Overview

Brief Summary

Diagnosis A globulous frog with very short hindlimbs and forelimbs and toes unwebbed. Mottled and spotted dorsal pattern without the irregular arsow-shaped mark.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Comprehensive Description

Description

Body stout, globular, with a snout-vent length of about 40-50 mm. This species is sexually dimorphic, with females tending to be larger than males. Head very small. Nuchal fold present. Tympanum concealed. Foreleg short, reaching the middle of the body when adpressed. Hindleg very short. Fingers and toes roundish and free. Skin smooth. Olive-brown above, spotted with dorsal and lateral dark irregular blotches, belly dark scattered with pale yellow spots (Parker 1934; Cochran 1955; Cei 1980). This species releases a whitish skin secretion that can have antiparasitic and antifungal activities (Tempone et al. 2007).

The tadpole has no nares. The snout is rounded and truncate, and the body is rounded dorsally and depressed laterally. Eyes are lateral and small. The oral disc is absent, and keratinized mouthparts and papillae are both lacking. A dermal flap is present in front of the mouth, but the flap does not have jagged edges. The spiracle is ventral, as well as long and wide. The vent is short and medial and fused with the ventral fin. Both dorsal and ventral fins are low and convex. Dorsal fin rises at a low slope from the body-tail junction. Tail sheath is present. The tadpole is reddish-brown in dorsal view and whitish in ventral view, with translucent, slightly pigmented fins (Rossa-Feres and Nomura 2006). A detailed description of the tadpole's external morphology can be found in Vizotto (1967), Cei (1980), Lavilla (1992), Altig and McDiarmid (1999), and Rossa-Feres and Nomura (2006), with the latter commenting on some of the discrepancies between larval morphology descriptions by different authors. A description of the chondrocranium can be found in Lavilla (1992). The internal oral morphology was described by Echeverría and Lavilla (2000).

  • Cei, J. M. (1980). ''Amphibians of Argentina.'' Monitore Zoologica Italiano, New Series Monografia, Firenze, 2, 1-609.
  • Rossa-Feres, D. C., and Nomura, F. (2006). ''Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil.'' Biota Neotropica, 6, 1-26.
  • Cochran, D. M. (1955). ''Frogs of southeastern Brazil.'' Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 206, 1-423.
  • Altig, R., and McDiarmid, R. W. (1999). ''Diversity: familial and generic characterization.'' Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Avila, R. W., and Ferreira, V. L. (2004). ''Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.'' Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 21, 887-892.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Conforti, V. (2000). ''Euglenoids living in the intestines of microhylid tadpoles of Argentina.'' Alytes, 18, 81-89.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Lavilla, E. O. (2000). ''Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor.'' Journal of Herpetology, 34, 517-523.
  • IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Dermatonotus muelleri. www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed on 6 August 2008.
  • Lavilla, E. O. (1992). ''The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae).'' Bolletino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 10, 63-71.
  • Nomura, F. (2003). Ecologia reprodutiva e comportamento de forrageio e escavação de Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) (Anura, Microhylidae). Master's Thesis, Universidade Estadual São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo.
  • Parker, H.W. (1934). A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. British Museum, London.
  • Silva, F. R., and Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2007). ''Uso de fragmentos florestais por anuros (Amphibia) de área aberta na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo.'' Biota Neotropica, 7, 1-7.
  • Tempone, A. G., Melhem, M. de S. C., Prado, F. O., Motoie, G., Hiramoto, R. M., Antoniazzi, M. M., Haddad, C. F. B., and Jared, C. (2007). ''Amphibian secretions for drug discovery studies: a search for new antiparasitic and antifungal compounds.'' Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, 4, 67-73.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2011 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution

Range Description

This species is known from central and southern Chaco: northern Argentina; southeastern Bolivia; Paraguay; and Brazil (from Maranhão to São Paulo). It occurs at elevations up to 1,500m asl.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Chile central (Concepcion)
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Chacoan regions of Argentina (provinces of Corrientes, Chaco, Entre Rios, Formosa, Jujuy, Misiones, Salta, Santiago del Estero, and Santa Fé) and Paraguay (department of Alto Paraguay, Boquerón, Central, Concepción, and Presidente Hayes); caatinga and cerrado regions of brazilian states of central northeast, and southeast.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Distribution and Habitat

