Rhinomyias brunneatus is preferred by Avibase (see names tab)

Misspelling according to Weidenhoffer & Bozano 2007. Should be Cigaritis siphax.

should be merged with http://eol.org/pages/49291/overview

header says Nissolia ruddiae see

header says 'Artemisia santolinifolia see '. Should be merged with http://eol.org/pages/2904308/overview

Doesn't seem to contain anything, delete?

header says 'Marcgraviastrum grandiflorum see'

header says 'Pachypodium rosulatum bemarahense see'. Should be merged with http://eol.org/pages/6853148/overview

header says 'Carex stenocarpa see', should be merged with http://eol.org/pages/1123324/overview

header says 'Aphanolejeunea pocsii see'

header says 'Aphanolejeunea moralesiae see'

header says 'Marcgraviastrum apaporensis see'

header says 'Oryzolejeunea grolleana see'

header says 'Aphanolejeunea costaricensis see'

Should be Satyrium w-album

According to Valter Jacinto this is spelling error. This is a duplicate of Parmacella valenciennii

Scientific name at the top of the page only mentions "Satyrium"

According to the Wikipedia content on the page itself. Also see comment of Dana Campbell on the species page.

The existing page in eol is Manduca diffiSSa. Informed the author of the photo, but apparently there are references that use M. diffiSa. See http://www.flickr.com/photos/58810081@N02/6193897868/. Join pages?

I think this should be spelled as Neolycaena tengstroemi (so double with http://eol.org/pages/12081948)

Should be Motacilla cinerea

Not sure this is mistaken. This spelling is found in other places on internet. But at least Weidenoffer et al. consistently uses Thecliola as synonym to Satyrium. [Z Weidenhoffer, GC Bozano, S Churkin (2004) Guide to the butterflies of the Palearctic region: Lycaenidae part II]