X.
  5. ^ Barrie Heather and Hugh Robertson, The Field Guide to the Birds of New Zealand ( revised edition), Viking, 2005
  6. ^ New Zealand Birding Network Brings You The Best Of New Zealand Birding
  7. ^ Stap, Don. "The Flight of the Kuaka." Living Bird. Autumn, 2009
  8. ^ Shorebird Migration

Further reading

Identification

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!