Articles on this page are available in 1 other language: Spanish (2) (learn more)

Overview

Brief Summary

Description

Tundra Voles have the northernmost distribution of any North American species of Microtus. They are widespread in northern latitudes in Eurasia, too, where they are known as Root Voles, and probably migrated to North America across the Bering land-bridge during the Pleistocene. They prefer moist meadow habitats, particularly near lakes, streams, and marshes. Tundra Voles are active year-round. In the fall, they store food—grass seeds and other plant materials—for winter. Many northern predators depend on this species, including weasels, Wolverines, Arctic Foxes, falcons, gulls, and owls.

Links:
Mammal Species of the World
  • Original description: Pallas, P. S., 1771-1776.  Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen des Russischen Reichs. St. Petersbourg, 3:693.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

Microtus oeconomus is a Holarctic species, with a wide range extending from north-west Europe in the west to Alaska in the East. In North America, restricted to Alaska and northwest Canada. In Europe, its main range extends from eastern Germany and northern Fennoscandia through Poland, Belarus, and northern and central European Russia; isolated relict populations are found in the Netherlands, southern Norway and northern Sweden, the Finnish coast, and Austria, Slovakia and Hungary (van Apeldoorn 1999, Shenbrot and Krasnov 2005). In China found in northern Xinjiang and northern Nei Mongol. In Mongolia found in northern areas including Mongol Altai, Hangai, Hövsgöl Hentii and Ikh Hyangan mountain ranges, and Mongol Daguur Steppe (Sokolov et al., 1985).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Geographic Range

Microtus oeconomus (pronounced e-KON-uh-mus), commonly known as the tundra or root vole, is one of only four Holarctic rodents and the only species of Microtus that is found on all northern continents. In the Nearctic, it is found from the extreme northern edge of British Columbia northward to the Arctic coast, and from western Northwest Territories, through Yukon Territory and nearly all of Alaska. It has the northernmost distribution of any Microtus species in North America, with occurrences to around 71°N in Alaska. In the Palearctic, tundra voles occupy a somewhat broader range, extending from Scandinavia and the Netherlands in the west, throughout northern Europe and Asia to Siberia in the east, and south as far as Mongolia.

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native ); palearctic (Native )

Other Geographic Terms: holarctic

  • Hoffmann, R., J. Koeppl. 1985. Zoogeography. Pp. 84–115 in R Tamarin, ed. Biology of New World Microtus . Boston, MA: The American Society of Mammalogists.
  • Musser, G., M. Carleton. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. Pp. 894-1522 in D Wilson, D Reeder, eds. Mammal Species of the World. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National Distribution

Canada

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

United States

Origin: Native

Regularity: Regularly occurring

Currently: Present

Confidence: Confident

Type of Residency: Year-round

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Global Range: Tundra and taiga of Holarctic; Scandinavia and the Netherlands to borderlands of Bering Sea, including Sakhalin and Kurile islands, and south to eastern Germany, Ukraine, southern Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and the Ussuri region; St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Sea; Alaska through Yukon Territory to western Northwest Territories and extreme northwestern British Columbia (Musser and Carleton, in Wilson and Reeder 1993).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Physical Description

Microtus oeconomus is a medium-sized vole and varies in color dorsally from darker brown or grayish to lighter shades of cinnamon, rusty brown, or ocher. All color variations display a mixture of black-tipped hairs in the dorsal pelage. Sides are somewhat paler and the ventral surface is much lighter, from buff or ash gray to white. The tail is slightly to strongly dichromatic, being darker above and paler below. There is a fair amount of color variation in the species, which can often be related to habitat and geography. Tundra voles are generally lighter colored in more open habitats, and have yellow or grayish tones in tundra or forested habitats, respectfully.

