The following bibliography has been generated by bringing together all references provided by our content partners. There may be duplication.

References

  • 1.  Abate, Tom. 1992. Which bird is the better indicator species for        old-growth forest?. BioScience. 42(1): 8-9.  [17437]
  • 10.  Boe, Kenneth N. 1975. Natural seedlings and sprouts after regeneration        cuttings in old-growth redwood. PSW-111. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department        of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range        Experiment Station. 17 p.  [9897]
  • 11.  Borchert, Mark; Segotta, Daniel; Purser, Michael D. 1988. Coast redwood        ecological types of southern Monterey County, California. Gen. Tech.        Rep. PSW-107. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest        Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 27 p.        [10225]
  • 11. Borchert, Mark; Segotta, Daniel; Purser, Michael D. 1988. Coast redwood ecological types of southern Monterey County, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-107. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 27 p. [10225]
  • 14.  Finney, Mark Arnold. 1991. Ecological effects of prescribed and        simulated fire on the coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don)        Endl.). Berkeley, CA: University of California. 179 p. Dissertation.        [15222]
  • 15.  Finney, Mark A.; Martin, Robert E. 1989. Fire history in a Sequoia        sempervirens forest at Salt Point State Park, California. Canadian        Journal of Forest Research. 19: 1451-1457.  [9845]
  • 16.  Finney, M. A.; Martin, R. E. 1991. Prescribed underburning and some        initital effects in young-growth coast redwood forests of California.        In: Andrews, Patricia L.; Potts, Donald F., eds. Proceedings, 11th        annual conference on fire and forest meteorology; 1991 April 16-19;        Missoula, MT. SAF Publication 91-04. Bethesda, MD: Society of American        Foresters: 328-334.  [16181]
  • 17.  Fiske, John N.; DeBell, Dean S. 1989. Silviculture of Pacific coast        forests. In: Burns, Russell M., compiler. The scientific basis for        silvicultural and management decisions in the National Forest System.        Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,        Forest Service: 59-78.  [10246]
  • 19.  Fritz, Emanuel. 1950. Some principles govering the growing of redwood        crops. In: Proceedings, 41st annual conference of the Western Forestry        and Conservation Association; 1950 December 6-8; San Francisco, CA.        Portland, OR: Western Forestry and Conservation Association: 23-25.        [15387]
  • 2.  Adams, Ronald S. 1974. When it pays to shade planted tree seedlings.        State Forest Notes No. 55. Sacramento, CA: State of California, The        Resources Agency, Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry. 6 p.        [7936]
  • 21.  Greenlee, Jason M.; Langenheim, Jean H. 1990. Historic FIRE REGIMES and        their relation to vegetation patterns in the Monterey Bay area of        California. American Midland Naturalist. 124(2): 239-253.  [15144]
  • 22.  Griffin, James R.; Critchfield, William B. 1972. The distribution of        forest trees in California. Res. Pap. PSW-82. Berkeley, CA: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and        Range Experiment Station. 118 p.  [1041]
  • 22. Griffin, James R.; Critchfield, William B. 1972. The distribution of forest trees in California. Res. Pap. PSW-82. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 118 p. [1041]
  • 23.  Hallin, William. 1936. Saving reserve and seed trees from redwood slash        fires. Journal of Forestry. 34: 54-61.  [15233]
  • 24.  Harper, James A. 1962. Daytime feeding habits of Roosevelt elk on Boyes        Prairie, California. Journal of Wildlife Management. 26(1): 97-100.        [8876]
  • 25.  Harris, Roger D. 1983. Decay characteristics of pileated woodpecker nest        trees. In: Davis, Jerry W.; Goodwin, Gregory A.; Ockenfeis, Richard A.,        technical coordinators. Snag Habitat management: proceedings of the        symposium; 1983 June 7-9; Flagstaff, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-99. Fort        Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky        Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 125-129.  [17826]
  • 26.  Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial        natural communities of California. Sacramento, CA: California Department        of Fish and Game. 156 p.  [12756]
  • 27.  Huston, Michael; Smith, Thomas. 1987. Plant succession: life history and        competition. American Midland Naturalist. 130(2): 168-198.  [9942]
