Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (7) (learn more)

Overview

Distribution

Geographic Range

Breeding range:

The sora (Porzana carolina) occupies much of temperate North America, ranging (in the west) as far north as the Northwest Territories, to the southern extremes of Arizona and New Mexico. The breeding range of P. carolina narrows in the east, occurring from Canada's Maritime provinces south to Maryland, USA.

Overwintering range:

As wetlands freeze in the breeding range of P. carolina, this species moves south to overwinter, occupying the southern United States from Arizona to Florida, and also throughout Mexico. In addition, many individuals migrate across the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea to overwinter in South America.

The coastline of California hosts P. carolina year round.

(Kaufman, 1996)

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Breeding

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: BREEDS: southeastern Alaska to northern Saskatchewan and Newfoundland, south locally to northwestern Baja California, southern New Mexico, eastern Colorado, southern Missouri, central Ohio, and Maryland. NORTHERN WINTER: regularly from central California to southern Texas, Gulf Coast, and South Carolina, south through Middle America and West Indies to South America (west of Andes to central Peru, east of Andes to eastern Colombia, eastern Ecuador, Venezuela, and Guyana. (AOU 1983).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Physical Description

Sexually monomorphic. Length 20-30 cm (8-10"). In its breeding plumage, the sora's throat and face are black, with a short, yellowish bill. The breast and nape of neck are gray. The back is mottled brown and the belly displays black and white barring.

Immature and non-breeding plumages are plainer and buff colored with no black on throat or face. While in this plumage, the throat is white and the breast is light brown. The legs of P. carolina are yellowish green. The tail is usually held erect while walking and flying.

(Godfrey, 1986; Semenchuk, 1992)

The body of a sora is suited for the marshy habitat that they occupy. Lateral compression of the body offers easy travel through dense vegetation. The sora possesses short, round wings which offer seemingly weak, but highly maneuverable flight through tangled vegetation. Strong legs, with long slender toes on provide P. carolina with a strong walking and running ability amongst tangled wetland vegetation. Although this species prefers walking to flying, its long distance capabilities are evident in its migration, often crossing the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribean.

(Semenchuk, 1992; Kaufman, 1996)

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size

Length: 22 cm

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat

The sora occupies a freshwater wetland habitat throughout its range; it also uses salt marshes while overwintering. The preferred habitat provides considerable cover for breeding soras, and consists mostly of freshwater wetlands with stands of cattail, sedges, and other tall wetland plants (Kaufman, 1996).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Primarily shallow freshwater emergent wetlands (e.g., marshes of cattail, sedge, blue-joint, or bulrush), less frequently in bogs, fens, wet meadows, and flooded fields, sometimes foraging on open mudflats adjacent to marshy habitat. Also occurs locally in swamps, along slough borders, and in mangroves. Can use very small marshes (e.g., 4 nests have been found in a half-acre marsh) (see Brewer et al. 1991). Nonbreeding: also in coastal salt marshes; roosts in cattails or other dense vegetation. In northern wetlands and midle-southern Atlantic coastal wetlands, wild rice provides habitat during migration (Fannucchi et al. 1986).

Nests about 15 cm above water level in marsh vegetation, often near open water. Nest is anchored to emergent plants or sometimes placed on top of a mound (Cogswell 1977). In Michigan, nests most often were over water 10-15 cm deep (see Brewer et al. 1991).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: No. All populations of this species make significant seasonal migrations.

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Arrives in northern breeding areas April-May, departs by September-October (Bent 1926). May make local migrations in Pacific states, generally extensive migrations elswhere. Migrants arrive in Costa Rica mostly in October, depart by late February or March (Stiles and Skutch 1989). Migration flights are mostly at night (Cogswell 1977).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Food Habits

Diet consists mainly of seeds, insects and snails. Seeds are obtained from sedges (Carex spp.), grasses (Calamagrostis spp., Bromus spp., Scoacloa spp., Poa spp., etc) or other wetland plants. Snails and insects are picked from ground surface, or by probing soft mud and vegetation with its bill.