Tundra voles display sexual size dimorphism, with adult males roughly 30% larger than females. The size and weight of the species is also variable relative to latitude and geography, especially so in the Palearctic. Individuals in populations at higher latitudes are generally larger and have proportionally smaller tails as a possible adaptation to colder temperatures. In addition, insular subspecies are generally larger than continental counterparts. Weight ranges from 25 to 80 g, with an average around 50 g. Total length ranges from 118 mm in the Old World, to 226 mm in the larger subspecies found in the New World. The tail is relatively short, generally being less than 30% of the total length. The name Microtus means “small ear” and refers to the short ears hidden in pelage that are a characteristic common to members of the genus. The dental formula for M. oeconomus follows the basic pattern for all Microtus: incisors 1/1, canines 0/0, premolars 0/0, molars 3/3.

Microtus oeconomus maintains a relatively high basal metabolic rate (compared to most rodents) of 12.5 mL O2 per gram of body mass per hour. This is due primarily to the high thermoregulatory demands of small endothermic mammals in cold environments.

Range mass: 25 to 80 g.

Average mass: 50 g.

Range length: 118 to 226 mm.

Average basal metabolic rate: 12.5 cm^3 oxygen/hour.

Other Physical Features: endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry

Sexual Dimorphism: male larger

Average basal metabolic rate: 0.566 W.

  • Bozinovic, F., M. Rosenmann. 1989. Maximum metabolic rate of rodents: physiological and ecological consequences on distributional limits. Functional Ecology, 3(2): 173-181.
  • MacDonald, S. 2003. The small mammals of Alaska: A field handbook of the shrews and small rodents. Unpublished Draft.
  • Nagorsen, D. 2002. An identification manual to the small mammals of British Columbia. British Columbia, Canada: Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management.
  • Ringens, P., G. Folk, J. Berberich. 1977. Cold acclimation in the tundra vole. Acta Theriologica, 22(3): 67-74.
  • Bondrup-Nielsen, S., R. Ims. 1990. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in microtines: are females larger than males or are males smaller than females?. Evolutionary Ecology, 4: 261-272.
  • Lance, E., J. Cook. 1998. Biogeography of tundra voles (Microtus oeconomus) of Beringia and the southern coast of Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy, 79(1): 53-65.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size

Length: 23 cm

Weight: 80 grams

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size in North America

Length:
Range: 152-225 mm

Weight:
Range: 25-80 g
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution

Source: Smithsonian's North American Mammals

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Type Information

Type for Microtus oeconomus
Collection: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals
Sex/Stage: Female; Adult
Preparation: Skull; Remainder in Fluid
Collector(s): J. Dawson
Year Collected: 1865
Locality: Plover Bay, Bering Strait, Chukotskiy, Russia, Asia
  • Type: Miller, G. S. 1899 Jan 31. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 13: 11.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Division of Mammals

Source: National Museum of Natural History Image Collection

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
It typically inhabits damp, densely-vegetated areas along the edges of lakes, streams and marshes; may be found in tundra, taiga, forest-steppe, and even semi-desert. Wet meadows, bogs, fens, riverbanks and flooded shores are all important habitats (Tast 1982, van Apeldoorn 1999). Feeds on green vegetation.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat

Microtus oeconomus inhabits the tundra and taiga biomes and prefers mesic sedge meadows with abundant cover. It is commonly found along the edges of lakes and streams where this and similar habitats occur. Although this habitat usually occurs in relative lowlands, tundra voles are also found in wetter areas of mountainous regions at elevations of up to 2,500 meters. In the Palearctic, M. oeconomus is found in a broader range of habitats, commonly inhabiting mixed forest, taiga, and forest-steppe biomes with similar conditions. Habitat is most strongly selected on the basis of food quality and amount of cover provided.

Range elevation: 0 to 2,500 m.