  • 28.  Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with native plants of the Pacific        Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 252 p.  [9980]
  • 3.  Agee, James K. 1988. Successional dynamics in forest riparian zones. In:        Raedeke, Kenneth J., ed. Streamside management: riparian wildlife and        forestry interactions. Institute of Forest Resources Contribution No.        58. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Forest Resources:        31-43.  [7657]
  • 30. Lenihan, James M. 1990. Forest ass. of Little Lost Man Creek, Humboldt Co., CA: reference-level in the hierarchical structure of old-growth coastal redwood vegetation. Madrono. 37(2): 69-87. [10673]
  • 30.  Lenihan, James M. 1990. Forest ass. of Little Lost Man Creek, Humboldt        Co., CA: reference-level in the hierarchical structure of old-growth        coastal redwood vegetation. Madrono. 37(2): 69-87.  [10673]
  • 33.  Marx, Wesley. 1990. A greening on the Sundown Coast. California Coast &        Ocean. 6(2): 33-38.  [15140]
  • 34.  Mcbride, Joe R; Jacobs, Diana F.; Cole, Dana W. 1985. Use of fire        history data in planning reburn intervals for controlled burning. In:        Long, James N., ed. Fire management: the challenge of protection and        use: Proceedings of a symposium; 1985 April 17-19; Logan, UT. [Place of        publication unknown]
  • 35.  McDonald, Philip M.; Helgerson, Ole T. 1990. Mulches aid in regenerating        California and Oregon forests: past, present, and future. Gen. Tech.        Rep. PSW-123. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agricuture, Forest        Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 19 p.  [15105]
  • 36.  Metcalf, Woodbridge. 1924. Artificial reproduction of redwood. Journal        of Forestry. 22: 873-893.  [15524]
  • 37.  Millar, Constance I.; Libby, William J. 1989. Disneyland or native        ecosystem: genetics and the restorationist. Restoration and Management        Notes. 7(1): 18-24.  [8071]
  • 38.  Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA:        University of California Press. 1905 p.  [6155]
  • 38. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
  • 39.  Namkoong, G.; Roberds, J. H. 1974. Extinction probabilities and the        changing age structure of redwood forests. American Naturalist.        108(961): 355-368.  [11081]
  • 4.  Arnold, Ron. 1975. Redwood region faces new park controversy. Western        Conservation Journal. 32(4): 12-16.  [8789]
  • 40.  Olson, David F., Jr.; Roy, Douglass F.; Walters, Gerald A. 1990. Sequoia        sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.  redwood. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala,        Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1.        Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service: 541-551.  [13414]
  • 40. Olson, David F., Jr.; Roy, Douglass F.; Walters, Gerald A. 1990. Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. redwood. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 541-551. [13414]
  • 41.  Osburn, Verne R.; Lowell, Phillip. 1972. A review of redwood harvesting.        Sacramento, CA: State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of        Conservation, Division of Forestry. 28 p.  [8792]
  • 43.  Person, Hubert L.; Hallin, William. 1942. Natural restocking of redwood        cutover lands. Journal of Forestry. 40(9): 683-688.  [8779]
  • 44.  Preston, Richard J., Jr. 1948. North American trees. Ames, IA: The Iowa        State College Press. 371 p.  [1913]
  • 44. Preston, Richard J., Jr. 1948. North American trees. Ames, IA: The Iowa State College Press. 371 p. [1913]
  • 45.  Ralph, C. John; Paton, Peter W. C.; Taylor, Cathy A. 1991. Habitat        association patterns of breeding birds ans small mammals in        Douglas-fir/hardwood stands in nw California and sw Oregon. In:        Ruggiero, Leonard F.; Aubry, Keith B.; Carey, Andrew B.; Huff, Mark H.,        technical coordinators. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir        forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-285. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station:        379-393.  [17329]
  • 46.  Ralph, C. John; Paton, Peter W. C.; Zakis, Aivars; Strachan, Gary. 1990.        Breeding distribution of the marbled murrelet in Redwood National Park        and vicinity during 1988. In: Van Riper, Charles, III; Stohlgren, Thomas        J.; Veirs, Stephen D., Jr.; Hillyer, Silvia Castillo, eds. Examples of        resource inventory and monitoring inNational Parks of California:        Proceedings, 3rd biennial conference on research in California's        National Parks; 1988 September 13-15; Davis, CA: Transactions and        Proceedings Series No. 8. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the        Interior, National Park Service: 57-70.  [15196]