(Kaufman, 1996)

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Eats mollusks, insects, seeds of marsh plants, duckweed (Terres 1980). Seeds, especially those of sedge and bulrush, may comprise the bulk of the diet. Often forages along edges (e.g., between vegetation types or along the edge of open water).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

BREEDING: Home range size averaged 0.19 ha during brood-rearing (Johnson and Dinsmore 1985). NON-BREEDING: Roosts communally. Home range averaged 0.78 hectares in Arizona during winter (Conway 1990).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Cyclicity

Comments: Leaves dense cover mostly in early morning and evening.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Reproduction

Nests are woven into a shallow basket from dead emergent wetland vegetation, and attached to stalks of dense, live vegetation. Nests are generally placed over or adjacent to water, occasionally occurring in dry environments such as willows or grassy habitat near water's edge. (Godfrey, 1986).

The average clutch size ranges from 10-12 (sometimes 6-18) brown, spotted eggs, occasionally laid in two layers to accommodate such large numbers in a relatively small nest. Incubation by both parents lasts from 18-20 days, and is initiated with the laying of the first few eggs (Kaufman, 1996).

Young hatch asynchronously due to incremental stages of incubation. Precocial downy young may be cared for by one parent, as the other parent incubates remaining eggs. Young soras leave the nest shortly after hatching, and mainly forage themselves, having been taught by a parent (Salt and Salt, 1976). At 21-25 days young soras fledge and gain independence from their parents' care.

(Kaufman, 1996)

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Clutch size is 6-18 (commonly 10-12). Incubation, by both sexes, lasts 18-20 days. In the upper Midwest, most hatch in late May or early June. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest within 1-2 days but may return at night for brooding. Cornell Nest Record Program data indicate a nest success rate of 0.53 (Conway et al. 1994). Females may lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics; females may be able to recognize eggs that are not their own (see Sorenson 1995, Condor 97:819-821).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Porzana carolina

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There are 4 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank.  Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
 
BSBNA507-06|VLBO 1142-51934|Porzana carolina| ------------------------------------------CTTTACCTGATCTTTGGAGCTTGAGCCGGCATAATTGGTACCGCCCTT---AGCCTGCTTATCCGGGCAGAACTAGGACAACCTGGCAGCCTCTTAGGAGAT---GACCAAATCTATAATGTAATCGTCACTGCCCACGCTTTCGTAATAATCTTCTTCATGGTAATACCAATTATAATCGGAGGCTTCGGCAATTGATTAGTACCCCTTATA---ATCGGAGCCCCAGACATAGCATTCCCCCGCATAAACAACATAAGCTTCTGACTTCTCCCCCCTTCCTTCCTTCTACTCCTAGCATCATCCACAGTAGAAGCAGGAGCAGGCACAGGCTGAACAGTCTACCCCCCACTAGCTGGCAACCTAGCACATGCAGGAGCTTCAGTGGACTTA---GCCATCTTCTCCCTCCATCTAGCAGGTGTCTCATCCATTCTAGGCGCCATCAACTTCATCACAACCGCTATCAACATAAAACCACCCGCCCTATCTCAATACCAAACCCCACTATTCGTATGATCCGTCCTTATTACCGCCGTCCTACTACTGCTATCCCTCCCAGTCCTTGCCGCT---GGCATTACCATGCTACTAACCGACCGAAACCTTAATACCACATTCTTCGACCCAGCCGGAGGGGGTGACCCTATCTTATACCAACACCTTTTCTGATTCTTCGGACACCCAGAAGTATATATCCTAATCCTA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Porzana carolina

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 4
Species: 5
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2009

Assessor/s
BirdLife International

Reviewer/s
Bird, J., Butchart, S.

Contributor/s

Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population trend appears to be increasing, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.

History
  • 2008
    Least Concern
  • 2004
    Least Concern
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Status

Numbers have declined across the sora's range, coinciding with loss of wetland habitat, however the species is still abundant (Kaufman, 1996). The sora is an unprotected species, and is considered to be a migratory game bird (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2000), although it is not often hunted.

US Migratory Bird Act: protected

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

State of Michigan List: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N5B - Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5B,N5N : N5B: Secure - Breeding, N5N: Secure - Nonbreeding

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Comments: Harvest of wild and planted rice may result in nest destruction and excessive disturbance (Fannucchi et al. 1986).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Management Requirements: Eddleman et al. (1988) provided the following information on managing waterfowl areas in a way that is compatible with the conservation of inland rails. Wetlands of the greatest importance to rallids (other than gallinules and coots) are shallower and have greater percentage cover by emergent vegetation than those typically managed for waterfowl. Dewatering in northern breeding areas should occur before April 15 to avoid disruption of rail nest initiation. Gradual dewatering (and presumably presence of topographic diversity) provides the maximum amount of favorable foraging area (edge between moist soil and marsh). Amount of nesting cover (emergent perennial vegetation) should be maximized. To provide rail habitat every year, different impoundments should be flooded in different years.