This species is found in Paraguay; Corrientes and central and southern Chaco provinces in Argentina; the states of São Paulo, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Ceará, Tocantins, Bahia, Maranhão, Piauí, Paraíba, in Brazil; and Southeastern Bolivia (IUCN 2006). Dermatonotus muelleri generally lives in open formations, though occasionally it can be found inside forest fragments (Silva and Rossa-Feres 2007) and near man-made facilities in urban areas (Ávila and Ferreira 2004). It occurs at elevations up to 1,500 m above sea level (IUCN 2006).

  • Cei, J. M. (1980). ''Amphibians of Argentina.'' Monitore Zoologica Italiano, New Series Monografia, Firenze, 2, 1-609.
  • Rossa-Feres, D. C., and Nomura, F. (2006). ''Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil.'' Biota Neotropica, 6, 1-26.
  • Cochran, D. M. (1955). ''Frogs of southeastern Brazil.'' Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 206, 1-423.
  • Altig, R., and McDiarmid, R. W. (1999). ''Diversity: familial and generic characterization.'' Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Avila, R. W., and Ferreira, V. L. (2004). ''Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.'' Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 21, 887-892.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Conforti, V. (2000). ''Euglenoids living in the intestines of microhylid tadpoles of Argentina.'' Alytes, 18, 81-89.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Lavilla, E. O. (2000). ''Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor.'' Journal of Herpetology, 34, 517-523.
  • IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Dermatonotus muelleri. www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed on 6 August 2008.
  • Lavilla, E. O. (1992). ''The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae).'' Bolletino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 10, 63-71.
  • Nomura, F. (2003). Ecologia reprodutiva e comportamento de forrageio e escavação de Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) (Anura, Microhylidae). Master's Thesis, Universidade Estadual São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo.
  • Parker, H.W. (1934). A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. British Museum, London.
  • Silva, F. R., and Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2007). ''Uso de fragmentos florestais por anuros (Amphibia) de área aberta na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo.'' Biota Neotropica, 7, 1-7.
  • Tempone, A. G., Melhem, M. de S. C., Prado, F. O., Motoie, G., Hiramoto, R. M., Antoniazzi, M. M., Haddad, C. F. B., and Jared, C. (2007). ''Amphibian secretions for drug discovery studies: a search for new antiparasitic and antifungal compounds.'' Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, 4, 67-73.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2011 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Physical Description