Habitat Regions: temperate ; polar

Terrestrial Biomes: tundra ; taiga ; forest ; mountains

Wetlands: bog

  • Bergman, C., C. Krebs. 1993. Diet overlap of collared lemmings and tundra voles at Pearce-Point, Northwest-Territories. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71(9): 1703-1709.
  • Tast, J. 1966. The root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), as an inhabitant of seasonally flooded land. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 3: 127-171.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Moist to wet tundra; tundra areas around streams, lakes, marshes; muskeg, among logs and roots of conifers. Sometimes in thick grass in drier areas. Makes shallow burrows and runways through vegetation. May use frost cracks as extensions of runway system. Nests are in shallow burrows or under debris.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Migration

Non-Migrant: Yes. At least some populations of this species do not make significant seasonal migrations. Juvenile dispersal is not considered a migration.

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make local extended movements (generally less than 200 km) at particular times of the year (e.g., to breeding or wintering grounds, to hibernation sites).

Locally Migrant: No. No populations of this species make annual migrations of over 200 km.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Trophic Strategy

Food Habits

Tundra voles are strictly vegetarian and preferentially feed on sedges (Carex sp. and Eupharium sp.) that grow in their favored habitat of wet, marshy tundra. Sedges make up around 70 to 80% of their diet, with the remainder comprising herbs, mosses, lichen, and small woody shrubs. These percentages vary seasonally, and a 30% decrease in sedge consumption is common in winter, with mosses and lichens becoming a relatively major component of the diet. Other plant foods that are preferred when available include Equisetum sp., Dryas integrifolia, Salix sp. and various grasses.

In the fall, Microtus oeconomus creates large caches of stored seeds and rhizomes to supplement its winter diet. Native peoples of North America occasionally sought out these caches in order to obtain large quantities of desired foods, such as licorice root.

Plant Foods: leaves; roots and tubers; wood, bark, or stems; bryophytes; lichens

Foraging Behavior: stores or caches food

Primary Diet: herbivore (Folivore )

  • Batzli, G., C. Lesieutre. 1991. The influence of high quality food on habitat use by arctic microtine rodents. Oikos, 60(3): 299-306.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comments: Eats mainly green grasses and sedges in summer. Stores rhizomes (especially knotweed and licorice root) and grass seeds for later use (Whitaker 1980).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Associations

Ecosystem Roles

Populations of Microtus oeconomus experience cyclical fluctuations, reaching peak densities of 70 to 80 voles per hectare. As explained above, during these peak density years, tundra voles provide a large food base for many predator species. When present in such large numbers, they can also significantly alter the biological production of the tundra ecosystem through their foraging activities. Tundra voles share their habitat preferences with several similar species (e.g., M. longicaudus, M. pennsylvanicus, M. agrestis and M. xanthognathus) but generally either avoid competition through niche specialization, or out-compete the other species, as in the case of M. agrestis.

Tundra voles are host to a variety of internal and external parasites. Endoparasites include cestodes (Echinococcus sp., Paranoplocephala sp., and Taenia sp.), nematodes (Heligmosomoides sp.), and trematodes (Quinqueserialis nassalli). Ectoparasites include fleas (Siphonaptera sp.), lice (Polyplax sp.), and ticks (Ixodes angustus).

Commensal/Parasitic Species:

  • Tast, J. 1968. Influence of the root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), upon the habitat selection of the field vole, Microtus agrestis (L.), in northern Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
  • Timm, R. 1985. Parasites. Pp. 455-528 in R Tamarin, ed. Biology of New World Microtus . Boston, MA: American Society of Mammalogists.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Predation

Microtus oeconomus is an important prey source for many carnivores. During cycles of peak density, they have been known to comprise the majority of the diet for species such as the arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) in Alaska. Other known terrestrial predators of M. oeconomus include weasels, martens, red foxes, and wolverines. In addition, numerous avian species prey on tundra voles, including owls, falcons, hawks, jaegers, gulls, and shrikes.

