Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Chinese (Simplified) (7) (learn more)
Overview
Distribution
Polish Exclusive Economic Zone, Portuguese Exclusive Economic Zone, Spanish Exclusive Economic Zone, United Kingdom Exclusive Economic Zone
-
MEDIN (2011). UK checklist of marine species derived from the applications Marine Recorder and UNICORN, version 1.0.
http://www.marinespecies.org/asteroidea/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149081
-
Ramos, M. (ed.). 2010. IBERFAUNA. The Iberian Fauna Databank
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149024
-
Kedra, M. (2010). A Checklist of marine species occurring in Polish marine waters, compiled in the framework of the PESI EU FP7 project.
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=149084
Trusted
Ecology
Habitat
Habitat and Ecology
Habitat and Ecology
Systems
Behaviour This species is strongly migratory and travels between breeding grounds in the high Arctic to wintering grounds in the temperate and subtropical zones1. Populations that breed in the taiga nest in early-May, with those breeding in the tundra nesting one month later in early-June1, 2. The species breeds in solitary pairs, usually with nests well-dispersed6 (although it will also nest in loose groups)1. After breeding the species undergoes a moulting period when it is flightless for c.1 month between July and August5, some populations undertaking extensive northward moult migrations2, and most congregating into large moulting flocks near open water5. The species departs from its breeding grounds after this post-breeding moulting period in early-September, arriving in the winter quarters from late-September through October3. It remains gregarious throughout the winter3 (although it occurs in smaller, loose flocks than many other goose species)6 and roosts close to feeding areas3 in mixed-species flocks on lakes, rivers and flooded lands2. Habitat Breeding The species breeds near lakes, pools, rivers and streams in high Arctic tundra or the taiga forest zone1. Taiga nesting populations show a preference for scrubby birch Betula spp. forest3 and dense spruce forest with bogs or mires3, whereas tundra-based populations nest on damp tundra of moss, grass, sedge or scrub4 near river flood-plains (but above flood levels)2, 3, on Arctic islands and in Arctic coastal regions3. Non-breeding During the winter and on passage the species inhabits marshes, agricultural land1 (pastures, arable fields, rice-paddies)2, damp steppe grassland3, flood-lands, rivers and coastal shallows6 in open country1. It also roosts on lakes, rivers and flood-lands in Europe during this season2. Diet The species is herbivorous1, its diet consisting of herbs, grasses, sedges1 and mosses4, complemented during the breeding season by berries (e.g. from Empetrum or Vaccinium spp.)1. During the winter it feeds predominantly on agricultural land taking grain, beans, potatoes1 and sprouting winter cereal crops2. Breeding site The species builds a nest of vegetation in a shallow scrape on the ground1. Taiga breeders nest in bogs or mires within forested regions, placing nests within 400 m of open mire and within 2 km of open water, usually 50-100 cm above bog surfaces on hummocks that are safe from flooding2. Tundra breeders nest on dry hummocks and moss2. Management information An investigation carried out in one of the species' wintering areas (UK) found that it was most likely to forage on improved grassland or grasslands grazed by cattle that were a minimum of 5 ha in area, had an optimum sward height of c.20 cm and were at a distance of less than 9 km away from roosting sites10.
Systems
- Terrestrial
- Freshwater
Trusted
Life History and Behavior
Life Expectancy
Lifespan, longevity, and ageing
Maximum longevity: 25.6 years (wild) Observations: Oldest bird in banding studies was 25.6 years of age (http://www.euring.org/data_and_codes/longevity.htm).
Trusted
Molecular Biology and Genetics
Molecular Biology
Barcode data: Anser fabalis
The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species.

There are 4 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
Download FASTA File
There are 4 barcode sequences available from BOLD and GenBank. Below is a sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species. See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen and other sequences.
TACCTCATCTTCGGGGCATGAGCAGGAATAGTCGGCACCGCACTC---AGCCTATTAATCCGCGCAGAACTAGGACAGCCAGGAACTCTCCTAGGCGAC---GACCAAATTTACAACGTAATCGTTACCGCCCACGCCTTTGTAATAATCTTCTTTATAGTCATACCCATCATGATCGGAGGATTCGGCAACTGATTAGTCCCCCTCATA---ATCGGTGCCCCCGACATAGCATTCCCACGAATAAACAACATAAGCTTTTGACTCCTCCCCCCATCATTCCTCCTACTACTAGCTTCATCCACTGTAGAAGCTGGCGCCGGCACAGGCTGAACTGTCTACCCTCCCCTAGCAGGTAACCTCGCCCACGCCGGAGCTTCAGTAGACCTG---GCTATCTTCTCACTCCACTTAGCCGGTATCTCCTCCATTCTTGGGGCCATCAACTTTATTACCACAGCTATCAACATAAAACCCCCCGCACTCTCACAATACCAAACCCCACTATTTGTCTGATCCGTACTAATTACCGCCATCCTACTCCTTCTATCACTCCCCGTACTCGCCGCC---GGTATTACAATACTACTAACTGATCGAAACCTAAACACCACATTCTTCGATCCCGCTGGAGGAGGAGACCCAATCCTGTACCAACACCTATTCTGATTCTTCGGACACCCAGAAGTCTATATTCTGATCCTACCAGGATTTGGAATT
-- end --
-- end --
Download FASTA File
Trusted
Statistics of barcoding coverage: Anser fabalis
Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 7
Specimens with Barcodes: 9
Species With Barcodes: 1
Public Records: 7
Specimens with Barcodes: 9
Species With Barcodes: 1
Trusted
Conservation
Conservation Status
IUCN Red List Assessment
Red List Category
LC
Least Concern
Red List Criteria
Version
3.1
Year Assessed
2009
Assessor/s
BirdLife International
Reviewer/s
Bird, J., Butchart, S.
Contributor/s
Justification
This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is very large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
History
- 2008Least Concern
- 2004Least Concern
Trusted
Threats
Major Threats
The species declined in the past due to hunting (resulting in mortality, injury and disturbance)1, 2, 8 and habitat loss1. Habitat degradation due to oil pollution7, 8, drainage, peat-extraction, changing management practices (decreased grazing and mowing in meadows leading to scrub over-growth) and forest clearance is a threat to breeding areas in Russia7, Norway and Sweden3. The species also suffers from human persecution3 and is susceptible to poisoning by pesticides used on agricultural land9.
Trusted