Diagnostic Description

Description Body stout, globular snout-vent of about 40-50 mm. Head very small, 1/6 of the body length; snout sharply pointed, protruding over the lower jaw. No vomerine teeth. A nucal fold encircling the tympanic area and the lateral parts of the throat. Interocular distance about twice the upper eyelid, and equal to the distance between the anterior corner of the eye and the snout. Nostrils lateral, close to the tip of snout. The eye diameter equal to the distance between eye and nostril. Tympanum concealed. No thoracic fold. Foreleg short, reaching middle of the body when adpressed. Hindleg very short; when is adpressed, heel does not cross the axilla. When the femurs are bent at right angles to body, the tibio-tarsal articulations do not touch. Fingers and toes roundish, free. Rate of the finger lengths: IV,I, II, III. Three metacarpal tubercles; inner metatarsal tubercle present, outer tubercle absent. Strong subarticular tubercles. Skin smooth, broad skin folds covering the femurs. Olive-brown above, spotted with dorsal and lateral dark irregular blotches; belly dark, scattered with pale yellow spots. Larval morphology Tadpoles are characterized by: total length 32.5-40.1 mm (n = 10); body depressed (depth less than width; mean ratio = 0.84; SD = 0.03), and oval (subparallel sides) in dorsal view. Maximum width coincident with body width at eye level. Snout rounded dorsally and laterally. Ventral contour of body convex. Mouth terminal, small (mean ratio labila flaps width/maximum body width = 0.35; SD = 0.02); margins of labial flaps smooth, with convergent medial borders. External nares closed at early stages. Eyes small (mean ratio eye diameterlbody width at eye level = 0.15; SD = 0.01), and placed laterally but oriented lateroventrally (the eyes are scarcely visible dorsally). The spiraculum is abdominal, placed on midline, and is projected, covering the proctodeal tube (mean ratio rostro-spiracular distance (body length = 1.04; SD = 0.01). Proctodeal tube ("anus") as a short, conical tube, with rounded aperture medially oriented. Tail large (mean ratio tail lengthltotal length = 0.62; SD = 0.03). Both fins higher than body (mean ratio fins heightlbody height = 1.37; SD = 0.04). Dorsal fin starts on the border bodyltail muscles and is divergent on the anterior half; ventral fin uniformly curved; tip as a short flagellum. The most peculiar character is the presence of a relatively thick sheet of connective tissue that covers the anterior half of tail musculature and runs into the dorsal and ventral fins. Color in life: dorsally olive-brown with a thin, medial, white band, from the tip of the snout to mid-body; laterally lighter; ventrally whitish, somewhat translucent but not transparent. Tail smoky, with irregular, white spots.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Ecology

Habitat

Habitat and Ecology

Habitat and Ecology
Burrowing form occurs on the ground near waterlogged soils, where it breeds explosively in temporary pools. It probably does not adapt well to anthropogenic disturbance.

Systems
  • Terrestrial
  • Freshwater
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Molecular Biology

Barcode data: Dermatonotus muelleri

The following is a representative barcode sequence, the centroid of all available sequences for this species. 

 
There is 1 barcode sequence available from BOLD and GenBank.   Below is the sequence of the barcode region Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI or COX1) from a member of the species.  See the BOLD taxonomy browser for more complete information about this specimen.  Other sequences that do not yet meet barcode criteria may also be available.
 
GBAP494-07|EF396046|Dermatonotus muelleri| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GAC---GACCAGATTTACAATGTCATTGTTACTGCTCACGCTTTTGTTATAATTTTCTTCATGGTCATACCGATTATAATCGGCGGCTTTGGAAACTGATTAGTTCCCCTAATA---CTAGGAGCACCAGACATGGCCTTCCCCCGTATAAATAATATAAGCTTCTGACTTCTCCCCCCCTCTTTTCTTCTTCTCCTAGCCTCATCAGCAGTAGAAGCCGGTGCAGGCACTGGATGAACTGTCTACCCACCACTCGCCGGAAATCTCGCCCATGCCGGCCCATCTGTTGATCTT---ACTATTTTCTCCCTTCATCTTGCCGGAATTTCCTCTATTTTAGGGGCTATCAATTTTATTACAACTATTATTAACATGAAACCCCCATCAGTCACTCAATATCAAACCCCCCTCTTTGTATGATCAGTAATCATTACAGCCGTACTACTTCTACTATCTCTTCCAGTGTTAGCAGCA---GGCATTACTATACTTCTGACAGACCGAAACTTAAACACCACATTCTTCGACCCTGCAGGAGGAGGTGACCCAGTCCTATACCAACACCTATTCTGATTCTTTGGCCAC-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
-- end --

Download FASTA File
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Statistics of barcoding coverage: Dermatonotus muelleri

Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLDS) Stats
Public Records: 1
Species: 1
Species With Barcodes: 1

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© Barcode of Life Data Systems

Source: Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

ALCALÓIDE
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Conservation

Conservation Status

IUCN Red List Assessment


Red List Category
LC
Least Concern

Red List Criteria

Version
3.1

Year Assessed
2004

Assessor/s
Guarino Colli, Steffen Reichle, Débora Silvano, Julian Faivovich

Reviewer/s
Global Amphibian Assessment Coordinating Team (Simon Stuart, Janice Chanson, Neil Cox and Bruce Young)

Justification
Listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, tolerance of a broad range of habitats, presumed large population, and because it is unlikely to be declining fast enough to qualify for listing in a more threatened category.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

LC. Least Concern.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

Supplier: IABIN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Population

Population
It is locally abundant during reproductive bouts.