  • 48.  Roberts, Warren G.; Howe, J. Greg; Major, Jack. 1980. A survey of        riparian forest flora and fauna in California. In: Sands, Anne, editor.        Riparian forests in California: Their ecology and conservation:        Symposium proceedings. Davis, CA: University of California, Division of        Agricultural Sciences: 3-19.  [5271]
  • 49.  Schubert, Gilbert H.; Adams, Ronald S.; Moran, Lewis A. 1971.        Reforestation practices for conifers in California. Sacramento, CA:        State of California, The Resourses Agency, Department of Conservation,        Division of Forestry. 359 p.  [6994]
  • 5.  Atzet, Thomas; Wheeler, David L. 1984. Preliminary plant associations of        the Siskiyou Mountain Province. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 278 p.  [9351]
  • 50.  Taber, Richard D. 1973. Effects of even-age forest management on big        game. In: Hermann, Richard K.; Lavender, Denis P., eds. Even-age        management: Proceedings of a symposium; 1972 August 1; [Location of        conference unknown]
  • 51.  Timbrook, Jan. 1990. Ethnobotany of Chumash Indians, California, based        on collections by John P. Harrington. Economic Botany. 44(2): 236-253.        [13777]
  • 53.  Veirs, Stephen D., Jr. 1980. The influence of fire in coast redwood        forests. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical        coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October        20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.        Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and        Range Experiment Station: 93-95.  [16048]
  • 55.  Veirs, Stephen D., Jr. 1982. Coast redwood forest: stand dynamics,        successional status, and the role of fire. In: Means, Joseph E., ed.        Forest succession and stand development research in the Northwest:        Proceedings of the symposium; 1981 March 26; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis,        OR: Oregon State University, Forest Research Laboratory: 119-141.        [4778]
  • 56.  Warren, L. E. 1980. Control of tanoak and associated species with cut        surface treatments of GARLON 3A herbicide. Down to Earth. 36(2): 8-13.        [7525]
  • 57.  Wolfe, Douglas. 1988. Recreating a "natural" riparian environment, or        getting the creek out of the culvert. In: Rieger, John P.; Williams,        Bradford K., eds. Proceedings of the second native plant revegetation        symposium; 1987 April 15-18; San Diego, CA. Madison, WI: University of        Wisconsin - Arboretum, Society of Ecological Restoration & Management:        193-197.  [4114]
  • 58.  Zinke, Paul J. 1977. The redwood forest and associated north coast        forests. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Major, Jack, eds. Terrestrial        vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley and Sons: 679-698.        [7212]
  • 6.  Atzet, Tom; Wheeler, David; Smith, Brad; [and others]
  • 7.  Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,        reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's        associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:        U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.        [434]
  • 8.  Boe, Kenneth N. 1974. Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.   Redwood. In:        Schopmeyer, C. S., ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States.        Agriculture Handbook No. 450. Washington: U. S. Department of        Agriculture, Forest Service: 764-766.  [7750]
  • 9.  Boe, Kenneth N. 1974. Growth and mortality after regeneration cuttings        in old-growth redwood. Res. Pap. PSW-104. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department        of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range        Experment Station, 13 p.  [11082]
  • Anonymous. 1986. List-Based Rec., Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S.D.A. Database of the U.S.D.A., Beltsville.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1103 External link.
  • Burns, Russell M., and Barbara H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods.   Agriculture Handbook 654 (Supersedes Agriculture Handbook 271,Silvics of Forest Trees of the United States, 1965).   U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. vol.2, 877 pp.   http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/table_of_contents.htm External link.
  • Endl. 1847. In: Syn. Conif.: 198.