For autumn migration, shallow flooding should commence in late summer in middle latitudes (vs. late autumn or winter for waterfowl), and habitat should include various shallow water depths, robust cover, and short-stemmed seed-producing plants. Flooding too deeply and too early, and deep winter flooding, lead to loss of robust plant cover.

In spring, areas that have annual grasses and smartweeds should be shallowly flooded (< 15 cm), with some areas flooded to depth of up to 50 cm. Drawdowns are most favorable when they concentrate invertebrate prey. These conditions also provide excellent habitat for dabbling ducks such as blue-winged teal and northern shoveler. Land leveling, which reduces topographic diversity and favorable rail foraging habitat (edge) should be avoided.

Rice harvest should be managed in such a way as to minimize nest destruction and disturbance of soras (Eddleman et al. 1988).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

The sora is considered a game bird under the Migratory bird treaty act (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2000) and may be hunted for food.

Viewing a sora in its natural habitat is a well won prize for an avid birder's effort.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Sora (crake)

The Sora (Porzana carolina) is a small waterbird of the family Rallidae, sometimes also referred to as the Sora Rail or Sora Crake.

Adults Soras are 19–30 cm (7.5–12 in)[1][2][3] long, with dark-marked brown upperparts, a blue-grey face and underparts, and black and white barring on the flanks. They have a short thick yellow bill, with black markings on the face at the base of the bill and on the throat. Sexes are similar, but young Soras lack the black facial markings and have a whitish face and buff breast. They weigh about 49–112 g (1.7–4.0 oz).[1]

The Sora's breeding habitat is marshes throughout much of North America.[4] They nest in a well-concealed location in dense vegetation. The female usually lays 10 to 12 eggs, sometimes as many as 18, in a cup built from marsh vegetation. The eggs do not all hatch together. Both parents incubate and feed the young, who leave the nest soon after they hatch and are able to fly within a month.

They migrate to the southern United States and northern South America. Sora is a very rare vagrant to western Europe, where it can be confused with Spotted Crake. However, the latter species always has spotting on the breast. a streaked crown stripe, and a different wing pattern.

Soras forage while walking or swimming. They are omnivores, eating seeds, insects and snails. Although Soras are more often heard than seen, they are sometimes seen walking near open water. They are fairly common, despite a decrease in suitable habitat in recent times. The call is a slow whistled ker-whee, or a descending whinny. The use of call broadcasts greatly increases the chances of hearing a Sora. Call broadcasts can also increase the chances of seeing a Sora, as they will often investigate the source of the call.

Contents

Distribution

Soras occur throughout most of North America.[5] Soras breed from Nova Scotia northeast to southern Yukon and Northwest Territories, south to California, Arizona, and New Mexico and northeast to Pennsylvania and New England. Sora wintering grounds include the northern portions of South America, including Ecuador, Columbia, and Venezuela, north through Central America and Mexico to southern California in the West and coastal regions of the Southeast. From southern Kansas south to northern and eastern Texas and east through the inland areas of the southeastern United States, soras are typically only observed during migration in the spring and fall. In a few areas of the western United States, including central California and areas of Arizona and New Mexico, soras may occur year round.[5]

Plant communities

Soras are commonly reported in plant communities dominated by Cattails (Typha spp.),[6][7][8][9][10][11] Sedges (Carex spp.),[7][10][11][12][13] Bulrushes (Scirpus spp.),[6][7][11][12] Smartweeds (Polygonum spp.),[10][13] Rushes (Juncus spp.),[10][13] Rice cutgrass (Leersia oryzoides),[14] and Barnyard grasses (Echinochloa spp.).[13][14]

Outside of wetlands, soras are most often reported in cultivated areas during migration or in the postbreeding period. For instance, a sora was observed 3 miles (5 km) from marshland in a cultivated field in Iowa in the middle of August. A male sora was observed less than 1,000 feet (300 m) from a large wetland in a soybean (Glycine max) field in northwestern Iowa during the postbreeding period.[15] From early June to mid-July, soras were observed on farms in Saskatchewan sown mainly with wheat (Triticum aestivum).[16]