Known Predators:

Anti-predator Adaptations: cryptic

  • Sundell, J., O. Huitu, H. Henttonen, A. Kaikusalo, E. Korpimäki, H. Pietiäinen, P. Saurola, I. Hanski, E. Korpimaeki, H. Pietiaeinen. 2004. Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73(1): 167-178.
  • Anthony, R., N. Barten, P. Seiser. 2000. Foods of arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus) during winter and spring in western Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy, 81(3): 820-828.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

General Ecology

Populations may fluctuate, with periodically high densities. Density generally in the range of 4-50/ha. Summer home ranges of sexually active adult males do not overlap, average about 3900 sq m; home ranges of females (average about 1100 sq m) generally overlap with each other and with home range of one adult male (Lambin et al. 1992).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History and Behavior

Behavior

Communication and Perception

Olfaction is presumably the most important and well-developed sense in Microtus oeconomus. Scents are commonly used by the species to identify familiar or unfamiliar individuals and to determine their age, sex, reproductive condition, diet, or social status. Conspicuous hip and preputial glands used for scent production are located on both sexes of adult tundra voles. The glands are largest in males and older individuals, and are only present in females at higher latitudes. Scent marking behaviors such as scratching or rubbing are also displayed by M. oeconomus. Hearing is well-developed in tundra voles and they may occasionally use vocalizations for communication, although little is known about this behavior.

Communication Channels: acoustic ; chemical

Other Communication Modes: scent marks

Perception Channels: visual ; acoustic

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life Expectancy

Lifespan/Longevity

There is insufficient research on Microtus oeconomus for a definitive lifespan to be established. However, relatively few adults survive much longer than one year in the wild, and the maximum age for other species of Microtus is commonly around two years.

Range lifespan

Status: wild:
2 (high) years.

Typical lifespan

Status: wild:
1 (high) years.

Average lifespan

Status: captivity:
1.8 years.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

Observations: Voles, in general, are short-lived and show seasonal population crashes, probably due to lack of food. These animals are estimated to live up to 1.8 years (Bernhard Grzimek 1990), but without further studies their maximum longevity cannot be determined.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Joao Pedro de Magalhaes

Source: AnAge

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Reproduction

Reproduction

Various mating systems have been observed in Microtus oeconomus, including promiscuous, multi-partner groups, polygyny, and monogamy. The mating system adopted is determined primarily by the general spacing patterns of a specific population, which are in turn influenced by factors such as habitat, season, and population densities (discussed below). In general, a slightly biased female (57%) to male (43%) ratio favors a system of polygyny in tundra voles. Accordingly, single-male polygyny and multi-male promiscuity are the most common systems observed during normal breeding season. However, facultative monogamy is adopted in isolated territories or patchy habitats with low densities and can be relatively long-lasting.

Mating System: monogamous ; polygynous ; polygynandrous (promiscuous)

Female tundra voles are polyestrous and often produce two to three litters per year. The breeding season generally lasts from late April to September during years with peak densities, and is around one to two months shorter in years of low densities. Winter breeding has been observed very rarely, and is attributed to unusually warm summers resulting in late fall re-growth.

Litter sizes of Microtus oeconomus are relatively large for the genus and usually range from four to eight offspring, with an average of 6.9. Litter size increases with age of the female, and over-wintered females are usually much more productive than spring-born females. Litters produced by northern populations of tundra voles are more female biased than those of southern populations. This bias is thought to be influenced by several factors both before and after birth, but this is not well understood. The gestation period for M. oeconomus lasts 20 to 21 days. Neonates weigh about 3 g at birth, have no external hair (except vibrissae), and are essentially poikilothermic. The newborns are very altricial and depend heavily on the mother during development. After five days the young are covered in hair and their eyes open 11 to 13 days after birth. They develop quickly and are weaned after 18 days, at which point they are fairly independent. Maximum size is reached as early as two months after weaning. Sexual maturation is reached in three weeks by females, whereas males do not usually mature until six to eight weeks. This sex-based delay in maturation serves as a defense against inbreeding in that females are almost always fertilized before their male siblings are able to mate.

Breeding interval: Female tundra voles breed several times in a year.

Breeding season: Breeding generally occurs from April to September. Very rarely, winter breeding has been observed

Range number of offspring: 4 to 8.