  • Farjon A. (2013). Conifer Database (version Jul 2011). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 11th March 2013 (Roskov Y., Kunze T., Paglinawan L., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Culham A., Bailly N., Kirk P., Bourgoin T., Baillargeon G., Hernandez F., De Wever A., eds). Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col/. Species 2000: Reading, UK.
  • Flora of China Editorial Committee. 1999. Fl. China 4: 1–453. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1018510 External link.
  • Flora of North America Editorial Committee, e. 1993. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. 2: i–xvi, 1–475. In Fl. N. Amer. Oxford University Press, New York.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/10884 External link.
  • Idárraga-Piedrahita, A., R. D. C. Ortiz, R. Callejas Posada & M. Merello. 2011. Flora de Antioquia. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares, vol. 2. Listado de las Plantas Vasculares del Departamento de Antioquia. Pp. 1-939.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/100008595 External link.
  • Image metadata at Bioimages (http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu/)   http://bioimages.vanderbilt.edu/baskauf/00000 External link.
  • Jørgensen, P. M. & S. León-Yánez. (eds.) 1999. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75: i–viii, 1–1181.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/42250 External link.
  • Marticorena C & R Rodríguez . 1995-2005. Flora de Chile. Vols 1, 2(1-3). Ed. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción. 351 pp., 99 pp., 93 pp., 128 pp. Matthei O. 1995. Manual de las malezas que crecen en Chile. Alfabeta Impresores. 545 p.
  • Munz, P. A. & D. D. Keck. 1959. Cal. Fl. 1–1681. University of California Press, Berkeley.   http://www.tropicos.org/Reference/1717 External link.
  •    
       
    1. Azevedo, J., and D. L. Morgan. 1974. Fog precipitation in coastal  California forests. Ecology 55:1135-1141.
    2.  
    3. Ball, E. A. 1980. Personal communication. University of California,  Division of Natural Sciences, Santa Cruz.
    4.  
    5. Ball, Ernest A., Dawn M. Morris, and James A. Rydelius. 1978.  Cloning of Sequoia sempervirens from mature trees through tissue  culture. In Proceedings, Table Ronde: Multiplication "In  vitro" d'Espèces Ligneuses. Gembloux, Belgique; 6-8 June,  1978. p. 181-226. Royaume de Belgique, Centre de Recherches Agronomiques  de l'Etat, Administration de la Recherche Agronomique, Ministère  de l'Agriculture.
    6.  
    7. Barrette, B. R. 1966. Redwood sprouts on Jackson State Forest.  California Division of Forestry. State For. Note 29, 8 p.
    8.  
    9. Bega, Robert V., tech. coord. 1978. Diseases of Pacific Coast  conifers. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 521.  Washington, DC. 206 p.
    10.  
    11. Blythe, Gene. 1984. Cutting propagation of Sequoia sempervirens  cultivars. Proc. International Plant Propagators Society 34:204-2  11.
    12.  
    13. Boe, Kenneth N. 1966. Windfall after experimental cuttings in  old-growth redwood. In Proceedings, Society of American  Foresters National Meeting; Oct. 24-28, 1965, Detroit, MI. p. 59-63.  Washington, DC.
    14.  
    15. Boe, Kenneth N. 1968. Cone production, seed dispersal, germination,  in old-growth redwood cut and uncut stands. USDA Forest Service,  Research Note PSW-184. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment  Station, Berkeley, CA. 7 p.
    16.  
    17. Boe, Kenneth N. 1974. Growth and mortality after regeneration  cuttings in old-growth redwood. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper  PSW-104. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station,  Berkeley, CA. 13 p.
    18.  
    19. Boe, Kenneth N. 1974. Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.  redwood. In Seeds of woody plants in the United States. p.  764-766. C. S. Schopmeyer, tech. coord. U.S. Department of Agriculture,  Agriculture Handbook 450. Washington, DC.
    20.  
    21. Boe, Kenneth N. 1975. Natural seedlings and sprouts after  regeneration cuttings in old-growth redwood. USDA Forest Service,  Research Paper PSW-111. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment  Station, Berkeley, CA. 17 p.
    22.  
    23. Bolsinger, Charles L. 1980. California forests: trends, problems, and  opportunities. USDA Forest Service, Resource Bulletin PNW-89. Pacific  Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. 138 p. 
