Diagnosis: A. bishopi can be distinguished from A. cingulatum by its shorter limbs and smaller head (USFWS 2009). Generally, this species has fewer costal grooves than A. cingulatum and a shorter tail. The ventral pattern of A. bishopi consists of indistinct white spots on a dark background, creating a "salt and pepper" look, compared to A. cingulatum, which has distinct white spots on the ventral side (Goin 1950; USFWS 2009). The dorsal side pattern of A. bishopi is more net-like in appearance than the frosted patterning of A. cingulatum (USFWS 2009; Goin 1950).
Tadpole morphology: Larvae are less vividly marked and metamorphose earlier and at a smaller size than A. cingulatum (Goin 1950; Telford 1954). A. bishopi has several stripes either yellow brown or black along the body. Gills are bright red in life (Telford 1954).
A. bishopi and A. cingulatum larvae are difficult to distinguish (Martof and Gerhardt 1965). A. cingulatum larvae have broad, striped heads, with a black stripe extending from the nose to the gills and a second stripe along the upper jaw (Palis 1996). A light lateral stripe is retained in first year fully metamorphosed individuals, but is lost in older individuals (Palis 1997).
Coloration: The dorsal surface of A. bishopi is reticulated, with thin grey lines that form a net-like or banded pattern against a black to brown background (USFWS 2009). These lines surround areas of dark coloration (Martof and Gerhardt 1965). Small white flecks on a dark background cover the ventral surface, creating a "salt and pepper" pattern (Goin 1950). Preserved specimens of A. bishopi, can become dark, making their dorsal pattern unrecognizable (Martof and Gerhardt 1965).
Species Authority and Phylogenetic Relationships: A. bishopi was first described by Goin (1950) as Ambystoma cingulatum bishopi. Later this subspecies categorization was refuted by Martof and Gerhardt (1965) and was combined with A. c. cingulatum to form one species, A. cingulatumi. In 2007, A. bishopi was separated from A. cingulatum by Pauly et al. (2007) based on differences in mitochondrial DNA, morphology and allozymes. Because the two species were considered subspecies until 2007 and much of the life history information is assumed to be true for both species (USFWS 2009).
- Anderson, J. D., and Williamson, G. K. (1976). ''Terrestrial mode of reproduction in Ambystoma cingulatum.'' Herpetologica, 32, 214-221.
- Bishop, D.C, Haas, C.A. (2005). ''''Burning trends and potential negative effects of suppressing wetland fires on flatwoods salamanders.'' Natural Areas Journal , 25, 290-294.
- Goin, C. J. (1950). ''A study of the salamander, Ambystoma cingulatum, with the description of a new subspecies.'' Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 31, 229-321.
- Martof, B. S., and Gerhardt, H. C. (1965). ''Observations on the geographic variation in Ambystoma cingulatum.'' Copeia, 1965, 342-346.
- Palis, J. G. (1997). ''Breeding migration of Ambystoma cingulatum in Florida.'' Journal of Herpetology, 31, 71-78.
- Palis, J., Hammerson, G. 2008. Ambystoma cingulatum. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 15 March 2012.
- Palis, J.G. (1996). ''Flatwoods Salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum Cope). Element stewardship abstract.'' Natural Areas Resource Journal, 16, 49-54.
- Pauly, G.B., Piskurek, O., Shaffer, H.B. (2007). ''Phylogeographic concordance in the southeastern United States: the flatwoods salamander, Ambystoma cingulatum, as a test case.'' Molecular Ecology, 16, 415-429.
- Telford, S. R. (1954). ''A description of the larvae of Ambystoma cingulatum bishopi Goin. including an extension of the range.'' Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 17, 233-236.
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2009). ''Determination of endangered status for Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander.'' Federal Register, 74(26), 6700-6774.
- Whiles, M. R., Jensen, J. B., and Palis, J. G. (2004). ''Diets of larval flatwoods salamanders, Ambystoma cingulatum, from Florida and South Carolina.'' Journal of Herpetology, 38, 208-214.