Average number of offspring: 6.9.

Range gestation period: 20 to 21 days.

Average weaning age: 18 days.

Average time to independence: 18 days.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 3 weeks.

Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 6 to 8 weeks.

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); fertilization ; viviparous

Average birth mass: 2.43 g.

Average number of offspring: 7.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)

Sex: female:
30 days.

Females provide the greater investment in the offspring, including nest construction, protection, and care of the young. However, increases in paternal investment in southern populations of tundra voles have been observed. It has been suggested that this is a result of longer foraging times required by southern females during lactation due to increased resource limitation at lower latitudes.

Parental Investment: altricial ; pre-fertilization (Provisioning, Protecting: Female); pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-weaning/fledging (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female)

  • Innes, D. 1978. A reexamination of litter sizes in some North American microtines.. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 56(7): 1488-1496.
  • Kaikusalo, A., J. Tast. 1984. Winter breeding of microtine rodents at Kilpisjaervi, Finnish Lapland. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 10: 243-252.
  • Ru-Yung, S., Z. Jing-Xiang. 1987. Postnatal development of thermoregulation in root vole and some comments on the index of homeothermy ability. Journal of Thermal Biology, 12(4): 267-272.
  • Ims, R. 1997. Determinants of geographic variation in growth and reproductive traits in the root vole. Ecology, 78(2): 461-470.
  • Aars, J., R. Ims. 2002. Intrinsic and climatic determinants of population demography: the winter dynamics of tundra voles. Ecology, 83(12): 3449–3456.
  • Aars, J., H. Andreassen, R. Ims. 1995. Root voles: litter sex ratio variation in fragmented habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64(4): 459-472.
  • Ims, R. 1994. Litter sex ratio variation in laboratory colonies of two geographically distinct strains of the root vole Microtus oeconomus . Ecography, 17(2): 141-146.
  • Lambin, X., C. Krebs, B. Scott. 1992. Spacing system of the tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) during the breeding season in Canada’s western arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70(10): 2068-2072.
  • Tast, J. 1966. The root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), as an inhabitant of seasonally flooded land. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 3: 127-171.
  • Viitala, J. 1994. Monogamy in free-living Microtus oeconomus . Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31(3): 343-345.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Females containing 3-11 embryos have been reported (Burt and Grossenheider 1976). Mating system probably is polygynous (Lambin et al. 1992).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Microtus oeconomus

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 0
Species: 73
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2008

Assessor/s
Linzey, A.V., Shar, S., Lkhagvasuren, D., Juškaitis, R., Sheftel, B., Meinig, H., Amori, G. & Henttonen, H.

Reviewer/s
Amori, G. (Small Nonvolant Mammal Red List Authority) & Temple, H. (Global Mammal Assessment Team)

Justification
Globally, the species is common and widespread and is not considered threatened. However, some isolate subspecies/subpopulations are declining and potentially threatened with extinction.

History
  • 2002
    Least Concern
  • 1996
    Lower Risk/near threatened
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Status

Overall, Microtus oeconomus is a relatively stable species and not currently listed as threatened or endangered on any listing. It is also categorized by the IUCN as a species of “least concern”. However, insufficient knowledge of several isolated subspecies has resulted in their categorization of “data deficient” by the IUCN. These subspecies include M. o. amakensis, M. o. elymocetes, M. o. innuitus, M. o. popofensis, M. o. punukensis, and M. o. sitkensis. Furthermore, two subspecies, M. o. mehelyi and M. o. arenicola, are categorized by the IUCN as “vulnerable” and “critically endangered”, respectively. Population declines in some subspecies have been attributed to habitat deterioration. In the case of M. o. arenicola, competition with M. arvalis has additionally contributed to population declines on some islands.

