Overview

Comprehensive Description

Etymology

This species is named for M.W. Parker of the British Museum in thanks for the preparation of a skeleton of Schoutedenella muta, which was described in the same publication as P. parkeri.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

This very poorly known species is known only from west-central and northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo. The map is provisional, connecting the three localities from which this species is known: Kunungu, Mauda and Garamba National Park. There have been no recent records, presumably due to the lack of herpetological work within its range.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

This very poorly known species is known only from west-central and northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo from three localities: Kunungu, Mauda and Garamba National Park. There have been no recent records, presumably due to the lack of herpetological work within its range (Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Morphology

Aspect is raniform. A conical papilla is present in the middle of the tongue and is clearly visible. Head is longer than broad. Snout is short and as long as the eye. Canthus rostralis is obtuse; frenal region is concave. Nostrils are equidistant from eye and tip of snout. Interorbital space is slightly broader than the upper eyelid. Tympanum is hidden. First finger is shorter than the second; the third is 1.5 times as long as the second. Fingers are slightly dilated into small but quite distinct discs. Subarticular tubercles are prominent. The inner metatarsal tubercle is oval shaped and well developed; a round tarsal tubercle on the inner side of the tarsus is joined together with the outer metatarsal tubercle by a cutaneous fold. The outer metatarsal tubercle is located at longer distance from the tarsal tubercle than the inner metatarsal tubercle. (Note: de Witte (1933) confused the inner and outer metatarsal tubercles in his description, the description given here has been corrected by B. Zimkus.) When the rear limb is brought forward, the tibio-tarsal articulation reaches the eye. The tibia is 1 and 5/6 times in the snout-vent length; the width of the tibia is approximately 1/4 its length. When the hind limbs are folded up in right angles with the center body, the tibiae overlap. Dorsal skin is granular, strewn with many more prominent warts. Dorsolateral glandular cords start behind the upper eyelid and extend until in the scapular area. Ventral parts are smooth with the exception of the males' external vocal sac in the gular region, which is granulous (de Witte, 1933).

Dorsum is grayish and mottled blackish; spots more or less form the shape of transverse bars between the eyes and on the limbs. A thin yellowish vertebral line is present between the eyes and extending until anus. Ventral parts are whitish and slightly punctuated with black (de Witte, 1933).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Size

De Witte (1933) reported that the type material measured 22 mm in snout-vent legth; Zimkus (unpublished) found that the male syntype measured 20.30 mm and female (eggs present) 21.42 mm.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Look Alikes

Comparisons

De Witte (1933) noted that this species is similar to P. giorgii but can be distinguished by the 1st finger shorter than the 2nd, by the outer metatarsal tubercle located at longer distance from the tarsal tubercle than the inner metatarsal tubercle, the granular skin of the back and the less extensive webbing on the toes. Inger (1968) noted its similarity to P. acridoides.

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
It is known from grassy and shrubby savannah, and from gallery forests in Garamba National Park. Its habitat preferences in the forest zone (e.g., at Kunungu and Mauda) are not clear, though it is suspected to survive well in heavily degraded former forest (farm bush). There is no information on its breeding, though it is presumably similar to most other members of the genus, and breeds in water.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Habitat and Ecology

It is known from grassy and shrubby savannah, and from gallery forests in Garamba National Park. Its habitat preferences in the forest zone (e.g., at Kunungu and Mauda) are not clear, though it is suspected to survive well in heavily degraded former forest (farm bush; Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population Biology

It is apparently fairly abundant in Garamba National Park (Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2004

Assessor/s
Martin Pickersgill

Reviewer/s
Global Amphibian Assessment Coordinating Team (Simon Stuart, Janice Chanson and Neil Cox)

Justification
Although this species is known mainly from isolated records from a large area, it is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, tolerance of a broad range of habitats, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

IUCN Red List Category and Justification of Conservation Status

The IUCN Red List (2010) categorizes this species as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, tolerance of a broad range of habitats, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category. It is noted that this species is known mainly from isolated records from a large area (Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
It is apparently fairly abundant in Garamba National Park.

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Major Threats
There is no direct information, but this species is beloved to be adaptable, and not facing any significant threats.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

There is no direct information, but this species is believed to be adaptable, and not facing any significant threats (Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
It occurs in Garamba National Park.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation Actions and Management

It occurs in Garamba National Park (Pickersgill, 2004).

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0)

© Zimkus, Breda

Source: African Amphibians Lifedesk

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Phrynobatrachus parkeri

Phrynobatrachus parkeri is a species of frog in the Petropedetidae family. It is found in Democratic Republic of the Congo, possibly Republic of the Congo, and possibly Sudan. Its natural habitats are subtropical or tropical moist lowland forests, moist savanna, subtropical or tropical moist shrubland, subtropical or tropical seasonally wet or flooded lowland grassland, freshwater marshes, intermittent freshwater marshes, heavily degraded former forest, ponds, and canals and ditches.

References

Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!