Soras have also been reported in flooded wooded areas.[9][17] In western New York, soras occurred during the breeding season on a study site where 26% of the area was categorized as "flooded timber," and 5% was classed as "scrub/shrub marsh".[9] In eastern and central Maine, an average of 2.1 soras was observed in wooded swamps per 100 hours of observation during the breeding season.[17] On a nonbreeding (August–April) site in southwestern Arizona, soras were found to use a "mixed shrub community" more than expected based on its availability.[6] Soras were observed at low abundances on a site with Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) in British Columbia.[18]

Major life events

Migration

Soras' northern migration occurs in spring, primarily in April and May. For instance, in east-central Kansas significantly (p<0.05) more soras were detected from 24 April to 7 May than the 2-week periods before or after. In southeast Missouri, soras were observed from 25 March to 6 May.[13] Soras were 1st detected in April to early May in Colorado,[7] Iowa, and Minnesota.[8] In a summary of the 1st detections of soras in Minnesota, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, all occurred in April.[19]

Soras depart their breeding grounds as early as July and as late as October. Soras were observed returning to wintering grounds in Arizona as early as late July.[6] Although local movements may obscure migration occurring in July, most migration occurred in August and September in Colorado. In northern Ohio, sora abundance was increased in late August and September by migrating individuals.[20] In southeastern Missouri, soras were observed from 5 September to 27 October.[13] Soras have been observed in Manitoba and Saskatchewan as late as October.[19]

Nesting

Although sora nesting activities have been observed from late April through early August, the peak nesting period typically occurs from May to early July. In New York, nesting was initiated in late April.[9] A nest search and literature review study of soras in Colorado reports a clutch initiated in early August. However, mean clutch initiation dates occurred in May and June in regions across the state.[21] Studies from northern Ohio,[20] North Dakota, and Alberta [10] report nesting from May to July. In a review, sora nests with eggs were recorded from early May to early July in Indiana.[22]

Sora females begin construction of saucer-shaped nests on the ground or on a platform over shallow water at the start of egg laying.[9][21] Clutch sizes typically range from 8 to 13 eggs,[21][22] although clutch sizes of up to 16 have been reported.[8][10][21] Both parents incubate the eggs. Incubation lasts approximately 19 days, although a wide range of incubation periods has been reported in the literature.[10] Eggs hatch over a span of 2 to 13 days.[8] Nestlings are precocial and are capable of walking and swimming short distances (<3 feet (1 m)) by the end of their 1st day. Young soras are independent by about 4 weeks of age.[15][21] Soras brood once per season.[21] Some late broods may be 2nd nesting attempts, but there is only 1 report in the literature of a 2nd brood attempt after a successful nest.[10] For information on breeding behavior of soras, see.[8] For information on conspecific nest parasitism and egg discrimination in soras see.[23]

Sora nest success rates vary across locations and years. In the literature addressing sora apparent nest success, the proportions of successful nests varied from 0.61 in Michigan to 0.833 in Minnesota.[20] In western New York, the nest success rate of 6 sora nests was 0.43, and the daily nest success rate was 0.97.[9] Using data from the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology's nest record program, nesting success rate of soras in North America was estimated as 0.529 over a 28-day period (n=108).[24] On a site in Alberta, 80.6% of eggs successfully hatched, while the following year only 59.6% of eggs hatched. The authors conclude that diminished water level interacting with predators and trampling by cattle resulted in decreased hatching success.[10] During late summer, soras are flightless for a period during their post-nuptial molt.[20]

Home range

Sora home range size varies. Sora brood-rearing home ranges in northwestern Iowa averaged 0.5 acre (0.19 ha).[15] In Arizona, sora home range size varied from 1.5 acres (0.59 ha) in the early breeding season to over 2 acres (0.91) ha in the postbreeding season. These seasonal differences in sora home range size were not significant (p>0.05).[6]

Survival

Few data are available on the survival of soras. Radio-marked soras in Arizona had a nonbreeding survival probability of 0.308. The authors suggest the low survival rate may be due to increased mortality of radio-marked birds.[24] Likely causes of mortality are predation and human-caused sources such as road kill.[20]

Preferred habitat

Water and emergent vegetation are important sora habitat characteristics.

