Add a new comment
Newsfeed
-
Rizqi ammar abdussalam commented on "Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut":
added "Life Cycle of all Pterygosomidae" to the collection "Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut".
-
Cyndy Parr modified the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr modified the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr modified the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL Staff" from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL Species Pages Working Group" from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL-BA Community" from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL Learning and Education Community" from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL Photographers" from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Cyndy Parr removed "EOL Biodiversity Informatics Group " from the collection "The discussion collection".
-
Adriani Sunuddin added "Myripristis" to the collection "Indonesian Marine Biodiversity".
-
Adriani Sunuddin added text to "Intisari" on "Myripristis".
Myripristis merupakan salah satu genus ikan terumbu yang umum dijumpai di...
-
Riza AIR commented on "Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut":
belum dapat fotonya langsung... susah oe,,
-
-
-
Bob Corrigan commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
@Jason Sharp: In this case my recommendation is as my colleagues have already suggested. That said, the description of the photo. . .that's wild!
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
@Jason Sharp: I agree with Katja. There is nothing necessarily inaccurate about an image with a watermark, so it shouldn't be automatic grounds for untrusting. But I'd downrate too, especially if there are better images without watermarks. I suppose if the watermark message were hateful I'd consider hiding.
-
Katja Schulz commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
@Jason Sharp: I find that watermark corny, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. It's just a form of personal expression, and I would trust the image as long as the watermark doesn't obscure the subject too much. Generally, I tend to rate images with any kind of large watermark lower than unmarked images.
-
Jason Sharp commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
I wanted to bring attention to this type of 'watermark' which is being submitted via the Flickr group. I have come across some of these pictures and was unsure if I should 'trust' them with what I believe is a questionable 'watermark'. Please advise. http://eol.org/data_objects/19141099
-
Cyndy Parr commented on "EOL Discussion Group":
Hey folks, inspired by Fake Wikipedia Caught by Reddit I've done a little searching on EOL to make sure we aren't getting mythical or otherwise malicious content. I found one mythical creature and have hidden it. Let us know if you find anything you think is suspicious!
