Mycobacterium bovis is a slow-growing (16 to 20 hour generation time), aerobic bacterium and the causative agent of tuberculosis in cattle (known as bovine TB). Related to M. tuberculosis—the bacteria which causes tuberculosis in humans—M. bovis can also jump the species barrier and cause tuberculosis in humans.
It has been estimated that, during the first half of the 20th century, M. bovis was responsible for more losses among farm animals than all other infectious diseases combined. Infection occurs if the bacterium is ingested.
M. bovis is usually transmitted to humans via infected milk, although it can also spread via aerosol droplets. Actual infections in humans are rare, mostly due to pasteurisation killing any bacteria in infected milk; as well, cattle are randomly tested for the disease and immediately destroyed if infected. However, in areas of the developing world where pasteurisation is not routine, M. bovis is a relatively common cause of human tuberculosis.
Epidemiology and control
In New Zealand, the common brushtail possum is the main vector for the spread of M. bovis. The Biosecurity Act 1993, which established a National Pest Management Strategy, is the legislation behind control of the disease in New Zealand. The Animal Health Board operate a nationwide programme of cattle testing and possum control with the goal of eliminating M. bovis.
In the 1930s, 40% of cows in the UK were infected with M. bovis and there were 50,000 new cases of human M. bovis infection every year. According to DEFRA and the Health Protection Agency, the risk to people contracting TB from cattle in Great Britain today is very low. The HPA has said that three quarters of the 440 human cases reported to the HPA between 1994 and 2006 were aged 50 years and above and only 44 cases (16%) were known to be non-UK born.
Badgers (Meles meles) were first identified as carriers of M. bovis 30 years ago, but it was the report of an independent review committee in 1997 which concluded that badgers made an important contribution to the spread of M. bovis between herds of cattle. This was the major cause of the current battle between animal conservationists (keen to save the badger) and farmers (keen to cull badgers, to reduce livestock losses). The Randomised Badger Culling Trial  (designed, overseen and analysed by the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB, or ISG ) was a large field trial of widescale (proactive) culling and localised reactive culling (in comparison with areas which received no badger culling). In their final report , the ISG concluded: "First, while badgers are clearly a source of cattle TB, careful evaluation of our own and others’ data indicates that badger culling can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain. Indeed, some policies under consideration are likely to make matters worse rather than better. Second, weaknesses in cattle testing regimes mean that cattle themselves contribute significantly to the persistence and spread of disease in all areas where TB occurs, and in some parts of Britain are likely to be the main source of infection. Scientific findings indicate that the rising incidence of disease can be reversed, and geographical spread contained, by the rigid application of cattle-based control measures alone." .
On 26 July 2007, the Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Lord Rooker) said "My Lords, we welcome the Independent Scientific Group’s final report, which further improves the evidence base. We are carefully considering the issues that the report raises, and will continue to work with industry, government advisers and scientific experts in reaching policy decisions on these issues."
In the UK, many other mammals have been found to be infected with M. bovis, but the frequency of isolation is much less than cattle and badgers. The disease is found in cattle throughout the globe, but some countries have been able to reduce or limit the incidence of the disease through process of 'test and cull' of the cattle stock. Most of Europe and several Caribbean countries (including Cuba) are virtually free of M. bovis. Australia is officially free of the disease since the successful BTEC program, but residual infections might exist in feral water buffalo in isolated parts of the Northern Territory. In the United States, there is endemic M. bovis in white-tailed deer in the northeastern portion of the state of Michigan and in northern Minnesota, and sporadic import of the disease from Mexico. In Canada, there are affected wild elk and white-tailed deer in and around Riding Mountain National Park in Manitoba. "To improve control and eliminate bovine TB, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has split Manitoba into two management areas: [The] Riding Mountain TB eradication area (RMEA), the area where the disease has been found [and] the Manitoba TB Eradication Area (MTEA), the rest of the province outside RMEA where the disease has not been found." The disease has also been found in wild buffalo in South Africa and brush-tailed possums in New Zealand.
In a 2010 opinion piece in Trends in Microbiology, Paul and David Torgerson argued that bovine tuberculosis is a negligible public health problem in the UK, providing milk is pasteurized. Bovine TB is very rarely spread by aerosol from cattle to humans. Therefore, the bovine tuberculosis control programme in the UK in its present form is a misallocation of resources and provides no benefit to society. Indeed there is even very little evidence of a positive cost benefit to the livestock industry, as few studies have been undertaken on the direct costs of bovine TB to animal production. Milk pasteurisation was the single public health intervention that prevented the transmisison of bovine TB to humans and there is no justification for the present test and cull policy in the UK 
- ^ Grange, John M.; Malcolm D. Yates and Isabel N. de Kantor. (1996). "Guidelines for speciation within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Second edition" (PDF). World Health Organization.. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1996/WHO_EMC_ZOO_96.4.pdf. Retrieved 2007-08-02.
- ^ O'Reilly LM, Daborn CJ. (August 1995). "The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review". Tuber Lung Dis. 76 (Suppl 1): 1–46. doi:10.1016/0962-8479(95)90591-X. PMID 7579326.
- ^ Reynolds D (2006). "A review of tuberculosis science and policy in Great Britain". Vet Microbiol 112: 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.042. PMID 16343818.
- ^ Krebs JR, Anderson T, Clutton-Brock WT, et al. (1997). Bovine tuberculosis in cattle and badgers: an independent scientific review. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
- ^ defra. "Bovine TB: Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT)". http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/culling/index.htm. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ^ defra. "Bovine TB: The Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB". http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/isg/index.htm. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ^ Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB. "Bovine TB: The Scientific Evidence; Final Report of the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB Presented to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs The Rt Hon David Miliband MP, June 2007" (PDF). http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/isg/pdf/final_report.pdf. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ^ Daily Hansard. "Daily Hansard, House of Lords; Thursday, 26 July 2007.". http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansrd/text/70726-0001.htm#st_11. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ^ " Bovine Tuberculosis (TB) Management - In the Riding Mountain Area, Manitoba Conservation
- ^ Debora MacKenzie. "TB travelled from a farm to a night club". http://www.promedmail.org/pls/promed/f?p=2400:1001:::NO::F2400_P1001_BACK_PAGE,F2400_P1001_PUB_MAIL_ID:1000%2C34753. Retrieved 2007-03-21.
- ^ Griffith AS and Munro WT (1944). "Human pulmonary tuberculosis of bovine origin in Great Britain". J Hyg 43: 229–40.
- ^ Tice FJ (1944). "Man, a source of bovine tuberculosis in cattle". Cornell Vet 34: 363–5.
- ^ Torgerson, PR; Torgerson, DJ (2010). "Public health and bovine tuberculosis: what's all the fuss about?". Trends in Microbiology 18: 67–72. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2009.11.002.