Water

Soras use areas with a wide range of water depths. They are often observed in water less than 1 foot (30 cm) deep,[7][11][13][14] although the average water depth of sora heavy-use areas in Arizona was 20 inches (52.2 cm).[6] In northwestern Iowa, average water depth in sora territories was 15 inches (38.4 cm), which was significantly (p<0.025) more shallow than water depths at random locations in the marsh.[12] Sora nesting sites occurred in shallower water than random sites in western New York.[9] Average water depths reported at nest sites range from 4 inches (10.7 cm) for 4 sora nests in Colorado to nearly 10 inches (24.2 cm) for sora nests in western New York.[9] In areas of deep water, soras typically wade on mats of floating vegetation.[15]

Water level fluctuations may result in nest abandonment. For example, at a site in Colorado where water level increased more than 8 inches (20 cm), a sora nest with 7 eggs was abandoned.[7] In Alberta, soras nested in more vegetation types during a drought year, most likely due to substantially reduced water levels in the vegetation used the previous year.[10]

Soras use areas with shallower water in fall than in spring.[6][13][14] Soras typically avoid open water. There is a significant (p≤0.05) negative relationship between area of open water and sora use of wetlands in Maine [17] and sora relative abundance in Saskatchewan.[16] In western New York, sora nesting sites had a lower percentage of open water than random sites,[9] and in Arizona soras used open water areas less than their availability.[6]

Emergent vegetation

Sora nesting sites had larger percentage of emergent vegetation than random sites in marshes of western New York.[9] Sora numbers in wetlands of northeastern North Dakota were significantly (p<0.05) positively correlated (r=0.45) with hectares of live emergent vegetation. In east and central Maine, wetlands used by soras had significantly (p=0.01) greater area of emergent vegetation than unused wetlands.[17]

Density of emergent vegetation in sora habitat varies. Reported density of emergent vegetation ranges from an average of 121.9 stems/m² in sora territories in northwestern Iowa [12] to 333 stems/m² on sites in northeastern Missouri used during fall migration.[14] In western New York, cover was greater than 70% at 95% of sora nests. In addition, nesting sites had more horizontal cover at 20 inches (0.5 m) above water level than random sites.[9] However, average stem density on sora territories was not significantly (p>0.05) different from random sites in northwestern Iowa.[12]

Height of emergent vegetation in sora habitat also varies. It ranged from 8 to 11 inches (20–30 cm) in the spring after a winter disturbance in northwestern Iowa [12] to 84 inches (213 cm) in areas heavily used by soras in Arizona.[6] In marshes of western New York, average vegetation height at sora nesting sites was shorter than at random locations.[9] However, the average height of emergent vegetation in sora territories in northeastern Iowa was not significantly (p>0.05) different from the height of vegetation in random plots.[12]

In Arizona, both cover and height of vegetation used by soras varied with seasons. Conway suggested the differences likely reflected the varied diet of the sora.[6] The availability of habitat in different seasons is another possible source of seasonal differences in sora habitat.[13]

Extent of woody vegetation surrounding South Dakota wetlands was not significantly (p=0.6) associated with sora occurrence. However, in marshes of western New York, there was a significant (p=0.041) negative relationship between percent flooded timber on a site and sora relative abundance.[9]

Soras may prefer some cover types. In Arizona, 65.3% of sora use was in southern cattail (Typha domingensis), although it comprised only 16.5% of the vegetation. Bulrushes and a mixed-shrub community were also used more than their availability, while saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and arrowweed (Pluchea sericea) were avoided.[6] A literature review notes sora avoidance of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria)-dominated sites. In east and central Maine, wetlands used by soras had significantly (p=0.05) more ericaceous vegetation, such as leatherleaves (Chamaedaphne spp.), sweetgales (Myrica spp.), and laurels (Kalmia spp.).[17] In marshes of northwestern Iowa, broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia) occurred in sora territories significantly (p<0.01) more often than at random sites. Johnson and Dinsmore [12] imply that this likely results from both species preferring similar site conditions. In May and June in Wisconsin, soras were detected significantly (p<0.025) more often in cattail (Typha spp.) survey areas than in sedge areas. However, in southeastern Wisconsin during the breeding season, there was no significant (p=0.943) difference in sora densities between habitats comprised predominantly of cattail, sedge, or bulrush.[11] In addition, soras' use of glaucous cattail (Typha × glauca), broadfruit bur-reed (Sparganium eurycarpum), sedge, river bulrush (Schoenoplectus fluviatilis), and hardstem bulrush (S. acutus var. acutus) habitats in marshes of northwestern Iowa generally reflected availability of these habitats.[12]