Population Trend
Stable
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

Like other microhylid frogs, it lives below ground. It feeds on termites and Isoptera. This species is an explosive breeder (Wells 1977), with reproduction occurring from September-November through February. Frequently, the breeding activity lasts 5 days. During the breeding period, the abundance of calling males can reach one thousand individuals. Oviposition takes place in water bodies (sometimes in farm ponds) in the shallows, with or without vegetation. A detailed description of the natural history and reproductive biology of this species can be found in Nomura (2003).

The tadpole is exotrophic and a suspension feeder, consuming algae (Baccilariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Dinophyceae). Euglenoids have also been found alive and undamaged in the intestinal contents of D. muelleri tadpoles (Echeverría and Conforti 2000).

Adults may be eaten by marsupials, birds, dogs, and snakes (Nomura 2003).

  • Cei, J. M. (1980). ''Amphibians of Argentina.'' Monitore Zoologica Italiano, New Series Monografia, Firenze, 2, 1-609.
  • Rossa-Feres, D. C., and Nomura, F. (2006). ''Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil.'' Biota Neotropica, 6, 1-26.
  • Cochran, D. M. (1955). ''Frogs of southeastern Brazil.'' Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 206, 1-423.
  • Altig, R., and McDiarmid, R. W. (1999). ''Diversity: familial and generic characterization.'' Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Avila, R. W., and Ferreira, V. L. (2004). ''Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.'' Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 21, 887-892.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Conforti, V. (2000). ''Euglenoids living in the intestines of microhylid tadpoles of Argentina.'' Alytes, 18, 81-89.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Lavilla, E. O. (2000). ''Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor.'' Journal of Herpetology, 34, 517-523.
  • IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Dermatonotus muelleri. www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed on 6 August 2008.
  • Lavilla, E. O. (1992). ''The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae).'' Bolletino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 10, 63-71.
  • Nomura, F. (2003). Ecologia reprodutiva e comportamento de forrageio e escavação de Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) (Anura, Microhylidae). Master's Thesis, Universidade Estadual São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo.
  • Parker, H.W. (1934). A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. British Museum, London.
  • Silva, F. R., and Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2007). ''Uso de fragmentos florestais por anuros (Amphibia) de área aberta na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo.'' Biota Neotropica, 7, 1-7.
  • Tempone, A. G., Melhem, M. de S. C., Prado, F. O., Motoie, G., Hiramoto, R. M., Antoniazzi, M. M., Haddad, C. F. B., and Jared, C. (2007). ''Amphibian secretions for drug discovery studies: a search for new antiparasitic and antifungal compounds.'' Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, 4, 67-73.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2011 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Threats

Threats

Major Threats
It is threatened in Argentina by the destruction of Chaco habitat for agriculture and wood extraction, land and water pollution caused by agrochemical runoff. In Paraguay, this species is captured (legally) for the international pet trade.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors