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

State of Michigan List: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

  • Gippoliti, S. 2006. "2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species" (On-line). Microtus oeconomus ssp. arenicola. Accessed December 04, 2006 at http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/40769/summ.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

National NatureServe Conservation Status

Canada

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

United States

Rounded National Status Rank: N5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

NatureServe Conservation Status

Rounded Global Status Rank: G5 - Secure

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
A widespread and abundant species, although in some areas (e.g. parts of Europe, some North American islands) its status is less favourable.

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
At the global level this species faces no major threats.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
Occurs in protected areas. It is listed on Appendix III of the Bern Convention. Subspecies arenicola (from the Netherlands) is listed on Annex II of the EU Habitats and Species Directive, and both M. oe. arenicola and M. oe. mehelyi (the latter from Austria, Hungary and Slovakia) are listed on Annex IV. In North America, the following subspecies are regarded as being of conservation concern (all are island forms): M. o. punakensis (S1); M. o. amakensis and M. o. elymocetes (S2); and M. o. innuitus, M. o. popofensis, M. o. sitkensis, and M. o. unalascensis (S3).
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Benefits

Economic Importance for Humans: Negative

Tundra voles are known carriers of several diseases. Of most importance to humans is the role of Microtus oeconomus as a carrier of the bacterium (Francisella tularensis) that causes tularemia in humans. This disease is transmitted by direct contact and is fatal in about 7% of untreated human cases. Additionally, at peak densities they can compete with livestock for forage and cause damage to trees by gnawing on the roots.

Negative Impacts: injures humans (carries human disease)

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Economic Importance for Humans: Positive

Microtus oeconomus is commonly considered an ideal species for scientific research due to its adaptability to laboratory settings, quick development, and rapid population growth. Many important hypotheses have been tested using tundra voles as model species. As discussed above, tundra voles also provide an important food base for many carnivores (such as mink and foxes) that are highly valued for their fur.

Positive Impacts: research and education

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors

Source: Animal Diversity Web

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Tundra Vole

The tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) or root vole is a medium-sized vole found in Northern and Central Europe, Asia, and northwestern North America, including Alaska and northwestern Canada. In the western part of the Netherlands the tundra vole is a relict from the ice age and has developed to the subspecies Microtus oeconomus arenicola.

It has short ears and a short tail. Its fur is yellowish brown with paler sides and white underparts. They are 18 cm long with a 4 cm tail and weigh about 50 g.

This species is found in damp tundra or moist meadows, usually near water. It makes runways through the surface growth in warm weather and tunnels through the snow in winter. It feeds on grasses, sedges and seeds.

Female voles have three to six litters of three to nine young in a shallow burrow. The vole population in a given area can vary greatly from year to year.

It is active year-round. It also digs underground burrows where it stores seeds and roots, especially licorice root, for the winter. The species epithet "oeconomus" refers to this "economical" behaviour.

Subspecies

There are several subspecies of tundra vole.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ a b Linzey, A.V., Shar, S., Lkhagvasuren, D., Juškaitis, R., Sheftel, B., Meinig, H., Amori, G. & Henttonen, H. (2008). "Microtus oeconomus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/13451. Retrieved 04 February 2010. 
  2. ^ Witte van den Bosch, R. and Bekker, D. (2009). Verdwijnt de oer-Hollandse lemming? Geschiedenis en toekomst van de noordse woelmuis. Zoogdier 20-4: p.p 3-7. (in Dutch)
  • Musser, G. G. and M. D. Carleton. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. Pp. 894-1531 in Mammal Species of the World a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder eds. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Names and Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Comments: Lance and Cook (1998) examined the biogeographic history of this species in Beringia and the southern coast of Alaska, based on allozymic, chromosomal, and morphologic variation. See Musser and Carleton (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) for extensive taxonomic discussion.

Microtus ratticeps or M. kamtschaticus have been proposed to be proper name for this species, but Baker et al. (2003), Musser and Carleton (in Wilson and Reeder 1993, 2005), and other authors have continued to use M. oeconomus; the nomenclatural uncertainty needs formal resolution (Musser and Carleton).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© NatureServe

Source: NatureServe

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!