Seasonal differences in sora habitat use have been reported. In northeastern Missouri in spring, the likelihood of detecting sora in robust emergents, such as cattail (Typha spp.) and longroot smartweed (Polygonum amphibium var. emersum), was over 6 times that of detecting soras in these areas in fall. However, availability of habitats during various times of the year was not addressed.[14] In a study performed in southeastern Missouri, plant species used by sora during spring and fall migration differed significantly (p=0.005). However, the author qualifies this finding with his observation of major seasonal differences in vegetation availability.[13]

Temperature

Temperature may also influence sora abundance. In Colorado, average April temperature was significantly (p<0.01) negatively correlated (r= -0.94) with sora abundance. On sites that had average April temperatures ≤42 °F (5.6 °C), soras were more abundant than closely related Virginia rails (Rallus limicola), while on warmer sites the sora to Virginia rail ratio declined.[7]

Densities

Sora densities vary from to 12 soras/acre in Colorado [21] to 0.47 pair/ha in Indiana.[22] An average of 1.3 soras/ha responded to calls across sites in Colorado.[7] A similar density of soras was found in southeastern Wisconsin.[11] In Iowa, average density over 2 years and several marsh habitats was 1.3 pairs/ha.[12]

Landscape factors, such as marsh area, habitat edges within marshes, and the number of marshes in a region may influence soras.

Although soras occur in marshes of all sizes, they may occur at higher densities in intermediate-sized marshes. Soras were significantly (p≤0.01) positively related with total wetland area and perimeter area of surface water in east and central Maine [17] and were significantly (p<0.05) positively related to area of wetlands in Saskatchewan.[16] In Maine, soras used 10% of 2.5-acre (1 ha) wetlands, 40% to 50% of wetlands from 2.5 to 50 acres (1–20 ha) in size, and 20% of wetlands larger than 50 acres (20 ha).[17] In western New York, soras were significantly (p=0.007) more abundant in marshes from 100 to 250 acres (41–100 ha) in size than in smaller (<100 acres (41 ha)) or larger (250–380 acres (101–155 ha)) marshes. In addition, sora nests were detected more often in the 100- to 250-acre (41–100 ha) marshes.[9]

Soras also seem to prefer edge habitats. Breeding sora density was significantly (p<0.001) correlated (r=0.62) with the perimeter:area ratio of northwestern Iowa marshes. The distance from the center of sora territories to a habitat edge was also significantly (p<0.005) less than from the center of Virginia rail territories.[12] In Arizona, habitat edges were closer to sora heavy use areas than random sites.[6]

Wetland dynamics at a large scale can affect soras. Indices of sora population at 3 "levels of response" were significantly (p<0.01) correlated (r≥0.70) with the number of ponds present in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota in May.[25]

Food habits

Sora foraging in water

Soras eat a wide range of foods. Animals that are commonly reported as sora food items include snails (Gastropoda), crustaceans (Crustacea), spiders (Araneae), and insects (Insecta), mainly beetles (Coleoptera), grasshoppers (Orthoptera), flies (Diptera), and dragonflies (Odonata).[26][27] Soras often eat the seeds of plants, such as smartweeds, bulrushes, sedges, and barnyard grasses.[20][26][27] Seeds of annual wildrice (Zizania aquatica) and rice cutgrass are eaten by soras in the eastern United States.[26] A literature review lists crowngrass (Paspalum spp.) and rice (Oryza sativa) as relatively important food sources for soras in the Southeast. Plants comprising <5% of the sora's diet are also listed and include spikerushes (Eleocharis spp.), duckweeds (Lemnaceae), pondweeds (Potamogeton spp.), panicgrasses (Panicum spp.), cordgrasses (Spartina spp.), and saltgrass (Distichlis spicata).[26]

Soras eat more plant food in fall and winter (68%-69%) than in spring and summer (40%).[26] Plant material such as hairy crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), fall panicgrass (Panicum dichotomiflorum), and bristlegrass (Setaria spp.) occurred at substantially higher frequencies and in much larger volumes in sora esophagi collected in southeastern Missouri during fall migration than those collected in spring. In addition, animals comprised a larger volume of the spring diet than the fall diet. The volume of animal material in esophagi collected in spring was predominantly composed of adult beetles and snails from the Physidae family.[27]

Predators

Sora eggs are eaten by several species including American minks (Mustela vison), skunks (Mephitidae), coyotes (Canis latrans), grackles (Quiscalus spp.), crows (Corvus spp.), and herons (Ardeidae).[10][20] Predation of adult soras by American minks, coyotes and peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) has been reported.[10][19]

References

 This article incorporates public domain material from the United States Department of Agriculture document "Porzana carolina".