    24.  
    25. Boulay, M. 1979. Multiplication et clonage rapide du Sequoia  sempervirens per la culture "in vitro." p. 49-55. In  Etudes et Recherches, Association Foret-Cellulose, Domaine de  l'Etancon, Nangis, France.
    26.  
    27. Clark, Joe W., and Theodore C. Scheffer. 1983. Natural decay  resistance of heartwood of coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens (D.  Don) Endl. Forest Products Journal 33(5):15-20.
    28.  
    29. Cole, Dana W. 1983. Redwood sprout growth three decades after  thinning. Journal of Forestry 81(3):148-150, 157.
    30.  
    31. Dallimore, W., and A. Bruce Jackson. 1967. A handbook of Coniferae  and Ginkgoaceae. 4th ed. Revised by S. G. Harrison. St. Martin's Press,  New York. 729 p.
    32.  
    33. Davis, Douglas F., and Dale F. Holderman. 1980. The white redwoods:  ghosts of the forest. Naturegraph Publishers, Happy Camp, CA. 45 p. 
    34.  
    35. Durgin, Philip B. 1981. Organic matter content of soil after logging  of fir and redwood forests. USDA Forest Service, Research Note PSW-346.  Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA. 4  p.
    36.  
    37. Fritz, Emanuel, and James A. Rydelius. 1966. Redwood reforestation  problems: an experimental approach to their solution. Foundation for  American Resource Management, San Francisco, CA. 130 p.
    38.  
    39. Fujimori, Takao. 1977. Stem biomass and structure of a mature Sequoia  sempervirens stand on the Pacific Coast of northern California. Journal  of the Japanese Forestry Society 59(12):435-441.
    40.  
    41. Furniss, R. L., and V. M. Carolin. 1977. Western forest insects. U.S.  Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 1339. Washington,  DC. 654 p.
    42.  
    43. Hepting, George H. 1971. Diseases of forest and shade trees of the  United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 386.  Washington, DC. 658 p.
    44.  
    45. Jacobs, Diana F., Dana W. Cole, and Joe R. McBride. 1985. Fire  history and perpetuation of natural coast redwood ecosystems. Journal of  Forestry 83(8):494-497.
    46.  
    47. Krumland, B., and L. C. Wensel. 1977. Height growth patterns and  fifty-year base age site index curves for young growth coastal redwood.  Cooperative Redwood Yield Research Note 4. University of California,  Department of Forestry and Resource Management, Berkeley. 11 p.
    48.  
    49. Krumland, B., and L. C. Wensel. 1980. Illustrative yield tables for  coastal conifers in California. Cooperative Redwood Yield Research Note  18. University of California, Department of Forestry and Resource  Management, Berkeley. 25 p.
    50.  
    51. Kuser, John E. 1976. Potential site index of redwood as a function of  climate. Thesis (M.S.), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. 98 p. 
    52.  
    53. Libby, W. J. 1981. Personal communication. University of California,  Department of Forestry and Conservation, Berkeley. 25 p.
    54.  
    55. Libby, William J. 1982. Cloning coast redwoods. California  Agriculture 36(8):34-35.
    56.  
    57. Libby, W. J., and B. G. McCutchan. 1978. Taming the redwood. American  Forests 84(8):18-23, 37-39.
    58.  
    59. Libby, W. J., B. G. McCutchan, and C. I. Millar. 1981. Inbreeding  depression in selfs of redwood. Silvae Genetica. 30:15-25.
    60.  
    61. Lindquist, James L. 1979. Sprout regeneration of young-growth  redwood: sampling methods compared. USDA Forest Service, Research Note  PSW-337. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station,  Berkeley, CA. 8 p.
    62.  
    63. Lindquist, James L., and Marshall N. Palley. 1963. Empirical yield  tables for young-growth redwood. California Agricultural Experiment  Station, Bulletin 796. Berkeley. 47 p.
    64.  
    65. Lindquist, James L., and Marshall N. Palley. 1967. Prediction of  stand growth of young redwood. California Agricultural Experiment  Station, Bulletin 831. Berkeley. 47 p.