The population appears to be stable. This is a common species within its range, though generally hard to find due to its burrowing habits (IUCN 2006).
  • Cei, J. M. (1980). ''Amphibians of Argentina.'' Monitore Zoologica Italiano, New Series Monografia, Firenze, 2, 1-609.
  • Rossa-Feres, D. C., and Nomura, F. (2006). ''Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil.'' Biota Neotropica, 6, 1-26.
  • Cochran, D. M. (1955). ''Frogs of southeastern Brazil.'' Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 206, 1-423.
  • Altig, R., and McDiarmid, R. W. (1999). ''Diversity: familial and generic characterization.'' Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Avila, R. W., and Ferreira, V. L. (2004). ''Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.'' Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 21, 887-892.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Conforti, V. (2000). ''Euglenoids living in the intestines of microhylid tadpoles of Argentina.'' Alytes, 18, 81-89.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Lavilla, E. O. (2000). ''Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor.'' Journal of Herpetology, 34, 517-523.
  • IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Dermatonotus muelleri. www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed on 6 August 2008.
  • Lavilla, E. O. (1992). ''The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae).'' Bolletino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 10, 63-71.
  • Nomura, F. (2003). Ecologia reprodutiva e comportamento de forrageio e escavação de Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) (Anura, Microhylidae). Master's Thesis, Universidade Estadual São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo.
  • Parker, H.W. (1934). A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. British Museum, London.
  • Silva, F. R., and Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2007). ''Uso de fragmentos florestais por anuros (Amphibia) de área aberta na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo.'' Biota Neotropica, 7, 1-7.
  • Tempone, A. G., Melhem, M. de S. C., Prado, F. O., Motoie, G., Hiramoto, R. M., Antoniazzi, M. M., Haddad, C. F. B., and Jared, C. (2007). ''Amphibian secretions for drug discovery studies: a search for new antiparasitic and antifungal compounds.'' Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, 4, 67-73.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2011 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Management

Conservation Actions

Conservation Actions
It occurs in several protected areas.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)

© International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

Source: IUCN

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Relevance to Humans and Ecosystems

Risks

Relation to Humans

There are some breeding facilities that sell this species as a pet.
  • Cei, J. M. (1980). ''Amphibians of Argentina.'' Monitore Zoologica Italiano, New Series Monografia, Firenze, 2, 1-609.
  • Rossa-Feres, D. C., and Nomura, F. (2006). ''Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil.'' Biota Neotropica, 6, 1-26.
  • Cochran, D. M. (1955). ''Frogs of southeastern Brazil.'' Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, 206, 1-423.
  • Altig, R., and McDiarmid, R. W. (1999). ''Diversity: familial and generic characterization.'' Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. R. W. McDiarmid and R. Altig, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Avila, R. W., and Ferreira, V. L. (2004). ''Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.'' Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 21, 887-892.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Conforti, V. (2000). ''Euglenoids living in the intestines of microhylid tadpoles of Argentina.'' Alytes, 18, 81-89.
  • Echeverría, D. D., and Lavilla, E. O. (2000). ''Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor.'' Journal of Herpetology, 34, 517-523.
  • IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment: Dermatonotus muelleri. www.globalamphibians.org. Accessed on 6 August 2008.
  • Lavilla, E. O. (1992). ''The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae).'' Bolletino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 10, 63-71.
  • Nomura, F. (2003). Ecologia reprodutiva e comportamento de forrageio e escavação de Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) (Anura, Microhylidae). Master's Thesis, Universidade Estadual São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo.
  • Parker, H.W. (1934). A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. British Museum, London.
  • Silva, F. R., and Rossa-Feres, D. C. (2007). ''Uso de fragmentos florestais por anuros (Amphibia) de área aberta na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo.'' Biota Neotropica, 7, 1-7.
  • Tempone, A. G., Melhem, M. de S. C., Prado, F. O., Motoie, G., Hiramoto, R. M., Antoniazzi, M. M., Haddad, C. F. B., and Jared, C. (2007). ''Amphibian secretions for drug discovery studies: a search for new antiparasitic and antifungal compounds.'' Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, 4, 67-73.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)

© AmphibiaWeb © 2000-2011 The Regents of the University of California

Source: AmphibiaWeb

Trusted

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Wikipedia

Dermatonotus muelleri

Dermatonotus muelleri is a species of frog in the Microhylidae family. It is monotypic within the genus Dermatonotus.[citation needed] It is found in Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and Paraguay. Its natural habitats are subtropical or tropical dry forests, moist savanna, subtropical or tropical moist shrubland, subtropical or tropical seasonally wet or flooded lowland grassland, and intermittent freshwater marshes. It is threatened by habitat loss.

References


Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)

 

Source: Wikipedia

Unreviewed

Article rating from 0 people

Average rating: 2.5 of 5

Disclaimer

EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.

To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!