  1. ^ a b Robbins, C.S.; Bruun, B., Zim, H.S. (1966). Birds of North America. New York: Western Publishing Company, Inc.. ISBN 0-7611-1397-5. 
  2. ^ [1]
  3. ^ [2]
  4. ^ Field Guide to the Birds of North America. Washington D.C.: National Geographic. Fourth Edition - 2002. 
  5. ^ a b Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2003. Sora. In: All about birds: Bird guide. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Cornell Lab of Ornithology
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Conway, Courtney J. 1990. Seasonal changes in movements and habitat use in three sympatric rails. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming. Thesis
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h Griese, Herman J.; Ryder, Ronald A.; Braun, Clait E. 1980. Spatial and temporal distribution of rails in Colorado. The Wilson Bulletin. 92(1): 96–102.
  8. ^ a b c d e Kaufman, Gerald W. 1989. Breeding ecology of the sora, Porzana carolina, and the Virginia rail, Rallus limicola. The Canadian Field Naturalist. 103(2): 270–282
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Lor, Socheata Krystyne. 2000. Population status and breeding ecology of marsh birds in western New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources. Thesis
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Lowther, James K. 1977. Nesting biology of the sora at Vermilion, Alberta. The Canadian Field Naturalist. 91(1): 63–67
  11. ^ a b c d e f Manci, Karen M.; Rusch, Donald H. 1988. Indices to distribution and abundance of some inconspicuous waterbirds on Horicon Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology. 59(1): 67–75
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Johnson, Rex R.; Dinsmore, James J. 1986. Habitat use by breeding Virginia rails and soras. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(3): 387–392
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Rundle, William Dean. 1980. Management, habitat selection, and feeding ecology of migrant rails and shorebirds. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. Thesis
  14. ^ a b c d e f Reid, Frederic Arthur. 1989. Differential habitat use by waterbirds in a managed wetland complex. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. Dissertation.
  15. ^ a b c d Johnson, Rex R.; Dinsmore, James J. 1985. Brood-rearing and postbreeding habitat use by Virginia rails and soras. The Wilson Bulletin. 97(4): 551–554.
  16. ^ a b c Shutler, Dave; Mullie, Adele; Clark, Robert G. 2000. Bird communities of prairie uplands and wetlands in relation to farming practices in Saskatchewan. Conservation Biology. 14(5): 1441–1451
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Gibbs, James P.; Longcore, Jerry G.; McAuley, Daniel G.; Ringelman, James K. 1991. Use of wetland habitats by selected nongame water birds in Maine. Fish and Wildlife Research No. 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service
  18. ^ Morgan, K. H.; Wetmore, S. P.; Smith, G. E. J.; Keller, R. A. 1989. Relationships between logging methods, habitat structure, and bird communities of the dry interior Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine forests of British Columbia. Technical Report Series No. 71. Delta, BC: Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region
  19. ^ a b c Nero, Robert W. 2000. The peregrine falcon and the sora. Blue Jay. 58(3): 125–127
  20. ^ a b c d e f g Andrews, Douglas Alexander. 1973. Habitat utilization by sora, Virginia rails, and king rails near southwestern Lake Erie. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. Thesis
  21. ^ a b c d e f g DeGraaf, Richard M.; Yamasaki, Mariko. 2001. New England wildlife: Habitat, natural history, and distribution. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England
  22. ^ a b c Mumford, Russell E.; Keller, Charles E. 1984. The birds of Indiana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
  23. ^ Sorenson, Michael D. 1995. Evidence of conspecific nest parasitism and egg discrimination in the sora. The Condor. 97(3): 819–821
  24. ^ a b Conway, Courtney J.; Eddleman, William R.; Anderson, Stanley H. 1994. Nesting success and survival of Virginia rails and soras. The Wilson Bulletin. 106(3): 466–473
  25. ^ Niemuth, Neal D.; Solberg, John W. 2003. Response of waterbirds to number of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, U.S.A. Waterbirds. 26(2): 233–23
  26. ^ a b c d e Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc
  27. ^ a b c Rundle, W. Dean; Sayre, Mark W. 1983. Feeding ecology of migrant soras in southeastern Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management. 47(4): 1153–1159
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!