    66.  
    67. Major, Jack. 1977. California climate in relation to  vegetation. In Terrestrial vegetation of California. p. 11-74.  Michael G. Barbour and Jack Major, eds. John Wiley, New York. 
    68.  
    69. Neal, Robert L., Jr. 1967. Sprouting of old-growth redwood  stumps--first year after logging. USDA Forest Service, Research  Note PSW-137. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station,  Berkeley, CA. 8 p.
    70.  
    71. Olson, David F., Jr., and John Fiske. 1983. Redwood. In Silvicultural  systems for the major forest types of the United States. p. 37-40.  Russell M. Bums, tech. compiler. USDA Forest Service, Agricultural  Handbook 445.
    72.  
    73. Powers, R F., and H. V. Wiant, Jr. 1970. Sprouting of old-growth  coastal redwood stumps. Forest Science 16:339-341.
    74.  
    75. Roy, Douglass F. 1965. Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens [D. Don] Endl.).  In Silvics of forest trees of the United States. p. 663-670. H. A.  Fowells, comp. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 271.  Washington, DC.
    76.  
    77. Roy, Douglass F. 1966. Silvical characteristics of redwood (Sequoia  sempervirens [D. Don] Endl.). USDA Forest Service, Research Paper  PSW-28. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley,  CA. 20 p.
    78.  
    79. Roy, Douglass F. 1972. Fasciation in redwood. Madroño  21(7):462.
    80.  
    81. Sclarbaum, S. E., and T. Tsuchiya. 1984. A chromosome study of coast  redwood, Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. Silvae Genetica  3(2/3):56-62.
    82.  
    83. Society of American Foresters. 1980. Forest cover types of the United  States and Canada. F. H. Eyre, ed. Washington, DC. 148 p.
    84.  
    85. Stone, Edward C., and Richard B. Vasey. 1968. Preservation of coast  redwood on alluvial flats. Science 159(3811):157-161.
    86.  
    87. Stuart, John D. 1987. Fire history of an old-growth forest of Sequoia  sempervirens (Taxodiaceae) forest in Humboldt Redwoods State Park,  CA. Madroño 34(2):128-141.
    88.  
    89. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1975. Soil  taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and  interpreting soil surveys. Soil Survey Staff, coords. U.S. Department of  Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 436. Washington, DC. 754 p.
    90.  
    91. University of California. 1979. California forest soils: a guide for  professional foresters and resource managers and planners. Robert J.  Laacke, coord. University of California, Division of Agricultural  Sciences, Berkeley. 181 p.
    92.  
    93. Veirs, Stephen D., Jr. 1980. The role of fire in northern coast  redwood forest dynamics. In Proceedings, Conference on  Scientific Research in the National Parks. vol. 10, Fire Ecology. Nov.  26-30, 1979, San Francisco, CA. p. 190-209. National Park Service,  Washington, DC. 403 p.
    94.  
    95. Veirs, Stephen D., Jr. 1980. The influence of fire in coast redwood  forests. In Proceedings, Fire History Workshop, Oct. 20-24,  1980, Tucson, AZ. p. 93-95. USDA Forest Service, General Technical  Report RM-81. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort  Collins, CO.
    96.  
    97. Waring, R. H., and J. Major. 1964. Some vegetation of the California  coastal redwood region in relation to gradients of moisture, nutrients,  light, and temperature. Ecological Monographs 34(2):167-215.
    98.  
    99. Zahl, Paul A. 1964. Finding the Mt. Everest of all living things.  National Geographic 126(l):10-51.
    100.  
    101. Zinke, Paul J. 1977. The redwood forest and associated north coast  forests. In Terrestrial vegetation of California. p. 679-698.  Michael G. Barbour and Jack Major, eds. John Wiley, New York.
    102.  
    103. Zinke, Paul J. 1984. Forest soil properties related to nutrient  storage and their change in the harvest of old-growth, and the regrowth  and harvest of second-growth redwood forests. In Proceedings of  Convention of Society of American Foresters. 1983. Washington, DC. p.  210-215.
    104.  
     

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!